scholarly journals OUTCOMES OF BIOABSORBABLE FIXATION OF OSTEOCHONDRAL INJURIES IN THE PEDIATRIC AND ADOLESCENT KNEE

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2325967119S0017
Author(s):  
Shawn Nguyen ◽  
Katie L. Fletcher ◽  
John A. Schlechter
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Operating Room ◽  
Osteochondral Allograft ◽  
Osteochondral Lesions ◽  
Bioabsorbable Implants ◽  
Surgeon Experience ◽  
Outcome Scores ◽  
Osteochondral Injuries

Background: Osteochondral lesions (OCL), including osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) and traumatic osteochondral fractures (OCF), are often encountered when treating injuries affecting the pediatric and adolescent knee. There are an array of treatment options depending upon lesion size, location, chronicity, and equally important, surgeon experience. There is a potential for healing in children and adolescents that may not be present in adults and the intent of internal fixation is to reduce and restore the injured hyaline cartilage and underlying bone. Stable fixation utilizing bioabsorbable implants offers a possibility of OCL healing without the need for implant removal or a major restorative procedure such as an osteochondral autograft transfer, osteochondral allograft, or autologous chondrocyte implantation, therefore avoiding the associated costs and potential morbidity. The purpose of our study was to review the mid-term outcomes of internal fixation with bioabsorbable implants of osteochondral injuries of the knee in children and adolescents. Methods: An IRB approved retrospective review of patients younger than 18 years old who had internal fixation of knee OCLs with bioabsorbable implants was performed. All those included had a minimum 2-year follow-up and completed validated outcome scores (Pedi-IKDC, Tegner, Lysholm). Medical records were reviewed from 2009 to 2015 for patient demographics, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes. Pedi-IKDC and Tegner-Lysholm functional outcome scores were used to assess overall outcomes at final follow-up. Return to the operating room was recorded. All cases were performed at a single tertiary pediatric institution by a single pediatric fellowship trained orthopedic surgeon. Results: There were a total of 35 children and adolescents that had a knee OCL that underwent internal fixation with bioabsorbable implants. 7 patients were lost to follow-up with a final cohort of 28 of the 35 patients (80%). Average follow-up was 44 months (range 24-97 months). Average age was 14.7 years. Out of the 28 children, 14 had OCD and 14 OCFs. The average number of bioabsorbable darts and screws used per intervention was 2 and 1, respectively. The average Pedi-IKDC and Lysholm scoring at final follow-up was 89.5 and 91, respectively. Five patients returned to the operating room following the primary procedure: 2 for manipulation under anesthesia related to OCL fixation, 1 for a planned staged ACL reconstruction, 1 for MPFL reconstruction for recurrent patella instability following the index procedure, and 1 patient returned secondary to a proud implant that was in-turn debrided. None of the 28 patients underwent a revision cartilage procedure. Conclusion: The use of bioabsorbable implants (screws and darts) in children and adolescents appears to be a safe and efficacious treatment with good functional outcomes at mid-term follow up and in this cohort there was no need for a revision cartilage procedure. Larger multi-center longer-term follow studies are needed.

scholarly journals Outcomes of Patellofemoral Osteochondral Lesions Treated With Structural Grafts in Patients Older Than 40 Years

Cartilage ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 255-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan M. Degen ◽  
Nathan W. Coleman ◽  
Danielle Tetreault ◽  
Brenda Chang ◽  
Greg T. Mahony ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Subjective Evaluation ◽  
International Knee Documentation Committee ◽  
Lesion Size ◽  
Osteochondral Allograft ◽  
Osteochondral Lesions ◽  
Activity Levels ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Osteochondral Autograft Transfer ◽  
Osteochondral Injuries

