scholarly journals Increasing Knowledge Transfer to Employees Through Organizational Justice with Affective Commitment as Mediator

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. Layouting
Author(s):  
Fawzi Rizki Pradana ◽  
Heru Kurnianto Tjahjono ◽  
Nuryakin Nuryakin
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Transfer ◽  
Distributive Justice ◽  
Procedural Justice ◽  
Organizational Justice ◽  
Affective Commitment ◽  
Model Development ◽  
Interactional Justice ◽  
Exploratory Research ◽  
Research Model ◽  
Study Results

Research aims: This study aims to determine the mediation of affective commitment on the effects of organizational justice, consisting of distributive justice, procedural justice, and interactional justice, on the knowledge transfer to employees at Diskominfo Kebumen Regency. The purpose of this research is also to find out the effect of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice on affective commitment, the effect of affective commitment on knowledge transfer, and the mediating role of affective commitment in the relationship between distributive, procedural, and interactional justice on knowledge transfer.Design/Methodology/Approach: This study used a quantitative approach with the path analysis method. Respondents in this study were employees at Diskominfo Kebumen. The sample used was 78 respondents who were taken by the total sampling technique.Research findings: This study found that distributive justice, procedural justice, and interactional justice significantly and directly affected affective commitment. The study results also showed a significant direct effect of affective commitment on knowledge transfer. Also, distributive justice, procedural justice, and interactional justice indirectly affected knowledge transfer through the mediation of affective commitment.Theoretical contribution: There are few previous studies on distributive, procedural, and interactional justice variables. The difference in this research lies in the research model development and the existing respondents’ characteristics.Practitioner/Policy implication: Based on this research, Diskominfo Kebumen, in the future, can pay attention to the variable aspects of this research in the decision-making process and the development of employee capabilities.Research limitation/Implication: The limitation in this study is that there are still few references related to variables, so mediation is needed. For example, no research addresses the direct relationship between knowledge transfer and organizational justice. Therefore, the scope for exploratory research is limited, and the research model and analysis methods must be adjusted.

Pengaruh Persepsi Keadilan terhadapKinerja Distributor PT X dengan Ketergantungan sebagai Variabel Moderating

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 268-285
Author(s):  
Icuk Hertanto ◽  
Ade Witoyo
Keyword(s):  
Distributive Justice ◽  
Procedural Justice ◽  
Organizational Justice ◽  
Total Population ◽  
Interactional Justice ◽  
Market Control ◽  
Eastern Indonesia ◽  
Positive Effect

Abstract: PT. X companies engaged in the national cement productionsector which are the market leaders in Indonesia which control the islandsof Java, Bali, Kalimantan and parts of Eastern Indonesia. The result of thisproduct tends to be a commodity product. So, to maintain market control isto maintain the level of availability of cement products. With suchchallenges, PT. X must maintain good relations with its distribution network.One important factor in maintaining good relations between suppliers andbuyers is the Perception of Organizational Justice that exists in both. Thepurpose of this study was to analyze the effect of perceptions oforganizational justice on the performance of the distributors of PT. X withdependence as moderating variable. This research is a quantitative studywith a total population of all distributors of PT. X. This study concludes thatorganizational justice has a positive effect on distributor performance, andthis influence is not moderated by dependency.Keywords: distributor performance, procedural justice, distributive justice,interactional justice, organizational justice, dependency.

Organizational justice and millennial turnover in public accounting

2017 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 112-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessie George ◽  
Stephanie Wallio
Keyword(s):  
Distributive Justice ◽  
Procedural Justice ◽  
Organizational Justice ◽  
Turnover Intentions ◽  
Public Accounting ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Public ◽  
Study Results ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Practical Implications

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between distributive justice, procedural justice, and turnover intentions for Millennial employees working in the public accounting environment. Design/methodology/approach Data collection utilized an online survey sent to members of a regional certified public accountant organization (n=75). Findings Lower levels of both distributive and procedural justice predicted higher turnover intentions, controlling for gender and job tenure. Procedural justice was found to have a stronger relationship with turnover intentions than distributive justice for Millennial public accountants. Practical implications The public accounting industry is facing a crisis based on the shortage of staff and senior level accountants, which are primarily Millennial employees. The study results have practical implications for public accounting firms. The findings suggest that the fairness of organizational processes could impact Millennials’ turnover intentions more than the fairness of organizational rewards. Employers could use this information to manage levels of procedural justice, which could reduce turnover intentions, actual turnover, and other byproducts of the staffing shortage. Originality/value This study examined the relationship between organizational justice and Millennial turnover intentions in public accounting. The study replicated the findings of some prior studies in a purely Millennial sample in the public accounting context and addressed some of the contradictory results seen previously related to organizational justice. As the public accounting industry has an abnormally large percentage of Millennial employees, these findings may be applied to other environments as the Millennial population in the workforce increases.

