A phase I study of MM-121 in combination with multiple anticancer therapies in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2609-2609 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica Arnedos ◽  
Crystal Shereen Denlinger ◽  
Wael A. Harb ◽  
Olivier Rixe ◽  
John Charles Morris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Clinical Benefit Rate

2609 Background: MM-121 is a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor family member ErbB3. ErbB3 has been implicated in driving cancer growth and in the development of resistance to conventional chemotherapies across multiple malignancies. Here we present results of an open-label, Phase 1, multicenter, non-randomized, dose-escalation trial which recently completed enrollment evaluating MM-121 in combination with one of the following chemotherapies: Gemcitabine (Arm A, n=11), carboplatin (Arm B, n=11), pemetrexed (Arm C, n=10), or cabazitaxel (Arm D, n=11). Methods: Patients were treated in a dose escalation “3+3” design to assess the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PK) of MM-121 administered weekly in combination with anticancer therapies in subjects with advanced cancer. Doses were escalated until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was identified or the combination was shown to be tolerable at the highest planned doses. Secondary objectives included: Determining the objective response rate, clinical benefit rate, PK and immunogenicity of MM-121. Data summarized are as of 1/17/2013 from a live database. Results: Overall, 43 patients, [22 (51%) female and 21 (49%) male] have been treated with a median treatment duration of 57 days (range 1-302). The median age was 59 years (range 42-84) and patients had received a median of four prior lines of therapy (range 0-13). Common (>20%) adverse events of any grade and causality across all arms included diarrhea (74%), nausea (54%), fatigue (51%), anemia (44%), vomiting (33%), hypokalemia (30%), decreased appetite (26%), thrombocytopenia (26%), peripheral edema (23%), neutropenia (21%), and constipation (21%). Four DLTs were observed: Two in combination with carboplatin (G4 thrombocytopenia and G3 rash), one with gemcitabine (G4 thrombocytopenia), and one with pemetrexed (G4 hyperuricemia). Overall 38 (88%) patients were evaluable for response and the overall clinical benefit rate (PR or SD >18 weeks), is 32% (12/38). Conclusions: MM-121 can be combined at its recommended single agent dose with standard doses of gemcitabine, pemetrexed, and cabazitaxel and adapted doses of carboplatin. Clinical trial information: NCT01447225.

scholarly journals Phase 1 dose escalation study of seribantumab (MM-121), an anti-HER3 monoclonal antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Crystal S. Denlinger ◽  
Vicki L. Keedy ◽  
Victor Moyo ◽  
Gavin MacBeath ◽  
Geoffrey I. Shapiro
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Best Response

SummaryBackground Overactivation of human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (HER3) triggers multiple intracellular pathways resulting in tumor cell survival. This Phase 1 study assessed the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of seribantumab, a fully human anti-HER3 monoclonal antibody. Methods Adult patients with advanced or refractory solid tumors were treated in six dose cohorts of seribantumab: 3.2, 6, 10, 15, or 20 mg/kg weekly, or 40 mg/kg loading dose followed by 20 mg/kg weekly maintenance dose (40/20 mg/kg) using a modified 3 + 3 dose escalation strategy with cohort expansion. Primary objectives were identification of a recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) and determination of objective response rate. Secondary objectives were assessment of safety, dose-limiting toxicities, and PK. Results Forty-four patients (26 dose escalation; 18 dose expansion) were enrolled. Seribantumab monotherapy was well tolerated with most adverse events being transient and mild to moderate (grade 1 or 2) in severity; maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The highest dose, 40/20 mg/kg, was identified as RP2D. Best response was stable disease, reported in 24% and 39% of patients during the dose escalation and expansion portions of the study, respectively. Seribantumab terminal half-life was ≈100 h; steady state concentrations were reached after 3–4 weekly doses. Conclusions Seribantumab monotherapy was well tolerated across all dose levels. Safety and PK data from this study support further seribantumab investigations in genomically defined populations.Clinical trial registration NCT00734305. August 12, 2008.

