scholarly journals Health systems performance assessment in low-income countries: learning from international experiences

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Tashobya ◽  
Valéria da Silveira ◽  
Freddie Ssengooba ◽  
Juliet Nabyonga-Orem ◽  
Jean Macq ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 440-451
Author(s):  
Jennifer A Callaghan-Koru ◽  
Munia Islam ◽  
Marufa Khan ◽  
Ardy Sowe ◽  
Jahrul Islam ◽  
...  

Abstract There is a well-recognized need for empirical study of processes and factors that influence scale up of evidence-based interventions in low-income countries to address the ‘know-do’ gap. We undertook a qualitative case study of the scale up of chlorhexidine cleansing of the umbilical cord (CHX) in Bangladesh to identify and compare facilitators and barriers for the institutionalization and expansion stages of scale up. Data collection and analysis for this case study were informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and the WHO/ExpandNet model of scale up. At the national level, we interviewed 20 stakeholders involved in CHX policy or implementation. At the district level, we conducted interviews with 31 facility-based healthcare providers in five districts and focus group discussions (FGDs) with eight community-based providers and eight programme managers. At the community level, we conducted 7 FGDs with 53 mothers who had a baby within the past year. Expanded interview notes were thematically coded and analysed following an adapted Framework approach. National stakeholders identified external policy and incentives, and the engagement of stakeholders in policy development through the National Technical Working Committee for Newborn Health, as key facilitators for policy and health systems changes. Stakeholders, providers and families perceived the intervention to be simple, safe and effective, and more consistent with family preferences than the prior policy of dry cord care. The major barriers that delayed or decreased the public health impact of the scale up of CHX in Bangladesh’s public health system related to commodity production, procurement and distribution. Bangladesh’s experience scaling up CHX suggests that scale up should involve early needs assessments and planning for institutionalizing new drugs and commodities into the supply chain. While the five CFIR domains were useful for categorizing barriers and facilitators, additional constructs are needed for common health systems barriers in low-income settings.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  

Abstract Since the publication of the World Health Report 2000, which aimed at assessing health systems performance globally, a number of health systems performance assessment (HSPA) frameworks and tools, designed for various purposes, have emerged. In 2017, the joint Universal Health Coverage 2030 Technical Working Group on Health Systems Assessment (TWG), consisting of health policy makers and global actors, such as the WHO, World Bank, USAID, Unicef, European Commission, OECD, etc., was formed with the aim to align the existing tools and develop a common approach to understanding and measuring health systems performance globally. As part of this work, the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies (OBS) has developed a Health Systems Performance Assessment framework for Universal Health Coverage (HSPA Framework for UHC), that allows to evaluate health system performance, largely by drawing on the information available in the existing tools or through global data collection initiatives. Suggested approach is based on the detailed assessment of the four health system functions (governance, financing, resource generation and service delivery) and their sub-functions, the interaction of which jointly leads to the successes and failures in the achievement of health system goals. We propose distinct assessment areas for specific functions and sub-functions as a way to identify potential strengths and weaknesses, which can then be related to actions or responsibilities of specific actors within a health system, or linkages to other sectors. The objective of the workshop is to introduce the background, rationale, methods and process of developing of the HSPA framework for UHC; present a systematic approach to assessing various functions of health system and their interactions; relate the assessment areas of specific functions and sub-functions to the final health system goals; and, finally, to test the use of the framework in practice. The workshop is structured as follows: the workshop will start from the four 10-minute presentations (outlined below), followed by an interactive session with the audience to discuss the content of the framework and elaborate on its potential use for HSPA and applications globally. Key messages The HSPA framework for UHC is an approach that allows to bring together existing HSPA efforts and moves towards a more systematic and universally applicable health system performance assessment. The approach assesses performance through attribution of various health system outcomes to specific functions and sub-functions, allowing to identify strengths and weaknesses that affect performance.


2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Irini Papanicolas

Abstract Health system assessment (HSA) tools are often built around static health system building blocks, which lead to largely descriptive narrative and lack of linkages to health system outcomes. The development of a common framework that would also focus on performance outcomes is long overdue. We analysed the key HSA frameworks and tools based on them, with the purpose of identifying a common approach that would allow to link health system components to specific outcomes. The presentation will focus on using the health system functions as the basis of conducting the performance assessment. In a second step, the presentation will elaborate on the intermediate and final health system goals as part of the HSPA framework. It will explain their links to the four functions and thus, discuss their relevance for performance assessment.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Kumah ◽  
Samuel E. Ankomah ◽  
Adam Fusheini ◽  
Emmanuel Kusi Sarpong ◽  
Eric Anyimadu ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adnan A Hyder ◽  
◽  
Gerald Bloom ◽  
Melissa Leach ◽  
Shamsuzzoha B Syed ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document