scholarly journals Daratumumab As a Treatment for Adult Immune Thrombocytopenia: A Phase II Study with Safety Run-in (the DART Study)

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2088-2088
Author(s):  
Galina Tsykunova ◽  
Pal André Holme ◽  
Hoa Thi Tuyet Tran ◽  
Tor Henrik Anderson Tvedt ◽  
Ludvig Andre Munthe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Count ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Rescue Therapy ◽  
Observational Period ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Autoimmune Cytopenias

Abstract Background: Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is characterized by antibody-mediated platelet destruction and impaired platelet production. Residual long-lived autoreactive plasma cells may be a source of treatment resistance in autoimmune cytopenias. Antiplatelet-specific plasma cells have been detected in the spleen of the rituximab refractory ITP patients. These cells can also migrate and reside in bone marrow as long-lived plasma cells. Daratumumab, an anti-CD38 antibody, targets plasma cells and is approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Daratumumab has been successfully used to treat refractory autoimmune cytopenias in children and a few cases of post-transplant autoimmune cytopenias and refractory SLE in adults. We hypothesized that long-lived autoreactive plasma cells may be the source of treatment failure in some ITP patients. Based on that, we initiated a multicenter, open-label, dose-escalating phase II study with a safety run-in to evaluate the safety and efficacy of daratumumab in patients with ITP (NCT04703621). The first 3 patients were included in the safety run-in during Jan - May 2021. Study design and methods: Main inclusion criteria include age ≥18, primary ITP with a platelet count of ≤30X109/L, failure of corticosteroid therapy, and at least one second-line therapy including rituximab and/or TPO-RA. Main exclusion criteria include active bleeding, secondary ITP, concomitant autoimmune hemolytic anemia. Twenty-one patients will be included in the study. The safety run-in phase includes 3 patients who receive 4 weekly subcutaneous daratumumab injections followed by a 4-week observational period. Enrollment of the next patient in this phase occurs after the previous patient has completed treatment and an observational period. In cohort 1, 9 patients will receive 8 weekly injections. If the response rate is <100% and no severe adverse events appear, the subsequent 9 patients will receive 8 weekly daratumumab injections followed by 2 injections administered every other week. Standard premedication before all daratumumab injections consists of antihistamine, corticosteroid (methylprednisolone 100 mg or equivalent before the 1 st daratumumab injection and 60 mg or equivalent before subsequent injections), and paracetamol. Rescue ITP medications are allowed during the first 8 weeks of the study. Steroid or TPO-RA (eltrombopag or romiplostim) dosing must remain stable during the 2 weeks preceding the inclusion. Dose escalation is not allowed during the study. The primary endpoint is a platelet count >50x10 9/L in 2 measurements 12 weeks after treatment initiation for cohort 1, and 16 weeks for cohort 2, without rescue therapy after week 8. Safety will be assessed by the incidence and severity of adverse events. Secondary endpoints will include the number of weeks with platelet count >50x10 9/L between the end of treatment and end of study without rescue therapy or dose increments of corticosteroids. Time to treatment failure (TTF) is defined as time to first platelet count <30x10 9/L or administration of any platelet elevating therapy after achieving response. Exploratory endpoints include: role of anti-GPIIb/IIIa and Ib antibodies; serial characterization of various subsets of immunocompetent cells in the bone marrow and blood; measurement of HRQoL and fatigue Statistics: The primary outcome (treatment response) will be reported separately for each cohort and the entire study population, expressed by absolute numbers and rates with the corresponding 95% confidence interval. Daratumumab treatment will be considered "successful" if we observe a response rate of 30% or higher. Current enrollment status: As of July 10, 2021, 2 sites are open. Two patients have completed the safety run-in; one is close. One/two responded to treatment at week 12. Platelet response in all 3 patients is shown in Figure 1. No serious or grade 3 adverse events were reported. Cohort 1 will start in August 2021. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Tsykunova: Ablynx: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sobi: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy. Holme: bayer, Octapharma, Pfizer: Other: support to institution, Research Funding; Bayer, Novo Nordisk, Octapharma, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, Sobi: Consultancy, Honoraria. Tran: Astra Zeneca: Consultancy; Novartis, Janssen, Abbvie, Takeda, CSL Bering: Consultancy. Tvedt: Ablynx,Alexion, Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Michel: Amgen,Novartis,UCB,Argenx,Rigel: Honoraria. Frederiksen: Novartis: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Alexion: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Bussel: CSL: Other: DSMB; UCB: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: DSMB; Principia/Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Argenx: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; UptoDate: Honoraria; RallyBio: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rigel: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dova/Sobi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Momenta/Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kuter: Rubius: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Actelion (Syntimmune), Agios, Alnylam, Amgen, Argenx, BioCryst, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Caremark, CRICO, Daiichi Sankyo, Dova, Genzyme, Immunovant, Incyte, Kyowa-Kirin, Merck Sharp Dohme, Momenta, Novartis, Pfizer, Principia, Protalex, Protalix, Rigel: Consultancy, Other: grant support and consulting fees; Actelion (Syntimmune), Agios, Alnylam, Amgen, Argenx, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Immunovant, Kezar, Principia, Protalex, Rigel, Takeda (Bioverativ), UCB: Research Funding; Platelet Disorder Support Association: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Up-to-Date: Patents & Royalties: Up-To-Date. Ghanima: Amgen, Novartis, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, SOBI, Griffols, Sanofi: Honoraria; Bayer, BMS/Pfizer: Research Funding; Amgen, Novartis, Pfizer, Principia Biopharma Inc- a Sanofi Company, Sanofi, SOBI, Griffols, UCB, Argenx: Consultancy.

scholarly journals A Randomized Phase II Study of Azacitidine Combined with Lenalidomide or with Vorinostat Vs. Azacitidine Monotherapy in Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) and Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML): North American Intergroup Study SWOG S1117

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. LBA-5-LBA-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikkael A. Sekeres ◽  
Megan Othus ◽  
Alan F. List ◽  
Olatoyosi Odenike ◽  
Richard M. Stone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
International Prognostic Scoring System ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
N Rates

