scholarly journals Mammalian Type I Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptors Undergo Slow, Constitutive, Agonist-Independent Internalization

Endocrinology ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 149 (3) ◽  
pp. 1415-1422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam J. Pawson ◽  
Elena Faccenda ◽  
Stuart Maudsley ◽  
Zhi-Liang Lu ◽  
Zvi Naor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Gnrh Receptor ◽  
G Protein Coupled Receptors ◽  
Receptor Internalization ◽  
Type I ◽  
Receptor Desensitization ◽  
Gnrh Receptors ◽  
Carboxyl Terminal ◽  
G Protein Coupled

Regulatory elements present in the cytoplasmic carboxyl-terminal tails of G protein-coupled receptors contribute to agonist-dependent receptor desensitization, internalization, and association with accessory proteins such as β-arrestin. The mammalian type I GnRH receptors are unique among the rhodopsin-like G protein-coupled receptors because they lack a cytoplasmic carboxyl-terminal tail. In addition, they do not recruit β-arrestin, nor do they undergo rapid desensitization. By measuring the internalization of labeled GnRH agonists, previous studies have reported that mammalian type I GnRH receptors undergo slow agonist-dependent internalization. In the present study, we have measured the internalization of epitope-tagged GnRH receptors, both in the absence and presence of GnRH stimulation. We demonstrate that mammalian type I GnRH receptors exhibit a low level of constitutive agonist-independent internalization. Stimulation with GnRH agonist did not significantly enhance the level of receptor internalization above the constitutive level. In contrast, the catfish GnRH and rat TRH receptors, which have cytoplasmic carboxyl-terminal tails, displayed similar levels of constitutive agonist-independent internalization but underwent robust agonist-dependent internalization, as did chimeras of the mammalian type I GnRH receptor with the cytoplasmic carboxyl-terminal tails of the catfish GnRH receptor or the rat TRH receptor. When the carboxyl-terminal Tyr325 and Leu328 residues of the mammalian type I GnRH receptor were replaced with alanines, these two mutant receptors underwent significantly impaired internalization, suggesting a function for the Tyr-X-X-Leu sequence in mediating the constitutive agonist-independent internalization of mammalian type I GnRH receptors. These findings provide further support for the underlying notion that the absence of the cytoplasmic carboxyl-terminal tail of the mammalian type I GnRH receptors has been selected for during evolution to prevent rapid receptor desensitization and internalization to allow protracted GnRH signaling in mammals.

scholarly journals GRKs as Modulators of Neurotransmitter Receptors

Cells ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 52
Author(s):  
Eugenia V. Gurevich ◽  
Vsevolod V. Gurevich
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
General Model ◽  
G Protein Coupled Receptors ◽  
Receptor Internalization ◽  
Neurotransmitter Receptors ◽  
Receptor Subtype ◽  
Receptor Subtypes ◽  
Receptor Kinase ◽  
G Protein Coupled ◽  
Homologous Desensitization

Many receptors for neurotransmitters, such as dopamine, norepinephrine, acetylcholine, and neuropeptides, belong to the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). A general model posits that GPCRs undergo two-step homologous desensitization: the active receptor is phosphorylated by kinases of the G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK) family, whereupon arrestin proteins specifically bind active phosphorylated receptors, shutting down G protein-mediated signaling, facilitating receptor internalization, and initiating distinct signaling pathways via arrestin-based scaffolding. Here, we review the mechanisms of GRK-dependent regulation of neurotransmitter receptors, focusing on the diverse modes of GRK-mediated phosphorylation of receptor subtypes. The immediate signaling consequences of GRK-mediated receptor phosphorylation, such as arrestin recruitment, desensitization, and internalization/resensitization, are equally diverse, depending not only on the receptor subtype but also on phosphorylation by GRKs of select receptor residues. We discuss the signaling outcome as well as the biological and behavioral consequences of the GRK-dependent phosphorylation of neurotransmitter receptors where known.

