scholarly journals Factors associated with abnormal cardio-ankle vascular index in patients with type 2 diabetes and prediabetes

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 132-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksei N. Sumin ◽  
Natalya A. Bezdenezhnykh ◽  
Natalya V. Fedorova ◽  
Anna V. Shcheglova ◽  
Elena V. Indukaeva ◽  
...  

Aim: The purpose of this study was to examine the phenotypic and genetic characteristics of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with different responses to treatment with metformin (MF) in the Novosibirsk region. Materials and methods: We examined 460 patients with T2DM in the Novosibirsk region. Patients were divided into groups according to their HbA1c level: patients who achieved the target HbA1c level during MF therapy (n = 209) and those who did not reach the target HbA1c level (n=251). Genotyping of ATM (rs11212617) was performed using polymerase chain reaction by TaqMan. Results: Patients who achieved the target HbA1c level during MF treatment (good response) were older (61. 1±9. 1 years vs. 57. 4±8. 4 years, p=0. 001), had later onset of diabetes (54. 6 ± 10. 1 years vs. 49. 2±8. 5 years, p = 0. 0001) and shorter duration of diabetes (6. 5±5. 9 years vs. 8. 2±6. 1 years, p=0. 03) compared with those who did not achieve the target HbA1c level. There was no statistically significant association between ATM rs11212617 and achieving the target HbA1c level among all patients [odds ratio (OR)=0. 94, 95% confidence interval = (0. 73–1. 23), p=0. 67] or those with MF monotherapy [OR=0. 90, (0. 65–1. 25), p=0. 54] or combination therapy [OR=1. 02, (0. 72–1. 43), p=0. 92]. There was an effect of age on response to MF therapy in all three groups (all patients: p=0. 001, MF monotherapy group: p=0. 04, combination therapy group: p=0. 0009). In the MF monotherapy group, low dose MF was associated with a good response (p=0. 03), and in the combination therapy group, males were more likely to have a good response (p=0. 003). Patients with genotype C/C or A/C for ATM (rs11212617) compared with those with genotype A/A were more likely to have high levels of triglycerides [2. 33 (1. 52–4. 2) mmol/l, 2. 09 (1. 35–3. 0) mmol/l and 1. 99 (1. 49–3. 21) mmol/l, respectively, p=0. 001], coronary heart disease (CHD) (13. 4%, 13. 4% and 9. 6%, respectively, p=0. 009) and myocardial infarction (7. 8%, 3. 2% and 4. 0%, respectively, p=0. 001). Conclusion: Patients with T2DM who had a good response to MF therapy were older, more likely to be male and had a later onset of T2DM. Genotype C/C for ATM rs11212617 was associated with high triglycerides, CHD and myocardial infarction. ATM rs11212617 was not associated with response to MF therapy in the Novosibirsk region.  

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-131
Author(s):  
Irina A. Bondar ◽  
Olesya Y. Shabelnikova ◽  
Ekaterina A. Sokolova ◽  
Olga V. Pyankova ◽  
Maksim L. Filipenko

Aim: The purpose of this study was to examine the phenotypic and genetic characteristics of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with different responses to treatment with metformin (MF) in the Novosibirsk region. Materials and methods: We examined 460 patients with T2DM in the Novosibirsk region. Patients were divided into groups according to their HbA1c level: patients who achieved the target HbA1c level during MF therapy (n = 209) and those who did not reach the target HbA1c level (n=251). Genotyping of ATM (rs11212617) was performed using polymerase chain reaction by TaqMan. Results: Patients who achieved the target HbA1c level during MF treatment (good response) were older (61. 1±9. 1 years vs. 57. 4±8. 4 years, p=0. 001), had later onset of diabetes (54. 6 ± 10. 1 years vs. 49. 2±8. 5 years, p = 0. 0001) and shorter duration of diabetes (6. 5±5. 9 years vs. 8. 2±6. 1 years, p=0. 03) compared with those who did not achieve the target HbA1c level. There was no statistically significant association between ATM rs11212617 and achieving the target HbA1c level among all patients [odds ratio (OR)=0. 94, 95% confidence interval = (0. 73–1. 23), p=0. 67] or those with MF monotherapy [OR=0. 90, (0. 65–1. 25), p=0. 54] or combination therapy [OR=1. 02, (0. 72–1. 43), p=0. 92]. There was an effect of age on response to MF therapy in all three groups (all patients: p=0. 001, MF monotherapy group: p=0. 04, combination therapy group: p=0. 0009). In the MF monotherapy group, low dose MF was associated with a good response (p=0. 03), and in the combination therapy group, males were more likely to have a good response (p=0. 003). Patients with genotype C/C or A/C for ATM (rs11212617) compared with those with genotype A/A were more likely to have high levels of triglycerides [2. 33 (1. 52–4. 2) mmol/l, 2. 09 (1. 35–3. 0) mmol/l and 1. 99 (1. 49–3. 21) mmol/l, respectively, p=0. 001], coronary heart disease (CHD) (13. 4%, 13. 4% and 9. 6%, respectively, p=0. 009) and myocardial infarction (7. 8%, 3. 2% and 4. 0%, respectively, p=0. 001). Conclusion: Patients with T2DM who had a good response to MF therapy were older, more likely to be male and had a later onset of T2DM. Genotype C/C for ATM rs11212617 was associated with high triglycerides, CHD and myocardial infarction. ATM rs11212617 was not associated with response to MF therapy in the Novosibirsk region. 