Abstract Background: Higher-risk MDS and CMML comprise a spectrum of disorders associated with cytopenias, high risk of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and truncated survival. Initial treatment with a hypomethylating agent such as azacitidine (AZA) is considered standard of care. Whether addition of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat (VOR), which acts synergistically with AZA to reactivate epigenetically silenced genes, or addition of lenalidomide (LEN), which impacts the bone marrow microenvironment, improves response rates compared to AZA monotherapy is unknown. Methods: This Phase II study (ClinTrials.gov # NCT01522976) randomized higher-risk MDS (International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) Int-2 or High and/or bone marrow blasts >5%) and CMML patients (pts) with <20% blasts to receive AZA (75 mg/m2/d on d1-7 of a 28d cycle), AZA + LEN (10 mg/d on d1-21), or AZA + VOR (300 mg BID on d3-9). Eligibility criteria included: >18 years (yrs), no previous allogeneic transplant, no prior treatment with any of the study drugs, and adequate organ function; therapy-related (t)MDS was allowed. Pts continued treatment until disease progression, relapse, unacceptable toxicity, or lack of response. Dose reductions occurred for unresolved grade >3 adverse events (per NCI CTCAE) or delayed count recovery. The primary endpoint was improvement in overall response rate (ORR), by intention to treat and reviewed centrally, of one of the combination arms vs. AZA monotherapy per 2006 International Working Group MDS response criteria (complete response (CR) + partial response (PR) + hematologic improvement (HI)). Relapse-free survival (RFS) was from time of response. The study had 81% power to detect a 20% improvement in ORR from 35% to 55%. Results: Of 282 pts enrolled from 3/12–6/14, 276 are included in analyses (6 ineligible pts excluded): 92 on the AZA arm, 93 on AZA+LEN, and 91 on AZA+VOR. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced across arms (Table). Pts received a median of 23 weeks of therapy: 25 of AZA; 24 of AZA+LEN; and 20 of AZA+VOR and were followed for a median of 9 months (range: 0-26). Numbers of pts with notable adverse events >grade 3 for AZA:AZA+LEN:AZA+VOR included febrile neutropenia (10:13:13); gastrointestinal disorders (4:11:23); infections (2:3:3); and rash (2:12:1). Responses were assessable in 260 pts (94%). ORR for the entire cohort was 33%: 19% CR, 1% PR, and 13% HI, with a median RFS of 7 months. ORR was similar across study arms: 36% for AZA, 37% for AZA+LEN (p=1.0 vs. AZA), and 22% for AZA+VOR (p=.07 vs. AZA). CR/PR/HI rates across arms were also similar: 23%/0%/13% for AZA; 18%/1%/17% for AZA+LEN (CR p=.47 vs. AZA); and 14%/1%/7% for AZA+VOR (CR p=.18 vs. AZA); rates of bone marrow exams to assess response were 76%, 67%, and 73%, respectively. HI-P/HI-E/HI-N rates were 21%/15%/5% for AZA, 26%/14%/15% for AZA+LEN, and 12%/8%/4% for AZA+VOR. HI-N rates were higher in AZA+LEN vs. AZA (p=.05) but otherwise were similar across arms. Median time to best response across arms was 15 weeks in AZA, 16 weeks in AZA+LEN, and 16 weeks in AZA+VOR. ORR did not vary significantly across arms in subgroup analyses for tMDS, baseline red blood cell (RBC) transfusion dependence, and by IPSS risk group. ORR for CMML pts for AZA:AZA+LEN:AZA+VOR was 33%:53%(p=.15 vs. AZA):12%(p=.41 vs. AZA). Allogeneic transplantation rates were: 7 pts on AZA, 6 on AZA+LEN, and 9 on AZA+VOR. For AZA:AZA+LEN:AZA+VOR, median RFS was: 6:8:11 months (log-rank p=.3 for combination arms vs. AZA, Figure); and for pts on therapy >6 months, it was 7:7.5:13 months (log-rank p=.11 for AZA+VOR, .74 for AZA+LEN vs. AZA). Conclusions: In higher-risk MDS pts, ORR was similar for AZA monotherapy compared to AZA-containing combination arms, though some subgroups may have benefitted from combination therapy. Differences in types of response may have resulted from differential rates of follow-up bone marrow assessments. While a non-significant signal of a DFS advantage for combination therapy was observed, longer-term outcome data are being assessed. Table Table. Figure Figure. Disclosures Sekeres: Boehringer-Ingelheim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: lenalidomide, vorinostat for higher-risk MDS. List:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Gore:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Attar:Celgene: Consultancy. Erba:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Successful Discontinuation of Eltrombopag Treatment in Patients with Chronic ITP

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1085-1085 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Leven ◽  
Allison Miller ◽  
Nayla Boulad ◽  
Anis Haider ◽  
James B Bussel
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Count ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Rescue Therapy ◽  
Primary Response ◽  
Additional Treatment ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Platelet Counts ◽  
Rescue Treatment ◽  
Immature Platelet Fraction

