scholarly journals Low suction on digital drainage devices promptly improves post-operative air leaks following lung resection operations: a retrospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Suguru Mitsui ◽  
Shunsuke Tauchi ◽  
Takahiro Uchida ◽  
Hisashi Ohnishi ◽  
Toshio Shimokawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chest Tube ◽  
Pulmonary Resection ◽  
Lung Resection ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Volume Of Fluid ◽  
Suction Pressure ◽  
Air Leaks ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Chest Tube Removal ◽  
Pressure Suction

Abstract Background We investigated the most effective suction pressure for preventing or promptly improving postoperative air leaks on digital drainage devices after lung resection. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the postoperative data of 242 patients who were monitored with a digital drainage system after pulmonary resection in our institution between December 2017 and June 2020. We divided the patients into three groups according to the suction pressure used: A (low-pressure suction group: − 5 cm H2O), B (intermediate-pressure group: − 10 cm H2O), and C (high-pressure suction group: − 20 cm H2O). We evaluated the duration of air leaks, timing of chest tube replacement, the amount of postoperative air leak, volume of fluid drained before chest tube removal, and the total number of air leaks during drainage. Results In total, 217 patients were included in this study. The duration of air leaks gradually decreased with significant difference between the groups, the highest decrease in A, the lowest decrease in C (P = 0.019). Timing of chest tube replacement, on the other hand, did not significantly differ between the three groups (P = 0.126). The number of postoperative air leaks just after surgery did not significantly differ between the three groups (P = 0.175), but the number of air leaks on postoperative day 1 were fewest in group A, then B, and greatest in group C (P = 0.033). The maximum amount of air leaks during drainage was lowest in A, then B, and highest in C (P = 0.036). Volume of fluid drained before chest tube removal did not significantly differ between the three groups (P = 0.986). Conclusion Low-pressure suction after pulmonary resection seems to avoid or promptly improve postoperative air leaks in digital drainage devices after lung resection. Trial registration This is a single-institution, retrospective analysis-based study of data from an electronic database. Study protocol was approved by the Akashi Medical Center Institutional Research Ethics Board (approval number: 2020–9).

scholarly journals Postoperative Air Leaks With Prompt Improvement of Low Suction on Digital Drainage Devices: a Retrospective Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suguru Mitsui ◽  
Shunsuke Tauchi ◽  
Takahiro Uchida ◽  
Hisashi Ohnishi ◽  
Toshio Shimokawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chest Tube ◽  
Pulmonary Resection ◽  
Maximum Amount ◽  
Fluid Volume ◽  
Suction Pressure ◽  
Air Leak ◽  
Air Leaks ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Chest Tube Removal ◽  
Pressure Suction

Abstract Purpose: The aim was to investigate the most effective suction pressure for preventing or promptly improving postoperative air leaks.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the postoperative data of 242 patients who were monitored with a digital drainage system after pulmonary resection between December 2017 and June 2020. We divided the patients into 3 of group by suction pressure, A (Low-pressure suction group: -5 cm H₂O), B (Intermediate-pressure group: -10 cm H₂O), C (High-pressure suction group: -20 cm H₂O). Duration of air leaks, duration of chest tube replacement, the amount of postoperative air leak, fluid volume drained before chest tube removal, and the maximum amount of air leaks during drainage were evaluated.Results: A total 217 patients were included. In the order of A, B, and C groups, duration of air leaks gradually decreased and significant trend was observed (p=0.019). Duration of chest tube replacement did not significantly differ among the three groups (p=0.126). The amount of postoperative air leak just after surgery did not significantly differ among the three groups (p=0.175), however, the amount of postoperative day 1 air leak gradually decreased with statistical significance in order of A, B, and C groups (p=0.033). The maximum amount of air leaks during drainage gradually decreased in order of A, B and C groups (p=0.036). Fluid volume drained before chest tube removal did not significantly differ among the three groups (p=0.986).Conclusion: Low-pressure suction after pulmonary resection would be useful for preventing or promptly improving postoperative air leaks.

scholarly journals Postoperative Air Leaks with Prompt Improvement of Low Suction on Digital Drainage Devices: A Retrospective Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suguru Mitsui ◽  
Shunsuke Tauchi ◽  
Takahiro Uchida ◽  
Hisashi Ohnishi ◽  
Toshio Shimokawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chest Tube ◽  
Pulmonary Resection ◽  
Maximum Amount ◽  
Fluid Volume ◽  
Suction Pressure ◽  
Air Leak ◽  
Air Leaks ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Chest Tube Removal ◽  
Pressure Suction

