Early Warning Signs of it Project Failure: The Dominant Dozen

2006 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 31-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leon A. Kappelman ◽  
Robert McKeeman ◽  
Lixuan Zhang
EDPACS ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 17-25
Author(s):  
Leon A. Kappelman ◽  
Robert McKeeman ◽  
Lixuan Zhang

EDPACS ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leon Kappelman ◽  
Robert McKeeman ◽  
Lixuan Zhang

2018 ◽  
Vol 203 ◽  
pp. 02008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Idris Othman ◽  
Siti Norfarahhanim Ghani ◽  
Hisham Mohamad ◽  
Wesam Alalou ◽  
Nasir Shafiq

Despite the improvement in utilization of project management tools and techniques over the years, there are still many projects failed to meet their objectives. Early warning signs becomes one of the concepts used to detect the potential cause of failure in a project. Early warning is defined by signals, which can be seen variously as an expression, indication, a proof, or a sign of existence of some future negative issues. In recent years, several researches regarding early warning signs have been proposed by many authors, varying from project assessment stage in detecting the signs, methodology in conduction early warning sign research and the type of the projects tested. This article presents a review of related work on early warning signs of project failure to give conceptual insights on what early warning is.


2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 828-843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gulnara Sharaborova ◽  
Derek H.T. Walker ◽  
Guinevere Gilbert

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide a summary report and reflect on a recently passed PhD thesis (Sharaborova, 2014b) related to project management topics. Design/methodology/approach – This paper focussed on narrative reflection upon the completed doctoral journey. Findings – This paper presents the thesis findings, the research models, the guide in dealing with the early warning signs that developed as a result of this research and the contribution made to theory and practice. Research limitations/implications – Limitations of the research and the perspectives of the further diffusion of the research findings are considered. Originality/value – This TRN is a PhD candidate’s point of view as well as the opinions of the scientific research supervisors about the doctoral study and its outcome. The paper could be useful for novice researchers who wish to conduct their research and did not yet make a decision.


Orthopedics ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 1147-1147
Author(s):  
Charles Sorbie

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 2529-2532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdulaziz Ahmed Al-Darwish ◽  
Abdullah Fouad Al-Naim ◽  
Khalid Saleh Al-Mulhim ◽  
Nasser Khaled Al-Otaibi ◽  
Mohammed Saad Morsi ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 58 (5) ◽  
pp. 1016-1018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Dickinson ◽  
Lou Irving ◽  
Michael Hofman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document