Marketing and the United States Supreme Court, 1965-1968

1969 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-23
Author(s):  
Ray O. Werner

Important changes in marketing's legal environment have resulted from decisions of an extremely active U. S. Supreme Court during the past three years. The Court decisions have altered significantly a wide variety of feasible operational and organizational alternatives. In this article, recent Supreme Court decisions which have important implications for marketing policy and practice are discussed.

1982 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-81
Author(s):  
Ray O. Werner

The U.S. Supreme Court conditions the legal environment of marketing, and over the past six years, its decisions have both limited and expanded the constraints on marketers. Constraints have been imposed on marketing operations, particularly pricing and channels of distribution, on marketing organizations, and on the relevant regulatory procedures. Indications are that future changes may be imminent, particularly in allowing greater marketing autonomy within a private enterprise system.


1992 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Karsten

One sunny summer Sunday, on August 17, 1873, an Irish-born day laborer named Fitzsimmons, “of very limited circumstances,” living in a shack in Ft. Leavenworth, Kansas, sent his twelve-year-old son, Jerry, to fetch the family's cow. The animal had been left on an “open common” grazing area near the local sheds and yards of the Kansas Central Railroad. Fitzsimmons had warned his son to stay away from the railroad company's trains, but he had never mentioned, and may never have known of, a curious device that stood near the commons. For the past three years, a large iron turntable had served to reverse the direction of the company's locomotives (see figure 1). The Fitzsimmons family cow had wandered to a spot close to this turntable, and Jerry Fitzsimmons climbed onto this device as two or three other, older children began to turn it around. The Fitzsimmons boy sat on the end of the table with his legs hanging over its rails. Before he realized what was happening, the rails of the turntable came into alignment with those of the adjacent track, and his left leg was caught between the two rails and badly mangled, requiring its amputation. His father sued the company for negligence, and a jury awarded him three thousand dollars and court costs; the company appealed the decision, and the Kansas Supreme Court ordered a new trial, but in 1879 it upheld that second jury's award and finding of the company's liability. The high court cited decisions of the United States Supreme Court and of the Minnesota Supreme Court in its opinion.


1980 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 3-3
Author(s):  
George J. Annas

Proponents of the death penalty have shifted gears. In the past, gruesome public executions were extolled as a deterrent to others, and even in modern times death has been inflicted on convicted criminals by hanging, firing squads, electrocution and poisonous gas. All of these methods cause significant pain to the victim, and all have the potential for failure and added suffering — both physical and mental. Many have argued that all of these methods of execution are potentially or actually “cruel and unusual” means of punishment, and recent United States Supreme Court decisions have suggested that they could be declared unconstitutional on this basis.


Author(s):  
Richard J Bonnie

This chapter addresses the emerging significance of decisional competence in the United States. The practice of assessing and adjudicating fitness to plead developed largely without assistance from the United States Supreme Court or other appellate courts for most of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. However, the need for appellate guidance became evident in the 1980s, especially regarding the significance of mental or emotional conditions that can impair capacity for rational decision making without impairing the defendant’s capacity to understand the proceedings and communicate coherently with counsel. During the past twenty-five years, some governing principles have come into view, but important issues remain unsolved. The chapter then evaluates the current state of the law in the United States, focusing on two recent decisions by the United States Supreme Court, and offers some suggestions for future development.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document