scholarly journals Weighting Model for Group Decision Support System: A Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 962
Author(s):  
Hamdani Hamdani ◽  
Retantyo Wardoyo ◽  
Khabib Mustofa
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Group Decision Support ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Group Decision Support Systems ◽  
Group Decision Support System ◽  
System A ◽  
Research Findings ◽  
Approach Method

This paper was conducted a survey of research findings related to decision-making in groups using weighting techniques This paper conducts a survey of research findings related to decision-making in groups using weighting techniques, therefore, a new weighting model can be proposed.. In order to make a decision, this model works based on the weighting parameters, criteria or decision makers (DM) to give ranking preference in the decision results. Weighting could be done objectively or subjectively by statistical calculations. Subjective weighting based on an understanding or expertise of the decision-making process, furthermore, a numerical value was needed to make it objective. The previous weighting models need to be modified for the development of group decision support systems (GDSS). It is required to accommodate the interests of all stakeholders to link the DM relationship. We formed several groups of weighting methods that currently use for the trend of group decision-making (GDM). It showed that the classical multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) models are still dominant in solving GDSS problems, therefore, it was necessary to apply hybrid MCDM with an approach method of stakeholders models and social networks (SN) to improve decision model that has been applied in the previous research.

scholarly journals Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kelompok Penentuan Kelayakan Lokasi Pemukiman

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 89
Author(s):  
Mutammimul Ula ◽  
Azhari SN
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Ocean Waves ◽  
Group Decision Support ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Group Decision Support Systems ◽  
Group Decision Support System

AbstrakSebagai  daerah yang rawan bencana dari tsunami, dan abrasi gelombang laut, dibutuhkan suatu lokasi yang layak untuk dapat dijadikan suatu daerah pemukiman untuk mendukung perkembangan perekonomian, sarana dan prasarana, serta sosial ekonomi di pemerintah kota Lhokseumawe. Oleh sebab itu, diperlukan penentuan kelayakan lokasi pemukiman yang layak untuk direkomendasi menjadi sebuah pemukiman yang akan dibangun. Sehingga perlu dilakukan evaluasi terhadap areal fisik pemukiman, sarana dan prasarana, dan sosial-ekonomi yang akan direkomendasi menjadi suatu lokasi pemukiman. Masukan dari masyarakat sangat dibutuhkan untuk mengetahui masalah lokasi yang akan direkomendasi menjadi sebuah pemukiman. Hal ini dilakukan agar pihak pengawas mengetahui dan dapat mengantisipasi masalah-masalah yang terjadi pada lokasi tersebut. Penerapan sistem pendukung keputusan kelompok atau Group Decision Support System (GDSS) yang dibuat menggunakan  metode VIKOR (Vlse Kriterijumska Optimizacija  Kompromisno Resenje in Serbia) dapat membantu para pengambil keputusan dalam melakukan perankingan nilai masing-masing alternatife solusi, entropy sebagai pembobotannya dari setiap kriteria.. Sementara metode Copeland score, sebagai salah satu metode voting yang tekniknya berdasarkan pengurangan frekwensi kemenangan dengan frekwensi kekalahan dari perbandingan berpasangan untuk melakukan voting terhadap solusi yang akan di ambil para decision maker. Kata kunci—  GDSS, Vikor, Entropy, Copeland Score, lokasi pemukiman.  AbstrakAs a disaster-prone areas of the tsunami, ocean waves and abrasion, it takes a decent location to be used as a residential area to support economic development, infrastructure, social and economic development of Regional Goverment of Lhokseumawe. Therefore, it is necessary to have feasibility determination of viable residential locations as recommendation to be a settlement. So it is necessary to evaluate the physical area of settlements, infrastructure, economic and social development that will be recommended to be a residential location. Public suggestion is needed to determine the problem locations to be recommended to a settlement. The application of group decision support systems or Group Decision Support System (GDSS) are made using the VIKOR method (Vlse Kriterijumska Optimizacija Kompromisno Resenje in Serbia) that is able to assist decision makers in the ranking value to each solution alternatives, entropy wih weigt for criterias, the method of Copeland score, as one method of voting is the technique by reducing the frequency of victory with the defeat of the comparison frequency pairs can be used to vote for a solution that will take the decision makers. Keyword— GDSS, Vikor, Copeland Score, Entropy, location determination.

