Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Diabetes and Multivessel or Left Main Disease – a Review

2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Donald E Cutlip ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Bare Metal Stents ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Patients With Diabetes ◽  
The Impact

Coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes is frequently a diffuse process with multivessel involvement and is associated with increased risk for myocardial infarction and death. The role of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with diabetes and multivessel disease who require revascularisation has been debated and remains uncertain. The debate has been continued mainly because of the question to what degree an increased risk for in-stent restenosis among patients with diabetes contributes to other late adverse outcomes. This article reviews outcomes from early trials of balloon angioplasty versus CABG through later trials of bare-metal stents versus CABG and more recent data with drug-eluting stents as the comparator. Although not all studies have been powered to show statistical significance, the results have been generally consistent with a mortality benefit for CABG versus PCI, despite differential risks for restenosis with the various PCI approaches. The review also considers the impact of mammary artery grafting of the left anterior descending artery and individual case selection on these results, and proposes an algorithm for selection of patients in whom PCI remains a reasonable strategy.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Diabetes and Multivessel or Left Main Disease—A Review

2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-111
Author(s):  
Donald E Cutlip
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Bare Metal Stents ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Patients With Diabetes ◽  
The Impact

Coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes is frequently a diffuse process with multivessel involvement and is associated with increased risk for myocardial infarction and death. The role of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with diabetes and multivessel disease who require revascularization has been debated and remains uncertain. The debate has been continued mainly because of the question to what degree an increased risk for in-stent restenosis among patients with diabetes contributes to other late adverse outcomes. This article reviews outcomes from early trials of balloon angioplasty versus CABG through later trials of bare-metal stents versus CABG and more recent data with drug-eluting stents as the comparator. although not all studies have been powered to show statistical significance, the results have been generally consistent with a mortality benefit for caBG versus PCI, despite differential risks for restenosis with the various PCI approaches. The review also considers the impact of mammary artery grafting of the left anterior descending artery and individual case selection on these results, and proposes an algorithm for selection of patients in whom PCI remains a reasonable strategy.

scholarly journals The Rise of Transradial Artery Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes in Australia

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Ryan James Ocsan ◽  
Ata Doost ◽  
Paul Marley ◽  
Ahmad Farshid
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Bypass Graft ◽  
Bare Metal Stents ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary

Objectives. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) via transradial artery access (TRA) or transfemoral artery access (TFA). Background. Over the last decade, evidence for the benefit of TRA for PCI has grown, leading to a steady uptake of TRA around the world. Despite this, the topic remains controversial with contrary evidence to suggest no significant benefit over TFA. Methods. A retrospective study of consecutive ACS patients from 2011 to 2017 who underwent PCI via TRA or TFA. The primary outcome was Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE), a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularisation (TLR), or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) bleeding events scored 2 or higher, haematoma formation, and stent thrombosis, in addition to all individual components of MACE. Results. We treated 3624 patients (77% male), with PCI via TFA (n = 2391) or TRA (n = 1233). Transradial artery access was associated with a reduction in mortality (3% vs 6.3%; p < 0.0001 ), MI (1.8% vs 3.9%; p = 0.0004 ), CABG (0.6% vs 1.5%; p = 0.0205 ), TLR (1% vs 2.9%; p < 0.0001 ), large haematoma (0.4% vs 1.8%; p = 0.0003 ), BARC 2 (0.2% vs 1.1%; p = 0.0029 ), and BARC 3 events (0.4% vs 1.0%; p = 0.0426 ). On multivariate Cox regression analysis, TFA, age ≥ 75, prior PCI, use of bare metal stents, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, and multivessel coronary artery disease were associated with an increased risk of MACE. Conclusion. Despite the limitations secondary to the observational nature of our study and multiple confounders, our results are in line with results of major trials and, as such, we feel that our results support the use of TRA as the preferred access site in patients undergoing PCI for ACS to improve patient outcomes.

scholarly journals The Impact of Successful Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Real World

