scholarly journals Evaluation of temporomandibular joint, masticatory muscle, and brain cortex activity in patients treated by removable functional appliances: a prospective fMRI study

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (7) ◽  
pp. 20190216
Author(s):  
Orhan Ozdiler ◽  
Kaan Orhan ◽  
Emre Cesur ◽  
Ayşegül Köklü ◽  
Oktay Algın
Keyword(s):  
Temporomandibular Joint ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Masticatory Muscles ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Orthodontic Appliances ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Muscle Adaptation ◽  
Mri Findings ◽  
Functional Appliances

Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of functional orthodontic appliances on the masticatory muscles, temporomandibular joint (TMJ), and brain to determine whether using functional appliances full-time or only at night yields different results. Methods: 16 patients with Class II malocclusion were included in this study. Eight patients were instructed to wear their appliances (monoblock/twinblock) full-time and the other eight patients were instructed to wear them at night while sleeping. An additional 10 patients with Class II malocclusion were later included as a pre-treatment control group. Signal intensity ratios (SIR) of TMJ structures and morphological evaluations of the masticatory muscles were done for all patients. Functional MRI (fMRI) data were also obtained from the patients while performing chewing and biting movements. Results: ANB angle was reduced significantly in both the full-time and night wear groups, by values of 1.17° and 1.35°, respectively (p < 0.05). MRI showed that SIRs were significantly increased in both groups in the masticatory muscles, retrodiscal pad, condylar process, and articular disc (p < 0.05). Both resting and task-based fMRI evaluation revealed significant increases in blood oxygen level dependent signals in several regions of the brain in both groups (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The cephalometric and MRI findings of this study indicate that the treatment effects were similar for both wear schedules. Functional appliances should be regarded not as simple devices that treat Class II malocclusion through skeletal and dental correction alone, but as exercise devices that lead to neuromuscular changes by facilitating muscle adaptation and activating various brain regions.

scholarly journals A Retrospective Cephalometric Evaluation of Dental Changes with Activator and Activator Headgear Combination in the Treatment of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion

2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Anil Kumar ◽  
Amit Maheshwari
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Combination Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Mandibular Incisor ◽  
Lower Incisor ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii ◽  
Lateral Cephalograms ◽  
Functional Appliances

ABSTRACT Aim The aims of this study were to evaluate the dental changes brought about by activator and activator headgear combination (ACHG) and to determine whether we can achieve control over the lower incisor proclination which is a side effect of using functional appliances; or not, while treating cases of skeletal class II malocclusions. Methods Lateral cephalograms of 45 skeletal class II division 1 patients were selected for the study. Fifteen of them were successfully treated with an Andresen activator and the other 15 with an activator headgear combination. Fifteen class II subjects who had declined treatment served as the control group. Cephalometric landmarks were marked by one author to avoid interobserver variability. Results The results revealed that both the activator and the activator headgear combination significantly (p < 0.001) affected dental variables measured. The mandibular incisor proclination was effectively controlled in the activator headgear combination group. Conclusion An activator headgear combination would offer itself as a better option compared with activator alone in the treatment of skeletal class II malocclusions especially in cases with proclined mandibular incisors. Clinical significance When one of the treatment goals is to achieve a greater control over mandibular incisor proclination in the treatment of Skeletal Class II malocclusions, employing a combination of activator and headgear may substantially improve clinical outcomes. How to cite this article Lall R, Kumar GA, Maheshwari A Kumar M. A Retrospective Cephalometric Evaluation of Dental Changes with Activator and Activator Headgear Combination in the Treatment of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion. J Contemp Dent Pract 2011;12(1):14-18.

scholarly journals Treatment effects of fixed functional appliances alone or in combination with multibracket appliances: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. 480-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Perinetti ◽  
Jasmina Primožič ◽  
Giovanna Furlani ◽  
Lorenzo Franchi ◽  
Luca Contardo
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Comprehensive Treatment ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Fixed Appliance ◽  
Manual Search ◽  
Functional Appliances ◽  
Skeletal Effects

