scholarly journals Comparison of Arch Bar, Eyelets and Transmucosal Screws for Maxillo Mandibular Fixation in Jaw Fratcure

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (02) ◽  
pp. 497-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
karthick Sekar ◽  
Prabhu Manickam Natarajan ◽  
Arva Kapasi
Keyword(s):  
Arch Bar ◽  
Maxillo Mandibular Fixation

scholarly journals New method for intraoperatory occlusal restauration in mandibular angle fractures treatment using two modified reduction forcepssing two modified reduction forceps

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
José Lineu Pereira Ogoshi ◽  
Rogerio Henrique Berardi ◽  
Denis Zangrando ◽  
Fernando kendi Horikawa ◽  
Susana Morimoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mandibular Fracture ◽  
New Method ◽  
Surgical Approaches ◽  
Dental Occlusion ◽  
Mandibular Angle ◽  
Intermaxillary Fixation ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Arch Bar ◽  
Angle Fractures ◽  
Maxillo Mandibular Fixation

The treatment of mandibular angle fractures presents several possibilities for fixation methods and surgical approaches which can be intraoral or can be accessed through the skin. An important point would be intraoperative occlusal restoration. We present a method that replaces the traditional form using an erich bar and which, in our view, is a fast and effective method for intraoperative occlusal restoration.Descriptors: Inter Maxillary Fixation (IMF); Occlusion; Arch Bar Fixation.ReferencesJohnson AW. Dental occlusion ties: A rapid, safe, and non-invasive maxillo-mandibular fixation technology. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2017;2(4):178-83.Abbasi AJ, Parvin M. New method of arch bar fixation. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;55(6):631-32.Shinohara EH, Mitsuda ST, Miyagusko JM, Horikawa FK. Mandibular fracture reduction without intraoperative intermaxillary fixation: a technique using two modified reduction forceps. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006;7(1):150-56.

Comparison of Biomet Omnimax© Versus Traditional Arch Bar Placement in Trauma Patients With Facial Fractures

2020 ◽  
pp. 000313482096001
Author(s):  
William Aukerman ◽  
Byron Dodson ◽  
Thomas Simunich ◽  
Kamran Shayesteh
Keyword(s):  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Facial Fractures ◽  
Arch Bar

A new arch bar for oral surgery

1981 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 462-464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akira Hasegawa ◽  
Donald Leake
Keyword(s):  
Oral Surgery ◽  
Arch Bar

scholarly journals Comparison of outcome of two plate fixation with one plate fixation along with arch bar in management of parasymphysis; A Randomized Control Trial.

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (09) ◽  
pp. 2007-2013
Author(s):  
Mohammad Umar ◽  
Jawad Ahmad Kundi ◽  
Muhammad Sulaiman ◽  
Muhammad Zaib Khan ◽  
Ali Altaf
Keyword(s):  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Treatment Protocol ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Arch Bar ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Inferior Border ◽  
Two Miniplates

Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare two plate fixation and one plate along with arch bar in the treatment of parasymphsis, and to analyze the advantages and disadvantages over one another. Study Design: Randomized Clinical Trial. Setting: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Sardar Begam Dental College and Northwest General Hospital Peshawar. Period: Over a period of one year from June 2017 to August 2018. Material & Methods: 60 patients with parasymphysis fracture after diagnosis established on clinical and radiological examination were equally divided into two groups, 30 patients in each. Group (A) were treated with two miniplates, while Group (B) one miniplate along with arch  bar under general anesthesia with proper antibiotics coverage in the pre- and post-operative period. Results: The infection rate 4 (13.3%) patients in Group B while 0 in Group A. No Loosening /fracture of screw or plate occur in any subject in group A at any follow up visit, while it occurred in 4 subjects in group B at 15 days follow up period. 9 patients in Group A and 6 in Group B presented with immediate post of paresthesia, which was reduced to 7 patients in group A and 6 in group B at 15 days follow up, and to 4 patients in Group A and 5 in Group B at 1 month follow up. Similarly, no subject had inferior border misalignment in group A at any follow up period while 3 subjects have immediate post -op inferior border discrepancy in group B and 6 subjects in the same group shows inferior border discrepancy at 15 days , but the overall result of this variable was also statistically non-significant. Conclusion: Isolated mandibular parasymphysis fracture can be treated with either two miniplates or one miniplate along with arch bar for 6 weeks. Both treatment protocol shows advantages and disadvantages with the aim of achieving the best treatment outcome for the patients.