Background Chondral lesions in the patellofemoral compartment represent a difficult entity to treat among active patients, with no clear consensus on the optimal treatment strategy. The purpose of this study was to review the functional outcomes of patients >40 years old with primary patellofemoral osteochondral lesions who underwent a cartilage restoration procedure with a structural graft. Methods Following institutional review board approval, 35 patients >40 years treated for patellofemoral chondral or osteochondral injuries were retrospectively identified. Seventeen (47%) had prior surgery (mean 1.4 procedures, range 1-4). Average follow-up was 3.6 ± 1.6 years. Average patient age was 51.5 years (range 40-72 years); 54% were male. Twenty-six (74%) had isolated trochlear lesions, 7 had isolated patellar lesions (20%), while 2 (6%) had bipolar lesions. Twenty patients (57%) were treated with synthetic biphasic scaffold plugs (SS), 9 (26%) with fresh osteochondral allograft (OCA) and 6 (17%) with osteochondral autograft transfer (OAT). Outcomes were measured with validated measures: Activity of Daily Living Score (ADL), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Evaluation form, and Marx Activity Scale (MAS). Results The average lesion size for the entire cohort was 3.1 ± 1.7 cm2. Average defect size was 2.6 ± 1.7 cm2 for the SS group, 4.3±1.5 cm2 for the OCA group, and 2.9 ± 0.8 cm2 for the OAT group ( P > 0.051). Outcome scores for the entire population demonstrated significant improvement in ADL ( P = 0.002) and IKDC scores ( P = 0.004) between baseline and final follow-up, while MAS scores were maintained ( P = 0.51). Conclusion Structural grafts are a viable treatment option for symptomatic focal osteochondral lesions of the patellofemoral joint in patients 40 years and older, with anticipated improvements in pain and function and maintenance of preoperative activity levels.

Open Treatment of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus With Bone Grafting and Particulated Juvenile Cartilage Allografting

2021 ◽  
pp. 193864002110097
Author(s):  
Suhas P. Dasari ◽  
Thomas M. Langer ◽  
Derek Parshall ◽  
Brian Law
Keyword(s):  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Symptomatic Improvement ◽  
Pain Scale ◽  
Osteochondral Lesions ◽  
Outcome Scores ◽  
Scale Scores ◽  
Open Treatment ◽  
Bone Autograft

Background: Large cystic osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) are challenging pathological conditions to treat, but particulated juvenile cartilage allografts (PJCAs) supplemented with bone grafts are a promising therapeutic option. The purpose of this project was to further elucidate the role of PJCA with concomitant bone autografts for treating large cystic OLTs with extensive subchondral bone involvement (greater than 150 mm2 in area and/or deeper than 5 mm). Methods: We identified 6 patients with a mean OLT area of 307.2 ± 252.4 mm2 and a mean lesion depth of 10.85 ± 6.10 mm who underwent DeNovo PJCA with bone autografting between 2013 and 2017. Postoperative outcomes were assessed with radiographs, Foot and Ankle Outcome Scores (FAOS), and visual pain scale scores. Results: At final follow-up (27.0 ± 12.59 weeks), all patients had symptomatic improvement and incorporation of the graft on radiographs. At an average of 62 ± 20.88 months postoperatively, no patients required a revision surgery. All patients contacted by phone in 2018 and 2020 reported they would do the procedure again in retrospect and reported an improvement in their symptoms relative to their preoperative state, especially with pain and in the FAOS activities of daily living subsection (91.93 ± 9.04 in 2018, 74.63 ± 26.86 in 2020). Conclusion: PJCA with concomitant bone autograft is a viable treatment option for patients with large cystic OLTs. Levels of Evidence: Level IV

No Difference in Outcomes Following Osteochondral Allograft with Fresh Precut Cores Compared to Hemi-Condylar Allografts

Cartilage ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 194760352110219
Author(s):  
Danielle H. Markus ◽  
Anna M. Blaeser ◽  
Eoghan T. Hurley ◽  
Brian J. Mannino ◽  
Kirk A. Campbell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Knee Injury ◽  
Lesion Size ◽  
Osteochondral Allograft ◽  
Osteochondral Lesions ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Mean

