scholarly journals Thickness of small sample for creep property evaluation of 9Cr steel base metal of piping on site

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masatsugu YAGUCHI ◽  
Masato TOMOBE ◽  
Shin-ichi KOMAZAKI ◽  
Akihiro KUMADA
Keyword(s):  
Base Metal ◽  
Creep Property ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
9Cr Steel ◽  
Property Evaluation ◽  
Steel Base

Effect of Filler Metals on the Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of Dissimilar Low Carbon Steel and 316L Stainless Steel Welded Joints

2015 ◽  
Vol 819 ◽  
pp. 57-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.F. Mamat ◽  
E. Hamzah ◽  
Z. Ibrahim ◽  
A.M. Rohah ◽  
A. Bahador
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Carbon Steel ◽  
Base Metal ◽  
Arc Welding ◽  
316L Stainless Steel ◽  
Filler Metal ◽  
Low Carbon Steel ◽  
Low Carbon ◽  
Steel Base ◽  
Welding Electrode

In this paper, dissimilar joining of 316L stainless steel to low carbon steel was carried out using gas metal arc welding (GMAW) and gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW). Samples were welded using AWS: ER309L welding electrode for GMAW and AWS: ER316L welding electrode for GTAW process. Determination of mechanical properties and material characterization on the welded joints were carried out using the Instron tensile test machine and an optical microscope respectively. The cross section area of the welded joint consists of three main areas namely the base metal (BM), heat affected zone (HAZ), and weld metal (WM). It was found that, the yield and tensile strengths of welded samples using ER316L filler metal were slightly higher than the welded sample using ER309L welding electrode. All welded samples fractured at low carbon steel base metal indicating that the regions of ER316L stainless steel base metal, ER316L filler metal and heat affected zone (HAZ) have a higher strength than low carbon steel base metal. It was also found that ER316L welding electrode was the best filler to be used for welding two dissimilar metals between carbon and stainless steel.

2C2 Creep Property Evaluation of Highly Aged Thermal Power Boiler Tubes by Small Punch Test

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 (0) ◽  
pp. 77-78
Author(s):  
Jumpei ARIDOME ◽  
Kazuto FUJITA ◽  
Shin-ichi KOMAZAKI ◽  
Terutaka FUJIOKA ◽  
Ken-ichi KOBAYASHI
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Power ◽  
Creep Property ◽  
Small Punch Test ◽  
Small Punch ◽  
Punch Test ◽  
Property Evaluation ◽  
Boiler Tubes ◽  
Power Boiler

Creep Property Evaluation of Gr.91 Boiler Pipings by Small Punch Test

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 (0) ◽  
pp. OS1205
Author(s):  
Keisuke OBATA ◽  
Shin-ichi KOMAZAKI ◽  
Masato TOMOBE ◽  
Masatsugu YAGUCHI ◽  
Akihiro KUMADA
Keyword(s):  
Creep Property ◽  
Small Punch Test ◽  
Small Punch ◽  
Punch Test ◽  
Property Evaluation

Creep Property Evaluation of Heat-Resistant Steels by Small Punch Creep Test

2007 ◽  
Vol 539-543 ◽  
pp. 4434-4439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinichi Komazaki ◽  
T. Nakata ◽  
Takayuki Sugimoto ◽  
Yutaka Kohno
Keyword(s):  
Creep Test ◽  
Ferritic Steel ◽  
Rupture Strength ◽  
Creep Property ◽  
Type Specimen ◽  
Standard Test ◽  
Creep Rupture ◽  
Ferritic Steels ◽  
Small Punch ◽  
Property Evaluation

The recently developed small punch (SP) creep test was applied to four different heatresistant ferritic steels, namely, two kinds of conventional ferritic steels which had been actually used in the high-temperature components for long periods and two advanced high chromium ferritic steels for fusion reactor materials to investigate the applicability of the SP creep test. The ratio of the load of SP creep test to the stress of standard uniaxial creep test was calculated so that both the creep rupture curves (load/stress versus Larson-Miller parameter curves) were overlapped to convert the results of SP creep test into those of standard test. As a result, the ratio was determined to be 2.4, irrespective of the kind of ferritic steel. This result indicates that the creep rupture strength of heat-resistance ferritic steels can be estimated using a miniaturized plate-type specimen and this conversion coefficient 2.4 independent of the kind of ferritic steel.

Study on Incorporation of New Design Fatigue Curves and a New Environmental Fatigue Correction Factor for PWR Environment Into the JSME Environmental Fatigue Evaluation Method

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seiji Asada ◽  
Shengde Zhang ◽  
Masahiro Takanashi ◽  
Yuichiro Nomura
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Base Metal ◽  
Stainless Steels ◽  
Evaluation Method ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steels ◽  
Steel Base ◽  
Improved Design ◽  
Fatigue Evaluation ◽  
Cast Stainless Steel ◽  
Metal Weld

Abstract Improved design fatigue curves were developed in the Subcommittee on Design Fatigue Curve in the Atomic Energy Research Committee in the Japan Welding Engineering Society (JWES). Working Group on Design Fatigue Curves (WG DFC) in the JSME has studied the validity and the applicability of the improved design fatigue curves developed in the JWES to incorporate into the JSME Environmental Fatigue Evaluation Method. The authors propose a fatigue analysis method using the design fatigue curves developed in the JWES that are applied revised factors to optimize the environmental fatigue analysis. Also, the Japanese pressurized water reactor (PWR) utility group developed equations of environmental fatigue factors (Fen) for austenitic stainless steel base metal, weld metal and cast stainless steel in PWR environment. The WG DFC has investigated the Fen equations and concluded that the Fen equation of austenitic stainless steel base metal is the most conservative among the three equations and close to NUREG/CR-6909 Rev.1 [24]. The authors propose to use the Fen equation for base metal for austenitic stainless steels for all of the base metal, weld metal and cast stainless steel. In addition, the authors have confirmed that the employment of the proposed Fen equation to the proposed design fatigue curves of austenitic stainless steels accurately predicts the existing environmental fatigue test data of austenitic stainless steels, which were used in the development of the current Fen equation of austenitic stainless steels in PWR environments in the JSME Environmental Fatigue Evaluation Method. Therefore, the proposed Fen equation can be applied to environmental fatigue evaluation for austenitic stainless steels.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document