Retrospective study of nivolumab monotherapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 179-179
Author(s):  
Hayato Mikuni ◽  
Shun Yamamoto ◽  
Kotoe Oshima ◽  
Hidekazu Hirano ◽  
Natsuko Okita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Treatment Rate ◽  
Practice Methods

179 Background: Based on the results of the ATTRACTION-1 and ATTRACTION-3 trials, nivolumab monotherapy has used for the treatment of metastatic or recurrence esophageal cancer patients who were refractory or intolerant to fluoropyrimidine and platinum since February 2020 in Japan. However, the ATTRACTION-1 trial mainly included patients who received nivolumab monotherapy as third or later-line treatments, which was different from the ATTRACTION-3 trial which mainly included patients as second-line treatment. Therefore, it is still unclear whether the treatment lines affect the efficacy of nivolumab in clinical practice. Methods: Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for patients diagnosed with metastatic or recurrence esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who received nivolumab monotherapy as second- or third or later-line treatments in our hospital. We evaluated progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) based on the RECIST ver1.1, and the incidences of adverse events (AEs) based on the CTCAE ver5.0. Results: Sixty-two patients were identified as the subject of this study. Thirty patients received nivolumab as second-line treatment (48.4%) and 32 patients as third or later-line treatments (51.6%). The median age (range) were 67 (33-80)/61 (52-84), PS 0 were 40.0/21.9%, prior taxane treatment rate were 6.7/93.8%, respectively. The ORR/DCR were 22.7/45.5% in second-line treatment, and 24.1/44.8% in third or later-line treatments (p=1.00). The median PFS (95% CI) was 2.3 (1.4-6.2)/2.3 (1.2-3.6) months in the second-/third or later-line treatments (HR=0.86, p=0.58). AEs of grade 3 or higher were observed in 6.7/6.3% of the second-/third or later-line treatments. Conclusions: There was no clear difference between second -line and third or later-line treatments in the short-term efficacy of nivolumab monotherapy in advanced ESCC patients.

659 AN SINGLE-ARM OPEN-LABEL PHASE II STUDY OF CAMRELIZUMAB PLUS APATINIB AS SECOND-LINE TREATMENT FOR ADVANCED ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Wang ◽  
Qingxia Fan ◽  
Junsheng Wang ◽  
Tao Wu ◽  
Yonggui Hong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line

Abstract   Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) as a common malignancy is prevalent in East Asia and in eastern and southern Africa. Although pembrolizumab, nivolumab and camrelizumab are respectively recommended as second-line treatment for advanced ESCC due to improved overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) was modest. New effective treatments are needed. Hence, the study of camrelizumab plus apatinib (VEGFR2 inhibitor) as second-line treatment for advanced ESCC was performed. Methods This ongoing phase II trial (NCT03736863) in six sites in China enrolled pts aged 18-75 with unresectable locally advanced, locally recurrent, or metastatic ESCC that progressed or were intolerant after first-line chemotherapy, and an ECOG performance status of 0-1. Pts received 200 mg camrelizumab intravenously every 2 weeks and apatinib 250 mg orally once per day in 4-week cycles until disease progression, unacceptable adverse events (AEs) or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed ORR. Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) and OS. Results At data cutoff (Feb 28, 2021), 52 pts were enrolled, including 42 males and 50 with distant metastases, with the median age of 62 years. In the evaluable population of 39 pts, ORR without confirmation was 43.59% and DCR was 94.87%. The median duration of response was 6.9 months (95% CI 4.57–9.23). The median PFS was 6.8 month (95% CI 2.66–10.94). The 12-month overall survival was 52.2%. A total of 80.8% of pts had treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) with 46.2% of grade ≥ 3 TRAEs. The safety profile of camrelizumab and apatinib was consistent with other anti–PD-1 antibodies and angiogenesis inhibitors. Conclusion This is the first study that evaluates the combination anti–PD-1 antibody and anti-angiogenesis inhibitor as a second-line therapy for advanced ESCC. Camrelizumab plus apatinib showed encouraging clinical efficacy and acceptable safety. Further phase III randomized trials are warranted.