Objective The purpose of the current study is to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes at early to midterm follow-up between fresh precut cores versus hemi-condylar osteochondral allograft (OCAs) in the treatment of symptomatic osteochondral lesions. Design A retrospective review of patients who underwent an OCA was performed. Patient matching between those with OCA harvested from an allograft condyle/patella or a fresh precut allograft core was performed to generate 2 comparable groups. The cartilage at the graft site was assessed with use of a modified Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) scoring system and patient-reported outcomes were collected. Results Overall, 52 total patients who underwent OCA with either fresh precut OCA cores ( n = 26) and hemi-condylar OCA ( n = 26) were pair matched at a mean follow-up of 34.0 months (range 12 months to 99 months). The mean ages were 31.5 ± 10.7 for fresh precut cores and 30.9 ± 9.8 for hemi-condylar ( P = 0.673). Males accounted for 36.4% of the overall cohort, and the mean lesion size for fresh precut OCA core was 19.6 mm2 compared to 21.2 mm2 for whole condyle ( P = 0.178). There was no significant difference in patient-reported outcomes including Visual Analogue Scale, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, and Tegner ( P > 0.5 for each), or in MOCART score (69.2 vs. 68.3, P = 0.93). Conclusions This study found that there was no difference in patient-reported clinical outcomes or MOCART scores following OCA implantation using fresh precut OCA cores or size matched condylar grafts at early to midterm follow-up.

Midterm Results of Fresh-Frozen Osteochondral Allografting for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus

2020 ◽  
pp. 107110072094986
Author(s):  
Chung-Hua Chu ◽  
Ing-Ho Chen ◽  
Kai-Chiang Yang ◽  
Chen-Chie Wang
Keyword(s):  
Short Form ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Osteochondral Allograft ◽  
Osteochondral Lesions ◽  
Midterm Results ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Allograft Transplantation ◽  
Fresh Frozen ◽  
The Mean

Background: Osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) are relatively common. Following the failure of conservative treatment, many operative options have yielded varied results. In this study, midterm outcomes after fresh-frozen osteochondral allograft transplantation for the treatment of OLT were evaluated. Methods: Twenty-five patients (12 women and 13 men) with a mean age 40.4 (range 18-70) years between 2009 and 2014 were enrolled. Of 25 ankles, 3, 13, 4, and 4 were involved with the talus at Raikin zone 3, 4, 6, and 7 as well as one coexisted with zone 4 and 6 lesion. The mean OLT area was 1.82 cm2 (range, 1.1-3.0). The mean follow-up period was 5.5 years (range, 4-9.3). Outcomes evaluation included the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, visual analog scale score, and 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). Result: AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score increased from 74 preoperatively to 94 at 2 years postoperatively ( P < .001) and the SF-12 physical health component scores increased from 32 to 46 points ( P < .001). Incorporation was inspected in all patients in the latest follow-up, and graft subsidence and radiolucency were observed in 2 and 7 cases, respectively, whereas graft collapse and revision OLT graft were not observed. Bone sclerosis was found in 6 of 25 patients. Conclusion: With respect to midterm results, fresh, frozen-stored allograft transplantation might be an option in the management of symptomatic OLT. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.

scholarly journals A Systematic Review of Fresh Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011420S0038
Author(s):  
Gregory F. Pereira ◽  
John Steele ◽  
Amanda N. Fletcher ◽  
Samuel B. Adams ◽  
Ryan B. Clement
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Graft Survival ◽  
Graft Survival Rate ◽  
Osteochondral Allograft ◽  
Osteochondral Lesions ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Allograft Transplantation ◽  
Fresh Osteochondral Allograft