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3903-3903
Author(s):  
Jiang Ji ◽  
Zhao Wang ◽  
Bing Han

Introduction: Hypomethylating agents (HMA) azacitidine and decitabine were the first-line therapy for intermediate/ higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients unsuitable for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HSCT). HMA combined with chemotherapy was recently used to achieve for a better outcome. However, few studies were carried out to compare the HMA monotherapy to the HMA and chemotherapy combination therapy. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy, survival benefit and safety of HMA monotherapy and combination therapy (with chemotherapy) in patients with intermediate/high-risk MDS or AML. Methods: Related articles published between January 2009 and April 2019 were selected and patients were separated as monotherapy group and combination group for meta-analysis. To further eliminate the potential influence of differences in patients' baseline characteristic between the two groups, subgroups with similar patients' baseline characteristics were selected for further analysis. Complete response (CR) rate, overall response (ORR) rate, 1-year overall survival (OS) rate, 1-month death rate and the proportion of adverse event (AE) were pooled and compared. Results: 13 RCT or cohort studies with 997 patients (790 in monotherapy group, 207 in HMA combination group) were selected for meta-analysis. For the pooled data, there was no significant difference in sex and cytogenetic risk between the 2 groups, but the age of combination therapy group was significantly younger than that of the monotherapy group (61.3±13.2 year-old vs 67.7±10.2 year-old, p=0.000). The CR and ORR rate were significantly higher in combination therapy group (53% vs 17%, p=0.000 for CR and 67% vs 44%, p=0.000 for ORR). However, the 1-year OS (56% for combination therapy vs 51% for HMA monotherapy group, p=0.282) and 1-month death rate (5% for combination therapy vs 4% for HMA monotherapy group, p=0.965) were similar between the two groups. The incidence of CTCAE grade 3-4 infection and bleeding were significantly higher (infection: 50% for combination therapy vs 25.7% for monotherapy group, p=0.003; bleeding: 27.5%% for combination therapy vs 7.8% for monotherapy group, p=0.004) in combination group. In subgroup analysis, 117 and 179 patients were included in combination group and HMA monotherapy group, respectively. There was no significant difference in age (69.5±4.6 vs 69.0±6.8 years old, p=0.451) and proportion of favorable/intermediate cytogenetic risk (62% vs 71%, p=0.114) between the two groups, but a significantly lower proportion of male was found in combination therapy group (57% vs 74%, p=0.003). Although combination group had a higher CR rate (49% vs 17%, p=0.000), it had similar ORR rate (58% vs 49%, p=0.140) to monotherapy group. Meanwhile, combination therapy came with higher 1-month death rate (12% vs 3%, p=0.008) and lower 1-year OS (54% vs 68%, p=0.013) compared with monotherapy group. Conclusions: HMA combined with chemotherapy could increase CR rate in all patients and ORR rate in younger patients, but could not improve OS. For patients with similar older age, combination therapy could result in higher 1-month death rate and less 1-year OS. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. e022448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nam Hoon Kim ◽  
Soo Lim ◽  
Soo Heon Kwak ◽  
Min Kyong Moon ◽  
Jun Sung Moon ◽  
...  

