Outcomes of Health Care–Associated Pneumonia Empirically Treated with Guideline-Concordant Regimens Versus Community-Acquired Pneumonia Guideline–Concordant Regimens for Patients Admitted to Acute Care Wards from Home

2013 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenny I Chen ◽  
Leonard N Slater ◽  
George Kurdgelashvili ◽  
Khawaja O Husain ◽  
Chris A Gentry
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Broad Spectrum ◽  
Clinical Cure ◽  
Pneumonia Severity Index ◽  
Severity Index ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Empiric Antibiotics ◽  
Cure Rates ◽  
Health Care Associated Pneumonia

BACKGROUND The introduction of the health care–associated pneumonia (HCAP) categorization expanded recommendations for broad-spectrum empiric antibiotics to pneumonia patients presenting from the community with recent health care–system exposure. However, the efficacy of such regimens in improving clinical outcomes in these patients has not been well established. OBJECTIVE To compare the clinical outcomes of HCAP patients treated initially with HCAP guideline–concordant antibiotic regimens to those treated initially with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) guideline-concordant antibiotic regimens. METHODS This retrospective study included HCAP patients presenting from home and admitted to general medical wards. HCAP regimen patients were treated empirically with at least 1 antipseudomonal agent. All other patients were assigned to the CAP regimen group. The primary end point was clinical cure at 30 days postdischarge. Subgroup analysis was performed in patients hospitalized 1–30 days and 31–90 days before the HCAP admission. RESULTS Of 228 HCAP admissions, 122 patients received CAP regimens and 106 received HCAP regimens. The 2 groups were similar at baseline, including Pneumonia Severity Index scores. Attributable clinical cure occurred in 75.4% of CAP regimen patients and 69.8% of HCAP regimen patients (p = 0.34). Overall clinical cure occurred in 59.8% of CAP regimen patients and 54.7% of HCAP regimen patients (p = 0.44). The CAP regimen group used fewer days of intravenous antibiotics (4.39 vs 7.75, p < 0.0001) and had shorter lengths of stay (6.36 vs 8.58 days, p < 0.0001). For patients hospitalized 31–90 days earlier, clinical cure was higher in the CAP regimen group (attributable, 82.9% vs 60.0%, p = 0.0090; overall, 67.1% vs 47.5%, p = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS Compared to CAP guideline–concordant regimens, treatment of HCAP with HCAP guideline–concordant regimens did not increase clinical cure rates and was associated with lower clinical cure rates in patients hospitalized 31–90 days prior to the HCAP admission. This study suggests that broad-spectrum empiric antibiotics may not be necessary in all HCAP patient groups.

scholarly journals 869. Evaluation of Broad-Spectrum Antibiotic De-Escalation in Patients with Health-Care Associated Pneumonia (HCAP) and No Microbiological Diagnosis

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S23-S24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Twisha S Patel ◽  
Lindsay Petty ◽  
Anna Conlon ◽  
Gregory Eschenauer ◽  
Daniel Nielsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Broad Spectrum ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Microbiological Diagnosis ◽  
Medical Patients ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Clinical Instability ◽  
Health Care Associated Pneumonia ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Broad-spectrum (BS) antibiotics directed against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are commonly used for health-care associated pneumonia (HCAP) treatment. Many patients with HCAP do not have a microbiologically confirmed diagnosis. The goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of antibiotic de-escalation on clinical outcomes in patients with HCAP without a microbiological diagnosis. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study of adult, non-ICU, medical patients hospitalized with HCAP between January 2016 and February 2018 at 46 Michigan hospitals. Exclusions included extrapulmonary infection, severe immune suppression, or clinical instability on day 4. Included patients: (1) lacked any positive culture (blood/sputum); (2) started on empiric anti-P. aeruginosa and anti-MRSA therapy by hospital day 2; (3) switched to a narrow-spectrum (NS) regimen (no anti-P. aeruginosa or anti-MRSA coverage) or maintained on BS antibiotics (anti-P. aeruginosa ± anti-MRSA) by therapy day 4 (Figure 1). Mortality, readmission, Clostridium difficile infection, and adverse events from antibiotics were compared between the BS and NS groups. Data were analyzed using logistic generalized estimating equation models and inverse probability of treatment weighting. Results Of 363 patients with HCAP included, 73 (20%) were switched to an NS regimen. Of 290 patients maintained on anti-PSA BS regimens, 47.6% also continued anti-MRSA therapy. The median age was 72 (IQR, 61–81) and Charlson comorbidity index was 4 (IQR, 2–6) of the entire cohort. Baseline characteristics were similar between BS and NS groups, except more patients had chronic kidney disease in the BS group. On multivariable analysis, no other baseline factors were found to be associated with use of BS antibiotics on day 4. Both total and IV antibiotic duration were longer in the BS group (10 vs. 8 days, P = 0.002, and 4 vs. 3 days, P &lt; 0.001, respectively). On adjusted analysis, there were no differences in patient outcomes (Figure 2). Conclusion Among patients with HCAP started on empiric MRSA and PSA coverage without microbiological diagnosis, clinical outcomes were similar in patients switched to an NS antibiotic and those maintained on BS antibiotics. Our findings suggest a potential role for antimicrobial stewardship in promoting antibiotic de-escalation in this population. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Soluble form of suppression of tumorigenicity-2 predicts clinical stability of inpatients with community-acquired pneumonia