Abstract Abstract 1085 Introduction: Patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) commonly experience platelet increases while under treatment with thrombopoietin-receptor agonists (TPO-RA). Anecdotal evidence suggests certain patients have been able to discontinue TPO-RA and still maintain platelet counts above baseline without additional treatment. This prospective ongoing study was designed to investigate the frequency and characteristics of patients exhibiting sustained responses after electively discontinuing eltrombopag (a TPO-RA) without substituting additional therapy. Methods: Enrolled patients were required to have ITP defined by consensus guidelines (Provan, Blood, 2009) for at least 6 months and must have been taking eltrombopag for a minimum of 4 months prior to starting this observational study. Rescue therapy is permitted once in the first 4 weeks off eltrombopag. The primary response endpoint was prospectively defined as a platelet count of ≥30,000/μl and ≥20,000/μl above initial baseline for 6 months off eltrombopag without intervening treatment (other than rescue). The secondary endpoint was being stably off therapy at 4 weeks after discontinuing eltrombopag. All patients who meet the 2 inclusion criteria (ITP for 6 months and eltrombopag for 4 months) are eligible for the study. Results: Fifteen patients are currently enrolled. Ages range from 3 to 86 years, median 55 years, with 10 females. There are 5 responders of 5 months or more (3 females, 2 males) and 10 non-responders (7 females, 3 males). Four of 5 responders have been off therapy for 6 months or more; the fifth “responder” has been off therapy for 5 months, with platelet counts ≥195,000/μL (figure 1). Responders are aged 19–86 years and have had ITP for 5–34 years; all had been on eltrombopag for > 2 years. Two responders were splenectomized and all had 3 or more prior therapies. One responder and 9 non-responders received rescue treatment in the first 4 weeks. One patient was a responder at 4 weeks, but she lost her response before reaching 6 months off-treatment. Factors not significantly associated with response were: age, duration of ITP, duration of eltrombopag therapy, splenectomy status, number of prior ITP treatments, bleeding history, and platelet count at the time that eltrombopag was discontinued. However, a lower absolute immature platelet fraction (AIPF) value at cessation of eltrombopag was seen in responders (fig 2, p=0.022). AIPF data for 1 non-responder is not available. An AIPF of 900 × 10/μl at the time of discontinuation of eltrombopag exceeds the AIPF of all 5 responders, but also of 3 of 9 non-responders. Conclusions: A substantial fraction of patients with ITP treated with eltrombopag, approximately 1/3, appear able to discontinue eltrombopag treatment and nonetheless maintain an at least adequate platelet count indefinitely (at the very least 6 months). Similar preliminary data has been reported with romiplostim (EHA and ASH abstracts). AIPF values (platelet retics) may better predict a patient's likelihood of successfully stopping therapy than other variables such as those listed above. Disclosures: Bussel: Amgen: Family owns Amgen stock Other, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cangene: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Family owns GSK stock, Family owns GSK stock Other, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; IgG of America: Research Funding; Immunomedics: Research Funding; Ligand: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Eisai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Shionogi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sysmex: Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy. Off Label Use: The use of romiplostim in pediatric patients was examined in this study.

Phase II Study Of The c-MET Inhibitor ARQ 197 (Tivantinib) In Patients With Relapsed Or Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1953-1953
Author(s):  
Robert Z. Orlowski ◽  
Shadia Zaman ◽  
Sheeba K. Thomas ◽  
Raymond Alexanian ◽  
Jatin J. Shah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Arq 197 ◽  
Met Inhibitor ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background c-MET receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) activity has been implicated in establishing the oncogenic phenotype across several human cancers with high levels of the activating c-MET ligand, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF). Malignant plasma cells secrete HGF-activator (HGFA), which converts HGF to its active form, and high HGF levels are correlated with a poor prognosis in multiple myeloma. Syndecan 1 (CD138) on malignant plasma cells binds HGF and potentiates interleukin-6-induced growth and migration. HGF stimulation of myeloma cells also activates autophosphorylation of c-MET and other critical downstream signaling pathways promoting oncogenesis. Finally, pre-clinical studies have shown that suppression of c-MET signaling with a number of small molecules, including ARQ 197, induced myeloma cell apoptosis. Tivantinib-mediated cytotoxic response was observed at concentrations of less than 5 µM, which are achievable in the clinic. These findings supported the hypothesis that suppression of the HGF/c-MET signaling axis could be a rational strategy against RRMM. Methods In this phase II study, the efficacy and safety of ARQ 197, a non-competitive and highly selective inhibitor of the c-MET RTK, was studied in patients with RRMM. Primary objectives were to determine the overall response rate (ORR) to single-agent tivantinib in patients who had received one to four prior lines of therapy, and to define the toxicities in this population. A Simon’s Minimax 2-stage design was used for the study. ARQ 197 was administered at a starting oral dose of 360 mg twice daily with meals for each day of every 4-week treatment cycle. This dose was selected from prior phase I investigations in solid tumors, and at this dose level, steady-state plasma levels of ARQ 197 were 7 µM. Treatment could continue providing that patients did not experience undue toxicities, or disease progression. Tivantinib is provided through the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP), and this study was supported by CTEP, as well as the MD Anderson Cancer Center SPORE in Multiple Myeloma. Results A total of 16 patients were enrolled and treated to date, including 9 men and 7 women, who had received a median of 1 prior line of therapy (range 1-3), including stem cell transplant in ten. The mean patient age was 66 (range 49-76), with ethnicity including 13 Caucasian Americans, 2 African Americans, and 1 Asian American. Patients have received a median of 3 cycles of therapy to date (1-11) with one patient continuing on study, and all were evaluable for toxicity, while 11 were evaluable for response based on having completed two treatment cycles. The most common adverse events (AEs) of any grade seen in at least 25% of patients and felt to be at least possibly drug related included fatigue or decreased neutrophils (94% each), pain (81%), myalgias (56%), diarrhea (38%), memory impairment, respiratory disorders, and rash (31% each), and hypertension (25%), and these were predominantly grade 1 or 2. Grade 3 or 4 AEs included neutropenia (31% and 25%, respectively), syncope, infection, pain (13% of each, all grade 3), and anal fissure, cough, fatigue, hypertension, and pulmonary embolism (6% each, all grade 3). Stable disease (SD) has been seen as the best response in 4/11 (36%) evaluable patients, which was maintained for up to 11 cycles, while the remaining patients showed evidence of disease progression. Conclusion Single-agent tivantinib has been well tolerated in patients with RRMM, and the ability to achieve stable disease in patients with previously progressing myeloma does support the possibility that targeting c-MET has some promise. Future studies with rationally designed combination regimens incorporating a c-MET inhibitor and other novel agents may better define the role of this class of drugs in our armamentarium against myeloma. Disclosures: Orlowski: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Resverlogix: Research Funding; Array Biopharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Thomas:Millenium: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Immunomedics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shah:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Array: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millenium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding.