scholarly journals Phase 1 Dose Escalation Study of Seribantumab (MM-121), an anti-HER3 Monoclonal Antibody, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Crystal Denliger ◽  
Vicki L Keedy ◽  
Victor Moyo ◽  
Gavin MacBeath ◽  
Geoffrey I Shapiro
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Best Response

Abstract BACKGROUND: Overactivation of human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (HER3) triggers multiple intracellular pathways resulting in tumor cell survival. This Phase 1 study assessed the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of seribantumab, a fully human anti-HER3 monoclonal antibody.METHODS: Adult patients with advanced or refractory solid tumors were treated in six dose cohorts of seribantumab: 3.2, 6, 10, 15, or 20 mg/kg weekly, or 40 mg/kg loading dose followed by 20 mg/kg weekly maintenance dose (40/20 mg/kg) using a modified 3+3 dose escalation strategy with cohort expansion. Primary objectives were identification of a recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) and determination of objective response rate. Secondary objectives were assessment of safety, dose-limiting toxicities, and PK.RESULTS: Forty-four patients (26 dose escalation; 18 dose expansion) were enrolled. Seribantumab monotherapy was well tolerated with most adverse events being transient and mild to moderate (grade 1 or 2) in severity; maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The highest dose, 40/20 mg/kg, was identified as RP2D. Best response was stable disease, achieved by 24% and 39% of patients during the dose escalation and expansion portions of the study, respectively. Seribantumab terminal half-life was ≈100 hours; steady state concentrations were reached after 3–4 weekly doses. CONCLUSIONS: Seribantumab monotherapy was well tolerated across all dose levels. Safety and PK data from this study support further seribantumab investigations in genomically defined populations. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00734305.DATE OF REGISTRATION: August 12, 2008.

scholarly journals Repurposing Leflunomide for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Final Analysis of a Phase 1 Study

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2007-2007
Author(s):  
Michael Rosenzweig ◽  
Joycelynne Palmer ◽  
Ni-Chun Tsai ◽  
Ralf Buettner ◽  
Lupe Duarte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
T Cells ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Phase 1 Study

