Incidental Findings of Appendiceal Diverticulitis Presenting as Acute Appendicitis

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110651
Author(s):  
Benjamin Souferi ◽  
Kristin Sheppard ◽  
Ayolola O. Onayemi ◽  
John M. Davis
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Pathological Finding ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Chronic Abdominal Pain ◽  
Adult Males ◽  
Pathologic Evaluation ◽  
Appendiceal Neoplasms ◽  
Appendiceal Diverticulitis ◽  
Gross Examination ◽  
Rule Out

Diverticulosis of the appendix (DA) is a rare pathological finding that clinically imitates acute appendicitis and is most commonly found in adult males with chronic abdominal pain. It has a higher rate of perforation compared to acute appendicitis (84% vs 12%, P<0.01), and is consequently associated with a higher rate of mortality. Appendiceal diverticulitis has been found to have a significant association with incidental appendiceal neoplasms, therefore elective prophylactic appendectomy is recommended to prevent the risk of complications and to rule out the possibility of a coexisting neoplasm. Meticulous gross examination in addition to thorough histological examination of the entire appendectomy specimen by pathologists is essential in order to identify diverticula. We present two female patients with signs and symptoms consistent with acute appendicitis, they were found to have appendiceal diverticulitis on pathologic evaluation.

scholarly journals Appendicular Tuberculosis as Manifestation of Gastrointestinal Tuberculosis: A Case Report

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 122
Author(s):  
Yuliza Yuliza ◽  
Alfian Nur Rosyid ◽  
Wiwin Is Effendi ◽  
Prastuti Asta Wulaningrum ◽  
Herley Windo Setiawan
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Histopathological Examination ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Definitive Diagnosis ◽  
Chronic Abdominal Pain ◽  
Gastrointestinal Tuberculosis ◽  
Clinical Presentations ◽  
Histopathology Result ◽  
The Right

Introduction: Gastrointestinal tuberculosis (GI TB) is quite rare with 3% incidence of all extrapulmonary involvement. Appendicular TB may occur in 0.1 - 3% of cases. Diagnosis is often difficult because the patient usually complains about chronic abdominal pain and fever. A definite diagnosis is based on histopathological examination of resected specimens from the appendectomy procedure.Case: We present a 37-year-old male patient admitted to the hospital with chronic abdominal pain, fever, nausea, and loss of body weight. The patient never had a persistent cough, hemoptysis, or night sweating. Physical examination showed pain and muscular rigidity in the right iliac area during palpation with Blumberg's sign and Rovsing's sign positive. Abdomen ultrasound imaging showed an appendicular abscess. The patient underwent appendectomy afterwards with histopathology result showing TB. The patient was treated with first category anti-tuberculosis drugs (ATD).Discussion: Diagnosis of appendicular TB is difficult due to unspecific clinical presentations. Appendicular TB patients often complain of signs and symptoms which are similar to acute appendicitis. These conditions can delay ATD treatment because the definitive diagnosis could be made after histopathological examination.Summary: Appendicular TB is a rare case of extrapulmonary TB. It can present as acute appendicitis. The definitive diagnosis is based on the histopathological examination. It is recommended to check the appendicectomy specimens histopathologically to exclude TB or other diseases. 

Adenocarcinoma of the Appendix in Elderly: Diagnostic dilemma

2020 ◽  
Vol 01 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heba Nofal ◽  
Hayder Al-Masari ◽  
Marwan Mohammed Rashed ◽  
Reham Ainawi ◽  
Desh Idnani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Diagnostic Dilemma ◽  
Increased Risk

: Acute appendicitis in elderly continue to be a diagnostic dilemma as it raises both the suspicion of malignancy and increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Cancers of the appendix are rare and most of them are found accidentally on appendectomies performed for acute appendicitis. When reviewed, majority of the tumors were carcinoid, adenoma, and lymphoma. Adenocarcinomas of appendix are only 0.08% of all cancers and the treatment remains controversial. This paper presents a case of 75-year-old female presented to emergency (ER) with signs and symptoms mimicking acute appendicitis, laparoscopic appendectomy was planned after a CT scan was done as it was suggesting acute appendicitis. The specimen then was sent foe pathology lab and a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the appendix was made.

scholarly journals Appendiceal adenocarcinoma found by surgery for acute appendicitis is associated with older age

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
John P. Skendelas ◽  
Victor S. Alemany ◽  
Vincent Au ◽  
Devika Rao ◽  
John McNelis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Incidental Finding ◽  
Population Sample ◽  
Operative Therapy ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
The United States ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Common Procedure ◽  
Appendiceal Neoplasms