An Interim Analysis Of a Phase 2, Single-Arm Study Of Platelet Responses and Remission Rates In Patients With Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) Receiving Romiplostim

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1074-1074 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Stasi ◽  
Adrian Newland ◽  
Bertrand Godeau ◽  
Victor Priego ◽  
Jean-Francois Viallard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Count ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Treatment Period ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Alternative Therapy ◽  
Platelet Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Platelet Counts

Abstract Background We describe here platelet response and remission observed with romiplostim treatment in patients with ITP. Methods Patients with an ITP diagnosis for less than 6 months who received first-line therapies only (ie, corticosteroids, IVIG, anti-D) received QW romiplostim for up to 12 months in the treatment period (Fig 1). The primary objective was to describe the number of months with a platelet response during the 12-month treatment period; secondary objectives included incidence of ITP remission and splenectomy. The romiplostim dose was increased QW by 1 μg/kg from 1 μg/kg up to 10 μg/kg to reach a platelet count of ≥50x109/L, adjusting to maintain a platelet count of 50-200x109/L. Patients who maintained platelet counts ≥50x109/L on romiplostim only entered a dose-tapering period in which the romiplostim dose was decreased by 1 μg/kg Q2W as long as platelet counts remained ≥50x109/L. Starting when the dose tapered to 0 during either the 12-month treatment period or at the end of the dose-tapering period, patients were followed to determine whether they had ITP remission (24 weeks platelet counts ≥50x109/L without any treatment for ITP, including romiplostim). At the end of 12 months, patients who 1) had platelet counts ≤20x109/L for <4 consecutive weeks, 2) had platelet counts of 20-50x109/L, and/or 3) were receiving treatment for ITP besides romiplostim had the option to enter a stabilization period (≤8 weeks) while the investigator determined suitable post-study therapy. Patients with platelet counts ≤20x109/L for ≥4 consecutive weeks on the highest romiplostim dose were discontinued from the study for non-response. Interim data up to March 2013 are reported here. Results Of the patient population (N = 71), 59.2% were women, median (Q1, Q3) age was 37 (28, 56) years, median (Q1, Q3) time since ITP diagnosis was 2.2 (0.9, 4.4) months, and median (Q1, Q3) platelet count at screening was 20 (12, 25) x109/L. Past treatments included steroids (96%), IVIG (42%), and anti-D (1%). Prior to the study, platelet transfusions were received by 9% of patients. 30 patients (42%) completed treatment, 31 (44%) are continuing treatment, and 10 (14%) discontinued romiplostim (due to consent withdrawn n = 2, adverse event n = 3, requirement for alternative therapy n = 3, lost to follow-up n = 1, death n = 1). Patients had a median (Q1, Q3) of 51 (34, 52) weeks of treatment with a median (Q1, Q3) average QW dose of 2.1 (1, 3.8) μg/kg. 66 (93%) patients had a peak platelet count ≥50x109/L. The median (Q1, Q3) time with a platelet response was 9 (6, 12) months; the median (95% CI) time to platelet response was 2.1 (1.1, 3.1) weeks; platelet counts are in Fig 2. Of 38 evaluable patients (ie, known remission status), 11 (29%, 95% CI 15% to 46%) had ITP remission. One patient had a splenectomy and 6 had treatment failure (defined as platelet count ≤20x109/L for 4 consecutive weeks at 10 μg/kg QW, requirement of alternative therapy, or death). Of the 71 patients receiving romiplostim, 9 patients had serious adverse events (2 treatment-related: 1 case each of gastritis and increased transaminases). There were also 3 adverse events leading to discontinuation of romiplostim (non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, leukocytosis, and the aforementioned increased transaminases, these last 2 treatment-related). Other serious adverse events, also occurring in 1 patient each, included atrial fibrillation, dapsone syndrome, fecaloma, the aforementioned non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, pleuritic pain, and tendon rupture. There were no fatalities reported as adverse events; the death leading to discontinuation was due to cerebral hemorrhage which began before the patient received romiplostim. The most common adverse events were headache (17%), arthralgia (13%), and nasopharyngitis (10%). The most common hemorrhage adverse events were hematoma (7%), petechiae (7%), and epistaxis (7%). No bone marrow findings were reported. Conclusions In this trial, patients with an ITP diagnosis for less than 6 months treated with romiplostim had a high response rate (over 90%), with platelet responses occurring quickly (median time to response of 2 weeks) and median number of months with a platelet response of 9 months. To date, 29% of evaluable patients have shown remission (24 weeks of platelet counts ≥50x109/L without any ITP treatment). There were no new safety signals. Updated data from this ongoing study will be presented in the future. Disclosures: Stasi: Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Genzyme: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Suppremol: Consultancy. Newland:Geron: Consultancy; Amgen: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Octapharma: Research Funding. Godeau:Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy; LFB: Consultancy. Jia:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lopez:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Final Results of the Phase I/II Study of Chemosensitization Using the CXCR4 Inhibitor Plerixafor in Combination with Bortezomib in Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4256-4256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene M. Ghobrial ◽  
Kenneth H. Shain ◽  
Jacob Laubach ◽  
Patrick Henrick ◽  
James Vredenburg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Recommended Dose ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine activity and safety of the CXCR4 inhibitor plerixafor in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM). This was based on our preclinical studies showing that plerixafor (Mozobil, Sanofi Corporation) induces de-adhesion of MM cells and sensitization to bortezomib in preclinical animal models. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Theprimary endpoint of the phase I study was the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and for the phase II study, the safety and response rate of the combination. Eligibility criteria included patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory MM with 1-5 prior lines of therapy including bortezomib (unless patients were refractory to bortezomib). The phase I included 8 cohorts with different doses and two treatment schedules. In cohorts 1-5, patients received plerixafor at the recommended dose sq on days 1-6 of each cycle and bortezomib at the recommended dose twice a week on days 3, 6, 10, and 13 every 21 days. In cohort 5b-6, plerixafor was given at the recommended dose sq on days 1, 3, 6, 10, and 13 and bortezomib was given at the recommended dose twice a week on days 3, 6, 10, and 13 every 21 days. For the phase II portion patients received plerixafor at the MTD established in phase I of trial, 320 mcg/kg sq on days 1, 2, 3, 6, 10, and 13. Bortezomib was given 1.3 mg/m2 IV or sq twice a week on days 3, 6, 10, 13, every 21 days. Dexamethasone was given at 40mg on days of Bortezomib. RESULTS: A total of 58 patients were enrolled on this study from June 2009 to March 2015, with 25 on the phase I and 33 on the phase II study. In the phase I study, the median age was 60 years (range, 43-85), the median number of prior therapies was 2 (range, 1-4), with all but 3 patients receiving prior bortezomib. The median number of cycles on therapy was 4 (1-12). Dose limiting toxicities including insomnia, restlessness, and psychosis were observed in two patients at dose level 6 (plerixafor 0.40 mg/kg and bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2). Therefore, 3 additional patients were enrolled at dose level 5b (plerixafor 0.32 mg/kg and bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2). There were no grade 4 toxicities. Grade 3 toxicities included lymphopenia (40%), hypophosphatemia (20%), anemia (10%), hyponatremia (10%), hypercalcemia (10%), and bone fracture due to myeloma bone disease (10%). Twenty-three patients were evaluable for response, including 1 (4%) complete response (CR), 1 (4%) very good partial response (VGPR), 1 partial remission (PR) and 2 (9%) MR, and 15 (65%) having stable disease with only 3 (13%) progressive disease (PD). In the phase II study, the median age was 63 (46-83). The median number of prior therapies was 2 (1-5), with 22 (66%) who have received prior bortezomib. The median number of cycles on therapy is 5 (1-24). The response rate included 5 VGPR (16%), 11 PR (35%) with an overall response rate of 51% and another 11 (35%) stable disease. Grade 3/4 toxicities included thrombocytopenia (68%), lymphopenia (6%), hypophosphatemia (2%), anemia (4%), infections (4%), hyponatremia (2%), hypercalcemia (2%) and neurological toxicity (2%). We also examined in vivo mobilization of plasma cells, CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells and other accessory bone marrow cells. Analysis of these samples showed rapid mobilization of plasma cells at 2 hours post-plerixafor with a rapid return to normal levels at 4 and 24 hours post plerixafor. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of plerixafor and bortezomib is generally well tolerated with minimal neuropathy or other toxicities seen to date. The responses observed are strongly encouraging with 51% ORR in this relapsed and refractory population. This study was supported by R01CA133799-01, and by Sanofi and Takeda Corporations. Disclosures Off Label Use: Plerixafor in myeloma. Azab:Verastem: Research Funding; Selexys: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Cell Works: Research Funding; Targeted Therapeutics LLC: Other: Founder and owner . Schlossman:Millennium: Consultancy. Richardson:Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gentium S.p.A.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Preliminary Results from a Phase II Study of the Combination of Pevonedistat and Azacitidine in the Treatment of MDS and MDS/MPN after Failure of DNA Methyltransferase Inhibition

