scholarly journals Comparison of PD-1 Inhibitors in Patients With Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the Second-Line Setting

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Xin Zhou ◽  
Ping Chen ◽  
Yu-Ting Sun ◽  
Bei Zhang ◽  
Miao-Zhen Qiu
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Indirect Comparison ◽  
Squamous Carcinoma ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Line Setting

BackgroundKEYNOTE-181, ATTRACTION-3, and ESCORT trials have opened the era of programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors in the second-line therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). There is no head-to-head comparison of pembrolizumab vs. nivolumab vs. camrelizumab in the second-line setting for ESCC. We performed an indirect comparison to explore the optimal choice of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) for advanced ESCC.MethodsPatients in ATTRACTION-3 and ESCORT were all squamous carcinoma, while KEYNOTE-181 enrolled both adenocarcinoma and squamous carcinoma patients. We only extract information of patients with squamous carcinoma from KEYNOTE 181 study and all the patients from ATTRACTION-3 and ESCORT. The main clinical outcomes for this study were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).ResultsIndirect analysis showed similar survival benefit among three PD-1 inhibitors. Nivolumab was comparable with pembrolizumab in most subgroups except that nivolumab was slightly better for patients with performance status (PS) score of 1 [HRnivo/pembro: 0.68 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.45–1.02], p = 0.07). Compared with nivolumab indirectly, pembrolizumab and camrelizumab had better PFS [HRpembro/nivo: 0.85 (95% CI: 0.63–1.14), p = 0.29; HRcam/nivo: 0.64 (95% CI: 0.47–0.87), p = 0.004] and significantly higher ORR [RRpembro/nivo: 2.51 (95% CI: 1.22–5.15), p = 0.01; RRcam/nivo: 3.52 (95% CI: 1.73–7.18), p = 0.001]. Compared with camrelizumab indirectly, pembrolizumab had slightly worse PFS [HRpembro/cam: 1.33 (95% CI: 0.99–1.79), p = 0.057] and comparable ORR [RRpembro/cam: 0.71 (95% CI: 0.32–1.60; p = 0.41)]. Camrelizumab had a significantly higher rate of all grade TRAEs than both pembrolizumab and nivolumab.ConclusionsCombining the safety and potential survival benefit, we recommend nivolumab for ESCC patients with PS score of 1 and pembrolizumab or camrelizumab for patients with better PS and seeking for higher efficacy or longer PFS.

659 AN SINGLE-ARM OPEN-LABEL PHASE II STUDY OF CAMRELIZUMAB PLUS APATINIB AS SECOND-LINE TREATMENT FOR ADVANCED ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Wang ◽  
Qingxia Fan ◽  
Junsheng Wang ◽  
Tao Wu ◽  
Yonggui Hong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line

Abstract   Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) as a common malignancy is prevalent in East Asia and in eastern and southern Africa. Although pembrolizumab, nivolumab and camrelizumab are respectively recommended as second-line treatment for advanced ESCC due to improved overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) was modest. New effective treatments are needed. Hence, the study of camrelizumab plus apatinib (VEGFR2 inhibitor) as second-line treatment for advanced ESCC was performed. Methods This ongoing phase II trial (NCT03736863) in six sites in China enrolled pts aged 18-75 with unresectable locally advanced, locally recurrent, or metastatic ESCC that progressed or were intolerant after first-line chemotherapy, and an ECOG performance status of 0-1. Pts received 200 mg camrelizumab intravenously every 2 weeks and apatinib 250 mg orally once per day in 4-week cycles until disease progression, unacceptable adverse events (AEs) or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed ORR. Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) and OS. Results At data cutoff (Feb 28, 2021), 52 pts were enrolled, including 42 males and 50 with distant metastases, with the median age of 62 years. In the evaluable population of 39 pts, ORR without confirmation was 43.59% and DCR was 94.87%. The median duration of response was 6.9 months (95% CI 4.57–9.23). The median PFS was 6.8 month (95% CI 2.66–10.94). The 12-month overall survival was 52.2%. A total of 80.8% of pts had treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) with 46.2% of grade ≥ 3 TRAEs. The safety profile of camrelizumab and apatinib was consistent with other anti–PD-1 antibodies and angiogenesis inhibitors. Conclusion This is the first study that evaluates the combination anti–PD-1 antibody and anti-angiogenesis inhibitor as a second-line therapy for advanced ESCC. Camrelizumab plus apatinib showed encouraging clinical efficacy and acceptable safety. Further phase III randomized trials are warranted.

