scholarly journals Cholinergic manipulations affect sensory responses but not attentional enhancement in macaque MT

BMC Biology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vera Katharina Veith ◽  
Cliodhna Quigley ◽  
Stefan Treue
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Spatial Attention ◽  
Rhesus Monkeys ◽  
Cell Activity ◽  
Extrastriate Cortex ◽  
Attentional Modulation ◽  
Cellular Mechanisms ◽  
Attention Task ◽  
Sensory Responses ◽  
Cholinergic Effect

Abstract Background Attentional modulation in the visual cortex of primates is characterized by multiplicative changes of sensory responses with changes in the attentional state of the animal. The cholinergic system has been linked to such gain changes in V1. Here, we aim to determine if a similar link exists in macaque area MT. While rhesus monkeys performed a top-down spatial attention task, we locally injected a cholinergic agonist or antagonist and recorded single-cell activity. Results Although we confirmed cholinergic influences on sensory responses, there was no additional cholinergic effect on the attentional gain changes. Neither a muscarinic blockage nor a local increase in acetylcholine led to a significant change in the magnitude of spatial attention effects on firing rates. Conclusions This suggests that the cellular mechanisms of attentional modulation in the extrastriate cortex cannot be directly inferred from those in the primary visual cortex.

scholarly journals The Effect of Attention on Neuronal Responses to High and Low Contrast Stimuli

2010 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 960-971 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joonyeol Lee ◽  
John H. R. Maunsell
Keyword(s):  
Cerebral Cortex ◽  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Rhesus Monkeys ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Visual Area ◽  
Neuronal Responses ◽  
Attentional Modulation ◽  
Low Contrast ◽  
Middle Temporal ◽  
Visual Area Mt

It remains unclear how attention affects the tuning of individual neurons in visual cerebral cortex. Some observations suggest that attention preferentially enhances responses to low contrast stimuli, whereas others suggest that attention proportionally affects responses to all stimuli. Resolving how attention affects responses to different stimuli is essential for understanding the mechanism by which it acts. To explore the effects of attention on stimuli of different contrasts, we recorded from individual neurons in the middle temporal visual area (MT) of rhesus monkeys while shifting their attention between preferred and nonpreferred stimuli within their receptive fields. This configuration results in robust attentional modulation that makes it possible to readily distinguish whether attention acts preferentially on low contrast stimuli. We found no evidence for greater enhancement of low contrast stimuli. Instead, the strong attentional modulations were well explained by a model in which attention proportionally enhances responses to stimuli of all contrasts. These data, together with observations on the effects of attention on responses to other stimulus dimensions, suggest that the primary effect of attention in visual cortex may be to simply increase the strength of responses to all stimuli by the same proportion.

scholarly journals Visual attention is available at a task-relevant location rapidly after a saccade

eLife ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Yao ◽  
Madhura Ketkar ◽  
Stefan Treue ◽  
B Suresh Krishna
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Spatial Attention ◽  
Spatial Location ◽  
Temporal Analysis ◽  
Neuronal Population ◽  
Attentional Modulation ◽  
Attention Task ◽  
Fine Grained ◽  
The One ◽  
Precise Time

Maintaining attention at a task-relevant spatial location while making eye-movements necessitates a rapid, saccade-synchronized shift of attentional modulation from the neuronal population representing the task-relevant location before the saccade to the one representing it after the saccade. Currently, the precise time at which spatial attention becomes fully allocated to the task-relevant location after the saccade remains unclear. Using a fine-grained temporal analysis of human peri-saccadic detection performance in an attention task, we show that spatial attention is fully available at the task-relevant location within 30 milliseconds after the saccade. Subjects tracked the attentional target veridically throughout our task: i.e. they almost never responded to non-target stimuli. Spatial attention and saccadic processing therefore co-ordinate well to ensure that relevant locations are attentionally enhanced soon after the beginning of each eye fixation.

scholarly journals Attending to What and Where: Background Connectivity Integrates Categorical and Spatial Attention

