Impact of aortic stent-graft oversizing on outcomes of the chimney endovascular technique based on a new analysis of the PERICLES Registry

Vascular ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konstantinos P Donas ◽  
Marco V Usai ◽  
Gergana T Taneva ◽  
Frank J Criado ◽  
Giovanni B Torsello ◽  
...  

Objective Chimney endovascular aortic aneurysm repair is gaining ever greater acceptance. However, persistent gutters leading to type IA endoleaks represent an unsolved issue. The aim of the current study was to analyze the impact of abdominal endograft oversizing to the occurrence of this phenomenon. Methods The PERformance of the snorkel/chImney endovascular teChnique in the treatment of compLex aortic PathologiesES registry includes the largest experience with chimney endovascular aortic aneurysm repair from 13 vascular centers in Europe and the U.S. Prospectively collected data from centers with standard use of the Endurant stent-graft and balloon-expandable covered stents as chimney grafts only were included in the present analysis. The parameter which varied was the degree of oversizing of the aortic stent-graft classifying the cohort in two groups, group A (20% and less oversizing) and group B (>20% of oversizing). The primary endpoint was the incidence of persistent type IA endoleak needed reintervention. Secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality and freedom from reintervention. Results Group A included 21 patients while group B 144. The mean preoperative pathology’s neck length and diameter was 5.8 mm (±4.4) versus 4.9 mm (±3.8) and 27.6 mm (±4.7) versus 24.9 mm (±3.7) for group A and group B, respectively. The mean length of the new sealing zone after chimney graft placement was similar for both groups (group A versus group B; 17.9 mm versus 18.3 mm, respectively, P = .21). The percentage of oversizing of the aortic stent-graft ranged between 13.8 and 20% versus 22.2 and 30%, for group A and group B, respectively. Patients of group A had more type 1A endoleaks, (14.3%) versus patients of group B (2.1%) based on the first follow-up imaging, P = .02. The incidence of persistent type IA endoleaks needing a reintervention was 14.3 and 1.4% for the group A and group B, respectively, P = .01. The mean volume of contrast medium used was greater in group A versus group B with 239 ml versus150 ml, P = .05. Additionally, 14.3% of patients of group A experienced acute renal failure compared to those in group B which was 1.0%, P = .01. Conclusions Oversizing of ideally 30% of the Endurant stent-graft is associated with significant lower incidence of type IA endoleaks requiring reintervention for patients treated by chimney endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

2017 ◽  
Vol 224 (4) ◽  
pp. 740-748 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali F. AbuRahma ◽  
Stephen M. Hass ◽  
Zachary T. AbuRahma ◽  
Michael Yacoub ◽  
Albeir Y. Mousa ◽  
...  

Vascular ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Rosenthal ◽  
Oliver von Känel ◽  
Thomas Eugster ◽  
Peter Stierli ◽  
Lorenz Gürke

Specialization and high volume are reported to be related to a better outcome after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. The aim of this study was to compare, in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, the outcomes of those whose surgery was done by general surgeons with the outcomes of those whose surgery was done by specialist vascular surgeons. All patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair at the Basel University Hospital (referral center) from January 1990 to December 2000 were included. Patients with endovascular treatment were excluded. Operations in group A ( n = 189), between January 1990 and May 1995, were done by general surgeons. Operations in group B ( n = 291), between June 1995 and December 2000, were done by vascular surgeons. In-hospital mortality and local and systemic complications were assessed. In-hospital mortality rates were significantly lower for group B (with specialist surgeons) than for group A, both overall (group B, 11.7%; group A, 21.7%; p = .003) and for emergency interventions (group B, 28.1%; group A, 41.9%; p = .042). The reduction in mortality for elective surgery in group B was not statistically significant (group B, 1.1%; group A, 4.9%; p = .054). There were significantly fewer pulmonary complications in group B compared with group A ( p = .000). We conclude that in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, those whose surgery is done by a specialized team have a significantly better outcome than those whose surgery is done by general surgeons.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document