Abstract Background Appendectomy for acute appendicitis is the most common procedure performed emergently by general surgeons in the United States. The current management of acute appendicitis is increasingly controversial as non-operative management gains favor. Although rare, appendiceal neoplasms are often found as an incidental finding in the setting of appendectomy. Criteria and screening for appendiceal neoplasms are not standardized among surgical societies. Methods The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried for all patients who underwent appendectomy over a 9-year period (2010–2018). Over the same time period, patients who underwent appendectomy in two municipal hospitals in The Bronx, New York City, USA were reviewed. Results We found a 1.7% incidence of appendiceal neoplasms locally and a 0.53% incidence of appendiceal tumors in a national population sample. Both groups demonstrated an increased incidence of appendiceal carcinoma by age. This finding was most pronounced after the age of 40 in both local and national populations. In our study, the incidence of appendiceal tumors increased with each decade interval up to the age of 80 and peaked at 2.1% in patients between 70 and 79 years. Conclusions Appendiceal adenocarcinomas were identified in patients with acute appendicitis that seem to be associated with increasing age. The presence of an appendiceal malignancy should be considered in the management of older patients with acute appendicitis before a decision to embark on non-operative therapy.

scholarly journals A retrospective analysis and literature review of neoplastic appendiceal mucinous lesions

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Belén Matias-García ◽  
Fernando Mendoza-Moreno ◽  
Ana Blasco-Martínez ◽  
José Ignacio Busteros-Moraza ◽  
Manuel Diez-Alonso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Clinical Status ◽  
Chronic Abdominal Pain ◽  
Tumour Type ◽  
Appendiceal Neoplasm ◽  
Appendiceal Neoplasms ◽  
Statistical Program ◽  
The Subject

Abstract Background At present, the term mucocele is outdated, and mucinous appendiceal neoplasm is preferred. Mucinous appendiceal neoplasm is an uncommon pathology that occurs predominantly in middle-aged women. Its classification and management have been the subject of debate in recent decades. The aim of this study was to analyse the incidence, clinical management and survival of these tumours diagnosed in our centre in the last 10 years. Methods This was a retrospective observational study of patients with a diagnosis of appendiceal neoplasms between 2009 and 2018 in our centre. Variables such as sex, age, tumour type, clinical status, diagnosis, treatment and survival were collected. All data were analysed using the statistical program IBM SPSS Statistic® version 25. Results Twenty-nine patients with a diagnosis of appendiceal neoplasm were identified, and 24 corresponded to neoplastic appendiceal mucinous lesions (85.7%). The average age was 59.7 ± 17.6 years. Most patients were women (15 cases; 62.5%). Most of them presented with chronic abdominal pain (37.5%), and the diagnosis was performed by computed tomography (CT) (50%). The treatment was surgical in all cases. The surgical technique depended on the findings and histology of the tumour. Conclusion Mucinous appendiceal neoplasms are an uncommon entity, and their pathological classification and management have recently changed.

Male gonadal function after chemotherapy for solid tumors in childhood.

1989 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 304-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Aubier ◽  
F Flamant ◽  
R Brauner ◽  
J M Caillaud ◽  
J M Chaussain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Toxic Effect ◽  
Alkylating Agents ◽  
Follicle Stimulating Hormone ◽  
Normal Growth ◽  
Testicular Biopsy ◽  
Testicular Function ◽  
Adult Males ◽  
Gonadal Function ◽  
Testicular Damage ◽  
Rule Out

The testicular function of 30 adolescent or adult males having undergone polychemotherapy in childhood was assessed by means of a spermogram or testicular biopsy. At the time of examination, the patients were pubertal and had completed chemotherapy between 1 and 20 years previously (mean, 9 years). All patients who were prepubertal or intrapubertal at the time of treatment achieved normal puberty with normal growth. Twenty patients presented with azoospermia and/or severe disturbances in the germinal line on biopsy. This series confirms the toxicity of alkylating agents, in particular that of the mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone combination (MOPP) and that of cyclophosphamide (CPM). However, dactinomycin, vinblastine, and vincristine did not appear to have a toxic effect on spermatogenesis. The prepubertal state did not protect the gonads of 19 patients who were prepubertal at diagnosis: 12 are now sterile as a result of the treatment. An increase in basal follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels gives a good indication of testicular damage, although normal levels do not rule out the possibility of azoospermia.