scholarly journals ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE AND AFFECTIVE COMMITMENT TO CHANGE IN EMPLOYEES OF MULTIFINANCIAL SERVICE COMPANY

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-60
Author(s):  
Safitri Primawidi ◽  
Wustari Mangundjaya
Keyword(s):  
Distributive Justice ◽  
Procedural Justice ◽  
Organizational Justice ◽  
Significant Role ◽  
Affective Commitment ◽  
Commitment To Change ◽  
Multiple Regressions ◽  
Four Dimensions ◽  
Service Company

The aim of the study is to investigate the role of organizational justice to affective commitment to change. The study was conducted based on data collected from 42 employees working in head office of multifinancial service company. It is made up of 16 males and 26 females’ employees. Affective commitment to change was measured using Herscovitch and Meyer’s Affective Commitment to Change Scale (6 items; α= .828). While organizational justice was measured using Colquitt’s Organizational Justice Scale (20 items; α=.905). The hypotheses were tested using multiple regressions. The result showed R2 of .821, meaning that 82% of affective commitment to change can be explained by organizational justice. Among four dimensions of organizational justice, procedural justice has the most influence and significant role on affective commitment to change (β= .445, p<.001), followed by distributive justice (β = .336, p<.001). The findings of the study demonstrated that organizational justice has positive significant impact on affective commitment to change, particularly distributive and procedural justice. Based on this study, in order to develop affective commitment to change in these multifinance company employees, to design intervention to increase organizational justice is neccessary.

scholarly journals How Compassion and Justice Mediate the effect of Ethical Leadership on Interpersonal Citizenship Behavior (OCBI)

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 28
Author(s):  
Fakeha Anwer ◽  
Danish Ahmed Siddiqui
Keyword(s):  
Distributive Justice ◽  
Procedural Justice ◽  
Organizational Justice ◽  
Ethical Leadership ◽  
Interactional Justice ◽  
Empathic Concern ◽  
Mediating Effect ◽  
Citizenship Behavior ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Common Humanity

While many analysts have directed few investigations on the influence of ethical leadership on the behavior of citizenship, in different contexts, however, not much is known about the moral components make it possible to produce follow-up findings as Organizational Citizenship Behavior(OCBs) for leaders, especially, Interpersonal OCBs (OCBI). For this, we suggested a hypothetical structure, thereby adapting Zoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara and Viera-Armas (2019) model to include Organizational Justice. Therefore, we intend to study the association of Ethical Leadership with OCBI empirically while in the view of various determining factors of Workplace Compassion (i.e. empathic concern, common humanity, mindfulness, and kindness), and Organizational Justice (i.e. procedural justice, distributive justice, and interactional justice) as mediating variables. Empirical validity was recognized; by directing a review utilizing a standardized close-ended questionnaire. Using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Structured Equation Modeling (SEM), information was collected from 350 employees and investigated. Both direct and indirect effect was tested; by using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) via SmartPLS software. Thus, the results revealed that: except for Common Humanity, ethical leadership remained significantly and positively connected with all factors of Workplace Compassion (Empathic Concern, Mindfulness, and Kindness), as well as with all three-factor of Organizational Justice (Procedural Justice, Distributive Justice, and Interactional Justice. However, ethical leadership seems to hurt the Mindfulness factor. Also, among compassion determinants, only Empathic Concern seems to affect OCBI. Whereas only interactional justice has a significant positive association with OCBI; further, the findings revealed that there is an insignificant mediating effect of workplace compassion and organizational justice in the ethical leadership relationship with OCBI. Hence, the investigation has portrayed significant ramifications for the organizations.

scholarly journals ORGANIZACINIO TEISINGUMO VAIDMUO PRIIMANT SPRENDIMUS PAAUKŠTINTI

Psichologija ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 38 ◽  
pp. 46-82
Author(s):  
Jurgita Lazauskaitė-Zabielskė ◽  
Dalia Bagdžiūnienė
Keyword(s):  
Job Satisfaction ◽  
Organizational Commitment ◽  
Distributive Justice ◽  
Procedural Justice ◽  
Organizational Justice ◽  
Turnover Intentions ◽  
Interactional Justice ◽  
Practical Applications ◽  
Trust In Management