Category: Ankle Introduction/Purpose: The term osteochondral lesion of the talus (OLT) refers to any pathology of the talar articular cartilage and corresponding subchondral bone. In general, OLTs can pose a formidable treatment challenge to the orthopaedic surgeon due to the poor intrinsic ability of cartilage to heal as well as the tenuous vascular supply to the talus. Although many treatment options exist, including microfracture, retrograde drilling, autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), and osteochondral autograft transfer system (OATS) these options may be inadequate to treat large cartilage lesions. Osteochondral allografts have demonstrated promise as the primary treatment for OLTs with substantial cartilage and bone involvement. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review of outcomes after fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation for OLTs. Methods: PudMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, and Medline were searched using PRISMA guidelines. Studies that evaluated outcomes in adult patients after fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation for chondral defects of the talus were included. Operative results, according to standardized scoring systems, such as the AOFAS Ankle/Hindfoot scale and the Visual Analog Scale were compared across various studies. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Coleman methodology score. Results: There were a total of 12 eligible studies reporting on 191 patients with OLTs with an average follow-up of 56.8 months (range 6-240). The mean age was 37.5 (range 17-74) years and the overall graft survival rate was 86.6%. The AOFAS Ankle/Hindfoot score was obtained pre- and postoperatively in 6 of the 12 studies and had significant improvements in each (P<0.05). Similarly, the VAS pain score was evaluated in 5 of the 12 studies and showed significant decreases (P<0.05) from pre- to postoperatively with an aggregate mean preoperative VAS score of 7.3 and an aggregate postoperative value of 2.6. The reported short-term complication rate was 0%. The overall failure rate was 13.4% and 21.6% percent of patients had subsequent procedures. Conclusion: The treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus remains a challenge to orthopaedic surgeons. From this systematic review, one can conclude that osteochondral allograft transplantation for osteochondral lesions of the talus results in predictably favorable outcomes with an impressive graft survival rate and high satisfaction rates at intermediate follow-up. [Table: see text]

Comparative Effectiveness of Cartilage Repair With Respect to the Minimal Clinically Important Difference

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (13) ◽  
pp. 3284-3293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristofer J. Jones ◽  
Benjamin V. Kelley ◽  
Armin Arshi ◽  
David R. McAllister ◽  
Peter D. Fabricant
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Cartilage Repair ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Osteochondral Allograft ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Outcome Scores ◽  
Chondrocyte Implantation ◽  
Autologous Chondrocyte

Background: Recent studies demonstrated a 5% increase in cartilage repair procedures annually in the United States. There is currently no consensus regarding a superior technique, nor has there been a comprehensive evaluation of postoperative clinical outcomes with respect to a minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Purpose: To determine the proportion of available cartilage repair studies that meet or exceed MCID values for clinical outcomes improvement over short-, mid-, and long-term follow-up. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic review was performed via the Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases. Available studies were included that investigated clinical outcomes for microfracture (MFX), osteoarticular transfer system (OATS), osteochondral allograft transplantation, and autologous chondrocyte implantation/matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI/MACI) for the treatment of symptomatic knee chondral defects. Cohorts were combined on the basis of surgical intervention by performing a meta-analysis that utilized inverse-variance weighting in a DerSimonian-Laird random effects model. Weighted mean improvements in International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm, and visual analog scale for pain (VAS pain) scores were calculated from preoperative to short- (1-4 years), mid- (5-9 years), and long-term (≥10 years) postoperative follow-up. Mean values were compared with established MCID values per 2-tailed 1-sample Student t tests. Results: A total of 89 studies with 3894 unique patients were analyzed after full-text review. MFX met MCID values for all outcome scores at short- and midterm follow-up with the exception of VAS pain in the midterm. OATS met MCID values for all outcome scores at all available time points; however, long-term data were not available for VAS pain. Osteochondral allograft transplantation met MCID values for IKDC at short- and midterm follow-up and for Lysholm at short-term follow-up, although data were not available for other time points or for VAS pain. ACI/MACI met MCID values for all outcome scores (IKDC, Lysholm, and VAS pain) at all time points. Conclusion: In the age of informed consent, it is important to critically evaluate the clinical outcomes and durability of cartilage surgery with respect to well-established standards of clinical improvement. MFX failed to maintain VAS pain improvements above MCID thresholds with follow-up from 5 to 9 years. All cartilage repair procedures met MCID values at short- and midterm follow-up for IKDC and Lysholm scores; ACI/MACI and OATS additionally met MCID values in the long term, demonstrating extended maintenance of clinical benefits for patients undergoing these surgical interventions as compared with MFX.