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 1281-1297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexa Tompary ◽  
Naseem Al-Aidroos ◽  
Nicholas B. Turk-Browne
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Spatial Attention ◽  
Temporal Cortex ◽  
Relevant Information ◽  
Neural Basis ◽  
Attentional Modulation ◽  
Temporal Correlations ◽  
Visual Areas ◽  
Early Visual Cortex ◽  
Ventral Temporal Cortex

Top–down attention prioritizes the processing of goal-relevant information throughout visual cortex based on where that information is found in space and what it looks like. Whereas attentional goals often have both spatial and featural components, most research on the neural basis of attention has examined these components separately. Here we investigated how these attentional components are integrated by examining the attentional modulation of functional connectivity between visual areas with different selectivity. Specifically, we used fMRI to measure temporal correlations between spatially selective regions of early visual cortex and category-selective regions in ventral temporal cortex while participants performed a task that benefitted from both spatial and categorical attention. We found that categorical attention modulated the connectivity of category-selective areas, but only with retinotopic areas that coded for the spatially attended location. Similarly, spatial attention modulated the connectivity of retinotopic areas only with the areas coding for the attended category. This pattern of results suggests that attentional modulation of connectivity is driven both by spatial selection and featural biases. Combined with exploratory analyses of frontoparietal areas that track these changes in connectivity among visual areas, this study begins to shed light on how different components of attention are integrated in support of more complex behavioral goals.

scholarly journals Attending to what and where: Background connectivity integrates categorical and spatial attention

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexa Tompary ◽  
Naseem Al-Aidroos ◽  
Nicholas B. Turk-Browne
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Spatial Attention ◽  
Temporal Cortex ◽  
Relevant Information ◽  
Neural Basis ◽  
Attentional Modulation ◽  
Temporal Correlations ◽  
Visual Areas ◽  
Early Visual Cortex ◽  
Ventral Temporal Cortex

AbstractTop-down attention prioritizes the processing of goal-relevant information throughout visual cortex, based on where that information is found in space and what it looks like. Whereas attentional goals often have both spatial and featural components, most research on the neural basis of attention has examined these components separately. This may reflect the fact that attention is typically studied in individual visual areas that preferentially code for either spatial locations or particular features. Here we investigated how these attentional components are integrated by examining the attentional modulation of functional connectivity between visual areas with different selectivity. Specifically, we used fMRI to measure temporal correlations between spatially-selective regions of early visual cortex and category-selective regions in ventral temporal cortex while participants performed a task that benefitted from both spatial and categorical attention. We found that categorical attention modulated the connectivity of category-selective areas, but only with retinotopic areas that coded for the spatially attended location. The reverse was not true, however, with spatial attention modulating the connectivity of retinotopic areas with category-selective areas coding for both attended and unattended features. This pattern of results suggests that attentional modulation of connectivity is dominated by spatial selection, which in turn gates featural biases. Combined with exploratory analyses of frontoparietal areas that track these changes in connectivity among visual areas, this study begins to shed light on how different components of attention are integrated in support of more complex behavioral goals.

Effect of Attentive Fixation in Macaque Thalamus and Cortex

2001 ◽  
Vol 85 (1) ◽  
pp. 219-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. B. Bender ◽  
M. Youakim
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Absolute Magnitude ◽  
Main Diagonal ◽  
Extrastriate Cortex ◽  
Modulation Amplitude ◽  
Intrinsic Variability ◽  
Attentional Modulation ◽  
Brain Areas ◽  
Lateral Geniculate ◽  
Response Vector