scholarly journals The Use of Risdon Cables in Pediatric Maxillofacial Trauma: A Technique Revisited

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Madsen ◽  
Paul S. Tiwana ◽  
Brian Alpert
Keyword(s):  
Primary Teeth ◽  
Maxillofacial Trauma ◽  
Facial Skeleton ◽  
Intermaxillary Fixation ◽  
Pediatric Fractures ◽  
Arch Bar ◽  
Tooth Buds ◽  
Future Growth

Although less common than adult fractures, fractures of the pediatric maxillofacial skeleton present unique challenges. Different considerations including variations of anatomy including tooth buds, dental variations, as well as considerations for future growth must be addressed. When traditional techniques to treat adult fractures are applied for securing intermaxillary fixation (IMF) such as arch bars, difficulty arises because the primary teeth are shorter and conventional arch bar techniques may slip off intra or postoperatively. We present a technique to achieve both IMF as well as interdental stability using a Risdon cable. Although this technique is not new, we present it as our preferred method for treating pediatric fractures of the facial skeleton where IMF must be accomplished.

scholarly journals Computer-aided autotransplantation of teeth with 3D printed surgical guides and arch bar: a preliminary experience

PeerJ ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. e5939 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei He ◽  
Kaiyue Tian ◽  
Xiaoyan Xie ◽  
Enbo Wang ◽  
Nianhui Cui
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rate ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Three Dimensional Printing ◽  
Surgical Guides ◽  
Arch Bar ◽  
Novel Approach ◽  
Computer Aided ◽  
Wisdom Teeth ◽  
Accuracy And Stability

Background/Aim Autotransplantation of teeth is a method to restore the missing teeth and computer-aided techniques have been applied in this field. The aim of this study was to describe a novel approach for computer-aided autotransplantation of teeth and to preliminarily assess its feasibility, accuracy, and stability. Methods Eight wisdom teeth with complete root formation of eight adult patients were autotransplanted. Individual replicas of donor teeth with local splints, surgical templates, and arch bars were virtually designed and fabricated using three-dimensional printing, these were then applied in the autotransplantation surgeries. Clinical and radiological outcomes were observed, the extra-alveolar time, success rate, and 1-year survival rate were analyzed, and accuracy and stability of this approach were evaluated. Results The extra-alveolar time of donor teeth were less than 3 min. The average follow-up duration was 2.00 ± 1.06 years. All autotransplanted teeth showed normal masticatory function. Ankylosis was found in one patient, and the overall success rate was 87.5%, whereas the 1-year survival rate was 100%. Linear differences between the designed and the immediate autotransplanted positions at crowns and apexes of the donor teeth were 1.43 ± 0.57 and 1.77 ± 0.67 mm, respectively. Linear differences between immediate and the stable positions at crowns and apexes of the donor teeth were 0.66 ± 0.36 and 0.67 ± 0.48 mm, respectively. Conclusion The present study illustrated the feasibility, clinical satisfied accuracy, and stability of a novel approach for computer-aided autotransplantation of teeth. This new approach facilitated the surgical procedure and might be a viable and predictable method for autotransplantation of teeth.

Cross-arch bar splint

1992 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur M. LaVere ◽  
Roland C. Smith ◽  
Robert J. Sarka
Keyword(s):  
Arch Bar
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document