Nors organizacinis teisingumas turi svarbių padarinių organizacijoje, esama vos keleto tyrimų, nagrinėjančių organizacinio teisingumo vaidmenį priimant sprendimus dėl paaukštinimo. Todėl buvo atliktas tyrimas, kurio tikslas buvo nustatyti suvokto skirstymo, procedūros ir sąveikos teisingumo vaidmenį priimant sprendimus paaukštinti. Šiuo tyrimu siekiama išsiaiškinti, kaip suvoktas skirstymo, procedūros ir sąveikos teisingumas yra susijęs su sprendimo dėl pareigų paaukštinimo palankumu, pasitenkinimu darbu ir paaukštinimo galimybėmis, įsipareigojimu organizacijai, ketinimu išeiti, pasitikėjimu vadovu ir vadovybe. Tyrime dalyvavo 132 darbuotojai iš įvairių organizacijų. Tyrimo rezultatai atskleidžia, kad suvoktas skirstymo teisingumas yra teigiamai susijęs su sprendimo dėl pareigų paaukštinimo palankumu ir pasitenkinimu darbu. O suvoktas procedūros teisingumas yra teigiamai susijęs su įsipareigojimu organizacijai ir neigiamai susijęs su ketinimais išeiti. Be to, suvoktas skirstymo ir sąveikos teisingumas yra teigiamai susijęs su pasitenkinimu paaukštinimo galimybėmis. Galiausiai tais atvejais, kai sprendimą dėl pareigų paaukštinimo priima tiesioginis vadovas, suvoktas sąveikos teisingumas yra susijęs su pasitikėjimu vadovu. O kai sprendimą paaukštinti pareigas priima aukštesnio lygio (netiesioginis) vadovas, suvoktas sąveikos teisingumas yra susijęs su pasitikėjimu vadovybe. Maža to, nei suvoktas procedūros, nei suvoktas sąveikos teisingumas nėra susiję su sprendimo dėl pareigų paaukštinimo palankumu.Pagrindiniai žodžiai: skirstymo teisingumas, procedūros teisingumas, sąveikos teisingumas, pareigų paaukštinimas. The Role of Organizational Justice in Promotion Decisions Jurgita Lazauskaitė-Zabielskė, Dalia Bagdžiūnienė SummaryOrganizational justice perceptions are important for organizations, because they help to predict organizationally important outcomes. However, justice regarding promotions in particular is studied less than other types of organizational justice. Therefore the research was conducted to examine the role of organizational justice aspects, i. e. distributive, procedural and interactional justice, in promotion decisions. The purpose of this study was to determine how perceived distributive, procedural and interactional justice are related to favourability of promotion decision and various levels of outcomes. In particular, this study explored the relationship between perceived distributive, procedural and interactional justice and job satisfaction, satisfaction with promotion opportunities, organizational commitment, turnover intentions, trust in supervisor and trust in management. 132 employees from various organizations participated in the study. The results of the study revealed that favourability of promotion decision (i. e. promotion or non-promotion) is related to perceived distributive justice (Z = –5.867, p ≤ 0.001), but not related to perceived procedural and interactional justice. While perceived justice of decision is related to decision favourability, fair procedures and fair interpersonal treatment is valued irrespective of it. The study also showed that different aspects of organizational justice are related to different outcomes. Perceived distributive justice is related to job satisfaction (β = 0.602, p ≤ 0.01) and satisfaction with promotion opportunities (β = 0.721, p ≤ 0.01). The more decision regarding promotion is considered as fair the more employees are satisfied with their job and promotion opportunities. Perceived procedural justice is the best predictor of organizational outcomes such as organizational commitment (β = 0.676, p ≤ 0.01) and turnover intentions (β = 0.687, p ≤ 0.01). When employees perceive promotion procedures as fair they are more committed to organization and less likely to leave. Moreover, perceived interactional justice is positively related to satisfaction with promotion opportunities (β = 0.138, p ≤ 0.01). Finally, when promotion decisions are made by supervisor, perceived interactional justice is positively related to trust in supervisor (β = 0.716, p ≤ 0.01). On the other hand when promotion decisions are made by upper-level manager, perceived interactional justice is positively related to trust in management (β = 0.682, p ≤ 0.01). Limitations of the study and possibilities for future researches and practical applications are discussed. Keywords: distributive justice, procedural justice, interactional justice, promotion decisions.

scholarly journals PENGARUH KEADILAN ORGANISASIONAL TERHADAP KEPUASAN KERJA KARYAWAN BANK NAGARI CABANG UTAMA PADANG

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiara Annisa ◽  
Riri Mayliza
Keyword(s):  
Job Satisfaction ◽  
Distributive Justice ◽  
Procedural Justice ◽  
Hypothesis Testing ◽  
Organizational Justice ◽  
Empirical Evidence ◽  
Sampling Method ◽  
Interactional Justice ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Employee Job Satisfaction

This study aims to obtain empirical evidence of the influence of organizational justice as measured by procedural justice, distributive justice and interactional justice to employee job satisfaction. In this study, a sample of 123 employees of Bank Nagari Branch of Padang selected by using purposive sampling method. The analysis method used is multiple regression and t-statistic test. Based on the results of hypothesis testing that has been done found that procedural justice and distributive justice have a significant effect on job satisfaction of employees of Bank Nagari Main Branch Padang, while interactional justice has no significant effect on employees of Bank Nagari Main Branch Padang

scholarly journals Effect of Organizational Justice on Turnover Intention: Mediating Role of Employee Motivation