CCK receptor phosphorylation exposes regulatory domains affecting phosphorylation and receptor trafficking

2000 ◽  
Vol 279 (6) ◽  
pp. C1986-C1992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rammohan V. Rao ◽  
Eileen L. Holicky ◽  
Susan M. Kuntz ◽  
Laurence J. Miller
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
Chinese Hamster ◽  
G Protein Coupled Receptors ◽  
Receptor Internalization ◽  
Ovary Cell ◽  
Guanine Nucleotide Binding Protein ◽  
Receptor Phosphorylation ◽  
Regulatory Domains ◽  
Ovary Cell Line ◽  
G Protein Coupled

Agonist-stimulated phosphorylation of guanine nucleotide-binding protein (G protein)-coupled receptors has been recognized as an important mechanism for desensitization by interfering with coupling of the activated receptor with its G protein. We recently described a mutant of the CCK receptor that modified two of five key sites of phosphorylation (S260,264A) and eliminated agonist-stimulated receptor phosphorylation, despite normal ligand binding and signaling (20). As expected, this nonphosphorylated mutant had impaired rapid desensitization but was ultimately able to be desensitized by normal receptor internalization. Here we demonstrate that this mutant receptor is also defective in resensitization, with abnormal recycling to the cell surface. To explore this, another receptor mutant was prepared, replacing the same serines with aspartates to mimic the charge of serine-phosphate (S260,264D). This mutant was expressed in a Chinese hamster ovary cell line and shown to bind CCK normally. It had accelerated kinetics of signaling and desensitization and was phosphorylated in response to agonist occupation, with all other normal sites of phosphorylation modified. It was internalized like wild-type receptors and was resensitized and trafficked normally. This provides evidence for an additional important function for phosphorylation of G protein-coupled receptors. Phosphorylation may induce a conformational change in the receptor to expose other potential sites of phosphorylation and to expose domains involved in the targeting and trafficking of endosomes. The hierarchical phosphorylation of these sites may play a key role in receptor regulation.

scholarly journals Clathrin and GRK2/3 inhibitors block δ-opioid receptor internalization in myenteric neurons and inhibit neuromuscular transmission in the mouse colon

2019 ◽  
Vol 317 (2) ◽  
pp. G79-G89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse J. DiCello ◽  
Pradeep Rajasekhar ◽  
Emily M. Eriksson ◽  
Ayame Saito ◽  
Arisbel B. Gondin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Smooth Muscle ◽  
G Protein ◽  
Opioid Receptor ◽  
Neuromuscular Transmission ◽  
G Protein Coupled Receptors ◽  
Receptor Internalization ◽  
Enteric Neurons ◽  
Myenteric Neurons ◽  
Gut Function ◽  
G Protein Coupled

Endocytosis is a major mechanism through which cellular signaling by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is terminated. However, recent studies demonstrate that GPCRs are internalized in an active state and continue to signal from within endosomes, resulting in effects on cellular function that are distinct to those arising at the cell surface. Endocytosis inhibitors are commonly used to define the importance of GPCR internalization for physiological and pathophysiological processes. Here, we provide the first detailed examination of the effects of these inhibitors on neurogenic contractions of gastrointestinal smooth muscle, a key preliminary step to evaluate the importance of GPCR endocytosis for gut function. Inhibitors of clathrin-mediated endocytosis (Pitstop2, PS2) or G protein-coupled receptor kinase-2/3-dependent phosphorylation (Takeda compound 101, Cmpd101), significantly reduced GPCR internalization. However, they also attenuated cholinergic contractions through different mechanisms. PS2 abolished contractile responses by colonic muscle to SNC80 and morphine, which strongly and weakly internalize δ-opioid and μ-opioid receptors, respectively. PS2 did not affect the increased myogenic contractile activity following removal of an inhibitory neural influence (tetrodotoxin) but suppressed electrically evoked neurogenic contractions. Ca2+ signaling by myenteric neurons in response to exogenous ATP was unaffected by PS2, suggesting inhibitory actions on neurotransmitter release rather than neurotransmission. In contrast, Cmpd101 attenuated contractions to the cholinergic agonist carbachol, indicating direct effects on smooth muscle. We conclude that, although PS2 and Cmpd101 are effective blockers of GPCR endocytosis in enteric neurons, these inhibitors are unsuitable for the study of neurally mediated gut function due to their inhibitory effects on neuromuscular transmission and smooth muscle contractility. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Internalization of activated G protein-coupled receptors is a major determinant of the type and duration of subsequent downstream signaling events. Inhibitors of endocytosis effectively block opioid receptor internalization in enteric neurons. The clathrin-dependent endocytosis inhibitor Pitstop2 blocks effects of opioids on neurogenic contractions of the colon in an internalization-independent manner. These inhibitors also significantly impact cholinergic neuromuscular transmission. We conclude that these tools are unsuitable for examination of the contribution of neuronal G protein-coupled receptor endocytosis to gastrointestinal motility.