The Association of “GOOP” on Gross Examination of Fine Needle Aspiration Samples and On-Site Adequacy

Respiration ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Nikhil Meena ◽  
Thaddeus Bartter ◽  
Roshen Mathew ◽  
Abhishek Kumar ◽  
Winnie Elma Roy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Study Interval ◽  
White Material ◽  
Gross Examination ◽  
Malignant Diagnosis ◽  
Rule Out

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Rapid on-site cytologic evaluation (ROSE) is not always available for fine needle aspiration (FNA) specimens. We have examined the relationships between the presence of “GOOP” (defined as gooey white material) on FNA aspirates, on-site adequacy (OSA), and diagnosis. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Consecutive FNA samples obtained over the study interval were included. Samples were assessed macroscopically for the presence or absence of GOOP (GOOP+ or GOOP−). GOOP+ samples were further characterized as shiny (G+<sub>S</sub>) or cheesy (G+<sub>C</sub>). Gross descriptors were correlated with OSA and final diagnoses. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of the 204 sites biopsied, 102 were malignant, 94 benign, and 8 nondiagnostic. The presence of GOOP was highly predictive for adequacy (positive predictive value 98%). While these correlations for GOOP positivity were significant, the absence of GOOP did not rule out adequacy or malignancy. The presence of GOOP was also significantly correlated with a malignant diagnosis. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> We have prospectively demonstrated that the presence of GOOP correlates strongly with adequacy. This may be of value for those for whom ROSE is not available and, when available, may help prioritize specimens for on-site review.

EP.FRI.615 Assessing the reliability of the Adult Appendicitis Score in managing patients with suspected acute appendicitis

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carry Zheng ◽  
Shiela Lee ◽  
Steven Brown ◽  
Venkat Kanakala
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Pathological Finding ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Histological Diagnosis ◽  
Suspected Appendicitis ◽  
Tertiary Centre ◽  
Negative Appendicectomy ◽  
Age Range ◽  
Suspected Acute Appendicitis

Abstract Aims To evaluate the effectiveness of using a clinical prediction tool in the management of suspected acute appendicitis Methods Retrospective data was collected on patients undergoing appendicectomy at a single tertiary centre from November 2019 to June 2020. Inclusion criteria were all patients aged 18 and above undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy for suspected appendicitis. Exclusion criteria were all patients that had a pathological finding other than appendicitis at laparoscopy. The pre operative AAS score at first presentation was calculated and patients grouped into low(0-10), intermediate(11-15), and high(16 and above) risk. These groups were then compared to the histological findings. Results A total of 74 patients were included, 44 male and 30 female. The age range was from 18 to 83, with a median age of 36. Of 10 patients in the low risk group, 4 (40%) had appendicitis on histology. 36 out of 40 (90%) patients in the intermediate risk group had appendicitis and 100% of the 24 patients in the high risk group. Pearson’s coefficient showed a significant correlation between the AAS risk (low, intermediate, and high) and the histological diagnosis of appendicitis (r = 0.48, p = 0.000016). Conclusions Our study did show a positive correlation between the AAS risk stratification and histological diagnosis. Based on our findings we would recommend the adoption of this score in assessing patients with suspected acute appendicitis and minimising the negative appendicectomy rate.

“A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF RIPASA SCORE AND ALVARADO SCORE IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS”

2021 ◽  
pp. 25-28
Author(s):  
M. Vijaya Kumar ◽  
Manasa Manasa
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Local Population ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Alvarado Score ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Ripasa Score

Acute appendicitis is the most common condition encountered in the Emergency department .Alvarado and Modied Alvarado scores are the most commonly used scoring system used for diagnosing acute appendicitis.,but its performance has been found to be poor in certain population . Hence our aim was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of RIPASA and ALVARADO Scoring system and study and compare sensitivity, specicity and predictive values of these scoring systems. The study was conducted in Government district hospital Nandyal . We enrolled 176 patients who presented with RIF pain . Both RIPASA and ALVARADO were applied to them. Final diagnosis was conrmed either by CT scan, intra operative nding or post operative HPE report. Sensitivity,specicity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, diagnostic accuracy was calculated both for RIPASA and ALVARADO. It was found that sensitivity and specicity of the RIPASA score in our study are 98.7% and 83.3%, respectively. PPV and NPV were 98.1% and 88.2% and sensitivity and specicity of the Alvardo score in our study are 94.3% and 83.3%, respectively. PPV and NPV were 98% and 62.5%.Diagnostic accuracy of RIPASA score and Alvarado score are 97% and 93% respectively. RIPASA is a more specic and accurate scoring system in our local population when compared to ALVARADO . It reduces the number of missed appendicitis cases and also convincingly lters out the group of patients that would need a CT scan for diagnosis (score 5-7.5 ) BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis is one of the most commonly dealt surgical emergencies, with a lifetime prevalence rate of approximately 1 one in seven. The incidence is 1.5–1.9 per 1,000 in the male and female population, and is approximately 1.4 times greater in men than in women. Despite being a common problem, it remains a difcult diagnosis to establish, particularly among the young, the elderly and females of reproductive age, where a host of other genitourinary and gynaecological inammatory conditions can present with signs and symptoms that are 2 similar to those of acute appendicitis. A delay in performing an appendectomy in order to improve its diagnostic accuracy increases the risk of appendicular perforation and peritonitis, which in turn increases morbidity and mortality. A variable combination of clinical signs and symptoms has been used together with laboratory ndings in several scoring systems proposed for suggesting the probability of Acute Appendicitis and the possible subsequent management pathway. The Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (RIPASA) and ALVARADO score are new diagnostic scoring systems developed for the diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis and has been shown to have signicantly higher sensitivity, specicity and diagnostic accuracy. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES PRIMARY OBJECT 1. To compare RIPASA Scoring system and ALVARADO Scoring system in terms of diagnostic accuracy in Acute Appendicitis. 2. To study and compare sensitivity, specicity and predictive values of above scoring systems. SECONDARY OBJECT 1. To study the rate of negative appendicectomy based on above scoring systems. CONCLUSION: The RIPASA score is a simple scoring system with high sensitivity and specicity for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The 14 clinical parameters are all present in a good clinical history and examination and can be easily and quickly applied. Therefore, a decision on the management can be made early. Although the RIPASA score was developed for the local population of Brunei, we believe that it should be applicable to other regions. The RIPASA score presents greater Diagnostic accuracy and Sensitivity and equal specicity as a diagnostic test compared to the Alvarado score and is helpful in making appropriate therapeutic decisions. In hospitals like ours, the diagnosis of AA relies greatly on the clinical evaluation performed by surgeons. An adequate clinical scoring system would avoid diagnostic errors, maintaining a satisfactory low rate of negative appendectomies by adequate patient stratication, while limiting patient exposure to ionizing radiation, since 21 there is an increased risk of developing cancer with computed tomography, particularly for the paediatric age group.

