High resolution ultrasonography of peripheral nerves in diabetic patients to evaluate nerve cross sectional area with clinical profile

2021 ◽  
Vol 94 (1121) ◽  
pp. 20200173
Author(s):  
Shamrendra Narayan ◽  
Amit Goel ◽  
Ajai Kumar Singh ◽  
Anup Kumar Thacker ◽  
Neha Singh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Nerves ◽  
Cross Sectional Area ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Tarsal Tunnel ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Sectional Area ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Early Therapy ◽  
Ultrasound Evaluation ◽  
Compressive Neuropathy

Objectives: The aim of this observational study was ultrasound evaluation of peripheral nerves cross-sectional area (CSA) in subjects with probable diabetic peripheral sensorimotor neuropathy (DPN). CSA was analyzed with reference to clinical and nerve conduction study’s (NCS) parameters for early diagnosis and pattern of involvement. Methods: A total of 50 patients with probable DPN due to Type 2 diabetes and 50 age-matched healthy controls underwent sonographic examinations of ulnar nerve at the lower arm, median nerve proximal to carpal tunnel, the common peroneal nerve proximal to fibular head, tibial nerve proximal to the tarsal tunnel, and sural nerve at lower third leg. Results: CSA was increased in cases of DPN as compared to healthy controls. Area changes were more marked with demyelinating pattern. Probable DPN cases with normal NCS had significantly higher number of peripheral nerves showing increased CSA as compared to healthy control. A cut-off of >4 nerve thickening showed a sensitivity of 86 %, and specificity of 56%. The neuropathy pattern in the lower limb was axonal, whereas in the upper limb, it was demyelinating with the majority showing sonographic feature of associated compressive neuropathy. Conclusion: There is an increase in CSA of peripheral nerve in diabetic patients. It can be used as a morphological marker for classifying DPN with changes being picked up earlier to NCS abnormality. Clinical neurological presentation in probable DPN can also be due to compressive neuropathy in early phases, and ultrasound can be a useful tool. Advances in knowledge: Early pick up of DPN cases shall be useful for early therapy and motivating the patients to actively participate in the treatment. Morphological changes on ultrasonography precedes the electrodiagnostic change in DPN. Symptoms of DPN is not only due to metabolic changes but also compressive neuropathy.

Morphological and Functional Changes in the Diabetic Peripheral Nerve

2005 ◽  
Vol 95 (5) ◽  
pp. 433-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Doohi Lee ◽  
Damien M. Dauphinée
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Nerve ◽  
Tibial Nerve ◽  
Imaging Techniques ◽  
Cross Sectional Area ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Tarsal Tunnel ◽  
Sectional Area ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Functional Changes ◽  
Chronic Nerve Compression

It has been hypothesized that in individuals with diabetes mellitus the peripheral nerve is swollen owing to increased water content related to increased aldose reductase conversion of glucose to sorbitol. It has further been hypothesized that the tibial nerve in the tarsal tunnel is at risk for chronic nerve compression related to this swelling. We used diagnostic ultrasound to evaluate this hypothesis. Cross-sectional areas of the tibial nerve were measured in diabetic patients with neuropathy and compared with previously reported measurements in nondiabetic patients and diabetic patients without neuropathy. We used the Pressure-Specified Sensory Device (Sensory Management Services LLC, Baltimore, Maryland) to document the presence of neuropathy in 24 diabetic patients (48 limbs). Previous studies have found that the cross-sectional area of the tibial nerve in nondiabetic patients and in diabetic patients without neuropathy is not significantly different. We found that the mean cross-sectional area of the tibial nerve in diabetic patients with neuropathy is significantly greater than that in diabetic patients without neuropathy (24.0 versus 12.0 mm2). Our study highlights the value of newer ultrasound imaging techniques in identifying morphological change in the tibial nerve and confirms that the tibial nerve in the tarsal tunnel is swollen, consistent with chronic compression, in diabetic patients with neuropathy. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 95(5): 433–437, 2005)

scholarly journals Ultrasound Assessment of the Median Nerve Does Not Adequately Discriminate the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome among Patients Diagnosed with Diabetes