scholarly journals Regulatory mechanisms that modulate signalling by G-protein-coupled receptors

1997 ◽  
Vol 322 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephan K. BÖHM ◽  
Eileen F. GRADY ◽  
Nigel W. BUNNETT
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
G Proteins ◽  
Extracellular Fluid ◽  
Cellular Responses ◽  
Drug Tolerance ◽  
G Protein Coupled Receptors ◽  
Regulatory Mechanisms ◽  
Receptor Desensitization ◽  
Down Regulation ◽  
G Protein Coupled

The large and functionally diverse group of G-protein-coupled receptors includes receptors for many different signalling molecules, including peptide and non-peptide hormones and neurotransmitters, chemokines, prostanoids and proteinases. Their principal function is to transmit information about the extracellular environment to the interior of the cell by interacting with the heterotrimeric G-proteins, and they thereby participate in many aspects of regulation. Cellular responses to agonists of these receptors are usually rapidly attenuated. Mechanisms of signal attenuation include removal of agonists from the extracellular fluid, receptor desensitization, endocytosis and down-regulation. Agonists are removed by dilution, uptake by transporters and enzymic degradation. Receptor desensitization is mediated by receptor phosphorylation by G-protein receptor kinases and second-messenger kinases, interaction of phosphorylated receptors with arrestins and receptor uncoupling from G-proteins. Agonist-induced receptor endocytosis also contributes to desensitization by depleting the cell surface of high-affinity receptors, and recycling of internalized receptors contributes to resensitization of cellular responses. Receptor down-regulation is a form of desensitization that occurs during continuous, long-term exposure of cells to receptor agonists. Down-regulation, which may occur during the development of drug tolerance, is characterized by depletion of the cellular receptor content, and is probably mediated by alterations in the rates of receptor degradation and synthesis. These regulatory mechanisms are important, as they govern the ability of cells to respond to agonists. A greater understanding of the mechanisms that modulate signalling may lead to the development of new therapies and may help to explain the mechanism of drug tolerance.

scholarly journals G Protein-Coupled Receptors in Taste Physiology and Pharmacology

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raise Ahmad ◽  
Julie E. Dalziel
Keyword(s):  
Binding Site ◽  
G Protein ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Taste Receptor ◽  
Receptor Activation ◽  
G Protein Coupled Receptors ◽  
Type I ◽  
Taste Receptors ◽  
Agonist Binding ◽  
G Protein Coupled

Heterotrimeric G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) comprise the largest receptor family in mammals and are responsible for the regulation of most physiological functions. Besides mediating the sensory modalities of olfaction and vision, GPCRs also transduce signals for three basic taste qualities of sweet, umami (savory taste), and bitter, as well as the flavor sensation kokumi. Taste GPCRs reside in specialised taste receptor cells (TRCs) within taste buds. Type I taste GPCRs (TAS1R) form heterodimeric complexes that function as sweet (TAS1R2/TAS1R3) or umami (TAS1R1/TAS1R3) taste receptors, whereas Type II are monomeric bitter taste receptors or kokumi/calcium-sensing receptors. Sweet, umami and kokumi receptors share structural similarities in containing multiple agonist binding sites with pronounced selectivity while most bitter receptors contain a single binding site that is broadly tuned to a diverse array of bitter ligands in a non-selective manner. Tastant binding to the receptor activates downstream secondary messenger pathways leading to depolarization and increased intracellular calcium in TRCs, that in turn innervate the gustatory cortex in the brain. Despite recent advances in our understanding of the relationship between agonist binding and the conformational changes required for receptor activation, several major challenges and questions remain in taste GPCR biology that are discussed in the present review. In recent years, intensive integrative approaches combining heterologous expression, mutagenesis and homology modeling have together provided insight regarding agonist binding site locations and molecular mechanisms of orthosteric and allosteric modulation. In addition, studies based on transgenic mice, utilizing either global or conditional knock out strategies have provided insights to taste receptor signal transduction mechanisms and their roles in physiology. However, the need for more functional studies in a physiological context is apparent and would be enhanced by a crystallized structure of taste receptors for a more complete picture of their pharmacological mechanisms.