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4236-4236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamara K Moyo ◽  
Justin M. Watts ◽  
Barry S. Skikne ◽  
Jason H. Mendler ◽  
Virginia M. Klimek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Experienced Grade

After failure of DNA methyltransferase inhibition (DNMTi) there is no standard of care therapy for high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and median survival for higher risk disease is less than 6 months (Prebet et al, JCO 2011; Jabbour et al, Cancer 2015). Pevonedistat, a first in human small molecule inhibitor of the NEDD8 activating enzyme (NAE), downregulates Cullin ring ligases (CRL) which interferes with the shuttling and degradation of proteins in the proteasome and leads to accumulation of CRL substrates. Combining pevonedistat (Pev) with azacitidine (AZA) resulted in synergistic cell killing in in vitro and xenograft models of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (Smith et al, Blood 2011), elicited favorable response rates in treatment naïve elderly or unfit AML patients (Swords et al Blood 2018), and is currently under study in treatment-naïve MDS. The study presented herein (NCT03238248) investigates the utility of adding pevonedistat to azacitidine (PevAz) after DNMTi failure in MDS and MDS/MPN overlap syndromes. Methods: In this on-going single-arm phase II study, MDS and MDS/MPN patients were eligible if they were refractory to DNMTi treatment, progressing after at least 2 cycles of therapy; had failed to achieve a complete remission (CR) after at least 4 cycles of DNMTi therapy; or had relapsed after an initial response to DNMTi therapy. Enrolled subjects received AZA 75mg/m2 sc/iv daily on days 1-5 and Pev 20mg/m2 iv on days 1, 3 and 5 of each 28-day cycle. Survival is the primary endpoint and is assessed at regularly scheduled study visits and every 3 months after ending protocol-directed therapy. Hematologic and bone marrow response rates are secondary endpoints. Responses to treatment are determined by the MDS International Working Group (IWG) response criteria (Cheson et al, Blood 2006) or for MDS/MPN, by the modified MDS/MPN IWG response criteria (Savona et al, Blood 2015). Results: As of the data cutoff on 15 MAR 2019, 23 subjects (21 with MDS, 2 with MDS/MPN) had enrolled and initiated treatment. Subjects had previously been treated with AZA (n=11/23), decitabine (n=11/23), and ASTX727 (n=4/23); some subjects had been treated with more than one DNMTi prior to enrollment. Median number of cycles of any prior DNMTi therapy was 7 (range 2-35). 65% of subjects were female. Median age at enrollment was 67 years (range 51 - 85). 65% had Intermediate-2 or High risk disease by IPSS at time of enrollment. Median number of PevAz cycles completed prior to the data cutoff was 4 (range 1-19). One subject had not reached the first response assessment at the time of the data cutoff and data was unavailable for one subject. The overall response rate including complete and partial remission, hematologic improvement and clinical benefit (CB) was 42.9% (9/21), and CR rate (including 1 CR + 4 marrow CR) was 23.8% (5/21) with a median duration of response (DOR) of 8.7m (range 2.8m-15.7m). An additional 38.1% (8/21) had stable disease as best response (Table 1). The most common Grade >2 adverse events (any attribution) include thrombocytopenia (39%), anemia (35%), leukopenia (26%), neutropenia (22%), infections (17%), and febrile neutropenia (13%). Six subjects experienced Grade ≤ 2 elevations in AST/ALT and 4 had Grade ≤ 2 elevation in bilirubin, whereas only one subject experienced Grade > 2 LFT abnormality (increase in ALT). There was one death on study due to intracerebral hemorrhage related to a previously undiagnosed metastatic carcinoma. PevAz treatment was discontinued in other subjects due to disease progression (n=7), adverse event (n=1), lack of response (n=1), or to pursue allogeneic stem cell transplant after achieving a satisfactory response to PevAz (n=3). Ten subjects were continuing PevAz therapy on study as of the data cutoff. Summary: PevAz was well-tolerated in MDS and MDS/MPN patients who had previously failed DNMTi, with the most common adverse events of cytopenias, which are a common feature of these diseases. 5/21 subjects achieved CR/mCR with meaningful DOR, and the ORR of 42.9% exceeded expectations for MDS patients with previous failure of DNMTi therapy; both MDS/MPN patients responded with CR and CB. For these patients whose treatment options are limited and prognosis very poor, these preliminary data are especially encouraging and warrant further investigation. This therapy combination is being tested in a phase 3 study in treatment naïve high risk MDS, CMML and low-blast AML. Disclosures Watts: Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Research Funding. Strickland:Astellas Pharma: Consultancy; Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Byrne:Karyopharm: Research Funding. Bradley:AbbVie: Other: Advisory Board. Savona:Sunesis: Research Funding; Selvita: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boehringer Ingelheim: Patents & Royalties.