Diabetology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 226-231
Author(s):  
Carlos Antonio Guillen-Astete ◽  
Monica Luque-Alarcon ◽  
Nuria Garcia-Montes
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Median Nerve ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Cross Sectional Area ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Sectional Area ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Patients With Diabetes ◽  
Ultrasound Assessment ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome

Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most prevalent peripheral nerve entrapment condition of the upper limb. Among metabolic risk factors, diabetes is considered the most relevant. Although wrist ultrasound assessment of the median nerve has demonstrated a good correlation with the gold standard for the diagnosis of this syndrome, neurophysiological study, its usefulness in patients with diabetes is questionable because the compressive phenomenon is not the predominant one. Method: We conducted a retrospective study to compare the clinical and median nerve ultrasound features of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome previously diagnosed or not diagnosed with diabetes. Additionally, a linear multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine to what extent the cross-sectional area of the median nerve was dependent on the condition of diabetes by fixing other variables such as sex, age, or time of evolution. Results: We included 303 records of patients (mean age 44.3 ± 11.7 years old, 57.89% female, mean of time of evolution 13.6 ± 8.3 months) from 2012 to 2020. The cross-sectional area of the median nerve was 10.46 ± 1.44 mm2 in non-diabetic patients and 8.92 ± 0.9 mm2 in diabetic patients (p < 0.001). Additionally, diabetic patients had a shorter time of evolution (7.91 ± 8.28 months vs. 14.36 ± 0.526 months, p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, the resultant model (fixed R-square = 0.659, p = 0.003) included a constant of the following four variables: the evolution time (Beta coeff. = 0.108, p < 0.001 95% CI 0.091 to 0.126, standardized coeff. = 0.611), the condition of diabetes (Beta coeff. = −0.623, p < 0.001 95% CI −0.907 to −0.339, standardized coeff. = −0.152), the severity (Beta coeff. = 0.359, p = 0.001 95% CI 0.147 to 0.571, standardized coeff. = 0.169), and the masculine sex (Beta coeff. = 0.309, p = 0.003, 95% CI 0.109 to 0.509, standardized coeff. = 0.103). Conclusions: Ultrasound assessment of the median nerve in patients with diabetes is not a useful tool to confirm whether carpal tunnel syndrome should be diagnosed or not diagnosed.

scholarly journals A comparison of minimal cross sectional areas, nasal volumes and peak nasal inspiratory flow between patients with obstructive sleep apnea and healthy controls

2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 342-347
Author(s):  
M.H.S. Moxness ◽  
V. Bugten ◽  
W.M. Thorstensen ◽  
S. Nordgard ◽  
G. Bruskeland
Keyword(s):  
Nasal Cavity ◽  
Inspiratory Flow ◽  
Cross Sectional Area ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Sectional Area ◽  
Cavity Volume ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
The Mean ◽  
And Function ◽  
Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow

Background: The differences in nasal geometry and function between OSA patients and healthy individuals are not known. Our aim was to evaluate the differences in nasal geometry and function using acoustic rhinometry (AR) and peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) between an OSA population and healthy controls. Methodology: The study was designed as a prospective case-control study. Ninety-three OSA patients and 92 controls were enrolled from 2010 to 2015. The minimal cross-sectional area (MCA) and the nasal cavity volume (NCV) in two parts of the nose (MCA0-3/NCV0-3 and MCA3-5.2/NCV3-5.2) and PNIF were measured at baseline and after decongestion. Results: The mean MCA0-3 in the OSA group was 0.49 cm2; compared to 0.55 cm2 in controls. The mean NCV0-3 correspondingly was 2.51 cm3 compared to 2.73 cm3 in controls. PNIF measured 105 litres/minute in the OSA group and 117 litres/minute in the controls. Conclusions: OSA patients have a lower minimum cross-sectional area, nasal cavity volume and peak inspiratory flow compared to controls. Our study supports the view that changes in the nasal cavity may contribute to development of OSA.