scholarly journals Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: Few Patients Require Surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011419S0005
Author(s):  
Seung-Hwan Park ◽  
Sang Gyo Seo ◽  
Ho Seong Lee
Keyword(s):  
Osteochondral Lesion ◽  
Lesion Size ◽  
Nonoperative Treatment ◽  
Osteochondral Lesions ◽  
Sports Activity ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Outcome Scores ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Analogue Scales

Category: Ankle, Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: The frequency of progression of osteoarthritis and persistence of symptoms in untreated osteochondral lesion of the talus (OCL) is not well known. We report the outcome of a nonoperative treatment for symptomatic OCL. Methods: This study included 142 patients with OCLs from 2003 to 2013. The patients did not undergo immobilization and had no restrictions of physical activities. The mean follow-up time was 6 (3–10) years. Initial MRI and CT confirmed OCL and showed lesion size, location, and stage of the lesion. Progression of osteoarthritis was evaluated by standing radiographs. In 83 patients, CT was performed at the final follow-up for analyses of the lesion size. We surveyed patients for limitations of sports activity, and Visual Analogue Scales (VAS), AOFAS, and SF-36 were assessed. Results: No patients had progression of osteoarthritis. The lesion size as determined by CT did not change in 69/83 patients, decreased in 5, and increased in 9. The mean VAS score of the 142 patients decreased from 3.8 to 0.9 (p < 0.001), the mean AOFAS ankle–hindfoot score increased from 86 to 93 (p < 0.001), and the mean SF-36 score increased from 52 to 72 (p < 0.001). Only 9 patients reported limitations of sports activity. The size and location of the lesion did not correlate with any of the outcome scores. Conclusion: Nonoperative treatment can be considered a good option for patients with OCL.

Prospective Evaluation of Structural Allograft Transplantation for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talar Shoulder

2017 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel B. Adams ◽  
Travis J. Dekker ◽  
Adam P. Schiff ◽  
Christopher P. Gross ◽  
James A. Nunley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Osteochondral Allograft ◽  
Osteochondral Lesions ◽  
Salvage Procedure ◽  
Prospective Evaluation ◽  
Allograft Transplantation ◽  
Structural Allograft ◽  
Additional Surgery ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Patient Reported

Background: Structural or bulk osteochondral allograft transplantation for shoulder talar osteochondral lesions as a salvage procedure has demonstrated efficacy in several retrospective reviews. The purpose of this study was to evaluate prospectively patients who received fresh structural allograft transplantation to the talus. Methods: Prospective evaluation of a consecutive series of patients who underwent fresh structural allograft transplantation for an osteochondral lesion of the talus (OLT) was performed. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or computed tomography (CT) and plain radiographs were obtained on all patients. The following patient-reported outcomes questionnaires were administered preoperatively and yearly after surgery: 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) pain scale, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale, Short Form 36 (SF-36), and the Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA). Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were assessed for allograft incorporation and subsequent arthritis. Fourteen patients with an average age of 40 years (range, 18-69) and a mean follow-up of 55 months (range, 24-97) underwent structural fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation to the talar shoulder. Results: The average size of the OLT was 2269 mm3 (range, 813-8366) based on CT imaging and 5797 mm3 (range, 1136-12 489) based on MRI imaging. There was significant ( P < .05) improvement in the VAS pain, AOFAS scale, SF-36, and SMFA scores. Five (36%) of the patients required additional surgery for pain and stiffness. Two patients had cartilage delamination and were considered treatment failures. Therefore, the success rate was 86% (12/14). Conclusion: Significant improvement in pain and function was achieved with structural allograft transplantation for large OLTs at midterm follow-up. This was a safe and effective treatment option in this small series for large OLTs. Level of Evidence: Level IV, prospective case series.

scholarly journals Fresh Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation for Fractures of the Knee

Cartilage ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guilherme C. Gracitelli ◽  
Luis Eduardo Passarelli Tirico ◽  
Julie C. McCauley ◽  
Pamela A. Pulido ◽  
William D. Bugbee
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Option ◽  
Femoral Condyle ◽  
International Knee Documentation Committee ◽  
Salvage Treatment ◽  
Osteochondral Allograft ◽  
Successful Outcome ◽  
Osteochondral Lesions ◽  
Knee Fracture ◽  
Fresh Osteochondral Allograft

Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate functional outcomes and allograft survivorship among patients with knee fracture who underwent fresh osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation as a salvage treatment option. Design Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Setting Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at one hospital. Patients Fresh OCAs were implanted for osteochondral lesions after knee fracture in 24 males and 15 females with an average age of 34 years. Twenty-nine lesions (74%) were tibial plateau fractures, 6 (15%) were femoral condyle fractures, and 4 (10%) were patella fractures. Main Outcome Measurements Clinical evaluation included modified Merle d’Aubigné-Postel (18-point), International Knee Documentation Committee, and Knee Society function scores, and patient satisfaction. Failure of OCA was defined as revision OCA or conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Results Nineteen of 39 knees (49%) had further surgery. Ten knees (26%) were considered OCA failures (3 OCA revisions, 6 TKA, and 1 patellectomy). Survivorship of the OCA was 82.6% at 5 years and 69.6% at 10 years. Among the 29 knees (74%) that had the OCA still in situ, median follow-up was 6.6 years. Pain and function improved from preoperative to latest follow-up; 83% of patients reported satisfaction with OCA results. Conclusion OCA transplantation is a useful salvage treatment option for osteochondral lesions caused by knee fracture. Although the reoperation rate was high, successful outcome was associated with significant clinical improvement.

Graft-Recipient Anteroposterior Mismatch Does Not Affect the Midterm Clinical Outcomes of Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation of the Femoral Condyle

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (10) ◽  
pp. 2441-2448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dean Wang ◽  
Francesca R. Coxe ◽  
George C. Balazs ◽  
Brenda Chang ◽  
Kristofer J. Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Femoral Condyle ◽  
Osteochondral Allograft ◽  
Radius Of Curvature ◽  
Allograft Transplantation ◽  
Outcome Scores ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Graft Recipient

Background: For the treatment of femoral condyle cartilage defects with osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA), many surgeons have relaxed their graft-recipient size-matching criteria given the limited allograft supply. However, since the anteroposterior (AP) length is typically correlated with the radius of curvature for a given condyle, a large mismatch in graft-recipient AP length can indicate a corresponding mismatch in the radius of curvature, leading to articular incongruity after implantation. Purpose: To evaluate the association between femoral condyle graft–recipient AP mismatch and clinical outcomes of OCA. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of patients treated with OCA for femoral condyle chondral defects from 2000 to 2015. Graft characteristics, including AP and mediolateral dimensions, were gathered from vendor-specific allograft offering documents. Patient condyle dimensions were measured on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Reoperations and patient responses to validated outcome measures were reviewed. Failure was defined by any partial removal/revision of the allograft or conversion to knee arthroplasty. A multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to examine the association of AP mismatch with OCA failure while adjusting for patient age and number of previous ipsilateral knee surgical procedures. Results: A total of 69 knees from 69 patients (mean age, 35.7 years; 71% male) met the inclusion criteria. Mean duration of follow-up was 4 years (range, 2-16 years). The mean absolute graft-recipient AP mismatch was 6.7 mm (range, 0-20 mm; P < .01). At final follow-up, 19 knees had failed. There was no significant difference in the mean absolute AP mismatch between failures (8.1 mm) and nonfailures (6.2 mm; P = .17). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that AP mismatch was not associated with graft failure ( P = .14). At final follow-up, significant improvements were noted in the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, International Knee Documentation Committee subjective form, and Knee Outcome Survey–Activities of Daily Living ( P < .01 for all). Magnitude of AP mismatch was not associated with postoperative outcome scores or achievement of minimal clinically significant differences in outcome scores. Conclusion: Magnitude of graft-recipient AP mismatch was not associated with midterm OCA failure rates or patient-reported outcome scores, suggesting that AP length mismatch within the limits measured here is not a contraindication for graft acceptance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document