Comparison of Splenectomy and Treatment Failure Incidence in Nonsplenectomized Patients with Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) Receiving Romiplostim or Medical Standard of Care: 1-Year Treatment and 6-Month Safety Follow-up.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 679-679 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J Kuter ◽  
Mathias J Rummel ◽  
Ralph Vincent Boccia ◽  
B. Gail Macik ◽  
Ingrid Pabinger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Count ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Actual Incidence

Abstract Abstract 679 Chronic ITP is an autoimmune disease characterized by low platelet counts due to both increased platelet destruction and suboptimal platelet production. Immunosuppressive ITP therapies have variable response rates and may be associated with substantial side effects, limiting their use for long-term treatment. Romiplostim is a novel peptibody that increases platelet counts by a mechanism similar to thrombopoietin, and is approved for the treatment of chronic ITP. We present final results from a phase 3b, randomized, open-label study, comparing the incidence of splenectomy and treatment failure in adult nonsplenectomized ITP patients receiving either romiplostim or medical standard of care (SOC). Patients were randomized (2:1) to romiplostim or SOC. Eligible patients had a platelet count <50 × 109/L. Once-weekly subcutaneous romiplostim was administered with dose adjustments to target a platelet count between 50 and 200 × 109/L. SOC treatments were prescribed according to standard institutional practices or therapeutic guidelines; the only treatments not allowed were investigational agents (rituximab was allowed) or other thrombopoietic agents. Patients received romiplostim or SOC for 52 weeks, and those who did not subsequently transfer to another romiplostim study completed a 6-month off-treatment safety follow-up. Co-primary endpoints of the study were: the incidence of splenectomy and the incidence of treatment failure (defined as: platelet count ≤20 × 109/L for 4 consecutive weeks at the highest recommended dose and schedule, or major bleeding event, or change in therapy due to intolerable side-effect or bleeding symptoms). Patients who discontinued study during the treatment period were counted as having had splenectomy or treatment failure. To assess the impact of treatment discontinuation on the primary endpoints, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine the actual incidence of splenectomy or treatment failure. A total of 234 patients were randomized (romiplostim, 157; SOC, 77); 83% of romiplostim and 66% of SOC patients completed the study. Patients had been diagnosed with ITP for a median of 2 years (range 0.01 to 44 years) and 73% had received ≥2 prior ITP therapies. Patient characteristics were similar between treatment groups. The efficacy of romiplostim was significantly greater than that of SOC in both primary endpoint analyses. The incidence of splenectomy was 9% (14/157) in the romiplostim group compared to 36% (28/77) in the SOC group (OR, 0.17; 0.08, 0.35; p<0.0001), and the incidence of treatment failure was 12% (18/157) in the romiplostim group compared to 30% (23/77) in the SOC group (OR, 0.31; 0.15, 0.61; p=0.0005). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the primary endpoint analyses: the actual incidence of splenectomy was significantly lower in the romiplostim group (2/157, 1%) than the SOC group (15/77, 20%) [p<0.0001], and the actual incidence of treatment failure was significantly lower in the romiplostim group (6/157, 4%) than the SOC group (10/77, 13%) [p=0.009]. The incidence of bleeding events with a worst grade score ≥3 appeared lower for patients in the romiplostim group (3%) than the SOC group (7%). Safety analyses included only patients who received ≥1 dose of romiplostim or 1 type of SOC. During the 52-week treatment period, adverse events occurred in 96% (147/154) of patients receiving romiplostim and 92% (69/75) of patients receiving SOC. Serious adverse events occurred in 23% (35/154) of romiplostim and 37% (28/75) of SOC patients; serious adverse events were considered treatment-related in 5% (7/154) of romiplostim and 8% (6/75) of SOC patients. During the 6-month safety follow-up period, 36% (11/31) of romiplostim and 43% (18/42) of SOC patients experienced an adverse event; treatment-related adverse events occurred in none of the romiplostim patients and 2 of the SOC patients. Overall, 6 patients died: 1 (1%) in the romiplostim group and 5 (7%) in the SOC group. None of the deaths were considered related to study treatment or the underlying ITP. No patients tested positive for neutralizing antibodies to romiplostim or TPO. One romiplostim-treated patient showed an increase in bone marrow reticulin that was still within the normal range (Grade 2). In summary, romiplostim significantly reduced incidences of splenectomy and treatment failure in nonsplenectomized ITP patients compared to SOC. The safety profile of romiplostim was similar to SOC. Disclosures: Kuter: Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Esehi: Consultancy; Shionagi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; ONO: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; MGI Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ligand: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Rummel:Amgen Inc.: Speakers Bureau; GlaxoSmithKline: Speakers Bureau. Boccia:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Macik:Amgen Inc.: Research Funding; Eisai Inc.: Research Funding. Pabinger:Amgen Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Selleslag:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; GlaxoSmithKline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Rodeghiero:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Shionogi: Speakers Bureau. Chong:Commonwealth Serum Laboratory (CSL): Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Müller-Beiβenhirtz:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy. Gehl:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wang:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Berger:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Thrombopoietic Agents in the Treatment of Childhood Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP): Clinical Treatment At 2 Centers

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2230-2230
Author(s):  
Kavitha Ramaswamy ◽  
Loan Hsieh ◽  
Hatice Melda Ürekli ◽  
Diane J. Nugent ◽  
James B Bussel
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Platelet Count ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Rescue Therapy ◽  
Bone Marrow Fibrosis ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Marrow Fibrosis