Abstract Purpose: The aim was to investigate the most effective suction pressure for preventing or promptly improving postoperative air leaks.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the postoperative data of 242 patients who were monitored with a digital drainage system after pulmonary resection between December 2017 and June 2020. We divided the patients into 3 of group by suction pressure, A (Low-pressure suction group: -5 cm H₂O), B (Intermediate-pressure group: -10 cm H₂O), C (High-pressure suction group: -20 cm H₂O). Duration of air leaks, duration of chest tube replacement, the amount of postoperative air leak, fluid volume drained before chest tube removal, and the maximum amount of air leaks during drainage were evaluated.Results: A total 217 patients were included. In the order of A, B, and C groups, duration of air leaks gradually decreased and significant trend was observed (p=0.019). Duration of chest tube replacement did not significantly differ among the three groups (p=0.126). The amount of postoperative air leak just after surgery did not significantly differ among the three groups (p=0.175), however, the amount of postoperative day 1 air leak gradually decreased with statistical significance in order of A, B, and C groups (p=0.033). The maximum amount of air leaks during drainage gradually decreased in order of A, B and C groups (p=0.036). Fluid volume drained before chest tube removal did not significantly differ among the three groups (p=0.986).Conclusion: Low-pressure suction after pulmonary resection would be useful for preventing or promptly improving postoperative air leaks.

scholarly journals Early postoperative day 0 chest tube removal using a digital drainage device protocol after thoracoscopic major pulmonary resection

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 657-663
Author(s):  
Karel Pfeuty ◽  
Bernard Lenot
Keyword(s):  
Chest Tube ◽  
Pulmonary Resection ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Lung Resection ◽  
Postoperative Recovery ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Complication ◽  
Drainage Device ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Chest Tube Removal

Abstract OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess the safety of early chest tube removal on postoperative day 0 (POD 0) on the basis of a digital drainage device protocol in patients undergoing thoracoscopic major lung resection and its contribution as a component of an enhanced recovery after surgery programme. METHODS One hundred consecutive patients who underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy or segmentectomy were submitted to the following criteria for chest tube removal: Air flow ≤20 ml/min for at least 4 h without fluid threshold, except if haemorrhagic or chylous. Two groups were defined according to chest tube removal on POD 0 (G0) or POD ≥1 (G1). Primary outcome was pleural complication and secondary outcomes were cardiopulmonary complication, length of drainage, length of stay (LOS), compliance with opioid-free analgesic protocol and readmission. The follow-up was 90 days from discharge. RESULTS The chest tube was removed on POD 0 in 45% of patients (G0). None of them required tube reinsertion for pneumothorax and 1 patient was readmitted for a delayed pleural effusion. Among the 55% remaining patients (G1), the median length of drainage was 2 days, including 3 prolonged air leaks (>5 days). G0 and G1 were not different in terms of cardiopulmonary complication and readmission (6.6% vs 9% and 4.4% vs 7.2%, respectively). The median LOS was 1 day in G0 and 2 days in G1. The compliance with opioid-free analgesic protocol was significantly higher (75% vs 45%, P = 0.004) in G0 compared to G1. CONCLUSIONS Early POD 0 chest tube removal after thoracoscopic major pulmonary resection is safe in selected patients on the basis of a digital drainage device protocol. Also, it may contribute, by reducing early postoperative pain, to enhance postoperative recovery as part of an advanced enhanced recovery after surgery programme.

scholarly journals What Keeps Postpulmonary Resection Patients in Hospital?

2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 86-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Bardell ◽  
D Petsikas
Keyword(s):  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Linear Regression ◽  
Chest Tube ◽  
Pulmonary Resection ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Air Leak ◽  
Air Leaks ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Prolonged Air Leak ◽  
Chest Tube Removal

BACKGROUND: Prolonged air leak (longer than three days) was hypothesized to be the primary cause of extended hospital stays following pulmonary resection. Its effect on length of stay (LOS) was compared with that of suboptimal pain control, nausea and vomiting, and other causes. Predictors of prolonged LOS and of prolonged air leaks were investigated.DESIGN: Retrospective review of 91 patients. Primary reasons for prolonged hospitalization were determined. Patient characteristics (demographic information, pulmonary function test results, body habitus measurements, smoking history), operative factors (procedure performed, duration of operation, complications) and postoperative factors (time of chest tube removal) were considered. Student'sttest andX2analysis were used to compare continuous and ratio data, respectively, and linear regression analysis was used to define the equation relating two variables.RESULTS: The mean postoperative LOS was 6.4 days. Only prolonged air leak was predictive of increased LOS (9.4 days versus 5.4 days, P<0.001). Forced expiratory volume in 1 s less than 1.5 L/min, carbon monoxide diffusing capacity less than 80% predicted and the detection of a pneumothorax were all predictive of prolonged air leak. A strong correlation between the time of chest tube removal and LOS was found (r=0.937, P<0.001). Linear regression analysis showed postoperative LOS and duration of thoracostomy tube insertion to be related by the equation y = 0.88x + 2.49 days.CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that increased LOS following pulmonary resection is due primarily to prolonged air leaks. Furthermore, patients who have their chest tubes removed sooner are discharged sooner.