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuhe Gong ◽  
Li Zhou ◽  
Xiaosong Ding ◽  
Hui Chen ◽  
Hongwei Li
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Real World ◽  
Cardiac Death ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: Coronary chronic total occlusions (CTOs) are correlated with increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes. The optimal treatment strategy for CTO has not been well established. We sought to examine the impact of CTO percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on long-term clinical outcome in the real world.Methods: A total of 592 consecutive patients with CTO in Beijing Friendship Hospital from June 2017 to December 2019 were enrolled, 29 patients were excluded due to Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). After exclusion, 563 patients were divided into the no-revascularized group (CTO-NR group, n=263) and successful revascularized group (CTO-R group, n=300). The primary endpoint was cardiac death; Secondary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, cardiac death, recurrent myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, re-hospitalization, heart failure, and stroke.Results: Percent of Diabetes mellitus (53.2% vs 39.7), Chronic kidney disease (8.7% vs 3.7%), CABG history (7.6% vs 1%), three vessel disease(96.2% vs 90%) and left main coronary artery disease (25.1% vs 13.7%) was significantly higher in the CTO-NR group than in success PCI group (all P<0.05). Moreover, the CTO-NR group has lower EF (0.58±0.11 vs 0.61±0.1, p=0.001) and FS (0.31±0.07 vs 0.33±0.07, p=0.002). At a median follow-up of 12 months, CTO revascularization was superior to CTO no-revascularization in terms of cardiac death (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.27, 95% conference interval [CI] 0.11-0.64). The superiority of CTO revascularization was consistent for MACCE (HR: 0.55, 95% CI 0.35-0.79). At multivariable Cox hazards regression analysis, CTO revascularization remains one of the independent predictors of lower risk of cardiac death and MACCE.Conclusions: Successful revascularization by PCI may bring more clinical benefits. The presence of LVEF＜0.5 and LM-disease was associated with an incidence of cardiac death; CTO revascularization was a protected predictor of cardiac death.

scholarly journals From Coronaries to Cirrhosis: The Role of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in End-Stage Liver Disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 232470962110050
Author(s):  
Taylor C. Remillard ◽  
Don C. Rockey
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Liver Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Bare Metal Stents ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
End Stage

Drug-eluting stents (DES) have superior efficacy compared with bare metal stents (BMS) for treatment of coronary artery lesions. However, BMS continue to play an important role in percutaneous coronary intervention for patients who are at a high bleeding risk, because they require a shorter duration of dual antiplatelet therapy. However, new developments in DES and understanding of the optimal time required for dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention may further limit the use of BMS. Furthermore, the use of dual antiplatelet therapy is complicated in patients with cirrhosis, who may have coagulopathy. In this article, we present the case of a patient with cirrhosis and end-stage chronic liver disease with coronary artery disease and a proximal left anterior descending stenosis who received a DES and had multiple episodes of gastrointestinal bleeding. We review the literature addressing DES and BMS in patients at high risk of bleeding. We also review the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Does Not Lower Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 465-472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gil Chernin ◽  
Shmuel Chen ◽  
Ozgu Ozan ◽  
Mengdan Liu ◽  
Dan Haberman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Cardiovascular Outcomes ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Cardiovascular Adverse Event ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
The Impact

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, most studies used bare-metal stents or first-generation drug-eluting stents, and less guideline-directed therapy to reduce cardiovascular risk was reported in CKD patients. This study investigates the impact of moderate-CKD on patients undergoing PCI in the current era. Methods: Patient level data were pooled from 2 multicenter randomized trials (BIONICS and NIREUS trials) with a near “all-comers” design, comparing PCI with ridaforolimus-eluting stents vs. zotarolimus-eluting stents in patients with CAD. Patients were classified according to the presence or absence of moderate-CKD, defined as creatinine clearance (CrCl) <60 mL/min. We compared baseline characteristics, angiographic findings, and clinical outcomes 1-year post-PCI. Results: 236/2,201 (10.7%) patients had CKD, mean CrCl of 50.3 + 7.8 mL/min. These patients were generally older and more often with hypertension than non-CKD patients, but the use of guideline-directed therapy was similar between the groups. CKD was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death (hazard ratio [HR] 6.08; 95% CI 2.11–17.51; p < 0.001), but with a reduced occurrence of repeated revascularization, including ischemia-driven revascularization (HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.24–0.92; p < 0.05). The rate of repeated angiography per severe cardiovascular adverse event was significantly lower in the CKD than the non-CKD group (23/38 [61%] vs. 253/334 [76%], p < 0.05). Conclusions: Moderate-CKD in patients with CAD was associated with higher rates of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, yet with a lower risk of revascularization 1-year following PCI. Lack of guideline-directed medical therapy does not explain the adverse outcome of CKD patients.

scholarly journals Cost-effectiveness of drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Open Heart ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. e000445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Baschet ◽  
Sandrine Bourguignon ◽  
Sébastien Marque ◽  
Isabelle Durand-Zaleski ◽  
Emmanuel Teiger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Bare Metal Stents ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Drug Eluting Stents ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Bare Metal ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Drug Eluting
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document