scholarly journals Procalcitonin in patients with influenza A (H1N1) infection and acute respiratory failure

2011 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-55
Author(s):  
Péricles Almeida Delfino Duarte ◽  
Carla Sakuma de Oliveira Bredt ◽  
Gerson Luís Bredt Jr ◽  
Amaury César Jorge ◽  
Alisson Venazzi ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Objective: To verify serum procalcitonin levels of patients with acute respiratory failure secondary to influenza A (H1N1) upon their admission to the Intensive Care Unit and to compare these results to values found in patients with sepsis and trauma admitted to the same unit. Methods: Analysis of records of patients infected with influenza A (H1N1) and respiratory failure admitted to the General Intensive Care Unit during in a period of 60 days. The values of serum procalcitonin and clinical and laboratory data were compared to those of all patients admitted with sepsis or trauma in the previous year. Results: Among patients with influenza A (H1N1) (n = 16), the median serum procalcitonin level upon admission was 0.11 ng/mL, lower than in the sepsis group (p < 0.001) and slightly lower than in trauma patients. Although the mean values were low, serum procalcitonin was a strong predictor of hospital mortality in patients with influenza A (H1N1). Conclusion: Patients with influenza A (H1N1) with severe acute respiratory failure presented with low serum procalcitonin values upon admission, although their serum levels are predictors of hospital mortality. The kinetics study of this biomarker may be a useful tool in the management of this group of patients.

Critical Care ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 14 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. P91 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Beduschi Filho ◽  
D Siqueira ◽  
SC Carvalho Flores ◽  
I Yoshiko Masukawa ◽  
L Kretzer ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Mendes da Silva ◽  
Flavio Geraldo Rezende de Freitas ◽  
Antonio Tonete Bafi ◽  
Hélio Tedesco Silva Junior ◽  
Bartira de Aguiar Roza

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 175346662092695
Author(s):  
Wei-Ling Lain ◽  
Shi-Chuan Chang ◽  
Wei-Chih Chen

Background: There are few studies reporting the clinical characteristics and outcomes of interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). The goal of this study is to investigate the clinical features, management, mortality, and associated factors in ILD patients with ARF requiring mechanical ventilation (MV). Methods: This was a retrospective, observational study conducted in a 24-bed intensive care unit (ICU) of a medical center in Taiwan during a 3-year period. Patients admitted to the ICU with a diagnosis of ILD with ARF needing MV were included for analysis. Patient characteristics, including demographics, critical-illness factors, and outcome data, were collected and analyzed. Results: A total of 82 patients with ILD who developed ARF were admitted to the ICU during the study period. At the onset of ARF, 38 patients received invasive MV, while 44 patients were treated with noninvasive MV. Overall in-hospital mortality was 65.9%, and 90-day and 1-year mortality were 69.5% and 76.8%, respectively. The independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality were worse oxygenation on days 5 and 7 after the onset of ARF. Invasive MV patients had significantly lower albumin levels, had higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores at the onset of ARF, and received more vasopressors, sedatives, and corticosteroid pulse therapy during hospitalization compared with noninvasive MV patients. Conclusion: High in-hospital and long-term mortality rates were observed in ILD patients with ARF requiring MV. Poor oxygenation during hospitalization could serve as a predictive factor of poor prognosis. The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.


Critical Care ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianmaria Cammarota ◽  
Teresa Esposito ◽  
Danila Azzolina ◽  
Roberto Cosentini ◽  
Francesco Menzella ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Noninvasive respiratory support (NIRS) has been diffusely employed outside the intensive care unit (ICU) to face the high request of ventilatory support due to the massive influx of patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) caused by coronavirus-19 disease (COVID-19). We sought to summarize the evidence on clinically relevant outcomes in COVID-19 patients supported by NIV outside the ICU. Methods We searched PUBMED®, EMBASE®, and the Cochrane Controlled Clinical trials register, along with medRxiv and bioRxiv repositories for pre-prints, for observational studies and randomized controlled trials, from inception to the end of February 2021. Two authors independently selected the investigations according to the following criteria: (1) observational study or randomized clinical trials enrolling ≥ 50 hospitalized patients undergoing NIRS outside the ICU, (2) laboratory-confirmed COVID-19, and (3) at least the intra-hospital mortality reported. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines were followed. Data extraction was independently performed by two authors to assess: investigation features, demographics and clinical characteristics, treatments employed, NIRS regulations, and clinical outcomes. Methodological index for nonrandomized studies tool was applied to determine the quality of the enrolled studies. The primary outcome was to assess the overall intra-hospital mortality of patients under NIRS outside the ICU. The secondary outcomes included the proportions intra-hospital mortalities of patients who underwent invasive mechanical ventilation following NIRS failure and of those with ‘do-not-intubate’ (DNI) orders. Results Seventeen investigations (14 peer-reviewed and 3 pre-prints) were included with a low risk of bias and a high heterogeneity, for a total of 3377 patients. The overall intra-hospital mortality of patients receiving NIRS outside the ICU was 36% [30–41%]. 26% [21–30%] of the patients failed NIRS and required intubation, with an intra-hospital mortality rising to 45% [36–54%]. 23% [15–32%] of the patients received DNI orders with an intra-hospital mortality of 72% [65–78%]. Oxygenation on admission was the main source of between-study heterogeneity. Conclusions During COVID-19 outbreak, delivering NIRS outside the ICU revealed as a feasible strategy to cope with the massive demand of ventilatory assistance. Registration PROSPERO, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, CRD42020224788, December 11, 2020.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document