Abstract Introduction: Despite significant progress in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), the disease remains incurable and typically follows a pattern of multiple responses and relapses. In the relapsed/refractory MM setting (RRMM), outcomes for patients may be particularly discouraging. New treatments that are safe and effective are therefore of urgent need for this population. Since its FDA approval in 1998 for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, leflunomide has been used in over 300,000 patients worldwide. Leflunomide is hepatically cleared and has a favorable toxicity profile even when given over long periods. Its primary mechanism of action is inhibition of pyrimidine synthesis by targeting dihydroorotate dehydrogenase, thus achieving anti-proliferative effects on B and T lymphocytes. The anti-neoplastic potential of this agent has been studied in a number of pre-clinical tumor models. Leflunomide's immunoregulatory action may be related to functional inhibition of CD4+ effector T cells, including Th17 cells as well as dysregulation of T regulatory cells (Tregs). We found that leflunomide-treated C57BL/KaLwRij mice engrafted with 5TGM1 cells had more robust expansion of CD8+ cytotoxic T cells and subsequent decrease of CD4+ Tregs compared to untreated mice. We have also noted that leflunomide impairs growth of MM cells at least partly through inhibition of PIM kinases and c-Myc signaling. We present here final results from a phase 1 study of leflunomide in patients with RRMM. Methods: This single center, single agent, phase 1 dose-escalation trial was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose of leflunomide in patients with RRMM. The trial implemented a modified rolling six phase 1 dose escalation design. The primary objectives were as follows: 1) to determine the maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase 2 dose of leflunomide; 2) to assess the safety and tolerably of leflunomide at each dose level by evaluation of toxicities. Leflunomide was administered at a loading dose of 100 mg daily for the first three days, then daily in 28-day cycles. The starting dose of daily leflunomide was 20 mg daily, with dose escalation in increments of 20 mg/day, up to 60 mg/day. Dose de-escalation in decrements of 10mg/day was planned. Results: A total of 12 patients have been enrolled starting in December 2015 and treated. The median age is 68 (range 48 - 85), and the median number of prior therapies is 5 (range: 3 - 14). Nine patients had prior autologous stem cell transplant. Double refractory (lenalidomide/bortezomib) disease was noted in 9 patients. High-risk cytogenetics were observed in 5 patients including 2 patients with del17p. All 12 subjects were evaluable for toxicity. One subject was not evaluable for response because of non-compliance. Of the eleven patients evaluable for response, the median number of cycles was 3 (range 1- 15). The median follow up was 177 days (range: 42 - 602). Three patients were treated on DL 1 (20 mg) and three on DL3 (40 mg) without incidence of DLT. At DL5 (60 mg), one patient had a DLT with grade III elevation of alanine aminotransferase; an additional three patients were enrolled at this dose level without further DLTs. One out of 12 subjects remains on treatment, 8 patients were removed from study due to disease progression, two due to adverse events (bacteremia at 60 mg, possibly related to study drug and angioedema at 40 mg, not related to study drug) and one from noncompliance. The most common toxicities were hematologic. There were 4 patients with grade 1 or 2 neutropenia on the 20 and 40 mg dose levels and 1 patient with grade 4 lymphopenia on the 40 mg dose. Except for the DLT, all non-hematologic toxicities were ≤ grade 2. Response: Although not all patients were treated at the 60 mg dose, a clinical benefit rate of 90% has been seen, with 9/10 achieving stable disease (SD). The median duration of SD among 9 patients thus far is 56 days (range: 27-401). In the five evaluable patients with high risk cytogenetics, four of them achieved a clinical benefit. Two subjects had SD lasting nearly one year or longer. In this small cohort, no association between dose and benefit was observed. Conclusion: Leflunomide is a safe and well-tolerated oral option for patients with RRMM, with a clinical benefit from single agent dosing. On the basis of our preclinical work showing synergistic inhibition of MM using leflunomide, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone, we plan clinical testing of this drug combination. Disclosures Rosenzweig: Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Krishnan:Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Sutro: Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Speakers Bureau. Forman:Mustang Therapeutics: Other: Licensing Agreement, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding.

A phase I, first-in-human, open-label, dose-escalation, safety, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic study of oral TP-1287 administered daily to patients with advanced solid tumors.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3611-3611
Author(s):  
Ben George ◽  
Donald A. Richards ◽  
William Jeffery Edenfield ◽  
Steven L Warner ◽  
Lars Mouritsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Grade 3

3611 Background: TP-1287 is a an orally bioavailable phosphate prodrug of alvocidib, a cyclin dependent kinase 9 (CDK9) inhibitor. TP-1287 exhibits potent inhibition of intracellular kinases including CDK9. Inhibition of CDK9 leads to downregulation of the BCL-2 family member, MCL-1, which in turn inhibits tumor growth in preclinical animal models of prostate, breast, and lung carcinomas. Methods: This is a multicenter, Phase 1, dose escalation study using a standard 3+3 design with a modified Fibonacci scheme to examine the safety and clinical activity of TP-1287 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients will be added at the maximum tolerated dose (i.e. expansion cohort) to test TP-1287 as a single agent in patients with castrate resistant prostate cancer. Results: Twenty-two patients who were enrolled between December 2018 and January 2020 received a range of doses from 1 mg QD to 11 mg BID over 7 cohorts. Data are available for 20 patients as of the data cutoff date. TP-1287 plasma PK Cmax and AUC increased in near linear fashion over cohorts 1 thru 6, reaching 80 ng/mL and 499.3 ng*h/mL in cohort 6 for Cmax and AUC, respectively. TP-1287 treatment resulted in dose-dependent reductions of phospho-RNA Pol II, consistent with CDK9 inhibition, as measured by a flow cytometric assay assessing pharmacodynamic changes in phosphorylation state in PBMCs. The most frequently observed Grade 3 AE was unrelated anemia in 2 patients. All other events of Grade 3 (9 events/7 patients) and Grade 4 (1 event/seizure with new CNS mets) were unlikely related or unrelated. Clinical benefit was seen in one sarcoma patient with PR (15+cycles), one RCC patient with SD (7+cycles) and 2 bladder cancer patients with SD (6 and 8 cycles). Conclusions: These findings suggest that TP-1287 is tolerated as a monotherapy in patients with heavily pretreated, relapsed, refractory solid tumors and further clinical development in selected indications is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT03298984 .