scholarly journals A Network of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases Links G Protein-Coupled Receptors to the c-jun Promoter: a Role for c-Jun NH2-Terminal Kinase, p38s, and Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 5

1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 4289-4301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Julia Marinissen ◽  
Mario Chiariello ◽  
Michael Pallante ◽  
J. Silvio Gutkind
Keyword(s):  
Signaling Pathway ◽  
Protein Kinases ◽  
G Protein ◽  
Intracellular Signaling ◽  
Temporal Integration ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
G Protein Coupled Receptors ◽  
Mitogen Activated Protein Kinases ◽  
Mitogen Activated Protein ◽  
G Protein Coupled

ABSTRACT The expression of the c-jun proto-oncogene is rapidly induced in response to mitogens acting on a large variety of cell surface receptors. The resulting functional activity of c-Jun proteins appears to be critical for cell proliferation. Recently, we have shown that a large family of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), represented by the m1 muscarinic receptor, can initiate intracellular signaling cascades that result in the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) and c-Jun NH2-terminal kinases (JNK) and that the activation of JNK but not of MAPK correlated with a remarkable increase in the expression of c-jun mRNA. Subsequently, however, we obtained evidence that GPCRs can potently stimulate the activity of the c-jun promoter through MEF2 transcription factors, which do not act downstream from JNK. In view of these observations, we set out to investigate further the nature of the signaling pathway linking GPCRs to the c-jun promoter. Utilizing NIH 3T3 cells, we found that GPCRs can activate the c-jun promoter in a JNK-independent manner. Additionally, we demonstrated that these GPCRs can elevate the activity of novel members of the MAPK family, including ERK5, p38α, p38γ, and p38δ, and that the activation of certain kinases acting downstream from MEK5 (ERK5) and MKK6 (p38α and p38γ) is necessary to fully activate the c-jun promoter. Moreover, in addition to JNK, ERK5, p38α, and p38γ were found to stimulate the c-jun promoter by acting on distinct responsive elements. Taken together, these results suggest that the pathway linking GPCRs to the c-junpromoter involves the integration of numerous signals transduced by a highly complex network of MAPK, rather than resulting from the stimulation of a single linear protein kinase cascade. Furthermore, our findings suggest that each signaling pathway affects one or more regulatory elements on the c-jun promoter and that the transcriptional response most likely results from the temporal integration of each of these biochemical routes.

scholarly journals SNP analysis, genotyping and mapping of the porcine <i>PTHR1</i> gene to chromosome 13 (Brief report)

2007 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 320-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Tetzlaff ◽  
S. Ponsuksili ◽  
E. Murani ◽  
K. Schellander ◽  
K. Wimmers
Keyword(s):  
Mammary Gland ◽  
Parathyroid Hormone ◽  
G Protein ◽  
G Protein Coupled Receptors ◽  
Type I ◽  
Snp Analysis ◽  
Chromosome 13 ◽  
The Family ◽  
Porcine Gene ◽  
G Protein Coupled

Abstract. The parathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone like hormone type I receptor (PTHR1) belongs to the family of G protein-coupled receptors for peptide hormones, including parathyroid hormone (PTH) and parathyroid hormone like hormone (PTHLH), which participate in epithelial-mesenchymal interactions during the formation and differentiation of epithelial organs (FOLEY et al., 2001; CHOMDEJ et al., 2004). The function of PTHR1 and its ligands suggest its candidacy for traits related to the development of bones and joints but also of mammary gland. The porcine gene was screened for SNPs and assigned to SSC13.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document