A highly conserved centrosomal kinase, AIR-1, is required for accurate cell cycle progression and segregation of developmental factors in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos

Development ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 125 (22) ◽  
pp. 4391-4402 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.M. Schumacher ◽  
N. Ashcroft ◽  
P.J. Donovan ◽  
A. Golden
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Centrosomal Protein ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Developmental Factors ◽  
Centrosome Separation ◽  
Spindle Dynamics ◽  
Bipolar Spindles

S. cerevisiae Ipl1, Drosophila Aurora, and the mammalian centrosomal protein IAK-1 define a new subfamily of serine/threonine kinases that regulate chromosome segregation and mitotic spindle dynamics. Mutations in ipl1 and aurora result in the generation of severely aneuploid cells and, in the case of aurora, monopolar spindles arising from a failure in centrosome separation. Here we show that a related, essential protein from C. elegans, AIR-1 (Aurora/Ipl1 related), is localized to mitotic centrosomes. Disruption of AIR-1 protein expression in C. elegans embryos results in severe aneuploidy and embryonic lethality. Unlike aurora mutants, this aneuploidy does not arise from a failure in centrosome separation. Bipolar spindles are formed in the absence of AIR-1, but they appear to be disorganized and are nucleated by abnormal-looking centrosomes. In addition to its requirement during mitosis, AIR-1 may regulate microtubule-based developmental processes as well. Our data suggests AIR-1 plays a role in P-granule segregation and the association of the germline factor PIE-1 with centrosomes.

scholarly journals Nek5 promotes centrosome integrity in interphase and loss of centrosome cohesion in mitosis

2015 ◽  
Vol 209 (3) ◽  
pp. 339-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanna L. Prosser ◽  
Navdeep K. Sahota ◽  
Laurence Pelletier ◽  
Ciaran G. Morrison ◽  
Andrew M. Fry
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Primary Cilia ◽  
Microtubule Nucleation ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Spindle Formation ◽  
Mitotic Entry ◽  
Bipolar Spindle ◽  
Centrosome Separation

Nek5 is a poorly characterized member of the NIMA-related kinase family, other members of which play roles in cell cycle progression and primary cilia function. Here, we show that Nek5, similar to Nek2, localizes to the proximal ends of centrioles. Depletion of Nek5 or overexpression of kinase-inactive Nek5 caused unscheduled separation of centrosomes in interphase, a phenotype also observed upon overexpression of active Nek2. However, separated centrosomes that resulted from Nek5 depletion remained relatively close together, exhibited excess recruitment of the centrosome linker protein rootletin, and had reduced levels of Nek2. In addition, Nek5 depletion led to loss of PCM components, including γ-tubulin, pericentrin, and Cdk5Rap2, with centrosomes exhibiting reduced microtubule nucleation. Upon mitotic entry, Nek5-depleted cells inappropriately retained centrosome linker components and exhibited delayed centrosome separation and defective chromosome segregation. Hence, Nek5 is required for the loss of centrosome linker proteins and enhanced microtubule nucleation that lead to timely centrosome separation and bipolar spindle formation in mitosis.

scholarly journals Human ANKLE1 is a nuclease specific for branched DNA

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junfang Song ◽  
Alasdair D. J. Freeman ◽  
Axel Knebel ◽  
Anton Gartner ◽  
David M. J. Lilley
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Substrate Selectivity ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Dna Junctions ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Branched Dna ◽  
Late Stages

ABSTRACTAll physical connections between sister chromatids must be broken before cells can divide, and eukaryotic cells have evolved multiple ways in which to process branchpoints connecting DNA molecules separated both spatially and temporally. A single DNA link between chromatids has the potential to disrupt cell cycle progression and genome integrity, so it is highly likely that cells require a nuclease that can process remaining unresolved and hemi-resolved DNA junctions and other branched species at the very late stages of mitosis. We argue that ANKLE1 probably serves this function in human cells (LEM-3 in C. elegans). LEM-3 has previously been shown to be located at the cell mid-body, and we show here that human ANKLE1 is a nuclease that cleaves a range of branched DNA species. It thus has the substrate selectivity consistent with an enzyme required to process a variety of unresolved and hemi-resolved branchpoints in DNA. Our results imply that ANKLE1 acts as a catch-all enzyme of last resort that allows faithful chromosome segregation and cell division to occur.

