Test Review: Kamphaus, R. W., & Reynolds, C. R. (2006). Parenting Relationship Questionnaire. Minneapolis, MN: NCS Pearson

Danielle Rubinic; Heather Schwickrath

doi:10.1177/0734282909346718

Test Review: Kamphaus, R. W., & Reynolds, C. R. (2006). Parenting Relationship Questionnaire. Minneapolis, MN: NCS Pearson

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment ◽

10.1177/0734282909346718 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 28 (3) ◽

pp. 270-275 ◽

Cited By ~ 9

Author(s):

Danielle Rubinic ◽

Heather Schwickrath

Keyword(s):

Test Review

Download Full-text

Test Review: Test of Memory Malingering

PsycEXTRA Dataset ◽

10.1037/e307232004-005 ◽

1998 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Glenn Smith

Keyword(s):

Test Of Memory Malingering ◽

Test Review

Download Full-text

Test review: Personal Preference Schedule, Manual (Rev.).

Journal of Counseling Psychology ◽

10.1037/h0039047 ◽

1959 ◽

Vol 6 (2) ◽

pp. 167-167

Author(s):

Laurence Siegel

Keyword(s):

Personal Preference ◽

Test Review

Download Full-text

Test review of Iranian university entrance exam: English Konkur examination

Language Testing in Asia ◽

10.1186/s40468-021-00125-6 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Ali Khodi ◽

Sayyed Mohammad Alavi ◽

Hossein Karami

Keyword(s):

Higher Education ◽

High School ◽

Standardized Test ◽

Present Review ◽

High Stake ◽

Entrance Exam ◽

Test Review ◽

Long Time ◽

Knowledge Of Language

AbstractThe present paper appraises a standardized test, the entrance exam of Iranian universities, known as “Konkur” that is administered annually as a means of gaining admission to higher education in Iran. This norm-referenced test is administered for students majoring in mathematics, experimental sciences, and humanities whose scores along their weighted GPAs in the last 3 years of high school are used as indicators of students’ rank. Based on the rank achieved, they would find the opportunity to select the highly regarded university for their education. Due to the importance of such a high-stake test which may bring about social and long-time consequences for the participants, the present paper tries to evaluate the test and its psychometrics aspects. It is ostensible that the exam provides a limited situation for measuring the participants “knowledge of language” rather than their “knowledge about language.” Therefore, the dimensionality and validity of the test are debatable. Thus, the present review tries to characterize Konkur examination and discusses the rooms for untouched aspects for the betterment of its quality.

Download Full-text