scholarly journals PD-1 inhibitors versus chemotherapy as second-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinxin Zhu ◽  
Qiyue Shanzhou ◽  
Danyang Li ◽  
Xuezhou Pang ◽  
Daiyuan Ma
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
American Society

Abstract Background Aim to establish the inhibitors of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) as second-line therapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods Published clinical trials in the PubMed, Medline, Embase databases on PD-1 inhibitors for the treatment of ESCC were searched, along with an additional search on abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) from inception to September 2021. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were synthesized using STATA. Results A total of 1970 patients (PD-1 inhibitors: 987; chemotherapy: 983) were enrolled in five randomized controlled trials. Compared with conventional chemotherapy, second-line PD-1 inhibitors significantly improved the OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.66–0.81; P < 0.001) and ORR (relative risk [RR] = 1.89, 95% CI: 1.16–3.05; P = 0.01) of advanced ESCC patients, especially significantly prolonged the OS in the patients with positive programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status (HR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.53–0.77; P < 0.001); but did not better PFS (HR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.68–1.14; P = 0.330) and DCR (RR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.59–1.37; P = 0.603). Moreover, PD-1 inhibitors were associated with statistically lower incidences of grade 3–5 TRAEs. Conclusion Second line PD-1 inhibitors significantly improved the OS and ORR of patients with advanced ESCC, especially the OS of those with positive PD-L1 expression, and did not result in significant improvement in PFS and DCR. Compared to chemotherapy, second-line PD-1 inhibitors had superior safety profiles for the treatment of advanced ESCC.

scholarly journals Clinical and biomarker analyses of sintilimab versus chemotherapy as second-line therapy for advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized, open-label phase 2 trial (ORIENT-2)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Ming Xu ◽  
Yi Li ◽  
Qingxia Fan ◽  
Yongqian Shu ◽  
Lei Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 2 Trial ◽  
Open Label Phase

Abstract This randomized, open-label, multi-center phase 2 study (ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03116152) assessed sintilimab, a PD-1 inhibitor, versus chemo in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) refractory to first-line (1L) chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), while exploratory endpoint was the association of biomarkers with treatment efficacy. The median OS in the sintilimab group was significantly prolonged compared with that of the chemotherapy group, (objective response rates 12.6% and 6.3 %, respectively). Incidence of treatment-related adverse events of grade 3–5 was lower with sintilimab than with chemotherapy (20.2 vs. 39.1 %). Patients with high TCR clonality and low mTBI showed the longest median OS (15.0 mo), while patients with low NLR at 6 wk post-treatment had a significantly prolonged median OS compared with those with high NLR. High expression of T-follicular helper cells or activated B-cell signature was significantly associated with longer progression-free survival in the sintilimab group.

scholarly journals Outcomes of Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Stage IVa (T4b vs. N4) Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Based on the Japanese Classification System: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 8
Author(s):  
Yuki Wada ◽  
Akira Anbai ◽  
Noriko Takagi ◽  
Satoshi Kumagai ◽  
Eriko Okuyama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Japanese Classification ◽  
System A ◽  
Single Center Study ◽  
Progression Patterns

The differences in prognoses or progression patterns between T4b non-N4 and non-T4b N4 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma post chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is unclear. This study compared the outcomes of CRT for stage IVa esophageal squamous cell carcinoma according to T/N factors. We retrospectively identified 66 patients with stage IVa esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent definitive CRT at our center between January 2009 and March 2013. The treatment outcomes, i.e., progression patterns, prognostic factors, and toxicities based on version 5.0 of the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, were studied. The patients (56 men and 10 women) had a median age of 67 (range: 37–87) years. The T/N classifications were T4b non-N4 (28/66), non-T4b N4 (24/66), and T4b N4 (14/66). Objective response was achieved in 57 patients (86.4%, (95% confidence interval, 74.6–94.1%)). There were no significant differences between the T/N groups in terms of overall survival, progression-free survival, and progression pattern. We found no significant differences in prognoses or progression patterns among patients with T4b non-N4, non-T4b N4, and T4b N4 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Thus, it seems impractical to modify CRT regimens based on T/N factors.

scholarly journals Anti-PD1/PDL1 antibodies plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiong Qian ◽  
Wu Lin ◽  
Haohao Wang ◽  
Chenyu Mao ◽  
Haiping Jiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Treatment

