Abstract
BackgroundPeripheral neuropathy evaluation depends mainly on physical examination, patient history, electrophysiological studies, with evoked potential abnormalities. High-resolution US has the advantage of being fast, non-invasive modality with nerve dynamic assessment allowing examination of long part of nerve. MR imaging serve better in examination of deeper nerves with higher contrast resolution. It shows great benefit in patient with atypical presentation, Equivocal diagnosis and suspicious of secondary cause and post-surgical relapse.MethodsThis study was conducted prospectively on 32 patients, presented with carpal tunnel syndrome diagnosed by electrophysiological tests. Superficial US of the wrist joint was done to all participants followed by MRI within 1 weeks of the US.We aimed to assess the measurements & criteria of both US & MRN in diagnosis of CTS, depending mainly on the three-measurement assessed by Buchberger et al., then to find the agreement between US & MR Neurography (MRN)ResultsUs proved to have higher rate of CTS prediction, the three main parameters CSA measurement, distal nerve flattening and flexor retinaculum bowing indices showed positive occurrence of 93.7%,59.4% &59.4% respectively. While we found that decreased nerve echotexture was positive in 90.6% of patients.Regarding MRI it showed less diagnostic ability when using CSA measurement as it was positive in 81.2% of patients, also distal tunnel nerve increased flattening and bowed flexor retinaculum positive results were slightly decreased to 56.2% for each. In contrast to high T2 signal of median nerve which was positive in 90.6% of patients.In agreement study, we found statically significant difference supporting US as the primary diagnostic modality of CTS depending mainly on the three measurement CSA, Flattening and bowing indices. Yet, for cases of secondary CTS and detection of underlying entrapping cause as well as innervated muscle early abnormality detection and better tissue characterization, MRI was better diagnostic modality with statistically significant difference. ConclusionsOur results proved that ultrasound examination can be used as first imaging modality after physician evaluation with comparable results to electrophysiological studies in evaluating CTS and try to find the cause. MRN examination came as second step in patients with suspected muscle denervation changes that could not be elicited by US or equivocal cases for detection of secondary cause in clinically suspected patient.