F VIII Inhibitors in Haemophilia A Patients after Continuous Infusion of Factor VIII Concentrates.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 3100-3100
Author(s):  
Ch. von Auer ◽  
J. Oldenburg ◽  
M. von Depka ◽  
C. Escuriola-Ettinghausen ◽  
W. Kreuz ◽  
...  

Abstract Continuous infusion (CI) of coagulation factor concentrates has been used since the early 1990s. Recent reports of the occurrence of an inhibitor (inh) after CI have raised concerns about this method of treatment. We conduct a retrospective study to investigate the development of inh after CI of FVIII concentrates in Germany. 99 haemophilia treating physicians in Germany were contacted and asked to answer a questionnaire. So far data of 13 departments have been reported and analyzed. Three of these 13 centers never conducted a CI, in 5 no inh were detected and in 5 haemophilia centers 10 patients with inh development after CI were registered. 5 of these patients were suffering from severe, 1 from moderate and 4 from mild haemophilia (age between 7 months and 57 years). Indications for treatment were major bleeds and surgical procedures. Plasma derived (6) and recombinant (4) factor concentrates were given in various infusion sets. Data concerning infused amount (4300 to >100000 IE), exposure days (1 to >100) and inh characteristic (alloantibodies, 3 LR, 7 HR) were collected. Regarding the genotype, we found 4 missense-mutations, 2 intron-22-inversions, 1 small deletion, 3 were unknown. In our own center we found no inh in 81 patients with major orthopaedic surgery and bolus infusion of factor VIII concentrate compared to 2 inh in 8 patients with major orthopaedic surgery and CI of FVIII. In conclusion we found only in 2 patients the typical gene mutation for inh development. Strikingly the inh developed very often in patients with mild haemophilia. These findings agree with published results. There might be an uncommon inh-pathomechanism due to CI or patients with mild haemophilia might exhibit a much higher prevalence of inhibitor development when treated with an “intensive FVIII-treatment” such as CI.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 3198-3198
Author(s):  
Charis von Auer ◽  
Johannes Oldenburg ◽  
Manuela Krause ◽  
Wolfgang Miesbach ◽  
Inge Scharrer ◽  
...  

Abstract Continuous infusion (CI) of coagulation factor concentrates has been used in haemophilia treatment since the early 1990s. Recent reports of the occurrence of an inhibitor (inh.) after CI have raised concerns about this method of treatment. We conduct a retrospective study to investigate the development of inh. After CI of factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates in Germany and report on further study results. A questionnaire was sent to 100 haemophilia treating colleagues in Germany. So far 42 colleagues have answered, in 19 haemophilia treatment centers CI was used as treatment modality, 5 of them still use it today. Altogether 200 CI were conducted in 128 patients (pat.). In 14 pat. Inh. Development was detected. 5 of these pat. Were suffering from severe, 1 from moderate and 8 from mild haemophilia, their median age was 27 years. Indications for treatment before inh. Detection were major bleeds and surgical procedures. Plasmaderived (9) and recombinant (4) factor concentrates were given in various infusion sets. Data concerning gene mutation, exposure days, inhibitor characteristic, former change of product, concomitant medication, vaccination and blood transfusion were collected. Regarding the genotype, we found 4 missense mutations, 2 intron-22-inversions, 1 small deletion, 1 splice site mutation, 6 were unknown. In our study strikingly the inh. Developed very often in pat. With mild or moderate haemophilia and genotypes that exhibit an inh. Prevalence of < 10 %. Our further data confirm the assumption that pat. With mild haemophilia might exhibit a much higher prevalence of inh. Development when treated with an “intensive FVIII - treatment” such as CI. On the other hand there might be an uncommon inh. pathomechanism in connection with CI, resulting in a peculiar group of pat. developing the inh. after this way of application. A prospective multicenter study to investigate the inhibitor development after CI should be conducted.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4022-4022
Author(s):  
Ch. von Auer ◽  
M. Krause ◽  
W. Miesbach ◽  
I. Scharrer ◽  
G. Asmelash ◽  
...  