Group Decision Support Systems

2009 ◽  
pp. 82-89
Author(s):  
John Wang ◽  
James Yao
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Information Technology ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support Systems ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Support Systems ◽  
Group Support Systems ◽  
Group Decision Support ◽  
Group Decision Support Systems

Group decision support systems (GDSSs) which aim at increasing some of the benefits of collaboration and reducing the inherent losses are interactive information technology-based environments that support concerted and coordinated group efforts toward completion of joint tasks (Dennis, George, Jessup, Nunamaker, & Vogel, 1998). The term group support systems (GSSs) was coined at the start of the 1990’s to replace the term GDSS. The reason for this is that the role of collaborative computing was expanded to more than just supporting decision making (Patrick & Garrick, 2006). For the avoidance of any ambiguities, the latter term shall be used in the discussion throughout this paper

A Multicriteria Group Decision Support System

2021 ◽  
pp. 107-133
Author(s):  
Nesrine Hamdani ◽  
Djamila Hamdadou
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Web Service ◽  
Support System ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Multicriteria Analysis ◽  
Group Decision Support ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Group Decision Support System ◽  
Voting Methods

In the present study, the authors propose a group decision support system (Web-GDSS), which allows multi-agents systems and multicriteria analysis systems to help decision-makers in order to obtain a collective decision, using web services. The proposed system operates on two main stages. First, decision-makers are in a different location away from each other. They must store their location in databases and invoke the appropriate web service. Second, in the case of negotiation between decision-makers, monotonic concession protocol will lead to an agreement using CONDORCET and BORDA voting methods.

A Communication Platform for Group Decision Support System

2021 ◽  
pp. 678-702
Author(s):  
Mounya Abdelhadi ◽  
Djamila Hamdadou ◽  
Nabil Menni
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Multicriteria Analysis ◽  
Negotiation Process ◽  
Group Decision Support ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Group Decision Support System ◽  
Communication Platform

In a group decision support system, the various decision-makers have their own information, constrains, decision strategies, preferences, and objectives which are generally not shared or communicated. This implies that the group decision process is distributed between the different entities implicated and impacted by various group members' characteristics. Solution to this problem is to find a decision that would be acceptable to all the decision-makers, following the necessity of a negotiation process that allows the elaboration of a common agreement for a group that faces a conflict on the decision to take. In the current study, the authors propose to establish a communication platform for a group decision support system (GDSS) based on web services, incorporating a multicriteria analysis methods and a negotiation protocol.

The Decision Hedgehog

2011 ◽  
pp. 148-154
Author(s):  
Patrick Humphreys
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support Systems ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Support Systems ◽  
Group Decision Support ◽  
Group Decision Support Systems ◽  
Decision Systems ◽  
Perceived Need ◽  
The Impact

The discourses established as the foundations of group decision support systems (GDSS) have been called into question not only in the interests of advancing the academic GDSS field (Bannon, 1997), but also out of the perceived need to plug gaps that sophisticated GDSS systems throw up in practice (Huber, 1981; Humphreys & Brezillon, 2002; Humphreys & Jones, 2006; Stabell, 1987). The limitations of rational perspectives of “decision- making as choice” have been raised (Carlsson, 2002; Cyert & March, 1992; Nappelbaum, 1997). The challenges relate to failures of implementation, the rise of unintended outcomes, the impact of cultures of fear and failure within organisations (Humphreys & Nappelbaum, 1997), and problems associated with externalisation of decision systems designers who “play God” by designing from outside the game for those who are inside (Humphreys, 1989).

A Communication Platform for Group Decision Support System

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 19-41
Author(s):  
Mounya Abdelhadi ◽  
Djamila Hamdadou ◽  
Nabil Menni
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Multicriteria Analysis ◽  
Negotiation Process ◽  
Group Decision Support ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Group Decision Support System ◽  
Communication Platform

In a group decision support system, the various decision-makers have their own information, constrains, decision strategies, preferences, and objectives which are generally not shared or communicated. This implies that the group decision process is distributed between the different entities implicated and impacted by various group members' characteristics. Solution to this problem is to find a decision that would be acceptable to all the decision-makers, following the necessity of a negotiation process that allows the elaboration of a common agreement for a group that faces a conflict on the decision to take. In the current study, the authors propose to establish a communication platform for a group decision support system (GDSS) based on web services, incorporating a multicriteria analysis methods and a negotiation protocol.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document