A phase I dose escalation and expansion study of the next generation oral SERD AZD9833 in women with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1024-1024
Author(s):  
Erika Paige Hamilton ◽  
Mafalda Oliveira ◽  
Udai Banerji ◽  
Cristina Hernando ◽  
Javier Garcia-Corbacho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Sinus Bradycardia ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Open Label

1024 Background: AZD9833 is an oral selective estrogen receptor (ER) antagonist and degrader (SERD) that has shown antitumor efficacy in a range of preclinical models of breast cancer. Methods: SERENA-1 (NCT03616587) is an ongoing Phase 1, open-label study in pre- and post-menopausal women, after ≥1 endocrine therapy and ≤2 prior chemotherapies for ER+ HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC). The primary objective is to determine the safety and tolerability of AZD9833 once daily (QD), with dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in 28d defining the maximum tolerated dose. Secondary objectives include pharmacokinetics and anti-tumor response. Pharmacodynamic (PD) analysis includes ER modulation in paired tumor biopsies and ctDNA dynamic changes. Results: At 20 January 2020: 60 patients were treated (median prior therapies 5 (1–9); prior fulvestrant (Fv) 82%; prior CDK4/6i 68%) across five doses; 25 mg QD n=12, 75 mg QD n=12, 150 mg QD n=13, 300 mg QD n=13, 450 mg QD n=10. AZD9833 exposure was dose proportional after multiple doses, with a median terminal t1/2 of 12h. Treatment-related AEs experienced by ≥10% of patients were visual disturbances (53%; 91% G1, 6% G2, 3% G3), bradycardia/sinus bradycardia (45%; 93% G1, 7% G2), nausea (18%; 46% G1, 55% G2), fatigue (13%; 38% G1, 63% G2), dizziness (10%; 83% G1, 17% G3) vomiting (10%; 50% G1, 33% G2, 17% G3), and asthenia (10%; 67% G1, 33% G2). Three patients experienced DLTs: G3 QTcF prolongation (300 mg); G3 vomiting (450 mg); and a combination of G2 visual disturbance, G2 headache and G2 gait disturbance (450 mg). DLTs resolved with dose reduction. No G4 or 5 AEs were reported. Efficacy data are presented in the table below; objective response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 24 weeks. Clinical trial information: NCT03616587 . ER signalling pathway modulation was observed in all dose cohorts. In patients where clinical responses occurred and paired biopsies obtained, 98% reduction in Ki67 was measured. Updated data will be presented. Conclusions: AZD9833 has an encouraging efficacy and dose-dependent safety profile. Evidence of clinical benefit and target engagement was observed at all dose levels in women with ER+ ABC, including patients pre-treated with CDK4/6i and Fv, and those with ESR1 mutations. A Phase 2 study comparing efficacy and safety of three doses AZD9833 vs Fv is planned (NCT04214288). [Table: see text]

A first-in-human, multicenter, open-label, phase 1 study of ATOR-1017, a 4-1BB antibody, in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2646-2646
Author(s):  
Gustav J. Ullenhag ◽  
Jeffrey Yachnin ◽  
Ana Carneiro ◽  
Emma Elison ◽  
Malin Carlsson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Choroidal Melanoma ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
Solid Malignancies