Peripheral Nerves: Not Only Cross-sectional Area in the Era of Radiomics

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (02) ◽  
pp. 175-180
Author(s):  
Alberto Stefano Tagliafico ◽  
Raquel Prada González ◽  
Federica Rossi ◽  
Bianca Bignotti ◽  
Carlo Martinoli
Keyword(s):  
Nervous System ◽  
Peripheral Nerve ◽  
Peripheral Nervous System ◽  
Internal Control ◽  
Peripheral Nerves ◽  
Imaging Techniques ◽  
Cross Sectional Area ◽  
Sectional Area ◽  
Musculoskeletal Radiology ◽  
Cross Sectional

AbstractThe peripheral nervous system is increasingly being investigated using medical imaging as a complement or in association with electrodiagnostics tests. The application of imaging techniques, such as ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), allows detailed visualization of the peripheral nervous system. According to the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology, the use of US for nerve evaluation is strongly encouraged. In addition, the role of US is further enhanced by the wide application of US-guided techniques to diagnose or to treat peripheral nerve disorders.Standard evaluation of peripheral nerves on US usually relies on cross-sectional area evaluation with different cutoff values in the osteofibrous tunnels and outside them. In several anatomical areas, side-to-side comparison is highly recommended because it helps distinguish subtle variations by using the unaffected limb as an internal control.US is widely used to perform US-guided interventional procedures on peripheral nerves. The recent development of radiomics and machine and deep learning applied to peripheral nerves may reveal new insights beyond the capabilities of the human eye. Radiomics may have a role in expanding the diagnostic capabilities of US and MRI in the study of peripheral nerve pathology, especially when the cross-sectional area is not markedly increased.

Comparison of the Cross-Sectional Area of Longus Colli Muscle Between Patients With Cervical Radicular Pain and Healthy Controls

PM&R ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pardis Noormohammadpour ◽  
Azime Dehghani-Firouzabadi ◽  
Mohammad Ali Mansournia ◽  
Mohammad Ali Mohseni-Bandpei ◽  
Navid Moghaddam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radicular Pain ◽  
Cross Sectional Area ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Sectional Area ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Longus Colli ◽  
Longus Colli Muscle ◽  
The Cross

scholarly journals High-resolution ultrasound in the assessment of peripheral nerves in leprosy: A comparative cross-sectional study

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Kalathummarath Sreejith ◽  
Sarita Sasidharanpillai ◽  
Kidangazhiathmana Ajithkumar ◽  
Reeba Mary Mani ◽  
Anuradha Thalian Chathoth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Peripheral Nerve ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Peripheral Nerves ◽  
Cross Sectional Area ◽  
Nerve Function ◽  
Sectional Area ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Function Impairment ◽  
The Cross

Background: Detection of peripheral nerve thickening and nerve function impairment is crucial in the diagnosis and the management of leprosy. Aims and objectives: (1) To document the cross-sectional area, echotexture and blood flow of peripheral nerves in healthy controls and leprosy cases using high-resolution ultrasound, (2) to compare the sensitivities of clinical examination and high-resolution ultrasound in detecting peripheral nerve thickening in leprosy. Methods: Peripheral nerves of 30 leprosy patients and 30 age- and sex-matched controls were evaluated clinically and by high-resolution ultrasound. When the cross-sectional area of a peripheral nerve on high-resolution ultrasound in a leprosy patient was more than the calculated upper bound of the 95% confidence interval for mean for that specific nerve in controls, that particular peripheral nerve was considered to be enlarged. Results: Cross-sectional areas more than 7.1 mm2 for the radial nerve, 8.17 mm2 for ulnar, 10.17 mm2 for median, 9.50 mm2 for lateral popliteal and 11.21mm2 for the posterior tibial nerve were considered as nerve thickening on high-resolution ultrasound. High-resolution ultrasound detected 141/300 (47%) nerves enlarged in contrast to the 60 (20%) diagnosed clinically by palpation (P < 0.001). Clinical examination identified thickening in 31/70 (44.3%) nerves in cases with impairment of nerve function and 29/230 (12.6%) in the absence of nerve function impairment. High-resolution ultrasound detected thickening in 50/70 (71.4%) nerves with impairment of function and in 91/230 (39.6%) nerves without any impairment of function. Limitation: A single-centre study design was the major study limitation. Conclusion: High-resolution ultrasound showed greater sensitivity than clinical examination in detecting peripheral nerve thickening in leprosy cases. High-resolution ultrasound, may therefore improve the sensitivity of the diagnostic criterion of peripheral nerve enlargement in the diagnosis and classification of leprosy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document