Retrospective study of nivolumab monotherapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 179-179
Author(s):  
Hayato Mikuni ◽  
Shun Yamamoto ◽  
Kotoe Oshima ◽  
Hidekazu Hirano ◽  
Natsuko Okita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Treatment Rate ◽  
Practice Methods

179 Background: Based on the results of the ATTRACTION-1 and ATTRACTION-3 trials, nivolumab monotherapy has used for the treatment of metastatic or recurrence esophageal cancer patients who were refractory or intolerant to fluoropyrimidine and platinum since February 2020 in Japan. However, the ATTRACTION-1 trial mainly included patients who received nivolumab monotherapy as third or later-line treatments, which was different from the ATTRACTION-3 trial which mainly included patients as second-line treatment. Therefore, it is still unclear whether the treatment lines affect the efficacy of nivolumab in clinical practice. Methods: Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for patients diagnosed with metastatic or recurrence esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who received nivolumab monotherapy as second- or third or later-line treatments in our hospital. We evaluated progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) based on the RECIST ver1.1, and the incidences of adverse events (AEs) based on the CTCAE ver5.0. Results: Sixty-two patients were identified as the subject of this study. Thirty patients received nivolumab as second-line treatment (48.4%) and 32 patients as third or later-line treatments (51.6%). The median age (range) were 67 (33-80)/61 (52-84), PS 0 were 40.0/21.9%, prior taxane treatment rate were 6.7/93.8%, respectively. The ORR/DCR were 22.7/45.5% in second-line treatment, and 24.1/44.8% in third or later-line treatments (p=1.00). The median PFS (95% CI) was 2.3 (1.4-6.2)/2.3 (1.2-3.6) months in the second-/third or later-line treatments (HR=0.86, p=0.58). AEs of grade 3 or higher were observed in 6.7/6.3% of the second-/third or later-line treatments. Conclusions: There was no clear difference between second -line and third or later-line treatments in the short-term efficacy of nivolumab monotherapy in advanced ESCC patients.

The AIM-HN Study: A pivotal study evaluating the efficacy of tipifarnib in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with HRAS mutations.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS6087-TPS6087
Author(s):  
Robert I. Haddad ◽  
Douglas Adkins ◽  
Lisa F. Licitra ◽  
Justine Yang Bruce ◽  
Maura L. Gillison ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Pivotal Study ◽  
Line Setting

