Standard Practice for Estimation of UV Irradiance Received by Field-Exposed Products as a Function of Location

10.1520/g0222 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Standard Practice ◽  
Uv Irradiance

IMMUNOASSAY OF GONADOTROPHINS USING COMPLEMENT FIXATION

1969 ◽  
Vol 62 (1_Suppl) ◽  
pp. S113-S133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sam Brody
Keyword(s):  
Complement Fixation Test ◽  
Complement Fixation ◽  
Research Work ◽  
Fixation Test ◽  
Years Of Experience ◽  
Standard Practice ◽  
Clinical Observations ◽  
Technical Procedure ◽  
Methodological Problems

ABSTRACT This report is a summary of 10 years of experience with the complement fixation test as adopted for the immunoassay of HCG in serum. It is based on published as well as unpublished material. The discussion centers mainly around methodological problems, criteria of reliability, and clinical observations. It is our impression that the complement fixation test is a reasonably rapid and simple technical procedure. It is standard practice in every bacteriological and virological laboratory. The precision of the HCG assay is high. Its accuracy is good. The complement fixation assay, as reported here, fulfils the criteria of specificity. It has been evaluated by means of serological techniques and through comparison between biopotency and immunopotency of HCG in serum with reference to a common standard. Its application for routine as well as research work is illustrated.

Department of Defense: Standard Practice for Military Packaging.

1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE WASHINGTON DC
Keyword(s):  
Department Of Defense ◽  
Standard Practice

scholarly journals Reconsidering the Reference Category

2021 ◽  
pp. 008117502098263
Author(s):  
Sasha Shen Johfre ◽  
Jeremy Freese
Keyword(s):  
Marital Status ◽  
American Sociological Review ◽  
Reference Group ◽  
Dominant Group ◽  
Social Scientists ◽  
Reference Category ◽  
Standard Practice ◽  
Explanatory Variables

Social scientists often present modeling results from categorical explanatory variables, such as gender, race, and marital status, as coefficients representing contrasts to a “reference” group. Although choosing the reference category may seem arbitrary, the authors argue that it is an intrinsically meaningful act that affects the interpretability of results. Reference category selection foregrounds some contrasts over others. Also, selecting a culturally dominant group as the reference can subtly reify the notion that dominant groups are the most “normal.” The authors find that three of four recently published tables in Demography and American Sociological Review that include race or gender explanatory variables use dominant groups (i.e., male or white) as the reference group. Furthermore, the tables rarely state what the reference is: only half of tables with race variables and one-fifth of tables with gender variables explicitly specify the reference category; the rest leave it up to the reader to check the methods section or simply guess. As an alternative to this apparently standard practice, the authors suggest guidelines for intentionally and responsibly choosing a reference category. The authors then discuss alternative ways to convey results from categorical explanatory variables that avoid the problems of reference categories entirely.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document