IntroductionPatients with type 2 diabetes are at risk of microvascular and macrovascular complications. Intensive glycaemic control, especially in patients with short duration of diabetes, is the mainstay of management of type 2 diabetes to lower the risk of complications. However, despite the improvement in the understanding of the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes and development of novel glucose-lowering agents, long-term durable glycaemic control remains a difficult goal to achieve. Several challenging clinical trials proved that an early combination therapy with a variety of glucose-lowering agents had a more favourable effect than conventional stepwise therapy in terms of glycaemic control. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a novel, initial triple combination therapy with metformin, sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (dapagliflozin) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (saxagliptin) compared with conventional stepwise add-on therapy in drug-naïve patients with recent-onset type 2 diabetes.Methods and analysisThis study is a multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label, parallel group, comparator-controlled trial. A total of 104 eligible participants will be randomised to either the initial combination therapy group or the conventional stepwise add-on therapy group for 104 weeks. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients who achieved haemoglobin A1c level<6.5% without hypoglycaemia, weight gain or discontinuation due to adverse events at 104 weeks. This trial will determine whether a novel triple combination therapy with metformin, dapagliflozin and saxagliptin has a beneficial effect on durable glycaemic control compared with conventional therapy in drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes.Ethics and disseminationThis study protocol was approved by the local institutional review boards and independent ethics committees over the recruitment sites. Results of this study will be disseminated in scientific journals and scientific conferences.Trial registration numberNCT02946632; Pre-results.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20517-e20517
Author(s):  
Fan Zhang ◽  
Tao Li ◽  
Yuzi Zhang ◽  
Shangli Cai ◽  
Lei Zhao ◽  
...  

e20517 Background: Immunotherapy combined with platinum-based chemotherapy is now standard first line treatment for NSCLC patients. However, limited evidence exists to show the efficacy of immunotherapy plus taxanes for patients who have progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy. Therefore, a retrospective study was conducted to assess whether immunotherapy plus nab-paclitaxel with or without bevacizumb could improve efficacy compared with immune monotherapy as second line therapy or beyond for NSCLC patients. Methods: Patients with metastatic NSCLC receiving anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy or combination therapy from 2015 to 2018 were identified in Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital. Patients who received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors as first-line therapy or combined with therapies other than nab-paclitaxel and bevacizumab were excluded. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety. Results: Of 59 patients, 42 were treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy and 17 were treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 plus nab-paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab. With a median follow-up of 8.2 months, combination therapy group showed significantly longer PFS compared with monotherapy group (8.4m vs. 3.7m, P = 0.047). When adjusted by covariates in COX proportional regression model, both treatment group (P = 0.007, Hazard ration [HR] 0.32; 95%CI 0.14-0.73) and performance status (P = 0.018, HR 0.44; 95%CI 0.22-0.87) demonstrated significant contribution to longer PFS. In addition, ORR was 23.5% (4/17) in the combination therapy group versus 12.8% (5/39) in the monotherapy group (P = 0.265) and the DCR was 88.2% (15/17) in the combination therapy group versus 61.5% (24/39) in the monotherapy group (P = 0.061). The incidence of grade 3/4 adverse events were 23.5% (4/17) in the combination therapy group and 4.8% (2/42) in monotherapy group (P = 0.052). Conclusions: PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus nab-paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab resulted in significantly longer PFS and higher DCR as second line therapy of beyond in metastatic NSCLC patients. These findings need to be further explored by randomized controlled studies.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takahiro Mori ◽  
Tomohisa Nagata ◽  
Masako Nagata ◽  
Kenji Fujimoto ◽  
Yoshihisa Fujino ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The number of people with diabetes is increasing and resulting in major economic losses. Presenteeism accounts for the majority of economic losses, so measures against presenteeism are important. This study investigated the relationship between severity of type 2 diabetes and presenteeism.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among workers over 40 years of age. Participants were classified as normal group or diabetic treatment group using their medical examination results and health insurance claims data. Diabetic treatment groups were described by degree of treatment control: Good (HbA1c <7%), Intermediate (7%≤ HbA1c <8%), and Poor (8%≤ HbA1c). Therapy type was also divided into monotherapy and combination therapy. Logistic regression analysis was performed to predict presenteeism loss using the Quantity and Quality method.Results: Data on 13271 workers were analyzed. Presenteeism loss was significantly higher in all treatment control groups compared with the normal group, particularly for the intermediate and poor control groups. The monotherapy group did not differ from the normal group, but presenteeism loss was significantly higher in the combination therapy group than the normal group.Conclusions: Presenteeism loss in workers with diabetes may be affected by diabetes severity, and even if treatment control was good, presenteeism loss could occur when the number of anti-diabetic drugs was high. Therefore, it is important to provide early intervention and continuous support as a preventive measure against not only diabetes and diabetes-related complications but also presenteeism.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
jingmao Yang ◽  
Liping Chen ◽  
Yajie Wang ◽  
Bei Lv ◽  
Hong Zhao ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Aim The efficacy of entecavir (ETV) add-on peg-interferon therapy compared with ETV monotherapy in treatment-naïve hepatitis B virus (HBV) patients remains controversial. We investigated whether adding Peg-interferon to ongoing ETV treatment leads to a better curative effect or not. Methods Eligible HBV patients (n=144) were randomly divided (1:1) to receive either ETV monotherapy (n=70) or peg-interferon add-on therapy from weeks 26 to 52 (n=74). Patients were followed-up for 2 years. We evaluated hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion rate, sustained virologic response (SVR), transient elastography value, and histological scores. Results At week 26, no patient achieved HBsAg seroconversion in either group. At week 52, one patient in the monotherapy group was HBsAg-negative but there was none in the combination therapy group. The monotherapy group showed significantly better liver function recovery results than the combination therapy group. At week 78, one patient in combination group had HBsAg seroconverted. At week 104, only three patients in the combination therapy group were HBsAg-negative compared with one patient in monotherapy. The mean alanine aminotransferase (ALT)and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels and transient elastography values decreased significantly compared with baseline. Both group showed a favorable decrease in alpha fetoprotein(AFP) (monotherapy:23.4±77.3 vs 2.4±0.91, P=0.149; combination therapy: 33.3±96.9 vs 4.3±5.5,P=0.085) and an improved result of liver biopsy examination scores. The combination group showed a better improvement in histology compared with the monotherapy group(mean transient elastography value 7.5±3.4 kPa [SD 1.9] vs. 12.8±13.9 kPa [SD 1.9], P=0.037). But this research didn’t show significant difference in HBsAg conversion rate (1.79% (1/56) vs 4.11% (3/73), P=0.632) as well as HBV-DNA sustained virologic response(93.2% vs 98.5%,P=0.15) between two groups. Conclusions Both therapies supported liver function recovery and histology improvement. Combination therapy did not show better antiviral efficacy in HBsAg or HBeAg seroconversion compared with monotherapy. However, combination therapy played a more positive role in reversing hepatic fibrosis compared with monotherapy.


