scholarly journals RISKS OF POLLEN-MEDIATED GENE FLOW FROM GENETICALLY MODIFIED MAIZE DURING CO-CULTIVATION WITH USUAL MAIZE VARIETIES

2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 426-445
Author(s):  
M.I. Chumakov ◽  
◽  
Yu.S. Gusev ◽  
N.V. Bogatyreva ◽  
A.Yu. Sockolov ◽  
...  
2008 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
pp. 1977-1983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Akiyama ◽  
Kozue Sakata ◽  
Kazunari Kondo ◽  
Asako Tanaka ◽  
Ming S. Liu ◽  
...  

Crop Science ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 1748-1756 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerhard Rühl ◽  
Bernd Hommel ◽  
Alexandra Hüsken ◽  
Klaus Mastel ◽  
Joachim Schiemann ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 292 ◽  
pp. 359-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Corujo ◽  
Maria Pla ◽  
Jeroen van Dijk ◽  
Marleen Voorhuijzen ◽  
Martijn Staats ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliana Erika de Carvalho Teixeira Yassitepe ◽  
Viviane Cristina Heinzen da Silva ◽  
José Hernandes-Lopes ◽  
Ricardo Augusto Dante ◽  
Isabel Rodrigues Gerhardt ◽  
...  

Over the past decades, advances in plant biotechnology have allowed the development of genetically modified maize varieties that have significantly impacted agricultural management and improved the grain yield worldwide. To date, genetically modified varieties represent 30% of the world’s maize cultivated area and incorporate traits such as herbicide, insect and disease resistance, abiotic stress tolerance, high yield, and improved nutritional quality. Maize transformation, which is a prerequisite for genetically modified maize development, is no longer a major bottleneck. Protocols using morphogenic regulators have evolved significantly towards increasing transformation frequency and genotype independence. Emerging technologies using either stable or transient expression and tissue culture-independent methods, such as direct genome editing using RNA-guided endonuclease system as an in vivo desired-target mutator, simultaneous double haploid production and editing/haploid-inducer-mediated genome editing, and pollen transformation, are expected to lead significant progress in maize biotechnology. This review summarises the significant advances in maize transformation protocols, technologies, and applications and discusses the current status, including a pipeline for trait development and regulatory issues related to current and future genetically modified and genetically edited maize varieties.


2014 ◽  
Vol 05 (05) ◽  
pp. 440-453
Author(s):  
Bo-Jein Kuo ◽  
Shuo-Cheng Nieh ◽  
Guang-Jauh Shieh ◽  
Wen-Shin Lin

2002 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. 646-653 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter D Brodmann ◽  
Evelyn C Ilg ◽  
Hélène Berthoud ◽  
André Herrmann

Abstract Quantitative detection methods are needed for enforcement of the recently introduced labeling threshold for genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in food ingredients. This labeling threshold, which is set to 1% in the European Union and Switzerland, must be applied to all approved GMOs. Four different varieties of maize are approved in the European Union: the insect-resistant Bt176 maize (Maximizer), Bt11 maize, Mon810 (YieldGard) maize, and the herbicide-tolerant T25 (Liberty Link™) maize. Because the labeling must be considered individually for each ingredient, a quantitation system for the endogenous maize content is needed in addition to the GMO-specific detection systems. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction detection methods were developed for the 4 approved genetically modified maize varieties and for an endogenous maize (invertase) gene system.


Toxins ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hajnalka Bánáti ◽  
Béla Darvas ◽  
Szilvia Fehér-Tóth ◽  
Árpád Czéh ◽  
András Székács

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document