scholarly journals Understanding Women’s Choice of Mastectomy Versus Breast Conserving Therapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 117955491769126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Gu ◽  
Gary Groot ◽  
Lorraine Holtslander ◽  
Rachel Engler-Stringer

Objective: To identify factors that influence Saskatchewan women’s choice between breast conserving therapy (BCT) and mastectomy in early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) and to compare and contrast underlying reasons behind choice of BCT versus mastectomy. Methods: Interpretive description methods guided this practice-based qualitative study. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis and presented in thematic maps. Results: Women who chose mastectomy described 1 of the 3 main themes: worry about cancer recurrence, perceived consequences of BCT treatment, or breast-tumor size perception. In contrast, women chose BCT because of 3 different themes: mastectomy being too radical, surgeon influence, and feminine identity. Conclusions: Although individual reasons for choosing mastectomy versus BCT have been discussed in the literature before, different rationale underlying each choice has not been previously described. These results are novel in identifying interdependent subthemes and secondary reasons for each choice. This is important for increased understanding of factors influencing a complicated decision-making process.

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 317-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Perndorfer ◽  
Emily C. Soriano ◽  
Scott D. Siegel ◽  
Jean‐Philippe Laurenceau

2006 ◽  
Vol 99 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bette J. Caan ◽  
Jennifer A. Emond ◽  
Loki Natarajan ◽  
Adrienne Castillo ◽  
Erica P. Gunderson ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiali Ji ◽  
Shushu Yuan ◽  
Jiawei He ◽  
Hong Liu ◽  
Lei Yang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Recent retrospective studies have reported that breast-conserving therapy (BCT) led to improved overall survival (OS) than mastectomy in some populations. We aimed to compare the efficacy of BCT and mastectomy using the SEER database. Methods: Between 2010 and 2015, 99,790 eligible patients were identified. We included early-stage breast cancer patients with 5cm or smaller tumors and three or fewer positive lymph nodes in our study. We compared the OS results among patients with BCT and mastectomy. Kaplan-Meier plots, Cox proportional hazard regressions were used to evaluate the outcomes. Propensity-score matching was used to assemble a cohort of patients with similar baseline characteristics. Results: In our study, 77,452 (77.6%) patients underwent BCT and 22,338 (22.4%) underwent mastectomy. The 5-year OS rate was 94.7% in the BCT group and 87.6% in the mastectomy group (P <0.001). After matching, multivariate analysis in the matched cohort showed that women underwent mastectomy was associated with worse OS results compared with those with BCT (Hazard ratio (HR) = 1.628; 95% confidence intervals (CIs) = 1.445- 1.834, P<0.001). Patients with different subtypes and age group (>50 years old; ≤50 years old) received BCT all showed significantly better OS than those received mastectomy. The effect of surgery choice on survival was the same in matched and all cohorts. Conclusions: Our study showed that BCT was associated with improved survival compared with mastectomy in early-stage breast cancer patients. It seems advisable to encourage patients to receive BCT rather than mastectomy in early-stage patients when feasible and appropriate.


2005 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 1132-1141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ketayun A. Dinshaw ◽  
Ashwini N. Budrukkar ◽  
Roshan F. Chinoy ◽  
Rajiv Sarin ◽  
Rajendra Badwe ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document