TPS6087 Background: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) accounts for more than 830,000 new cancer cases each year worldwide. The prognosis for recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) HNSCC patients remains poor with an estimated median overall survival (mOS) of 7-15 months in the first line setting and 5-8 months in the second line setting and beyond. Approximately 4-8% of HNSCC tumors are driven by gain-of-function mutations in the HRAS (m HRAS) proto-oncogene. Tipifarnib is a potent and selective farnesyltransferase inhibitor that disrupts HRAS function by blocking required protein membrane localization, and subsequent cellular growth and survival. Data from a prior phase 2 study (RUN-HN; NCT02383927) of tipifarnib in R/M m HRAS HNSCC patients in the second line plus setting demonstrated encouraging efficacy, with an objective response rate (ORR) of 55% and mOS of 15.4 months for patients with mHRAS variant allele frequency (VAF) ≥ 20%, providing support for pursuing a pivotal trial in this patient population. Methods: AIM-HN (NCT03719690) is a global, open-label single-arm pivotal study evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of tipifarnib in second line plus R/M m HRAS HNSCC patients. The primary objective is to determine the ORR in patients with a m HRAS VAF ≥ 20% (High VAF population), as assessed using RECIST v1.1 by Independent Review Facility. Key secondary objectives include the ORR for patients of all VAF levels, and the duration of responses for both VAF≥ 20% and all VAF levels. Key inclusion criteria include: histologically confirmed head and neck cancer of squamous histology not amenable to local therapy with curative intent; known tumor missense HRAS mutation (with VAF determined and available) detected by Next Generation Sequencing; ECOG performance status of 0-1; measurable disease by RECIST v1.1; and adequate organ function. Key exclusion criteria include: salivary gland, thyroid, (primary) cutaneous squamous or non-squamous histologies; intolerable Grade 2 or ≥ Grade 3 neuropathy or unstable neurological symptoms within 4 weeks of Cycle 1 Day 1; or active, uncontrolled infections requiring systemic therapy. Tipifarnib is administered at a dose of 600 mg, orally with a meal twice a day for 7 days in alternating weeks (Days 1-7 and 15-21) of 28-day cycles until discontinuation criteria are met. All patients are being followed for safety through the End of Treatment visit, roughly 30 days after treatment discontinuation or immediately before the administration of another anticancer treatment, whichever occurs first. Upon therapy discontinuation, all patients are being followed approximately every 12 weeks for survival status, and the use of subsequent therapy. The IDMB last reviewed data in October 2020 and recommended the trial continue as planned. AIM-HN is continuing to enroll patients globally. Ho et al, JCO, accepted. Clinical trial information: NCT03719690.

scholarly journals PD-1 inhibitors versus chemotherapy as second-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinxin Zhu ◽  
Qiyue Shanzhou ◽  
Danyang Li ◽  
Xuezhou Pang ◽  
Daiyuan Ma
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
American Society

Abstract Background Aim to establish the inhibitors of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) as second-line therapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods Published clinical trials in the PubMed, Medline, Embase databases on PD-1 inhibitors for the treatment of ESCC were searched, along with an additional search on abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) from inception to September 2021. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were synthesized using STATA. Results A total of 1970 patients (PD-1 inhibitors: 987; chemotherapy: 983) were enrolled in five randomized controlled trials. Compared with conventional chemotherapy, second-line PD-1 inhibitors significantly improved the OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.66–0.81; P < 0.001) and ORR (relative risk [RR] = 1.89, 95% CI: 1.16–3.05; P = 0.01) of advanced ESCC patients, especially significantly prolonged the OS in the patients with positive programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status (HR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.53–0.77; P < 0.001); but did not better PFS (HR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.68–1.14; P = 0.330) and DCR (RR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.59–1.37; P = 0.603). Moreover, PD-1 inhibitors were associated with statistically lower incidences of grade 3–5 TRAEs. Conclusion Second line PD-1 inhibitors significantly improved the OS and ORR of patients with advanced ESCC, especially the OS of those with positive PD-L1 expression, and did not result in significant improvement in PFS and DCR. Compared to chemotherapy, second-line PD-1 inhibitors had superior safety profiles for the treatment of advanced ESCC.

Nivolumab in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ATTRACTION-1/ONO-4538-07): Minimum of five-year follow-up.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 207-207
Author(s):  
Ken Kato ◽  
Yuichiro Doki ◽  
Takashi Ura ◽  
Yasuo Hamamoto ◽  
Takashi Kojima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Objective Response