Abstract Abstract 2230 Introduction: Thrombopoietic agents (TPO-A) are widely used in adults for difficult ITP. However only 1 study has been published describing the use of a TPO mimetic (Nplate) in 22 children with ITP. This study is a post hoc analysis of 32 children (<21yr) who received clinical treatment (off study) with either Nplate or Promacta. Methods: All children described are from 2 centers:,Weill Cornell in New York (n=22, 9 on Nplate, 13 on Promacta) and Childrens Hospital Orange County (10, all on Nplate). All patients in this abstract were treated off study although some had previously participated in the AMGEN195 (Pediatric) followed by AMGEN 213 (long term maintenance) studies. Responses (taken from the published study) were defined as platelet count (plt ct) > 50k on 2 consecutive weeks, plt increase ≥ 20k on 2 consecutive weeks, and the percent of weeks at ≤ 50k independent of rescue therapy. Rescue therapy e.g. IVIG, steroids, plt transfusion, resulted in counts being considered “non-responder” for 2 full weeks after initiation of treatment. Bone marrows were evaluated for reticulin fibrosis (RF) using consensus grades 0–3. Several patients had more than one marrow during treatment; in these cases, the most recent on-therapy marrow was used. Results: The median age of patients on Nplate was 10 years of age (2–19) while for those on Promacta it was 16 years (5–19). Of the 32 patients treated with TPO-A, 24 responded with a plt ct ≥ 50k twice; 19/32 received Nplate and 15/19 responded; 13/32 received Promacta and 9/13 responded. Plt increases ≥ 20k were seen in 23 of 32 patients. The number of patients whose platelet count was ≥ 50k for at least 50 percent of visits was 20/32. The mean number of previous treatments for responders to Nplate was 3.2 while for Nplate non-responders it was 2.25. For Promacta, the mean for responders was 2.9 treatments and for non-responders 3 treatments. Younger patients did not seem to respond as well to treatment with either TPO-A (see table). Nplate patients received treatment for a mean of 19.2 weeks; for patients treated with Promacta it was 13.7 weeks. Baseline bone marrows were available in 17 patients of whom 6 had grade 1 reticulin fibrosis (RF). There were 10 children with marrows performed after the start of TPO-A: 2 with RF score=0, 7 with score=1+, and 1 with score=2+ Adverse events (AEs) other than bone marrow fibrosis and bleeding (lack of efficacy) were all 1–2+ and not related to TPO-A. In particular, no thrombosis or development of malignancy was seen. In conclusion, TPO-A were an effective treatment of chronic ITP in the 32 consecutive children retrospectively analyzed here from 2 centers. Younger children in this study seemed not to respond as well as older children, in contrast to small numbers of young children in published data who responded very well. No major changes were seen in the bone marrows but a formal baseline and on therapy study in children is needed to assess this issue. AEs were infrequent and tolerable. Additional studies with both Nplate and Promacta, either planned or in progress, are needed to clarify the response rates, AEs eg bone marrow fibrosis, and effects in subgroups of children. Disclosures: Bussel: Portola: Consultancy; Eisai: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Cangene: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; Immunomedics: Research Funding; Ligand: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Shionogi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sysmex: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Mitoxantrone, Etoposide and Cytarabine (MEC) Can Induce Deep Complete Remission and Is an Effective Bridge Therapy to Allotransplantation (SCT) in Refractory/Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Patients

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4036-4036
Author(s):  
Giovanni Marconi ◽  
Annalisa Talami ◽  
Maria Chiara Abbenante ◽  
Stefania Paolini ◽  
Chiara Sartor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Rescue Therapy ◽  
Treatment Schedule ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Number Of Patients

