scholarly journals A real-world analysis of second-line treatment options in pancreatic cancer: liposomal-irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 175883591985319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Kieler ◽  
Matthias Unseld ◽  
Daniela Bianconi ◽  
Werner Scheithauer ◽  
Gerald W. Prager
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Option ◽  
Real World ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Real World Evidence ◽  
Nanoliposomal Irinotecan ◽  
Liposomal Irinotecan ◽  
Line Setting

Background: Nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) is a novel treatment option for gemcitabine-pretreated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) patients, but real-world evidence is rare. Our aim was to determine the effectiveness and tolerability of this regimen in advanced PAC patients and to compare it with oxaliplatin plus fluoropyrimidines in the second-line setting after failure of gemcitabine. Methods: This is a retrospective single-center analysis of all patients who have been treated with nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV. To compare its effectiveness with other second-line treatment options, all patients who had received oxaliplatin plus fluoropyrimidines after gemcitabine-based chemotherapy were also eligible for analysis. Results: Fifty-two patients were treated with nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV between April 2016 and August 2018. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.84 months and the median overall survival (OS) was 6.79 months. Median OS from the beginning of the treatment for advanced disease was 19.9 months. Median PFS in patients that received nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV as second-line treatment after gemcitabine-based chemotherapy was 4.49 months whereas median PFS in a matched cohort of patients treated with oxaliplatin plus fluoropyrimidines was 3.44 months ( p = 0.007). Between these two groups the median OS of patients with CA 19-9 levels above the statistical median (⩾772.8 kU/l) differed significantly (9.33 versus 6.18 months, p = 0.038). Conclusion: Our data confirms the effectiveness of nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV treatment as a well-tolerated regimen in the treatment of advanced PAC and extends available data on its use as a second-line treatment option when compared with oxaliplatin plus fluoropyrimidines.

scholarly journals Patient profiles as an aim to optimize selection in the second line setting: the role of aflibercept

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. González Astorga ◽  
F. Salvà Ballabrera ◽  
E. Aranda Aguilar ◽  
E. Élez Fernández ◽  
P. García-Alfonso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Effective Therapeutic Option ◽  
Line Setting ◽  
First Line Treatment

AbstractColorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. For metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients, it is recommended, as first-line treatment, chemotherapy (CT) based on doublet cytotoxic combinations of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) and fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX). In addition to CT, biological (targeted agents) are indicated in the first-line treatment, unless contraindicated. In this context, most of mCRC patients are likely to progress and to change from first line to second line treatment when they develop resistance to first-line treatment options. It is in this second line setting where Aflibercept offers an alternative and effective therapeutic option, thought its specific mechanism of action for different patient’s profile: RAS mutant, RAS wild-type (wt), BRAF mutant, potentially resectable and elderly patients. In this paper, a panel of experienced oncologists specialized in the management of mCRC experts have reviewed and selected scientific evidence focused on Aflibercept as an alternative treatment.

scholarly journals Assessing Type and Impact of Biases Potentially Occurring when Analyzing Real World Evidence: The Case of Second Line Treatment for Ovarian Cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S213
Author(s):  
F Kuehne ◽  
M Arvandi ◽  
LM Hess ◽  
DE Faries ◽  
R Matteucci Gothe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Real World ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Real World Evidence

Efficacy of weekly paclitaxel-bevacizumab combination in advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): AVATAX, a retrospective multicentric study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21086-e21086
Author(s):  
Geoffroy Bilger ◽  
Anne-Claire Toffart ◽  
Marie Darasson ◽  
Michaël Duruisseaux ◽  
Lucie Ulmer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Multicentric Study ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Third Line ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Line Setting

e21086 Background: With the growing role of immunotherapy (ICI) as first-line setting for advanced NSCLC, strategies must be redefined after failure. The combination paclitaxel-bevacizumab showed in the ULTIMATE trial a significant superiority versus docetaxel as second or third-line treatment. Limited restropective studies has demonstrated unexpected efficacy of chemotherapy after prior progression on ICI. This combination could be use as salvage treatment following ICI. Methods: This multi-centric retrospective study identifies patients treated with the combination paclitaxel-bevacizumab in metastatic non-squamous NSCLC as second-line therapy or beyond. Main objectives were to describe safety and efficacy of this combination, with a special attention to the sub-group treated just after ICI. Results: From January 2010 to February 2020, 314 patients started the paclitaxel-bevacizumab combination : 55% male, with a median age of 60 years, 27% with a performance status ≥2, 45% with brain metastases. A majority of patients were treated in second (20%) and third-line (39%), and 28% were treated just after ICI failure (88/314). Objective response rate (ORR) was 40% and disease control rate was 77 %. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5,7 months [IQ,3,2–9,6] and 10,8 months [IQ,5,3–19,6] respectively. All grades adverse events concerned 82% of patients, including 53% asthenia and 39% neurotoxicity, and 25% of patients continued a monotherapy alone due to toxicity. Median PFS for patients treated after ICI failure (ICI+) was significantly superior compare to those not previously treated with ICI (ICI-) : 7,0 months [IQ,4,2–11,0] vs 5,2 months [IQ,2,9–8,8] p (log-rank) = 0,01. There was not statistically significant difference in term of OS between this two groups. In multivariate analysis, factors associated with superior PFS were previous ICI treatment (ICI+) and performance status. Conclusions: This study confirms an acceptable toxicity profile associated with interesting efficacy of the combination paclitaxel-bevacizumab as second-line treatment or beyond for non–squamous NSCLC patients, particularly after progression with ICI.