2646 Background: ATOR-1017 is a human agonistic IgG4 antibody targeting the co-stimulatory receptor 4-1BB (CD137). It is developed to activate T cells and natural killer cells in the tumor environment, leading to immune-mediated tumor cell killing. This is a first-in-human, multicenter, phase 1 study (NCT04144842). Methods: In this study, ATOR-1017 is administered intravenously every 21 days as a single agent to patients with solid malignancies. ATOR-1017 is administered until confirmed progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent. The primary objective of the study is to determine the maximum tolerated dose, assessed by adverse events (AEs) and dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), and the recommended phase 2 dose. Secondary objectives include pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity and clinical efficacy, assessed with CT scans using response criteria for use in studies testing immunotherapeutics (iRECIST). The study uses a single cohort design for doses up to 40 mg, and thereafter a modified 3+3 design. Results: The first patient was dosed in December 2019; by 22 Jan 2021, twelve patients have been exposed to ATOR-1017. The following dose levels have been evaluated; 0.38 mg; 1.5 mg; 5 mg; 15 mg; 40 mg and 100 mg. Dose escalation is ongoing, and the 200 mg dose level is under evaluation. The maximum tolerated dose has not been reached. The following cancer types are included; ovarian cancer (n = 1), choroidal melanoma (n = 3), anal cancer (n = 1), cholangiocarcinoma (n = 1), gastrointestinal stromal tumor (n = 1), breast cancer (n = 1), pancreatic cancer (n = 1), adenoid cystic cancer (n = 1), malignant melanoma (n = 1), colorectal cancer (n = 1). Drug-related AEs were reported in 5 out of 12 patients; one patient experienced a grade 3, all others were grade 1 or 2. There have been two episodes each of chest pain (grades 2 and 3) and headache (grades 1 and 2). Single cases of pyrexia, upper abdominal pain, mouth ulceration, nausea, leukopenia, neutropenia, cytokine release syndrome (CRS), arthralgia, neck pain, and rash were also reported. No DLTs have been observed in the study to date. The median age of the patients were 48.5 years (range 34-76). Patients received a median of 2 prior lines of therapy (range 1-4). The median time on study were 15 weeks (range 0.14-51). Six patients are on study, and six patients have discontinued treatment. Reasons for discontinuation include; investigator decision (n = 1), confirmed disease progression (n = 1), withdrawal of consent (n = 1), death due to disease progression (n = 1) and other reason (n = 2). Preliminary PK data show dose-proportional kinetics up to 100 mg. Best response has been stable disease. Conclusions: ATOR-1017 is safe and well-tolerated up to 100 mg. Dose escalation continues and the current dose level is 200 mg. Clinical trial information: NCT04144842.

402 DRAGON: Phase 1 trial of SRK-181, a latent TGFβ1 inhibitor in combination with anti-PD-(L)1 inhibitors for patients with solid tumors unresponsive to anti-PD-(L)1 therapy alone

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A427-A427
Author(s):  
Lu Gan ◽  
Johanna Bendell
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Immune Cells ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Tumor Stroma ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Primary Resistance

