In vitro activity of sorafenib against imatinib- and sunitinib-resistant kinase mutations associated with drug-resistant GI stromal tumors
10500 Background: Most gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) harbor mutant KIT or platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) kinases, which are targets of imatinib (front-line therapy) or sunitinib (second-line therapy). Resistance to imatinib (IM) or sunitinib (SU) is commonly associated with the acquisition of secondary kinase mutations. In phase II studies, sorafenib (SOR), which targets KIT, PDGFRs, and several other kinases, has demonstrated efficacy in GIST patients after failure of IM and SU. We evaluated the in vitro activity of SOR against IM and/or SU resistant kinases. Methods: Kinase mutants were biochemically profiled for SOR, SU, and IM sensitivity by measuring inhibition of kinase phosphorylation after drug treatment in mutant-expressing CHO cells. We also tested the biochemical and cellular activity of SOR and IM against GIST cells derived from IM-resistant tumor clones. Results: SOR had superior potency to IM against IM-resistant KIT secondary mutations involving the ATP binding pocket (V654A, T670I) and the activation loop (D816H, D820A/G, N822K, Y823D). SOR and SU had similar potency against IM-resistant KIT secondary mutations involving the ATP binding pocket. In contrast, SOR had markedly increased potency, compared to SU, against IM-resistant KIT activation loop mutations. Both SOR and SU were more potent than IM against the isolated KIT exon 9 mutation. To confirm these observations in a GIST cellular context, we tested the relative potency of IM and SU against two previously described IM-resistant GIST cell lines (GIST430: exon 11 + V654A, GIST48: exon 11 + D820A). SOR was significantly more potent than IM against KIT in these cell lines. This also correlated with enhanced inhibition of downstream signaling pathways and cellular proliferation. Conclusions: SOR has superior in vitro potency compared with IM or SU against a panel of GIST-relevant mutant kinases. Notably, SOR, unlike SU, is active against most IM-resistant secondary mutations involving the KIT activation loop. Based on these results, we hypothesize that SOR might have superior clinical activity to SU in the setting of imatinib-resistant GIST and should be further evaluated for clinical efficacy in the second-line setting. [Table: see text]