Attentional modulation of neuronal responsiveness is common in many areas of visual cortex. We examined whether attentional modulation in the visual thalamus was quantitatively similar to that in cortex. Identical procedures and apparatus were used to compare attentional modulation of single neurons in seven different areas of the visual system: the lateral geniculate, three visual subdivisions of the pulvinar [inferior, lateral, dorsomedial part of lateral pulvinar (Pdm)], and three areas of extrastriate cortex representing early, intermediate, and late stages of cortical processing (V2, V4/PM, area 7a). A simple fixation task controlled transitions among three attentive states. The animal waited for a fixation point to appear (ready state), fixated the point until it dimmed (fixation state), and then waited idly to begin the next trial (idle state). Attentional modulation was estimated by flashing an identical, irrelevant stimulus in a neuron's receptive field during each of the three states; the three responses defined a “response vector” whose deviation from the line of equal response in all three states (the main diagonal) indicated the character and magnitude of attentional modulation. Attentional modulation was present in all visual areas except the lateral geniculate, indicating that modulation was of central origin. Prevalence of modulation was modest (26%) in pulvinar, and increased from 21% in V2 to 43% in 7a. Modulation had a push-pull character (as many cells facilitated as suppressed) with respect to the fixation state in all areas except Pdm where all cells were suppressed during fixation. The absolute magnitude of attentional modulation, measured by the angle between response vector and main diagonal expressed as a percent of the maximum possible angle, differed among brain areas. Magnitude of modulation was modest in the pulvinar (19–26%), and increased from 22% in V2 to 41% in 7a. However, average trial-to-trial variability of response, measured by the coefficient of variation, also increased across brain areas so that its difference among areas accounted for more than 90% of the difference in modulation magnitude among areas. We also measured attentional modulation by the ratio of cell discharge due to attention divided by discharge variability. The resulting signal-to-noise ratio of attention was small and constant, 1.3 ± 10%, across all areas of pulvinar and cortex. We conclude that the pulvinar, but not the lateral geniculate, is as strongly affected by attentional state as any area of visual cortex we studied and that attentional modulation amplitude is closely tied to intrinsic variability of response.

scholarly journals Inhibition of Return Impairs Phosphene Detection

2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (11) ◽  
pp. 2262-2267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel T. Smith ◽  
Keira Ball ◽  
Amanda Ellison
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Spatial Attention ◽  
Inhibition Of Return ◽  
Visual Exploration ◽  
Extrastriate Cortex ◽  
Neural Signals ◽  
Extrastriate Visual Cortex ◽  
Visual Areas ◽  
Target Locations ◽  
Site Of Stimulation

Efficient visual exploration requires the ability to select possible target locations via spatial attention and to deselect previously inspected locations via inhibition of return (IOR). Although a great deal is known about the effects of spatial attention on processing in visual cortex, much less is known about the effects of IOR on early visual areas. One possibility is that IOR acts in an opposite way to spatial attention, such that, whereas spatial attention enhances target related neural signals in visual cortex, IOR suppress target-related signals. Using a novel dual-coil TMS protocol, we found that IOR reduced the probability of detecting a TMS-induced phosphene in extrastriate cortex (V5). Specifically, a nonpredictive spatial precue presented 500 or 800 msec before stimulation significantly reduced the probability of detecting a phosphene when the precue appeared contralaterally to the site of stimulation (i.e., ipsilaterally to the potential location of the phosphene), compared with ipsilaterally or centrally presented cues. This result demonstrates that IOR facilitates visual exploration by directly affecting the strength of target-related signals in extrastriate visual cortex. This result is consistent with neurophysiological models of attention, which postulate that IOR modulates perception by biasing competition between sensory representations.

scholarly journals Cortical state dynamics and selective attention define the spatial pattern of correlated variability in neocortex

2022 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan-Liang Shi ◽  
Nicholas A. Steinmetz ◽  
Tirin Moore ◽  
Kwabena Boahen ◽  
Tatiana A. Engel
Keyword(s):  
Population Structure ◽  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Spatial Correlations ◽  
Anatomical Connectivity ◽  
Attentional Modulation ◽  
Cognitive States ◽  
Correlated Activity ◽  
Lateral Distance ◽  
Sensory Responses ◽  
And Behavior

AbstractCorrelated activity fluctuations in the neocortex influence sensory responses and behavior. Neural correlations reflect anatomical connectivity but also change dynamically with cognitive states such as attention. Yet, the network mechanisms defining the population structure of correlations remain unknown. We measured correlations within columns in the visual cortex. We show that the magnitude of correlations, their attentional modulation, and dependence on lateral distance are explained by columnar On-Off dynamics, which are synchronous activity fluctuations reflecting cortical state. We developed a network model in which the On-Off dynamics propagate across nearby columns generating spatial correlations with the extent controlled by attentional inputs. This mechanism, unlike previous proposals, predicts spatially non-uniform changes in correlations during attention. We confirm this prediction in our columnar recordings by showing that in superficial layers the largest changes in correlations occur at intermediate lateral distances. Our results reveal how spatially structured patterns of correlated variability emerge through interactions of cortical state dynamics, anatomical connectivity, and attention.