2017 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-16
Author(s):  
Irina A. Bondar ◽  
Olesia Y. Shabelnikova ◽  
Ekaterina A. Sokolova ◽  
Maksim L. Filipenko

Rationale. The genetic aspects influencing the effectiveness of metformin (MF) therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DMT2) have recently been intensively studied. Objective — to study the association between the rs11212617 polymorphism in the ATM gene and response to metformin therapy in DMT2 patients in the Novosibirsk region and to conduct a metaanalysis of the previously reported data. Material and methods. 460 DMT2 patients (97 males and 363 females) who received MF, both as a part of monotherapy and in combination with sulfonylurea (SU) drugs, were subjected to cross-sectional examination. Depending on HbA1c level, patients were divided into the following groups: patients who have attained the target HbA1c level after MF therapy (n=209) and those who did not attain the target HbA1c level although receiving the maximum dose of MF (n=251). Alleles and genotypes were determined by real-time PCR using TaqMan probes at the Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine (SB RAS). Results. Frequency of the rare C allele of the rs11212617 polymorphism in the ATM gene in the examined patients was 0.41 and statistically did not differ between the subgroups who received MF monotherapy and combination therapy. Statistically significant association between the genotype of the rs11212617 polymorphism in the ATM gene and the type of response was revealed neither in the total group of patients (OR=0.94, 95% CI 0.73—1.23; p=0.67) nor in the MF monotherapy (OR=0.94, 95% CI 0.73—1.23; p=0.67) or combination therapy subgroups (OR=1.02, 95% CI 0.72—1.43; p=0.92). However, the metaanalysis results verify that the C allele is associated with attainment of the target HbAc1 level (the total OR=1.27, 95% CI 1.10—1.46; p=0.0008). Conclusions. The rs11212617 polymorphism in the ATM gene can influence the effectiveness of MF therapy in DMT2 patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1084.2-1085
Author(s):  
B. M. Fernandes ◽  
S. Garcia ◽  
F. Oliveira Pinheiro ◽  
M. Rato ◽  
D. Fonseca ◽  
...  