A phase II trial comparing pemetrexed with gefitinib as the second-line treatment of nonsquamous NSCLC patients with wild-type EGFR (CTONG0806).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8042-8042 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinji Yang ◽  
Ying Cheng ◽  
Mingfang Zhao ◽  
Qing Zhou ◽  
Hong hong Yan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Egfr Mutation ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Line Setting ◽  
Nsclc Patients

8042 Background: Pemetrexed or gefitinib is one of the standard second-line treatments for advanced non-squamousNSCLC in East Asia. The CTONG 0806 a multi-center, randomized, controlled, open-label phase II trial was designed to explore the efficacy of pemetrexed versus gefitinib as the second-line treatment in advanced NSCLC patients without EGFR mutation. Methods: The patients with locally advanced or metastatic, non-squamous NSCLC previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and no EGFR mutation in exons 18-21 were enrolled. Patients were 1:1 randomized to receive either gefitinib 250 mg per oral every day (G arm) or pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 iv day 1 with vitamin B12 and folic acid supplement every 21 days (P arm) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation of treatment due to other reason. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were 4-month and 6-month progression-free survival rate, overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), quality of life using the FACT-L questionnaire and safety, EGFR and K-ras mutation status were evaluated and correlated with outcomes. Results: From Feb. 2009 to Aug. 2012, 157 evaluable patients were randomized (81 cases in G arm and 76 in P arm). Baseline age, gender, and ECOG performance status were balanced between arms. The primary endpoint of PFS was met with 1.6 months for G arm versus 4.8 months for P arm, the HR is 0.51 (95% CI 0.36~0.73, P<0.001). Overall response rates were 14.7 % and 13.3 % (P=0.814) and DCR were 32.0% and 61.3% (P<0.001) for G arm and P arm, respectively. OS data were not yet mature. More skin rash and diarrhoea were seen in G arm, but more fatigue and ALT increased in P arm. CTCAE grade 3 or 4 of AEs was 12.3% in G arm and 32.9% in P arm (p=0.002). The further analyses of efficacy evaluated by IRR and biomarkers analysis will be presented on the ground. Conclusions: CTONG0806 is the first trial to show significant improvements in PFS and DCR with pemetrexed compared with gefitinib in second-line setting for advanced NSCLC with EGFR wild type. Patients with EGFR wild type did not benefit from EGFR TKI gefitinb in second-line setting. Clinical trial information: NCT00891579.

Phase II study of weekly scheduled irinotecan and capecitabine treatment in advanced colorectal cancer patients.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14644-e14644
Author(s):  
Wenhua Li ◽  
Jin Li ◽  
Jianming Xu ◽  
Lin Shen ◽  
Tianshu Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Current Phase ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Severe Diarrhea ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Setting

e14644 Background: The clinical application of combination therapy of irinotecan and capecitabine is at a standstill due to the consideration on severe diarrhea. The aim of the current phase II study was to explore the optimal administration mode of these two drugs, and evaluate the safety and efficacy of weekly-scheduled XELIRI regimen (wXELIRI) in mCRC pts. Methods: Pts with unresectable, histologically confirmed mCRC were enrolled to receive wXELIRI: irinotecan 90mg/m(2) on Day 1 and capecitabine 1200 mg/m(2) bid on Days 1-5 weekly. Both the first-line pts and second-line treatment pts who failed with FOLFOX or XELOX were eligible. The primary endpoint was rate of Grade 3/4 diarrhea. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and other safeties. Results: From January 2011 to May 2012, totally 43 pts with measurable mCRC were enrolled, 18 of them were male and 25 were female. The median age was 60 yrs (range 32-70). No Grade 4 diarrhea was observed and the rate of grade 3 diarrhea was 4.7%. The most common Grade 3/4 toxicities included leucocyte(11.6%), neutrophile (18.6%), vomiting (4.7%), fatigue (2.3%), hand-foot-syndrome (2.3%) . With a median follow-up of 19.0 months, 23 PFS events were observed. The mPFS for all the 43 pts was 6.1 mons and the mOS was 15.5 mons. For the 31 first-line treatment pts, the mPFS was 7.5 mons and the mOS has not reached. In the second-line treatment group (12 pts), the mPFS was 5.4 mons and mOS was 13.8 mons. Conclusions: The weekly-scheduled irinotecan and capecitabine combination has a low rate of severe diarrhea and acceptable toxicity profile. It could be an alternative regimen for mCRC pts, especially in the second-line setting. Clinical trial information: NCT01322152.