ABSTRACT Objective:  To assess skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of fixed functional appliances, alone or in combination with multibracket appliances (comprehensive treatment), on Class II malocclusion in pubertal and postpubertal patients. Materials and Methods:  Literature survey was conducted using the Medline, SCOPUS, LILACS, and SciELO databases and The Cochrane Library, and through a manual search. The studies retrieved had to have a matched untreated control group. No restrictions were set regarding the type of fixed appliance, treatment length, or to the cephalometric analysis used. Data extraction was mostly predefined at the protocol stage by two authors. Supplementary mandibular elongation was used for the meta-analysis. Results:  Twelve articles qualified for the final analysis of which eight articles were on pubertal patients and four were on postpubertal patients. Overall supplementary total mandibular elongations as mean (95% confidence interval) were 1.95 mm (1.47 to 2.44) and 2.22 mm (1.63 to 2.82) among pubertal patients and −1.73 mm (−2.60 to −0.86) and 0.44 mm (−0.78 to 1.66) among postpubertal patients, for the functional and comprehensive treatments, respectively. For pubertal subjects, maxillary growth restraint was also reported. Nevertheless, skeletal effects alone would not account for the whole Class II correction even in pubertal subjects with dentoalveolar effects always present. Conclusions:  Fixed functional treatment is effective in treating Class II malocclusion with skeletal effects when performed during the pubertal growth phase, very few data are available on postpubertal patients.

scholarly journals Skeletal Class II Malocclusion Treated with AdvanSync 2 - A Case Report

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (34) ◽  
pp. 2951-2953
Author(s):  
Namrata Dogra ◽  
Archana Jaglan ◽  
Sidhu M. S. ◽  
Seema Grover ◽  
Suman Suman
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Treatment Success ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Orthodontic Appliances ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Functional Appliance ◽  
Fixed Functional Appliance ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii ◽  
Fixed Orthodontic Appliances ◽  
Functional Appliances

Treatment of complex malocclusion poses a challenge for the orthodontist because of its multifactorial aetiology. Class II malocclusion is the most frequently encountered and treated malocclusion in orthodontic practice and affects approximately 14.6 % of the North Indian population.1 A common reason for Class II malocclusion is mandibular skeletal retrusion which is the most common characteristic, as reported by McNamara.2 This can be caused by genetic or hereditary factors. When evaluating treatment options for Class II patients, the extent of the skeletal discrepancy and the skeletal maturity of the patient needs to be considered. Treatment may range from dental compensation including camouflage with extractions to surgical procedures targeted at moving the jaw at fault. In growing patients, growth modification with functional appliances offers an intermediate treatment option. Functional appliances are basically of two types; Removable and Fixed. Removable functional appliances such as Activator, Bionator, Frankel Function regulator and Twin Block appliance change Class II relationship by the transmission of soft tissue tension to the dentition. Treatment success with these appliances relies heavily on patient compliance. Therefore, in non-compliant patients, fixed Class II correctors in conjunction with fixed orthodontic appliances are the best choice.3 Fixed functional appliances generate continuous stimuli for mandibular growth without break and permit better adaptation to functions like mastication, swallowing, speech and respiration.1 The Herbst fixed functional appliance has been used routinely for Class II patients and has undergone many design variations over time.4 The AdvanSync2 Class II corrector is a recently introduced fixed functional appliance. It has a much smaller size than the conventional Herbst appliances, is easier to place, activate and remove and most importantly, can be used in conjunction with full-arch fixed appliances throughout.3 Here we describe a case report of a patient treated with the AdvanSync2 Class II corrector and the findings observed in the sagittal and vertical dimensions

scholarly journals Long-term skeletal and dental effects and treatment timing for functional appliances in Class II malocclusion

2012 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 334-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Franchi ◽  
Chiara Pavoni ◽  
Kurt Faltin ◽  
James A. McNamara ◽  
Paola Cozza
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Group ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Treatment Timing ◽  
Class Ii Treatment ◽  
Lateral Cephalograms ◽  
Functional Appliances ◽  
Fixed Appliances

ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze the long-term skeletal and dentoalveolar effects and to evaluate treatment timing of Class II treatment with functional appliances followed by fixed appliances. Materials and Methods: A group of 40 patients (22 females and 18 males) with Class II malocclusion consecutively treated either with a Bionator or an Activator followed by fixed appliances was compared with a control group of 20 subjects (9 females and 11 males) with untreated Class II malocclusion. Lateral cephalograms were available at the start of treatment (mean age 10 years), end of treatment with functional appliances (mean age 12 years), and long-term observation (mean age 18.6 years). The treated sample also was divided into two groups according to skeletal maturity. The early-treatment group was composed of 20 subjects (12 females and 8 males) treated before puberty, while the late-treatment group included 20 subjects (10 females and 10 males) treated at puberty. Statistical comparisons were performed with analysis of variance followed by Tukey's post hoc tests. Results: Significant long-term mandibular changes (Co-Gn) in the treated group (3.6 mm over the controls) were associated with improvements in the skeletal sagittal intermaxillary relationship, overjet, and molar relationship (∼3.0–3.5 mm). Treatment during the pubertal peak was able to produce significantly greater increases in total mandibular length (4.3 mm) and mandibular ramus height (3.1 mm) associated with a significant advancement of the bony chin (3.9 mm) when compared with treatment before puberty. Conclusion: Treatment of Class II malocclusion with functional appliances appears to be more effective at puberty.

Functional Appliances in the Treatment of Class II Malocclusion- A Review

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aakash Shah ◽  
Purvesh Shah ◽  
Santosh Goje ◽  
Romil Shah ◽  
Bhumi Modi
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Functional Appliances

scholarly journals Proxy Crimps: A Transformative Solution

2021 ◽  
pp. 030157422096341
Author(s):  
Jamoy James ◽  
Payal Ostwal ◽  
Juhi Notra
Keyword(s):  
Low Cost ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Functional Appliances

The Forsus appliance is one of the most commonly used rigid fixed functional appliances in the correction of class II malocclusion. It is often seen that parts go missing with regular usage of the appliance. Replacement of the same is expensive and also requires a large inventory. An innovative low-cost and easy option for lost or broken split crimps is described in this article.

Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of the use of various orthodontic appliances in the correction of malocclusion of the II class in children and adolescents

2021 ◽  
pp. 12-15
Author(s):  
N.D. Pilipenko ◽  
S.Yu Maksyukov
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Treatment Process ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Orthodontic Appliances ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Twin Block ◽  
Lower Jaw ◽  
Jaw Position

This study is dedicated to a comparative analysis of effectiveness of using orthodontic appliances when treating class II malocclusion in children and adolescents. It was shown that treatment with the Invisalign system with a change of the lower jaw position is the most effective method for correcting class II malocclusion in growing patients. Using Invisalign aligners showed not only the best efficacy according to teleroentgenograms. but also made the treatment process comfortable for patients at all its stages. Moreover, higher level of compliance was demonstrated with treatment using the Invisalign system compared to the Twin-block appliance.

scholarly journals Effects of the cervical headgear in growing Angle Class II malocclusion patients: a prospective study

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 25-31
Author(s):  
Anderson Jaña Rosa ◽  
Rizomar Ramos do Nascimento ◽  
José Nelson Mucha ◽  
Oswaldo de Vasconcellos Vilella
Keyword(s):  
Significant Variation ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Angle Class Ii ◽  
Skeletal Changes ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
A Prospective Study ◽  
Untreated Individuals ◽  
Experimental Group

ABSTRACT Objective: Evaluate dental and skeletal changes resulting from the exclusive use of the cervical headgear for 15 ± 4 months in the treatment of patients with Class II division 1 malocclusion. Methods: Differences between the beginning (T1) and immediately after the end of the therapy (T2) with the cervical headgear in growing patients (Experimental Group, EG, n = 23) were examined and compared, during compatible periods, with those presented by a group of untreated individuals (Control Group, CG, n =22) with similar malocclusions and chronological age. The cephalometric variables evaluated were: ANB, GoGn.SN, AO-BO, S'-ANS, S'-A, S'-B, S'-Pog and S'-U6 (maxillary first molar). The Shapiro-Wilk and Levene tests were used to evaluate the results. Results: Significant differences were found relative to the ANB, S'-U6, AO-BO, S'-ANS, S'-A, S'-B and S'-Pog variables between T1 and T2 when comparing both groups. No statistically significant variation was found regarding the GoGn.SN angle. Conclusions: The use of cervical headgear promoted distal movement of the maxillary first molars and restricted the anterior displacement of the maxilla, without significantly affecting the GoGn.SN angle.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document