Abstract Introduction Relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML patients continue to be a formidable clinical challenge, mainly in consideration of associated very poor outcome, with a median overall survival (OS) of less than 12 months. SCT represents the only curative option for these patients. Although, there is no standard-of-care approach which may serve as a bridge to SCT. Our study aims to investigate the effectiveness of MEC regimen as a rescue therapy for R/R AML patients by specifically addressing the CR rate, including minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity, the number of patients who subsequently underwent SCT and the presence of predictive factors of response. Methods Fifty-five consecutive adult AML patients were treated with MEC regimen in our Institution. In patients under 66 years old, we administered mitoxantrone 6 mg/sqm/die from day 1 to day 6, etoposide 100 mg/sqm/die from day 1 to day 6 and cytarabine 1000mg/sqm/die from day 1 to day 6, whereas in patients over 66 years old, the treatment schedule was reduced to 4 consecutive days. Data were retrospectively collected by using RedCap in accordance with Helsinki declaration and GCP. We used Kaplan-Meyer to estimate survival, and log rank to test differences in survival. Chi-squared, fisher's exact test and linear-by-linear correlation were used to test differences in proportions and distributions. Response was defined in accordance with 2017 ELN recommendations. CTCAE 4.03 was used to grade adverse events. MRD was assessed with WT1 or specific fusion transcripts. Results Fifty-five patients received MEC from 2008 to 2018. Age at diagnosis ranged from 17 to 72 years, with a median age of 51 years. Our set was enriched for high-risk patients. Interestingly, twenty percent of patients harbored FLT3-ITD at diagnosis (table 1). Two main groups were included: resistant AML, 28/55 patients (50,9%), and relapsed AML, 27/55 patients (49,1%). At induction, almost half of patients received "3+7" (n=25, 45,5%), while fludarabine-based regimens were administered to 14 patients (25,5%). In our set, after MEC median duration of hospitalization was 30 days (14-78); PMN >500/mm3 was reached after 26 days (range 18-67). Fever and febrile neutropenia was the most recurrent adverse events (AE). AEs were low in grade; out of 80 graded AEs, 38 (47,5%) were grade 2, 27 (33,8%) were grade 3, 9 (11,3%) were grade 4 and only 3 events resulted in death (3,8%). E. coli was the most recurrent cause of infection (10 cases). Overall, 25/55 patients (45,5%) achieved a complete remission (CR) after one course of MEC chemotherapy. Twelve patients (21.9%) achieved MRD negativity and 13 patients (23,6%) obtained an MRD+ CR or had no MRD test. Six patients (10,9%) had a partial response (PR) and 1 patient (1,8%)had hematological improvement (HI). Four patients (7.3%) died during post-MEC aplastic phase. Disease risk at diagnosis and R/R status did not influence the chance to obtain CR (figure 1 A). In 12 patients, a second MEC was administered. Four out of 12 patient improved their response with the 2nd MEC (2 patients obtained MRD - from MRD+ CR, 1 patient obtained PR and 1 patients obtained CR from hematological improvement). MEC was an effective bridge to SCT, 32/55 patients (58,2%, figure 1 B), received SCT; 15/32 patients (46,9%) received SCT directly after the 1st course of MEC, 9/32 patients (28,1%) after the 2nd course of MEC and 2 patients (6,3%) after an additional course of post-remission chemotherapy. Of note, only 6 patients (18,8%), who were not responsive to MEC, underwent SCT after an alternative rescue therapy. Median overall survival (OS) from MEC was 455 days (95% C.I. 307-602 days.); 1-year OS, 3-year OS and 5-years OS were 57,9%, 33,2% and 23,1%, respectively (std. error ± 0,067). Patients who responded to MEC (CR MRD+ or CR MRD- after 1 or 2 courses) had better OS than non-responders (median OS 1389 vs 160 days, p=.003). Stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis with COX-HR model established that pre-MEC R/R status, diagnosis class risk, response to one or two courses of MEC, and SCT were independent predictors of survival in the optimal model. Conclusions Taken together, our data indicate that MEC is an effective salvage regimen with affordable toxicity, and gives a high chance to obtain CR. MEC is particularly useful as a bridge to SCT, and has to be considered as a rescue therapy whenever a clinical trial is not available. *GM and AT equally contributed Disclosures Martinelli: Ariad/incyte: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy. Cavo:Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Pracinostat in Combination with Azacitidine Produces a High Rate and Rapid Onset of Disease Remission in Patients with Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 947-947 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
Ehab Atallah ◽  
Olatoyosi Odenike ◽  
Bruno C Medeiros ◽  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Null Hypothesis ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract Background: Pracinostat is a potent oral inhibitor of histone deacetylases (HDAC’s), selective for class I, II and IV isoforms. In-vitro cytotoxicity assays in AML cell lines revealed an IC50 of <0.1µM, and the combination with azacitidine was synergistic (CI=0.44). A Phase I study of single agent pracinostat showed activity in AML and a pilot Phase II study of pracinostat in combination with azacitidine in higher risk MDS demonstrated a complete response (CR)/CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) rate of 89% (Proc ASH:3821, 2012). We report initial results from a Phase II study of pracinostat with azacitidine in previously untreated, elderly AML. Methods: Eligibility includes previously untreated AML (≥ 20% bone marrow blasts), age ≥65 years, deemed inappropriate for intensive induction therapy, with intermediate or high risk cytogenetics based on SWOG criteria. De-novo, treatment-related, or AML evolved from an antecedent hematologic disorder (AHD) are allowed. Pracinostat is administered orally (60 mg) 3 days a week (e.g., Monday, Wednesday, Friday) for 3 weeks followed by a 1 week break. Azacitidine is administered subcutaneously or intravenously (75 mg/m2) day 1-7 or day 1-5 and 8-9 of each 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint is CR+CRi+ morphologic leukemia free state (MLFS) according to IWG criteria. Response assessments occur at the end of cycle 1 or 2 followed by every other cycle or when clinically indicated. A Simon 2-stage statistical design is utilized with the following assumptions: null=0.10, alternate=0.25, α=0.10, power=0.90. Transition from stage 1 to 2 requires ≥ 3/27 response events; the null hypothesis will be rejected if ≥ 7 response events are observed in the total planned sample of 40 patients. Results: As of August 01, 2014, 21 patients have been enrolled from 12 study sites and are evaluable for safety; 14 are evaluable for efficacy (Table 1), and 7 are ‘too early’ for response assessment. Baseline disease characteristics include: median age 77 (range 69-84); 16 de novo AML, 4 evolved from AHD, 1 treatment related; 11 intermediate-risk, 8 high-risk cytogenetics, and 2 are pending; baseline bone marrow blast counts ranged from 22% to 89%. The primary endpoint of CR +CRi+MLFS was observed in 8 of 14 evaluable patients (57%), the majority after 1 or 2 cycles. No responders have progressed. The most common treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE) were neutropenia/neutropenic fever (n=15), thrombocytopenia (n=12), nausea (n=10), fatigue (n=8), and anemia (n=7). Serious adverse events include febrile neutropenia (n=6) and pulmonary infiltrate/pneumonia (n=2). Three patients discontinued study therapy due to a TEAE, including one each with cellulitis, bacteremia, and subdural hematoma after a fall. There have been 3 deaths on study: 1 bacteremia, 1 subdural hematoma, and 1 progressive disease. Abstract 947. Table 1 Patient Number Days on Study Baseline BM Blast % 1st On-Study BM Blast % Subsequent On-Study BM Blast % Best Response on Study 2 172+ 22 1 (C2) --- CR 3 165+ 24 4 (C1) 0 (C4) CRi 5 162+ 27 9 (C1) 1 (C4) CRi 6 156+ 81 9 (C1) 0 (C4) CRi 7 148+ 78 44 (C1) 17 (C3), 0 (C5) CR 8 114+ 89 4 (C1) --- CR 10 86+ 45 3 (C1) --- CRi 12 81+ 41 2 (C2) --- CRi 4 90 22 43 (C2) Off due to SAE SD 11 56 37 60 (C2) --- PD 15 28 70 --- Patient Withdrew 17 28 60 --- PD 1 26 70 --- Off due to AE 9 26 38 --- Off due to AE +=Patients continue on study; C=cycle; SD=Stable Disease; PD=Progressive Disease Conclusions: The study has achieved the primary goal of rejecting the null hypothesis. The CR+CRi +MLFS response rate estimate of 57% is high compared to historical results with hypomethylating agents alone in this population, and the responses occur rapidly, most within the first 2 cycles. The combination appears tolerable with no unexpected toxicities. Recruitment continues to the final planned sample size of 40 to further define the tolerability and efficacy of the regimen, including remission duration. Updated data will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures Garcia-Manero: MEI Pharma, Inc.: Consultancy. Off Label Use: Azacitidine is not approved for use in acute myelogenous leukemia.. Odenike:Sanofi-Aventis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Algeta Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Suneisis Pharmaceuticals : Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Medeiros:MEI Pharma, Inc: Research Funding. Cortes:Celgene: Research Funding. Esquibel:MEI Pharma, Inc.: Employment. Cha:MEI Pharma, Inc.: Employment. Khaled:Sequenom: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document