scholarly journals A TPR domain–containing N-terminal module of MPS1 is required for its kinetochore localization by Aurora B

2013 ◽  
Vol 201 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilco Nijenhuis ◽  
Eleonore von Castelmur ◽  
Dene Littler ◽  
Valeria De Marco ◽  
Eelco Tromer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Binding Activity ◽  
Tetratricopeptide Repeat ◽  
Aurora B ◽  
Calponin Homology Domain ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Tpr Domain

The mitotic checkpoint ensures correct chromosome segregation by delaying cell cycle progression until all kinetochores have attached to the mitotic spindle. In this paper, we show that the mitotic checkpoint kinase MPS1 contains an N-terminal localization module, organized in an N-terminal extension (NTE) and a tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) domain, for which we have determined the crystal structure. Although the module was necessary for kinetochore localization of MPS1 and essential for the mitotic checkpoint, the predominant kinetochore binding activity resided within the NTE. MPS1 localization further required HEC1 and Aurora B activity. We show that MPS1 localization to kinetochores depended on the calponin homology domain of HEC1 but not on Aurora B–dependent phosphorylation of the HEC1 tail. Rather, the TPR domain was the critical mediator of Aurora B control over MPS1 localization, as its deletion rendered MPS1 localization insensitive to Aurora B inhibition. These data are consistent with a model in which Aurora B activity relieves a TPR-dependent inhibitory constraint on MPS1 localization.

scholarly journals The Last Chance Saloon

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ye Hong ◽  
Hongtao Zhang ◽  
Anton Gartner
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Chromosome Fragmentation ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Chromatin Bridges

Accurate chromosome segregation requires the removal of all chromatin bridges, which link chromosomes before cell division. When chromatin bridges fail to be removed, cell cycle progression may halt, or cytokinesis failure and ensuing polyploidization may occur. Conversely, the inappropriate severing of chromatin bridges leads to chromosome fragmentation, excessive genome instability at breakpoints, micronucleus formation, and chromothripsis. In this mini-review, we first describe the origins of chromatin bridges, the toxic processing of chromatin bridges by mechanical force, and the TREX1 exonuclease. We then focus on the abscission checkpoint (NoCut) which can confer a transient delay in cytokinesis progression to facilitate bridge resolution. Finally, we describe a recently identified mechanism uncovered in C. elegans where the conserved midbody associated endonuclease LEM-3/ANKLE1 is able to resolve chromatin bridges generated by various perturbations of DNA metabolism at the final stage of cell division. We also discuss how LEM-3 dependent chromatin bridge resolution may be coordinated with abscission checkpoint (NoCut) to achieve an error-free cleavage, therefore acting as a “last chance saloon” to facilitate genome integrity and organismal survival.

scholarly journals Non‐redundant functions of H2A.Z.1 and H2A.Z.2 in chromosome segregation and cell cycle progression

EMBO Reports ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raquel Sales‐Gil ◽  
Dorothee C Kommer ◽  
Ines J Castro ◽  
Hasnat A Amin ◽  
Veronica Vinciotti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Redundant Functions

The role of gamma-tubulin in mitotic spindle formation and cell cycle progression in Aspergillus nidulans

1997 ◽  
Vol 110 (5) ◽  
pp. 623-633 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.A. Martin ◽  
S.A. Osmani ◽  
B.R. Oakley
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Microtubule Assembly ◽  
Cytoplasmic Microtubule ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Spindle Microtubules ◽  
Gamma Tubulin