Efficacy of liposomal-irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (5-FU/LV) versus oxaliplatin plus fluoropyrimidines in previous gemcitabine treated pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) patients (pts).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 383-383
Author(s):  
Markus Kieler ◽  
Matthias Unseld ◽  
Daniela Bianconi ◽  
Werner Scheithauer ◽  
Gerald W. Prager
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Cohort Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Median Progression Free Survival ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Analysis ◽  
Liposomal Irinotecan

383 Background: The chemotherapy regimens nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV as well as oxaliplatin plus fluoropyrimidines are used after previous gemcitabine based chemotherapy in the 2nd line treatment of metastatic PAC. We aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of these two treatment options. Methods: In this single institutional retrospective cohort analysis all pts with advanced PAC that were treated between 01/2012-08/2018 with nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV or oxaliplatin plus fluoropyrimidines after previous 1st line gemcitabine based chemotherapy were analysed for clinical parameters, median progression free survival (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS). Survival analyses were performed by Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Characteristics of pts were well matched (Table). mPFS in pts (n=30) that received nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV in the 2nd line treatment after gemcitabine based chemotherapy was 4.49 months while treatment with oxaliplatin plus fluoropyrimidines (n=31) resulted in a mPFS of 3.44 months (p=0.007, HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.27-0.81). Furthermore, pts with a CA 19-9 level >1000 kU/l at the beginning of 2nd line treatment had a significantly improved mPFS and mOS, when treated with nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV compared to oxaliplatin plus fluoropyrimidines (mPFS 4.94 months versus 3.44 months, p=0.0186, HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.18-0.98; mOS 9.31 months versus 6.16 months, p=0.0386, HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.18-1.02). Conclusions: The efficacy of nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV in our study is encouraging and outperforms oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in the 2nd line treatment setting for PAC pts pretreated with gemcitabine. Prospective randomized trials are urged to validate our observation. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Real-world evidence: A review of clinical experience in metastatic gastric cancer second-line treatment with ramucirumab

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel Quintana-Quintana ◽  
María Consuelo Díaz-Romero ◽  
Christian Patricio Camacho-Limas ◽  
Laura Torrecillas-Torres ◽  
Erika Ruiz-García ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Clinical Experience ◽  
Real World ◽  
Metastatic Gastric Cancer ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Real World Evidence

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of second-line nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine after progression on FOLFIRINOX for unresectable or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: multicenter retrospective analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592092342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heejung Chae ◽  
Hyehyun Jeong ◽  
Jaekyung Cheon ◽  
Hong Jae Chon ◽  
Hyewon Ryu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Treatment Option ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3

Background: FOLFIRINOX (fluorouracil, folinic acid, irinotecan plus oxaliplatin) is an effective standard first-line treatment option for advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). There is no clear consensus on the second-line treatment following progression on FOLFIRINOX. In this multicenter retrospective analysis, we evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of second-line nab-P/Gem (nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine) after progression on FOLFIRNOX in PDAC. Methods: Patients with unresectable or metastatic PDAC who received nab-P/Gem after progression on FOLFIRINOX between February 2016 and February 2019 were identified from five referral cancer centers in South Korea. Baseline characteristics, treatment history, survival outcomes, and toxicity profile were obtained retrospectively from medical records. Results: A total of 102 patients treated with second-line nab-P/Gem for advanced PDAC after progression on FOLFIRINOX were included. At the time of nab-P/Gem, the median age was 60 years, with males comprising 49.0%, and most (75.5%) had metastatic disease. Patients received a median of three cycles (range 1–12) of nab-P/Gem. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from the start of second-line nab-P/Gem therapy were 9.8 (95% CI, 8.9–10.6) and 4.6 months (3.7–5.5), respectively. A partial response was achieved in 8.5%, and the disease control rate was 73.6%. From the start of first-line FOLFIRIOX, the OS1+2 and PFS1+2 were 20.9 (15.7–26.1) and 13.9 (10.8–17.0) months, respectively, with a 2-year survival rate of 45.1%. There was no treatment-related mortality and grade ⩾3 toxicity was observed in 60.2%. Conclusion: Our results showed that nab-P/Gem was an effective and tolerable second-line treatment option in medically fit patients with advanced PDAC who progressed on first-line FOLFIRNOX. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04133155

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document