366 Study on properties of turbulent boundary layers affected by large-scale free-stream turbulence

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011.60 (0) ◽  
pp. _366-1_-_366-2_
Author(s):  
Saori TSUKUDA ◽  
Hiroki SUZUKI ◽  
Kouji NAGATA ◽  
Tomoyuki KITAYAMA ◽  
Yasuhiko SAKAI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Free Stream ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Scale Free ◽  
Free Stream Turbulence

scholarly journals Interactions of large-scale free-stream turbulence with turbulent boundary layers

2016 ◽  
Vol 802 ◽  
pp. 79-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eda Dogan ◽  
Ronald E. Hanson ◽  
Bharathram Ganapathisubramani
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Free Stream ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Scale Interactions ◽  
Free Stream Turbulence ◽  
Small Scales ◽  
Near Wall

The scale interactions occurring within a turbulent boundary layer are investigated in the presence of free-stream turbulence. The free-stream turbulence is generated by an active grid. The free stream is monitored by a single-component hot-wire probe, while a second probe is roved across the height of the boundary layer at the same streamwise location. Large-scale structures occurring in the free stream are shown to penetrate the boundary layer and increase the streamwise velocity fluctuations throughout. It is speculated that, depending on the extent of the penetration, i.e. based on the level of free-stream turbulence, the near-wall turbulence production peaks at different wall-normal locations than the expected location of $y^{+}\approx 15$ for a canonical turbulent boundary layer. It is shown that the large scales dominating the log region have a modulating effect on the small scales in the near-wall region; this effect becomes more significant with increasing turbulence in the free stream, i.e. similarly increasing $Re_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{0}}$. This modulating interaction and its Reynolds-number trend have similarities with canonical turbulent boundary layers at high Reynolds numbers where the interaction between the large scales and the envelope of the small scales exhibits a pure amplitude modulation (Hutchins & Marusic, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A, vol. 365 (1852), 2007, pp. 647–664; Mathis et al., J. Fluid Mech., vol. 628, 2009, pp. 311–337). This similarity has encouraging implications towards generalising scale interactions in turbulent boundary layers.

Conditional statistics and flow structures in turbulent boundary layers buffeted by free-stream disturbances

2019 ◽  
Vol 866 ◽  
pp. 526-566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiho You ◽  
Tamer A. Zaki
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Shear Stress ◽  
Kinetic Energy ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Free Stream ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Direct Numerical Simulations ◽  
Free Stream Turbulence ◽  
Conditional Statistics

Direct numerical simulations are performed to study zero-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layers beneath quiescent and vortical free streams. The inflow boundary layer is computed in a precursor simulation of laminar-to-turbulence transition, and the free-stream vortical forcing is obtained from direct numerical simulations of homogeneous isotropic turbulence. A level-set approach is employed in order to objectively distinguish the boundary-layer and free-stream fluids, and to accurately evaluate their respective contributions to flow statistics. When free-stream turbulence is present, the skin friction coefficient is elevated relative to its value in the canonical boundary-layer configuration. An explanation is provided in terms of an increase in the power input into production of boundary-layer turbulence kinetic energy. This increase takes place deeper than the extent of penetration of the external perturbations towards the wall, and also despite the free-stream perturbations being void of any Reynolds shear stress. Conditional statistics demonstrate that the free-stream turbulence has two effects on the boundary layer: one direct and the other indirect. The low-frequency components of the free-stream turbulence penetrate the logarithmic layer. The associated wall-normal Reynolds stress acts against the mean shear to enhance the shear stress, which in turn enhances turbulence production. This effect directly enlarges the scale and enhances the energy of outer large-scale motions in the boundary layer. The second, indirect effect is the influence of these newly formed large-scale structures. They modulate the near-wall shear stress and, as a result, increase the turbulence kinetic energy production in the buffer layer, which is deeper than the extent of penetration of free-stream turbulence towards the wall.

SD7003 airfoil in large-scale free stream turbulence

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian L. Herbst ◽  
Christian J. Kähler ◽  
Rainer Hain
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Free Stream ◽  
Scale Free ◽  
Free Stream Turbulence

Direct numerical simulation of hypersonic turbulent boundary layers. Part 3. Effect of Mach number

2011 ◽  
Vol 672 ◽  
pp. 245-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. DUAN ◽  
I. BEEKMAN ◽  
M. P. MARTÍN
Keyword(s):  
Mach Number ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Free Stream ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Thermodynamic Quantities ◽  
Reynolds Analogy ◽  
Number Range ◽  
Free Stream Mach Number ◽  
Mach Numbers

In this paper, we perform direct numerical simulations (DNS) of turbulent boundary layers with nominal free-stream Mach number ranging from 0.3 to 12. The main objective is to assess the scalings with respect to the mean and turbulence behaviours as well as the possible breakdown of the weak compressibility hypothesis for turbulent boundary layers at high Mach numbers (M > 5). We find that many of the scaling relations, such as the van Driest transformation for mean velocity, Walz's relation, Morkovin's scaling and the strong Reynolds analogy, which are derived based on the weak compressibility hypothesis, remain valid for the range of free-stream Mach numbers considered. The explicit dilatation terms such as pressure dilatation and dilatational dissipation remain small for the present Mach number range, and the pressure–strain correlation and the anisotropy of the Reynolds stress tensor are insensitive to the free-stream Mach number. The possible effects of intrinsic compressibility are reflected by the increase in the fluctuations of thermodynamic quantities (p′rms/pw, ρ′rms/ρ, T′rms/T) and turbulence Mach numbers (Mt, M′rms), the existence of shocklets, the modification of turbulence structures (near-wall streaks and large-scale motions) and the variation in the onset of intermittency.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document