scholarly journals Lateral phase differences in a population model of the visual cortex are sufficient for the development of rhythmic spatial sampling

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin D. Yi ◽  
Katsushi Arisaka
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Spatial Attention ◽  
Phase Difference ◽  
Computational Study ◽  
Field Potential ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Population Activity ◽  
Attention Task ◽  
Phase Differences

AbstractWhen attending to many spatially distributed visual stimuli, attention is reweighted rhythmically at 4-8 Hz. The probability of detection depends on the phase at which a stimulus is deployed relative to this intrinsic rhythm. The reweighting oscillations can be observed both electrophysiologically and behaviorally, and appear to be regulated by the pulvinar. Based on these findings, we considered the computational consequences of allowing feedback to shape the distribution of inhibitory oscillations from the thalamus, as measured by a local field potential (LFP) phases in the 8 Hz low alpha-band, across laterally-connected regions of the visual cortex. We constructed a population activity model with lateral and feedforward connections. In agreement with prior models, we found that the sign of the lateral phase difference in the inhibitory low-frequency oscillations regulated the direction of communication between the laterally-connected regions. Furthermore, the phase difference induced periodicity in the dynamics of a downstream winner-takes-all attractor network such that periodic switching between states was observed. We finally simulated a simple spatial attention task. We found rhythmic 8 Hz sampling between two regions when a lateral phase difference was present—an effect that disappeared when the lateral phase difference was zero. These findings are in agreement with spatial attention literature and suggest that lateral phase differences are essential for manifesting communicational asymmetries in laterally-connected visual cortices. Our model predicts that population-specific phase differences are critical for sampling the spatial extent of stimuli.Author summaryWe conducted a computational study of the effects of lateral phase differences in a simulated model of the visual cortex. Lateral phase differences are defined to be when the phase of an intrinsic low-frequency inhibitory oscillation varies consistently across populations in the same cortical area. For example, our model was intended to capture the dynamics of a retinotopic cortex where feedback from the frotoparietal areas via the pulvinar nucleus assigned laterally-connected regions of the visual cortex different phases. We found that the sign of the phase differences influenced the direction of lateral communication. Furthermore, the phase differences introduced rhythmicity in the downstream areas, thus allowing us to simulate rhythmic spatial selection of stimuli. Prior to the current study, the influence of inter-areal phase differences in feedforward models had been well characterized. Our model provides new insights into the dynamics of population-specific lateral phase differences and predicts that the development of phase differences across the visual cortex are critical for the allocation of attention in space.

Visual Spatial Attention in Migraine Sufferers in Postictal and Interictal Phases: An Event-Related Potential Study

2001 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.H. de Koning ◽  
J.C. Woestenburg ◽  
M. Elton
Keyword(s):  
Cerebral Cortex ◽  
Visual Attention ◽  
Migraine Attack ◽  
Spatial Attention ◽  
Event Related Potential ◽  
Significant Enhancement ◽  
Pathophysiological Mechanism ◽  
Attention Task ◽  
Visual Spatial Attention ◽  
Visual Spatial

Migraineurs with and without aura (MWAs and MWOAs) as well as controls were measured twice with an interval of 7 days. The first session of recordings and tests for migraineurs was held about 7 hours after a migraine attack. We hypothesized that electrophysiological changes in the posterior cerebral cortex related to visual spatial attention are influenced by the level of arousal in migraineurs with aura, and that this varies over the course of time. ERPs related to the active visual attention task manifested significant differences between controls and both types of migraine sufferers for the N200, suggesting a common pathophysiological mechanism for migraineurs. Furthermore, migraineurs without aura (MWOAs) showed a significant enhancement for the N200 at the second session, indicating the relevance of time of measurement within migraine studies. Finally, migraineurs with aura (MWAs) showed significantly enhanced P240 and P300 components at central and parietal cortical sites compared to MWOAs and controls, which seemed to be maintained over both sessions and could be indicative of increased noradrenergic activity in MWAs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document