Abstract Previously treated patients (PTP), who have not developed an inhibitor (inh) so far, are considered to be tolerant to factor VIII and at low risk for inh development. Therefore inh detection in a PTP should raise concerns about the concomitant variables such as product neo-antigenicity or way of application. In our own center we recently detected the new development of a high responding inh to factor VIII in a 58 year old patient with severe haemophilia A. To find out about the current situation regarding inh development in PTP in Germany, we conducted a retrospective study. A questionnaire was sent to 99 haemophilia treating physicians, so far 46 of them answered. 24 PTP-inh were registered during the last 5 years. Patients had at least 20 ED and/or one change of factor concentrate. Age (9 months to 70 years, median 35), severity of haemophilia A (16 severe, 2 moderate, 6 mild), exposure days (ED 6 to >1500, median 37) and genotype (4 intron-22-inversions, 3 large deletions, 2 missense mutations, 1 stop mutation, 1 insertion, 1 small deletion, 11 unknown) were recorded. 8 different factor VIII concentrates were given during inh development (5 plasma derived, 3 recombinant). Way of application (16 bolus infusion, 3 continuous infusion, 5 times both), infused amount until inh development (3000 IU to >1 mio IU), inh characteristic (15 HR, 9 LR), concomitant diseases and medication were registered. In conclusion it became obvious that inh in PTP are still a serious and underestimated problem in haemophilia treatment today. Our patient numbers are still too small to draw conclusions concerning given F VIII products or way of application. Secondly data showed that there is a variety of PTP definitions in Germany, referring to age of pat, number of ED and former change of product. A definition from the SSC of the ISTH for PTP would be helpful. The continuous use of the German register for drug side effects would make it easier to evaluate data in the future. A prospective, not product related study should be conducted.


1990 ◽  
Vol 64 (03) ◽  
pp. 374-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Farrugia ◽  
S Douglas ◽  
J James ◽  
G Whyte ◽  
R Herrington

SummaryWe have attempted to exploit the Ca2+ -dependent stability of factor VIII in producing factor VIII concentrates of higher yield. Plasma levels of ionised calcium were increased in two ways: (a) whole blood collection into half-strength citrate CPD anticoagulant, leading to free Ca2+ levels of ca 120 µM and (b) apheresis collection of plasma which was then recalcified to free Ca2+ levels of ca 300 µM under heparin cover. Coagulation factor concentrates were prepared using model versions of our industrial scale manufacturing methods. Factor VIII yield was increased through low citrate collection. This did not compromise factor IX yield or thrombogenic potential. Use of recalcified heparinised plasma did not lead to any improvement in factor VIII yield and resulted in a marked drop in factor IX recovery, possibly from interference by heparin of factor IX binding in ion-exchange chromatography. The benefits accruable through the use of half-strength citrate CPD anticoagulant support the continued evaluation of this preservative in large scale blood collection and fractionation. The deleterious effects of heparin in charge-mediated plasma fractionations may pose serious difficulties in harvesting vitamin K dependent factors.


Haemophilia ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 662-669 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Sengupta ◽  
D. Sarkar ◽  
K. Ganguly ◽  
D. Sengupta ◽  
S. Bhaskar ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 4105-4105
Author(s):  
Charis von Auer ◽  
Johannes Oldenburg ◽  
Manuela Krause ◽  
Wolfgang Miesbach ◽  
Inge Scharrer ◽  
...  

Abstract Previously treated patients (PTP), who have not developed an inhibitor (inh.) so far, are considered to be tolerant to factor VIII and at low risk for inh. development. Therefore inh. detection in a PTP should raise concerns about the concomitant variables such as product neo-antigenicity or way of application. To find out about the current situation regarding inh. development in PTP in Germany, we conduct a retrospective study. A questionnaire was sent to 87 haemophilia treating centers, so far 46 of them answered. 28 PTP-inh. developments during the last 5 years were reported. Age of the patient (median 35), severity of haemophilia A (18 severe, 2 moderate, 8 mild), exposuer days (median 30) and gene mutation (intron-22-inversions 31%, large deletions 13%, missense mutations 25%, stop mutation 6%, small deletion 13%) were recorded. 8 different factor VIII concentrates were given during inh. development (5 plasma derived, 3 recombinant). Way of application (16 times bolus infusion, 3 times continuous infusion, 5 times both), former change of product, infused amount until inh. development, inh. characteristic, concomitant diseases and medication were registered. In conclusion most of the patients were over 18 years old (17/28) when the inh. developed. Most of them had severe haemophilia A (18/28) and had at least one change of product before inh. detection. Our data are still too small to draw any conclusion concerning product neo-antigenicity or treatment modalities. Nevertheless it became obvious that inh. development in PTP is still a serious and underestimated problem in haemophilia treatment today. Secondly data showed that there is a variety of PTP definitions in Germany, referring to age of pat, number of exposure days and former change of product. An international definition for PTP would be helpful. A national haemophilia register would make it easier to evaluate data in the future and a prospective, not product related study should be conducted.


