Collaborative Preteaching of Students at Risk for Academic Failure

2009 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 177-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jlann H. Munk ◽  
Glrdln S. Gibb ◽  
Paul Caldarella
2018 ◽  
Vol 129 ◽  
pp. 131-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prarthana Franklin ◽  
Kimberley C. Tsujimoto ◽  
Margaret E. Lewis ◽  
Ayda Tekok-Kilic ◽  
Jan C. Frijters

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 427
Author(s):  
María Gómez Gallego ◽  
Alfonso Palazón Perez de los Cobos ◽  
Juan Cándido Gómez Gallego

A main goal of the university institution should be to reduce the desertion of its students, in fact, the dropout rate constitutes a basic indicator in the accreditation processes of university centers. Thus, evaluating the cognitive functions and learning skills of students with an increased risk of academic failure can be useful for the adoption of strategies for preventing and reducing school dropout. In this research, cognitive functions and learning skills in 284 university students were evaluated. Academic performance predictors were identified, and conglomerates analysis was carried out to establish groups according to those variables. The stability and validity of the conglomerates were tested with discriminant analyzes and comparison tests. The variables associated significantly to academic performance were: attention, intelligence, motivation, metacognition and affective components. The conglomerate analysis suggested a three-group solution: (1) students with cognitive skills of moderate to high, but deficient learning strategies; (2) students with cognitive and learning capabilities of moderate to high; (3) students with cognitive functions low and moderate learning capacity. Students from groups 1 and 3 showed worse academic performance; 83.3% of students at risk of desertion belonged to such groups. Two groups of students have been identified with the highest risk of academic failure: those with poor cognitive capacity and those with bad learning skills.


2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 195-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan A. Stevenson

As a school-wide framework, Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) relies on the prevention and early identification of students at risk of academic failure. Approaches to early identification of students in need of support include the administration of universal screening assessments and the analysis of existing student data such as attendance, grades, office discipline referrals, and prior performance on statewide assessments. However, there is little research that directly compares the accuracy and reliability of these approaches, particularly in middle grades. This investigation provides a direct comparison of curriculum-based measures in reading and the examination of archival data at the middle school level for the identification of students at risk for academic failure. Data were collected for students in Grades 7 ( n = 197) and 8 ( n = 237). Data were analyzed through hierarchical logistic regression using statewide reading achievement tests as the dependent variable. Results inform how data from universal screening assessments and existing sources can be used to accurately and efficiently identify students in need of academic support.


2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 298-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily R. DeFouw ◽  
Robin S. Codding ◽  
Melissa A. Collier-Meek ◽  
Kaitlin M. Gould

To prevent academic failure and promote long-term success, response-to-intervention (RtI) is designed to systematically increase the intensity of delivering research-based interventions. Interventions within an RtI framework must not only be effective but also be implemented with treatment fidelity and delivered with the appropriate level of treatment intensity to improve student mathematics achievement. The purpose of this systematic review was to explore the mathematics intervention research for students at risk of mathematics failure by examining intervention characteristics related to treatment fidelity and intensity. Results from 66 math intervention studies conducted from 2004 to 2015 were summarized. The majority of studies monitored treatment fidelity and provided details of some aspects of treatment intensity (i.e., dose, group size). However, interventionists’ characteristics, implementation characteristics, and treatment design were less frequently reviewed. Implications for future research and educational practices are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document