2021 ◽  
pp. 153537022110271
Author(s):  
Yifeng Zeng ◽  
Mingshan Xue ◽  
Teng Zhang ◽  
Shixue Sun ◽  
Runpei Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Regression Model ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Pneumonia Severity Index ◽  
Severity Index ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Risk Classification ◽  
Soluble Form ◽  
Pneumonia Severity ◽  
Clinical Stability

The soluble form of the suppression of tumorigenicity-2 (sST2) is a biomarker for risk classification and prognosis of heart failure, and its production and secretion in the alveolar epithelium are significantly correlated with the inflammation-inducing in pulmonary diseases. However, the predictive value of sST2 in pulmonary disease had not been widely studied. This study investigated the potential value in prognosis and risk classification of sST2 in patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Clinical data of ninety-three CAP inpatients were retrieved and their sST2 and other clinical indices were studied. Cox regression models were constructed to probe the sST2’s predictive value for patients’ restoring clinical stability and its additive effect on pneumonia severity index and CURB-65 scores. Patients who did not reach clinical stability within the defined time (30 days from hospitalization) have had significantly higher levels of sST2 at admission ( P <  0.05). In univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis, a high sST2 level (≥72.8 ng/mL) was an independent reverse predictor of clinical stability ( P < 0.05). The Cox regression model combined with sST2 and CURB-65 (AUC: 0.96) provided a more accurate risk classification than CURB-65 (AUC:0.89) alone (NRI: 1.18, IDI: 0.16, P < 0.05). The Cox regression model combined with sST2 and pneumonia severity index (AUC: 0.96) also provided a more accurate risk classification than pneumonia severity index (AUC:0.93) alone (NRI: 0.06; IDI: 0.06, P < 0.05). sST2 at admission can be used as an independent early prognostic indicator for CAP patients. Moreover, it can improve the predictive power of CURB-65 and pneumonia severity index score.

scholarly journals Management of Health-Care Associated Pneumonia (HCAP)

2013 ◽  
pp. 87-90
Author(s):  
Alessia Rosato ◽  
Claudio Santini
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Treatment Approach ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Traditional Classification ◽  
Hospital Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Health Care Associated Pneumonia ◽  
Hospital Acquired

Introduction The traditional classification of Pneumonia as either community acquired (CAP) or hospital acquired (HAP) reflects deep differences in the etiology, pathogenesis, approach and prognosis between the two entities. Health-Care Associated Pneumonia (HCAP) develops in a heterogeneous group of patients receiving invasive medical care or surgical procedures in an outpatient setting. For epidemiology and outcomes, HCAP closely resembles HAP and possibly requires an analogous therapeutic regimen effective against multidrug-resistant pathogens. Materials and methods We reviewed the pertinent literature and the guidelines for the diagnosis and management of HCAP to analyze the evidence for the recommended approach. Results Growing evidence seems to confirm the differences in epidemiology and outcome between HCAP and CAP but fails to confirm any real advantage in pursuing an aggressive treatment for all HCAP and CAP patients. Discussion Further investigations are needed to establish the optimal treatment approach according to the different categories of patients and the different illness severities. Keywords Health Care Associated Pneumonia (HCAP); Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP); Hospital Acquired Pneumonia (HAP); Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pathogens

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document