BackgroundTGFβ1 is a key mediator of primary resistance to PD1 (programmed cell death protein 1) pathway blockade. SRK-181 is a high-affinity, fully humanized antibody that selectively binds to latent TGFβ1 and inhibits its activation on suppressive immune cells as well as within tumor stroma. Preclinical data demonstrated that selective inhibition of latent TGFβ1 with SRK-181 overcomes primary anti-PD-1 resistance and has an improved safety profile compared to broad inhibition of the TGFβ pathway.MethodsThe DRAGON trial is a multi-center, open-label, Phase 1, first-in-human (FIH), dose-escalation, and dose expansion study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and efficacy of SRK-181 administered by IV infusion every 3 weeks (q3w) alone and in combination with an anti-PD-(L)-1 in adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors. The study is divided into 3 parts: Part A1, a single agent dose escalation, will determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or maximum administered dose (MAD) of SRK-181 as a single agent. Part A2, a combination dose escalation, will determine the MTD or MAD of SRK-181 in combination with anti-PD-(L)1 therapy and the RP2D of the combination treatment for use in Part B. Part B, the dose expansion, will enroll parallel cohorts of patients with non-small cell lung cancer, urothelial carcinoma, melanoma, or other advanced solid tumors, to confirm the tolerability of the RP2D and to evaluate the anti-tumor activity of SRK-181 in combination with an anti-PD-(L)1 therapy. Patients in Part A2 and Part B will have previously received anti-PD-(L)1 therapy and considered non-responders to anti-PD-(L)1 therapy alone. Patients will receive SRK-181 alone or in combination with anti-PD-(L)1 until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or other reasons for study discontinuation. Safety, PK, PD and efficacy data will be collected and monitored throughout the study. PD effects will be assessed by measuring modulation of tumor immune cells and TGFb pathway within the tumor microenvironment.ResultsN/AConclusionsAn enrollment update will be providedTrial RegistrationNCT04291079

scholarly journals A first-in-human, phase 1 study of the NEDD8 activating enzyme E1 inhibitor TAS4464 in patients with advanced solid tumors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noboru Yamamoto ◽  
Toshio Shimizu ◽  
Kan Yonemori ◽  
Shigehisa Kitano ◽  
Shunsuke Kondo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Function ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Enzyme Inhibitor ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
Open Label Phase

SummaryBackground This open-label, phase 1 study investigated TAS4464, a potent NEDD8-activating enzyme inhibitor, in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors (JapicCTI-173,488; registered 13/01/2017). The primary objective was dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was investigated using an accelerated titration design. Methods The starting 10-mg/m2 dose was followed by an initial accelerated stage (weekly dosing; n = 11). Based on liver function test (LFT) results, a 14-day, 20-mg/m2 dose lead-in period was implemented (weekly dosing with lead-in; n = 6). Results Abnormal LFT changes and gastrointestinal effects were the most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs). DLTs with 56-mg/m2 weekly dosing occurred in 1/5 patients; five patients had grade ≥ 2 abnormal LFT changes at 40- and 56-mg/m2 weekly doses. Further dose escalation ceased because of the possibility of severe abnormal LFT changes occurring. DLTs with weekly dosing with lead-in occurred in 1/5 patients at a 56-mg/m2 dose; MTD could not be determined because discontinuation criteria for additional enrollment at that particular dose level were met. As no further enrollment at lower doses occurred, dose escalation assessment was discontinued. Serious treatment-related AEs, AEs leading to treatment discontinuation, and DLTs were all related to abnormal LFT changes, suggesting that TAS4464 administration could affect liver function. This effect was dose-dependent but considered reversible. Complete or partial responses to TAS4464 were not observed; one patient achieved prolonged stable disease. Conclusions MTD could not be determined due to TAS4464 effects on liver function. Further evaluation of the mechanism of NEDD8-activating enzyme inhibitor-induced abnormal liver function is required. Trial registration number JapicCTI-173,488 (registered with Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center). Registration date 13 January 2017

A Phase 1, Open-Label, Multi-Center, Multiple-Dose, Dose-Escalation Study of MDX-1342 in Patients with CD19-Positive Refractory/Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3425-3425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis H Camacho ◽  
Robin Joyce ◽  
Jennifer R Brown ◽  
Asher Chanan-Khan ◽  
Philip C. Amrein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Multiple Dose ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Tolerability Profile ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Dose Cohort ◽  
Median Reduction

