Rapid changes in gene expression after in vivo growth hormone treatment.

Endocrinology ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 136 (11) ◽  
pp. 4741-4748 ◽  
Author(s):  
A M Gronowski ◽  
P Rotwein
1995 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
A M Gronowski ◽  
Z Zhong ◽  
Z Wen ◽  
M J Thomas ◽  
J E Darnell ◽  
...  

Endocrinology ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 142 (7) ◽  
pp. 3163-3176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amilcar Flores-Morales ◽  
Nina Ståhlberg ◽  
Petra Tollet-Egnell ◽  
Joakim Lundeberg ◽  
Renae L. Malek ◽  
...  

1978 ◽  
Vol 234 (1) ◽  
pp. E38 ◽  
Author(s):  
K E Flaim ◽  
J B Li ◽  
L S Jefferson

The role of growth hormone in regulating protein turnover was examined in a perfused preparation of rat skeletal muscle. The perfused muscle maintained in vivo levels of ATP and creatine phosphate and exhibited constant rates of oxygen consumption and protein synthesis. Hypophysectomy reduced the rate of protein synthesis, the concentration of RNA, and the efficiency of protein synthesis in gastrocnemius muscle to 30, 46, and 66 percent of normal, respectively. In vivo treatment of hypophysectomized (hypox) rats with bovine growth hormone (250 microgram/day for 5 days) resulted in small increases in protein synthesis and RNA, whereas synthesis/RNA was returned to near normal. Elevation of ribosomal subunits in psoas muscle indicated an inhibition of peptide-chain initiation in hypox rats that was reversed by in vivo growth hormone treatment. Thus, hypox rats exhibited both a decreased capacity and a decreased efficiency of protein synthesis. Growth hormone replacement primarily increased efficiency of protein synthesis. The rate of protein degradation and the activity of cathepsin D in gastrocnemius muscle were decreased by hypophysectomy. Growth hormone treatment had no significant effect on degradation.


2001 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. BARLE ◽  
L. RÅHLÉN ◽  
P. ESSÉN ◽  
M.A. McNURLAN ◽  
P.J. GARLICK ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 299 (3) ◽  
pp. G769-G777 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Glaser ◽  
M. Wang ◽  
Y. Ueno ◽  
J. Venter ◽  
K. Wang ◽  
...  

Biliary epithelial cells (BEC) are morphologically and functionally heterogeneous. To investigate the molecular mechanism for their diversities, we test the hypothesis that large and small BEC have disparity in their target gene response to their transcriptional regulator, the biliary cell-enriched hepatocyte nuclear factor HNF6. The expression of the major HNF ( HNF6, OC2, HNF1b, HNF1a, HNF4a, C/EBPb, and Foxa2) and representative biliary transport target genes that are HNF dependent were compared between SV40-transformed BEC derived from large (SV40LG) and small (SV40SM) ducts, before and after treatment with recombinant adenoviral vectors expressing HNF6 (AdHNF6) or control LacZ cDNA (AdLacZ). Large and small BEC were isolated from mouse liver treated with growth hormone, a known transcriptional activator of HNF6, and the effects on selected target genes were examined. Constitutive Foxa2, HNF1a, and HNF4a gene expression were 2.3-, 12.4-, and 2.6-fold, respectively, higher in SV40SM cells. This was associated with 2.7- and 4-fold higher baseline expression of HNF1a- and HNF4a-regulated ntcp and oatp1 genes, respectively. Following AdHNF6 infection, HNF6 gene expression was 1.4-fold higher ( P = 0.02) in AdHNF6 SV40SM relative to AdHNF6 SV40LG cells, with a corresponding higher Foxa2 (4-fold), HNF1a (15-fold), and HNF4a (6-fold) gene expression in AdHNF6-SV40SM over AdHNF6-SV40LG. The net effects were upregulation of HNF6 target gene glucokinase and of Foxa2, HNF1a, and HNF4a target genes oatp1, ntcp, and mrp2 over AdLacZ control in both cells, but with higher levels in AdH6-SV40SM over AdH6-SV40LG of glucokinase, oatp1, ntcp, and mrp2 (by 1.8-, 3.4-, 2.4-, and 2.5-fold, respectively). In vivo, growth hormone-mediated increase in HNF6 expression was associated with similar higher upregulation of glucokinase and mrp2 in cholangiocytes from small vs. large BEC. Small and large BEC have a distinct profile of hepatocyte transcription factor and cognate target gene expression, as well as differential strength of response to transcriptional regulation, thus providing a potential molecular basis for their divergent function.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. e0120463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Kolarova ◽  
Ole Ammerpohl ◽  
Jana Gutwein ◽  
Maik Welzel ◽  
Inka Baus ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document