Background:In Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in combination with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) has shown advantages concerning efficacy and immunogenicity in comparison with monotherapy. However, in clinical practice, up to 40% of patients under biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) are on monotherapy.Objectives:To compare the efficacy outcomes of TNFi in monotherapy and in combination therapy in a RA monocentric cohort.Methods:Retrospective, cross-sectional study including all the RA patients under TNFi followed at our Rheumatology Department and registered in the national database. Demographic, clinical and laboratorial data and disease activity measures were collected at the last visit of 2019 from each patient. Mann-Whitney U and chi-square tests were used to the comparison analysis between the two groups (continuous and categorical variables, respectively).Results:A total of 144 patients were included: 84% were females; at the last visit of 2019, the mean age was 56.3±10.9 years and the mean disease duration was 18.3±10.2 years; 73.6% were positive for rheumatoid factor (RF), 81.9% for anti-citrullinated protein autoantibodies (ACPA) and 45.1% had erosive disease. There were no statistically significant differences in these variables between the monotherapy and the combination therapy groups (table 1).Table 1.Demographic and disease-related variables in the monotherapy and the combination therapy group.Monotherapy(n=31)Combination therapy (n=113)Age - mean±SD59.1±14.0 years55.5±9.8 yearsDisease duration - mean±SD20.5±11.2 years17.7±9.7 yearsRF positive - n (%)20 (60.4%)86 (76.8%)ACPA positive - n (%)25 (80.6%)93 (85.3%)Erosive disease - n (%)15 (48.4%)50 (44.6%)Thirty-one patients (21.5%) were under monotherapy with TNFi and etanercept was the most frequent TNFi in both groups (54.8% vs 50.0%; monotherapy and combination therapy groups, respectively). At the start of the first bDMARD, the monotherapy group had a higher disease activity score 28 - 4 variables (DAS 28 4V; 6.083±0.930 vs 5.605±1.043, p=0.039) and a higher simple disease activity score (SDAI; 36.12±11.77 vs 28.76±9.98, p=0.035); also, in the monotherapy group more patients had already started the bDMARD in monotherapy (22.6% vs 2.7%, p<0.001), less patients were under (38.7% vs 73.2%, p=0.001) or had already been treated with (77.4% vs 93.8%, p=0.007) methotrexate, in comparison with the combination group therapy.At the last visit of 2019, the monotherapy group had a higher mean years of duration of iTNF treatment (5.5±5.8 vs 3.4±4.5, p=0.048), a higher mean patient global assessment - visual analogue scale (PGA-VAS; 49±18 vs 39±25, p=0.023), a higher mean prednisolone equivalent dose in mg/day (7.6±6.3 vs 5.6±3.2, p=0.045) and a lower proportion of American College of Rheumatology 50 and 70 responses (ACR 50: 12.9% vs 17.0%, p=0.023; ACR 70: 3.2% vs 10.7%, p=0.045) in comparison with the combination therapy group.Conclusion:In line with the literature, our real-life results demonstrate some direct (higher PGA-VAS and lower ACR 50 and 70 responses) and indirect (higher current prednisolone equivalent dose) data that suggest that patients with TNFi monotherapy may have a worst disease activity control in comparison with combination therapy.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3979-3979 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eunice S. Wang ◽  
Richard Aplenc ◽  
Deborah Chirnomas ◽  
Michael John Dugan ◽  
Salman Fazal ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO; MylotargTM) is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of an anti-CD33 monoclonal antibody covalently linked to the potent antibiotic calicheamicin. Previous studies have shown GO is generally well tolerated and can induce durable second remissions when administered as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We report safety data from an expanded-access protocol (EAP) that allowed compassionate use of GO in patients with R/R AML or acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) and no access to comparable or alternative therapy. Methods: Conducted in the United States, the GO EAP (NCT02312037) was an open-label study in patients aged ≥3 months with R/R AML (including myelodysplastic syndrome) or APL who were considered to have the potential to derive clinical benefit and had exhausted other treatment options. The protocol allowed for treatment regimens tested in clinical trial settings and reported in the Mylotarg Investigators Brochure or peer-reviewed journals. Data from these trials indicated these regimens could potentially benefit a patient with R/R AML or APL. For R/R AML patients, the regimens included GO as monotherapy