Abstract Abstract 3425 Poster Board III-313 MDX-1342 is a fully human monoclonal antibody (HuMAb) with enhanced antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) effector function, targeting CD19-membrane receptor which is highly expressed on malignant chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells. An open-label, multi-center, multiple-dose, dose-escalating Phase 1 study is being conducted to determine the safety and tolerability profile of MDX-1342 in subjects with CD19-positive relapsed or refractory CLL. To date, MDX-1342 has been administered intravenously (iv) weekly for 4 weeks to 12 subjects (8 Male, 4 Female) - in cohorts of 3 subjects each - at doses of 0.7, 7, 40, and 200 mg/dose. Overall, MDX-1342 has been well tolerated. No drug-related serious adverse events have been reported among the 12 subjects treated. Grade 1 and 2 infusion reactions (including rigors, chills, and wheezing) have been observed in 9 subjects. This has been adequately managed with the use of antihistamines and corticosteroids. Dose escalation continues and a maximum tolerated dose has not yet been identified. Of the 9 currently evaluable subjects, 1 has experienced a partial response (40 mg/dose cohort), 6 have stable disease and 2 have discontinued due to progressive disease. Preliminary results indicate antileukemic signals with dose-correlative reductions in both white blood counts (WBC) and circulating CD20+ cells after one 4-week cycle of weekly i.v. infusions of MDX-1342. In the 40 mg/dose cohort, the median reduction in WBC was 62% and the median reduction in circulating CD20+ cells was 74%. Additional subjects are being accrued to higher dose cohorts to more accurately characterize the safety and clinical activity of MDX-1342 and to determine if there is a consistent cumulative drop in WBC and circulating CD20+ cells as the dose increases. Disclosures Assad: Medarex, Inc.: Employment. Carrigan:Medarex, Inc: Employment.

Safety and efficacy of AMG 655 plus modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) and bevacizumab (B) for the first-line treatment of patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4079-4079 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Saltz ◽  
J. Infante ◽  
L. Schwartzberg ◽  
J. Stephenson ◽  
C. Rocha-Lima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Death Receptor ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Death Receptor 5 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps

4079 Background: AMG 655 is an investigational fully human monoclonal antibody (IgG1) agonist of human death receptor 5 (DR5). AMG 655 activates caspases and induces apoptosis in sensitive tumor cells. The primary objective of this phase 1b study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (up to a target dose of 10 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks) of AMG 655 that can be safely administered in combination with mFOLFOX6-B to mCRC pts. Methods: Eligible pts were ≥ 18 years old with previously untreated mCRC, ECOG PS of 0 or 1, and adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function. Pts were enrolled into sequential cohorts of 3- or 10-mg/kg AMG 655 + mFOLFOX6-B administered on day 1 of each 14-day cycle. Study endpoints included incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), adverse events (AE), pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of AMG 655, and objective response rate (by modified RECIST). Results: As of 09/08, 12 pts (6 per cohort) were enrolled and received ≥ 1 cycle of treatment; 8 were female. Median (range) age was 54 (37–75), median (range) time on AMG 655 treatment was 6.9 (1.6 to 11.4+) months; 8 pts continue on study treatment. There were no DLTs in the first 28 days of treatment. Eight pts had grade 3–4 AE; the most common were diarrhea, febrile neutropenia, peripheral neuropathy, neutropenia, DVT, and pulmonary embolism (2 pts each). Post baseline laboratory parameters grade ≥ 3: no ALT and AST; 1 grade 3 bilirubin (due to disease progression), and 3 grade 3 lipase (asymptomatic). No anti-AMG 655 antibodies were detected. AMG 655 PK values (Cmax, Cmin) were similar to those observed with single-agent AMG 655 (LoRusso JCO 2007; 25: abstract 3534). AMG 655 did not appear to affect PK of oxaliplatin or bevacizumab. Best overall tumor response: 5 partial responses (2 unconfirmed, both underwent resection); 6 stable disease; 1 pt had non-measurable disease at baseline. Time to disease progression (3 patients): 8, 42, and 44 weeks. Conclusions: The addition of AMG 655 does not appear to substantially alter the safety profile of mFOLFOX6-B. The randomized phase 2 part of the trial (mFOLFOX6-B ± AMG 655) is in progress. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document