Abstract Background: Patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) have a poor prognosis with few treatment options. Immunotherapy was suggested as a promising treatment for ESCC from some clinical trials. Here we collected clinical results from 23 patients who were received anti-PD1/PDL1 antibodies (mAbs) plus chemotherapy as first line therapy with advanced ESCC, to analyze this combined therapy’s efficacy on advanced ESCC. Methods: Results of 23 Patients started treatment from December 15th, 2017 to September 27th, 2019 (12 patients were enrolled in phase II clinical trials, 11 patients were treated by physician’s choice regiment) of anti-PD1/PDL1 antibodies (mAbs) plus chemotherapy on advanced ESCC as first line treatment were collected. Regiments were either anti-PD1 or anti-PDL1 mAbs plus traditional chemotherapy (cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (5-FU), Paclitaxel/ cisplatin, Paclitaxel/carboplatin or Paclitaxel/ 5-FU) every 3 weeks for six cycles, followed by maintenance therapy with anti-PD1/PDL1 mAbs. Objective response and safety profiles were observed as well as progression-free survival(PFS), overall survival(OS) and duration of response. Results: Of the 23 patients, 18 (78.3%) responded to treatment: 15 partial and 3 complete response. 4 patients had stable disease and 1 patient had progressive disease. The median time to response was 1.4 months (range, 1.4 months – 2.8 months). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in all patients but 3-4 grade immune-mediated adverse events occurred in only one patient. As of April 10th, 2020, the Objective response rate was 78.3%, the median PFS was 15.5 months and the median OS was 21.5 months. No treatment-related deaths were observed. Conclusions: Anti-PD1/PDL1 antibodies plus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for advanced ESCC showed promising results with manageable adverse events and worthy of further study.

scholarly journals Comparison of PD-1 Inhibitors in Patients With Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the Second-Line Setting

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Xin Zhou ◽  
Ping Chen ◽  
Yu-Ting Sun ◽  
Bei Zhang ◽  
Miao-Zhen Qiu
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Indirect Comparison ◽  
Squamous Carcinoma ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Line Setting

BackgroundKEYNOTE-181, ATTRACTION-3, and ESCORT trials have opened the era of programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors in the second-line therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). There is no head-to-head comparison of pembrolizumab vs. nivolumab vs. camrelizumab in the second-line setting for ESCC. We performed an indirect comparison to explore the optimal choice of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) for advanced ESCC.MethodsPatients in ATTRACTION-3 and ESCORT were all squamous carcinoma, while KEYNOTE-181 enrolled both adenocarcinoma and squamous carcinoma patients. We only extract information of patients with squamous carcinoma from KEYNOTE 181 study and all the patients from ATTRACTION-3 and ESCORT. The main clinical outcomes for this study were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).ResultsIndirect analysis showed similar survival benefit among three PD-1 inhibitors. Nivolumab was comparable with pembrolizumab in most subgroups except that nivolumab was slightly better for patients with performance status (PS) score of 1 [HRnivo/pembro: 0.68 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.45–1.02], p = 0.07). Compared with nivolumab indirectly, pembrolizumab and camrelizumab had better PFS [HRpembro/nivo: 0.85 (95% CI: 0.63–1.14), p = 0.29; HRcam/nivo: 0.64 (95% CI: 0.47–0.87), p = 0.004] and significantly higher ORR [RRpembro/nivo: 2.51 (95% CI: 1.22–5.15), p = 0.01; RRcam/nivo: 3.52 (95% CI: 1.73–7.18), p = 0.001]. Compared with camrelizumab indirectly, pembrolizumab had slightly worse PFS [HRpembro/cam: 1.33 (95% CI: 0.99–1.79), p = 0.057] and comparable ORR [RRpembro/cam: 0.71 (95% CI: 0.32–1.60; p = 0.41)]. Camrelizumab had a significantly higher rate of all grade TRAEs than both pembrolizumab and nivolumab.ConclusionsCombining the safety and potential survival benefit, we recommend nivolumab for ESCC patients with PS score of 1 and pembrolizumab or camrelizumab for patients with better PS and seeking for higher efficacy or longer PFS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document