gamma-Tubulin has been hypothesized to be essential for the nucleation of the assembly of mitotic spindle microtubules, but some recent results suggest that this may not be the case. To clarify the role of gamma-tubulin in microtubule assembly and cell-cycle progression, we have developed a novel variation of the gene disruption/heterokaryon rescue technique of Aspergillus nidulans. We have used temperature-sensitive cell-cycle mutations to synchronize germlings carrying a gamma-tubulin disruption and observe the phenotypes caused by the disruption in the first cell cycle after germination. Our results indicate that gamma-tubulin is absolutely required for the assembly of mitotic spindle microtubules, a finding that supports the hypothesis that gamma-tubulin is involved in spindle microtubule nucleation. In the absence of functional gamma-tubulin, nuclei are blocked with condensed chromosomes for about the length of one cell cycle before chromatin decondenses without nuclear division. Our results indicate that gamma-tubulin is not essential for progression from G1 to G2, for entry into mitosis nor for spindle pole body replication. It is also not required for reactivity of spindle pole bodies with the MPM-2 antibody which recognizes a phosphoepitope important to mitotic spindle formation. Finally, it does not appear to be absolutely required for cytoplasmic microtubule assembly but may play a role in the formation of normal cytoplasmic microtubule arrays.

scholarly journals Cyclin E and CDK-2 regulate proliferative cell fate and cell cycle progression in the C. elegans germline

Development ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 138 (11) ◽  
pp. 2223-2234 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. M. Fox ◽  
V. E. Vought ◽  
M. Hanazawa ◽  
M.-H. Lee ◽  
E. M. Maine ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cyclin E ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Proliferative Cell

CHIP Is A Novel Centrosomal Protein Involved In Cell Cycle Progression

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
YOBAO SHA ◽  
Lavannya M. Pandit ◽  
shenyan zeng ◽  
Li-Yuan Yu-Lee ◽  
Tony N. Eissa
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Centrosomal Protein

Meiotic cycle checkpoints in mammalian oocytes

Zygote ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 351-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josef Fulka ◽  
Judy Bradshaw ◽  
Robert Moor
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Mitotic Cell ◽  
Mitotic Cell Cycle ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Chromosomal Segregation ◽  
Nuclear Events ◽  
Last Stage ◽  
Meiotic Cycle

Recent Spectacular achievements have enabled the identification of key molecules responsible for mitotic cell cycle progression through the stages of G1, the gap before DNA replication; S, the phase of DNA synthesis; G2, the gap before chromosome segregation; and M, mitosis itself. The last stage has been most intensively studied, where MPE, maturation promotion factor, has been found responsible for the nuclear events associated with chromosomal segregation and the prodcution of two identical daughter cells (see Murray & Hunt, 1993).

scholarly journals Budding Yeast Bub2 Is Localized at Spindle Pole Bodies and Activates the Mitotic Checkpoint via a Different Pathway from Mad2

1999 ◽  
Vol 145 (5) ◽  
pp. 979-991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberta Fraschini ◽  
Elisa Formenti ◽  
Giovanna Lucchini ◽  
Simonetta Piatti
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Spindle Pole Body ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Spindle Pole Bodies

The mitotic checkpoint blocks cell cycle progression before anaphase in case of mistakes in the alignment of chromosomes on the mitotic spindle. In budding yeast, the Mad1, 2, 3, and Bub1, 2, 3 proteins mediate this arrest. Vertebrate homologues of Mad1, 2, 3, and Bub1, 3 bind to unattached kinetochores and prevent progression through mitosis by inhibiting Cdc20/APC-mediated proteolysis of anaphase inhibitors, like Pds1 and B-type cyclins. We investigated the role of Bub2 in budding yeast mitotic checkpoint. The following observations indicate that Bub2 and Mad1, 2 probably activate the checkpoint via different pathways: (a) unlike the other Mad and Bub proteins, Bub2 localizes at the spindle pole body (SPB) throughout the cell cycle; (b) the effect of concomitant lack of Mad1 or Mad2 and Bub2 is additive, since nocodazole-treated mad1 bub2 and mad2 bub2 double mutants rereplicate DNA more rapidly and efficiently than either single mutant; (c) cell cycle progression of bub2 cells in the presence of nocodazole requires the Cdc26 APC subunit, which, conversely, is not required for mad2 cells in the same conditions. Altogether, our data suggest that activation of the mitotic checkpoint blocks progression through mitosis by independent and partially redundant mechanisms.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document