2015 ◽  
Vol 113 (02) ◽  
pp. 373-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiangfeng Du ◽  
Kanin Wichapong ◽  
Tilman M. Hackeng ◽  
Gerry A. F Nicolaes

SummaryThe C-terminal C domains of activated coagulation factor VIII (FVIIIa) are essential to membrane binding of this crucial coagulation cofactor protein. To provide an overall membrane binding mechanism for FVIII, we performed simulations of membrane binding through coarsegrained molecular dynamics simulations of the C1 and C2 domain, and the combined C-domains (C1+C2). We found that the C1 and C2 domain have different membrane binding properties. The C1 domain uses hydrophobic spikes 3 and 4, of its total of four spikes, as major loops to bind the membrane, whereas all four of its hydrophobic loops of the C2 domain appear essential for membrane binding. Interestingly, in the C1+C2 system, we observed cooperative binding of the C1 and C2 domains such that all four C2 domain spikes bound first, after which all four loops of the C1 domain inserted into the membrane, while the net binding energy was higher than that of the sum of the isolated C domains. Several residues, mutations of which are known to cause haemophilia A, were identified as key residues for membrane binding. In addition to these known residues, we identified residues from the C1 and C2 domains, which are involved in the membrane binding process, that have not been reported before as a cause for haemophilia A, but which contribute to overall membrane binding and which are likely candidates for novel causative missense mutations in haemophilia A.


1976 ◽  
Vol 35 (03) ◽  
pp. 510-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inga Marie Nilsson

SummaryThe incidence of living haemophiliacs in Sweden (total population 8.1 millions) is about 1:15,000 males and about 1:30,000 of the entire population. The number of haemophiliacs born in Sweden in 5-year periods between 1931-1975 (June) has remained almost unchanged. The total number of haemophilia families in Sweden is 284 (77% haemophilia A, 23% haemophilia B) with altogether 557 (436 with A and 121 with B) living haemophiliacs. Of the haemophilia A patients 40 % have severe, 18 % moderate, and 42 % mild, haemophilia. The distribution of the haemophilia B patients is about the same. Inhibitors have been demonstrated in 8% of the patients with severe haemophilia A and in 10% of those with severe haemophilia B.There are 2 main Haemophilia Centres (Stockholm, Malmo) to which haemophiliacs from the whole of Sweden are admitted for diagnosis, follow-up and treatment for severe bleedings, joint defects and surgery. Minor bleedings are treated at local hospitals in cooperation with the Haemophilia Centres. The concentrates available for treatment in haemophilia A are human fraction 1-0 (AHF-Kabi), cryoprecipitate, Antihaemophilic Factor (Hyland 4) and Kryobulin (Immuno, Wien). AHF-Kabi is the most commonly used preparation. The concentrates available for treatment in haemophilia B are Preconativ (Kabi) and Prothromplex (Immuno). Sufficient amounts of concentrates are available. In Sweden 3.2 million units of factor VIII and 1.0 million units of factor IX are given per year. Treatment is free of charge.Only 5 patients receive domiciliary treatment, but since 1958 we in Sweden have practised prophylactic treatment of boys (4–18 years old) with severe haemophilia A. At about 5-10 days interval they receive AHF in amounts sufficient to raise the AHF level to 40–50%. This regimen has reduced severe haemophilia to moderate. The joint score is identical with that found in moderate haemophilia in the same age groups. For treatment of patients with haemophilia A and haemophilia B complicated by inhibitors we have used a large dose of antigen (factor VIII or factor IX) combined with cyclophosphamide. In most cases this treatment produced satisfactory haemostasis for 5 to 30 days and prevented the secondary antibody rise.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document