Axillary metastasis from occult breast cancer and synchronous contralateral breast cancer initially suspected to be cancer with contralateral axillary metastasis: a case report

Background Initial detection of axillary metastasis without known ipsilateral breast cancer could be a challenging diagnostic problem. Four options could be considered for the primary site of the malignancy: ipsilateral occult breast cancer, contralateral breast cancer, tumors in other distant organs, and primary axillary malignancy itself. Although breast cancer is known as the most common primary cancer of axillary metastasis, both occult breast cancer and breast cancer with contralateral axillary metastasis (CAM) are rare. Case presentation A 63-year-old woman presented with palpable right axillary metastasis, and a tiny contralateral breast cancer was detected by breast magnetic resonance imaging. No lesion was found in the ipsilateral right breast and contralateral left axillary region. Both right axillary metastasis and contralateral breast cancer were positive for estrogen receptor. The diagnostic issue was to determine whether the axillary metastasis was derived from the contralateral breast cancer or not. Right axillary dissection and left breast conserving surgery were performed. The final diagnosis was occult breast cancer that presented with axillary lymph node metastasis and early-stage synchronous contralateral breast cancer, based on clinical evidence and postoperative pathologic results. After surgery, systemic treatment and whole breast irradiation were administered. No recurrence or metastasis was observed 15 months postoperatively. Conclusion For accurate diagnosis of axillary metastasis without detectable ipsilateral breast cancer, multifaceted diagnostic approach considering clinical, radiological, and pathological evidences is required.

Repeat Breast-Conserving Surgery Versus Salvage Mastectomy for Ipsilateral Breast Tumour Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Surgery in Breast Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis

BackgroundSalvage mastectomy (SM) is the standard surgery for ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence (IBTR). However, whether repeat breast-conserving surgery (RBCS) is an alternative method remains unclear. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the effects of RBCS and SM after IBTR for breast-conserving surgery (BCS).MethodsWe searched PubMed, Cochrane, Wiley Online and Embase for controlled studies comparing RBCS and SM after IBTR for BCS (published between 1993 and 2019, published in English). Our main endpoints were the secondary local recurrence rate (SLRR), distant metastasis rate (DMR) and overall survival (OS). We used a random-effects model or fixed-effects model for data pooling.ResultsFifteen of the 424 eligible studies were ultimately included, and all studies were retrospective cohort studies (n=2532 participants). 1) SLRR: The SLRR of RBCS was higher than SM (pooled relative rate (pRR) = 1.87, 95% CI 1.22 - 2.86, P=0.004). Stratified analysis was performed according to whether radiotherapy was performed after salvage surgery (radiotherapy group: 2ndRT, no radiotherapy group: no-2ndRT), and the following results were revealed: pRR=0.43 (95% CI 0.20-0.95, P=0.04) for group 2ndRT; and pRR=2.30 (95% CI 1.72-3.06, P<0.00001) for group no-2ndRT. These results showed that the main cause of heterogeneity was salvage radiotherapy. 2) DMR: No significant difference in the DMR was observed between RBCS and SM (pRR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.37 - 1.01, P=0.05). 3) OS: No significant difference in OS was observed between RBCS and SM (pRR=0.65, 95% CI 0.39 - 1.08, P=0.10).ConclusionsThe SLRR of RBCS was higher than SM for ITBR after BCS, but survival was not affected. RBCS may be used as an alternative for IBTR patients after BCS with strict control for several indications, such as tumor size, recurrence interval and biological behavior, and attaching importance to subsequent salvage radiotherapy and systematic therapy.