or in combination with anthracyclines and/or nucleoside-analogue containing regimens or hypomethylating agents. For patients with APL, these included GO as monotherapy or in combination with all-trans retinoic acid and/or arsenic trioxide. Patients were permitted to re-enroll in treatment, and their data are summarized according to each enrollment treatment. Results: A total of 331 patients received GO either as monotherapy for R/R AML (adult [aged ≥18 years]: n=118; pediatric [aged <18 years]: n=21), combination therapy for R/R AML (adult: n=99; pediatric: n=84), or treatment for APL (adult: n=9; pediatric: n=0). Mean age in the monotherapy, combination therapy, and APL groups was 55, 32, and 57 years, respectively. The most frequently administered doses of GO in the monotherapy group were 9 mg/m2 (1 dose: n=21 [15%]; doses on ≥2 days: n=29 [21%]) and 3 mg/m2 (1 dose: n=10 [7%]; doses on ≥2 days: n=33 [24%]). Nearly all patients in the combination-therapy group received 3 mg/m2 (1 dose: n=96 [53%]; doses on ≥2 days: n=76 [42%]). GO 6 mg/m2 was the most frequently administered dose in the APL group (1 dose: n=3 [33%]; doses on ≥2 days: n=4 [44%]). Treatment was discontinued in 94 (68%), 71 (39%), and 3 (33%) patients in the monotherapy, combination-therapy, and APL groups, respectively. Common reasons for discontinuation included resistant disease (monotherapy: n=25 [18%]; combination therapy: n=16 [9%]; APL: n=1 [11%]), adverse events (AEs) not related to study drug (monotherapy: n=7 [5%]; combination therapy: n=3 [2%]; APL: n=1 [11%]), and AEs related to study drug (monotherapy: n=6 [4]%; combination therapy: n=4 [2%]; APL: n=0). All-causality grade 5 AEs were reported in 114 (34%) patients: 72 (52%), 40 (22%), and 2 (22%) in the monotherapy, combination-therapy, and APL groups, respectively. The most common grade 5 AEs (excluding disease progression and AML) were sepsis in the monotherapy group (n=7 [5%]; 4 treatment-related), respiratory failure in the combination-therapy group (n=5 [3%]; 1 treatment-related), and intracranial hemorrhage in the APL group (n=1 [11%], not treatment-related). Grade ≥3 treatment-related, treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were reported for 84 (60%) patients in the monotherapy group, 102 (56%) patients in the combination-therapy group, and 7 (78%) patients in the APL group; hematologic TEAEs were most common, followed by hepatic TEAEs (Table). Possible hepatotoxicity was reported in 5 patients: 1 case each of veno-occlusive disease (VOD) and drug-induced liver injury in the monotherapy group and 2 cases of veno-occlusive liver disease (1 fatal) and 1 case of VOD in the combination-therapy group. Conclusions: GO was generally well tolerated; only a small proportion (<5%) of patients in each group discontinued treatment due to treatment-related TEAEs. The most frequent treatment-related, grade ≥3 TEAEs were hematologic. The incidence of hepatotoxicity was low across all cohorts. The results suggest GO is an important treatment option for patients with R/R AML or APL. Disclosures Wang: Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Chirnomas:Pfizer Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Fazal:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. Lin:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Nand:Pfizer: Honoraria. Pierce:Pfizer Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shami:JSK Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Lone Star Biotherapies: Equity Ownership; Baston Biologics Company: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy. Vermette:Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Abboud:Agios: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.


2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-21
Author(s):  
A G Evdokimova ◽  
Yu V Ryzhova ◽  
L V Gukolenko

The evaluation of the clinical efficacy and renoprotective effects of olmesartan and lercanidipine as monotherapy and when combined application in patients with arterial hypertension (AH) 1-2 degrees and microalbuminuria (MAU).It is established that the degree of blood pressure (BP) reduction and corrective influence on diurnal BP profile were similar in groups of monotherapy with olmesartan and lercanidipine. In the group of combined application of the studied drugs target BP levels were achieved in 88% of cases in the monotherapy group and 78% (1G) and 76% (2 G).Revealed renoprotective effects of olmesartan and lercanidipine as when used in monotherapy and in combination in patients with arterial hypertension of 1-2 degrees, and MAU, revealed reliable decrease in MAU. The greatest reduction in MAU was achieved in the combination therapy group.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document