207 Background:ATTRACTION-1/ONO-4538-07 (AT-1), an open-label, single-arm, multicenter phase 2 clinical trial conducted in Japan, evaluated the clinical activity and safety of nivolumab in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) refractory/intolerant to fluoropyrimidine-, platinum-, and taxane-based chemotherapy. We previously reported the 2-year follow-up findings of AT-1, in which nivolumab demonstrated antitumor activity with a manageable safety profile for these patients. Here we report the final findings from AT-1 at a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Methods:Patients aged ≥20 years with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) of 0-1 received 3 mg/kg nivolumab intravenously every 2 weeks in 6-week cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was centrally-assessed objective response rate (ORR), defined as the proportion of patients whose best overall response was either a complete or partial response. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), investigator-assessed ORR, progression-free survival (PFS), change in tumor burden, time to response, time to disease progression, and duration of response. Results:Between February 25 and November 14, 2014, a total of 65 patients were enrolled. Sixty-four patients were evaluated for the efficacy, and all patients were evaluated for the safety. At the final database lock on August 6, 2020, 11 (17.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 9.9-28.2) of 64 patients had an objective response by central assessment. The median OS was 10.8 months (95% CI, 7.4-13.9), and the estimated 5-year OS rate was 6.3% (95% CI, 2.0-14.0). The median PFS was 1.5 months (95% CI, 1.4-2.8), and the estimated 5-year PFS rate was 6.8% (95% CI, 2.2-15.1). Treatment-related adverse events that occurred with a frequency of > 10% were diarrhea and rash. The presentation will include characteristics of long-term survivors as well as detailed efficacy and safety data of nivolumab. Conclusions:This final assessment represents the longest follow-up of patients with advanced ESCC treated with nivolumab. Nivolumab demonstrated continued long-term efficacy in these patients based on a minimum of 5-year long-term survival update of AT-1. Furthermore, no new safety signals with nivolumab were identified during long-term follow-up. These findings are consistent with those of nivolumab monotherapy for various types of cancer. Clinical trial information: No.142422.

Camrelizumab combined with paclitaxel and nedaplatin as neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESPRIT): A phase Ⅱ, single-arm, exploratory research.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16033-e16033
Author(s):  
Jianqun Ma ◽  
Jinfeng Zhang ◽  
Yingnan Yang ◽  
Dayong Zheng ◽  
Xiaoyuan Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Radical Surgery ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Therapeutic Effects

e16033 Background: Camrelizumab has been approved as a standard therapy in the second-line treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab combined with commonly used neoadjuvant chemotherapy (paclitaxel and platinum) in neoadjuvant treatment of ESCC. Methods: In this single-arm, phase Ⅱ study, patients with advanced ESCC who were expected to receive neoadjuvant therapy followed by radical surgery were recruited. The patients received 2-4 cycles of camrelizumab (200mg, iv, q3w) in combination with paclitaxel (155mg/m2, iv, q3w) and nedaplatin (80mg/m2, iv, q3w) as neoadjuvant therapy, and the therapeutic effects were determined every 2 cycles. The radical surgery was performed on patients whose tumors were evaluated as resectable. The primary endpoint was pCR, and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Results: From May 2020 to January 2021, 24 patients with a median age of 60.5 years (50-73) were enrolled. Among them, 21 patients were available for efficacy analysis, of which 1 achieved complete response (CR), 7 achieved partial response (PR), and 13 had stable disease (SD). The ORR was 38.1% and DCR was 100%. The tumor in 10 patients shrank significantly after neoadjuvant therapy and these patients preferred radiotherapy instead of surgery as the radical therapeutic method. 2 patients abandoned surgery because of personal reasons. 2 patients were in the process of neoadjuvant therapy and had not undergone surgery yet. The remaining 7 patients underwent radical surgery and 4 patients (57.14%) achieved pCR (pT0N0M0). The main treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse event (AE) was neutropenia (1/21). All the AEs were manageable. The average intraoperative blood loss was 221mL and the average hospitalization time after operation was 12.7 days (range 8-19 days). No anastomotic leakage and treatment-related death occurred. Conclusions: Camrelizumab in combination with paclitaxel and platinum as a neoadjuvant therapy was well tolerated. The pCR rate of 57.14% was higher than the expected 40%. This encouraging result promoted us to continue this phase Ⅱ study. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2000033761.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document