scholarly journals The impact of chest tube removal on pain and pulmonary function after pulmonary resection

2011 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 820-823 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Refai ◽  
A. Brunelli ◽  
M. Salati ◽  
F. Xiume ◽  
C. Pompili ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Function ◽  
Chest Tube ◽  
Pulmonary Resection ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Chest Tube Removal ◽  
The Impact

Early Identification of Patients Who Will Meet 24-Hour Fluid Output Threshold for Chest Tube Removal After Lung Resection

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 861-867 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jayson L. Azzi ◽  
Bram Gottlieb ◽  
Donna E. Maziak ◽  
Andrew J.E. Seely ◽  
Farid M. Shamji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Early Identification ◽  
Chest Tube ◽  
Lung Resection ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Chest Tube Removal

Routine Chest X-ray After Chest Tube Removal Is Not Indicated for Minimally Invasive Lung Resection

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron R. Dezube ◽  
Ashley Deeb ◽  
Luis E. De Leon ◽  
Suden Kucukak ◽  
M. Blair Marshall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Chest Tube ◽  
Lung Resection ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Chest X Ray ◽  
Chest Tube Removal ◽  
Routine Chest

scholarly journals Multicenter randomized study on comparison between electronic and traditional chest drainage systems

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Marulli ◽  
Giovanni Maria Comacchio ◽  
Mario Nosotti ◽  
Lorenzo Rosso ◽  
Paolo Mendogni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chest Tube ◽  
Pleural Space ◽  
Chest Drain ◽  
Chest Drainage ◽  
Drainage Systems ◽  
Air Leaks ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Space Effect ◽  
Digital Chest ◽  
Chest Tube Removal

Abstract Background: In patients submitted to major pulmonary resection, post-operative length of stay is mainly influenced by duration of air leaks and chest tube removal. The measurement of air leaks largely relies on traditional chest drainage systems which are prone to subjective interpretation. Difficulty in differentiating between active air leaks and bubbles due to a pleural space effect may also lead to tentative drain clamping and prolonged time for chest drain removal. New digital systems allow continuous monitoring of air leaks, identifying subtle leakage that may be not visible during daily patient evaluation. Moreover, an objective assessment of air leaks may lead to a reduced interobserver variability and to an optimized timing of chest tube removal. Methods: This study is a prospective randomized, interventional, multicenter trial designed to compare the electronic chest drainage system (Drentech™ Palm Evo) with the traditional one (Drentech™ Compact) in a cohort of patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy through a standard 3-ports VATS approach both for benign or malignant disease. It will enroll 382 patients in 3 Italian centers. Duration of chest drainage and length of hospital stay will be evaluated in the two groups. Moreover, it will be evaluated if the use of a digital chest system compared with a traditional system reduces theinterobserver variability. Finally, it will be evaluated if the digital drain system may help in distinguishing an active air leak from a pleural space effect, by the digital assessment of intrapleural differential pressure, and in identifying potential predictors of prolonged air leaks. Discussion : To date, few studies have been performed to evaluate clinical impact of digital drainage systems. The proposed prospective randomized trial will provide new knowledge to this research area by investigating and comparing the difference between digital and traditional chest drain systems. In particular, the objectives of this project are to evaluate the feasibility and usefulness of digital chest drainages and to provide new tools to identify patients at higher risk of developing prolonged air leaks.

scholarly journals Intrabronchial Valve Treatment for Prolonged Air Leak: Can We Justify the Cost?

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eitan Podgaetz ◽  
Felix Zamora ◽  
Heidi Gibson ◽  
Rafael S. Andrade ◽  
Eric Hall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Individual Patient Data ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Air Leak ◽  
Levels Of Care ◽  
Air Leaks ◽  
Limited Experience ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Prolonged Air Leak ◽  
Chest Tube Removal ◽  
The Cost

Background.Prolonged air leak is defined as an ongoing air leak for more than 5 days. Intrabronchial valve (IBV) treatment is approved for the treatment of air leaks.Objective.To analyze our experience with IBV and valuate its cost-effectiveness.Methods.Retrospective analysis of IBV from June 2013 to October 2014. We analyzed direct costs based on hospital and operating room charges. We used average costs in US dollars for the analysis not individual patient data.Results.We treated 13 patients (9 M/4 F), median age of 60 years (38 to 90). Median time from diagnosis to IBV placement was 9.8 days, time from IBV placement to chest tube removal was 3 days, and time from IBV placement to hospital discharge was 4 days. Average room and board costs were $14,605 including all levels of care. IBV cost is $2750 per valve. The average number of valves used was 4. Total cost of procedure, valves, and hospital stay until discharge was $13,900.Conclusion.In our limited experience, the use of IBV to treat prolonged air leaks is safe and appears cost-effective. In pure financial terms, the cost seems justified for any air leak predicted to last greater than 8 days.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document