scholarly journals Diagnosis and treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in patients with acute cough: a quantitative study of decision thresholds in primary care

2018 ◽  
Vol 68 (676) ◽  
pp. e765-e774 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark H Ebell ◽  
Isabella Locatelli ◽  
Yolanda Mueller ◽  
Nicolas Senn ◽  
Kathryn Morgan
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Multivariate Model ◽  
Clinical Decisions ◽  
Acute Cough ◽  
Treatment Thresholds ◽  
Rule Out

BackgroundTest and treatment thresholds have not yet been described for decision-making regarding the likelihood of pneumonia in patients with acute cough.AimTo determine decision thresholds in the management of patients with acute cough.Design and settingSet among primary care physicians attending meetings in the US and Switzerland, using data from a prospective cohort of primary care patients.MethodClinical vignettes were used to study the clinical decisions of physicians regarding eight patients with cough that varied by six signs and symptoms. The probability of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) was determined for each vignette based on a multivariate model. A previously published approach based on logistic regression was used to determine test and treatment thresholds.ResultsIn total, 256 physicians made 764 clinical decisions. Initial physician estimates systematically overestimated the likelihood of CAP; 75% estimating a higher probability than that predicted by the multivariate model. Given the probability of CAP from a multivariate model, 16.7% (125 of 749) changed their decision from ‘treat’ to ‘test’ or ‘test’ to ‘rule out’, whereas only 3.5% (26/749) changed their decision from ‘rule out’ to ‘test’ or ‘test’ to ‘treat’. Test and treatment thresholds were 9.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 8.7 to 10.5) and 43.1% (95% CI = 40.1 to 46.4) and were updated to 12.7% (95% CI = 11.7 to 13.8) and 51.3% (95% CI = 48.3 to 54.9) once the true probability of CAP was given. Test thresholds were consistent between subgroups. Treatment thresholds were higher if radiography was available, for Swiss physicians, and for non-primary care physicians.ConclusionTest and treatment thresholds for CAP in patients with acute cough were 9.5% and 43.1%, respectively. Physicians tended to overestimate the likelihood of CAP, and providing information from a clinical decision rule (CDR) changed about 1 in 6 clinical decisions.

scholarly journals Appendicitis in puerpeium: Case report

2011 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 111-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milica Berisavac ◽  
Biljana Kastratovic-Kotlica ◽  
V. Tosic ◽  
N. Markovic ◽  
S. Ljustina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Early Detection ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Laboratory Infection ◽  
Infection Parameters ◽  
Clinical Signs And Symptoms

Acute appendicitis in puerperium is often diagnosed too late, because clinical signs can be unrelaible. Abdominal wall rigidity is rarely noticed in puerpeium because of weak abdominal wall muscles, laboratory parameters are not enough relaible and atipycal appendix presentation makes difficulties in diagnosis3,4. Knowing clinical signs and symptoms of appendicitis, possible complications and their early detection, make a chance for a good surgical outcome. Measuring of axillar and rectal temperature can take confusion in, and prolong time until surgical treatment. Leucocytosis in puerperium is not valid for diagnosis. We report a case of patient in puerperium with high laboratory infection parameters. Diagnosis of appendicitis is made based on clinical signs and symptoms, that is proved intraoperatively and histologicaly. Appendectomy without perforation carries less risks for mother and fetus.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document