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-121
Author(s):  
MUHAMMAD YOUNAS ◽  
IMRAN SAEED ◽  
GHAYYUR QADIR ◽  
SAIF ULLAH KHAN
Keyword(s):  
Distributive Justice ◽  
Procedural Justice ◽  
Organizational Justice ◽  
Turnover Intention ◽  
Extrinsic Motivation ◽  
Turnover Intentions ◽  
Interactional Justice ◽  
Employee Motivation ◽  
Mediating Role ◽  
Knowledge Intensive

Turnover is a substantial problem all over the world, in all the industries. The problem is further impairing to the performance of knowledge intensive industries such as pharmaceuticals. This study examined the effect of Organizational justice facets i.e. Procedural Justice, Distributive Justice and Interactional Justice on Turnover Intention. Based on a sample of 141employees from 19 Private sector pharmaceutical companies located in Peshawar. The results reveal that Procedural Justice and Distributive Justice have significant and constructive effect on Turnover Intention while of Interactional Justice had no statistically significant effect. The analysis also shows that Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation as mediating variables significant effect on relationship between Organizational and Turnover Intentions.

The Impact of Organizational Justice on Employee Performance: A Survey in Turkey and Turkish Context

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faruk Kalay
Keyword(s):  
Public Schools ◽  
Distributive Justice ◽  
Procedural Justice ◽  
Organizational Justice ◽  
Task Performance ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Employee Performance ◽  
Interactional Justice ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
The Impact

The purpose of this study is to analyze the impacts of three aspects of organizational justice, namely, distributive justice, procedural justice and interactional justice, on the task performance of employees in the context of Turkey. The study was conducted based on data collected from 942 teachers working in public schools in three Turkish metropolitan cities. The hypotheses were tested using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) techniques. The findings of the study indicated that among the three aspects of organizational justice, distributive justice has a positive and significant impact on task performance. However, it was determined that the other two aspects, procedural justice and interactional justice, have no significant impact on task performance.

Effects of Inter-organizational Justice on Dimensions of Organizational Citizenship Behaviours: A Study on Kuwait Ministries’ Employees

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 444-470
Author(s):  
Mohammad Zayed ◽  
Junaimah Jauhar ◽  
Zurina Mohaidin ◽  
Mohsen Ali Murshid
Keyword(s):  
Distributive Justice ◽  
Procedural Justice ◽  
Organizational Justice ◽  
Organizational Citizenship ◽  
Indirect Effect ◽  
Interactional Justice ◽  
Civic Virtue ◽  
Partial Least Square ◽  
Least Square ◽  
Five Dimensions

The aim of this article is to model the relationships between three different dimensions of inter-organizational justice (procedural, interactional and distributive) and their influence on five dimensions of organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB) (altruism, sportsmanship, conscientiousness, courtesy and civic virtue) in public sector organizations. The partial least square (PLS) path method was used to explore the nature of the relationships. The survey was self-administered to 573 employees working in nine different government ministries in Kuwait, with a response rate of 373. The results indicate that employees’ perceptions of interactional justice positively influence their perceptions of procedural justice, distributive justice, altruism, civic virtue, conscientiousness, courtesy and sportsmanship. In addition, the results showed the perceived interactional justice of employees has an indirect effect on all dimensions of OCBs through their distributive justice perceptions. The results also revealed that interactional justice has only an indirect effect on altruism, sportsmanship, and courtesy through procedural fairness. Directors of public organizations should pay particular attention to offering a higher level of interactive justice that can strongly improve employee perception of distributive and procedural justice. This, in turn, may show high degrees of civic virtue, sportsmanship, altruism, courtesy, and conscience behavior among employees.

Perceived justice and creativity in crowdsourcing communities: Empirical evidence from China

2015 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 253-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lingfei Zou ◽  
Jinlong Zhang ◽  
Wenxing Liu
Keyword(s):  
Distributive Justice ◽  
Procedural Justice ◽  
Idea Generation ◽  
Interactional Justice ◽  
Research Model ◽  
Creative Performance ◽  
Community Environment ◽  
Innovation Activities ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Practical Implications

Crowdsourcing has provided firms with a new way to involve their users with innovation activities. By outsourcing innovation-related tasks to huge external crowds, companies can access diverse creative ideas. Despite the great potential of crowdsourcing communities, it remains unclear how to create the necessary community environment to drive the creative ideas of participants. The present research investigates the effects of community fairness on the creativity of participants in crowdsourcing communities. Justice theory indicates that three types of justice are positively related to the creativity of participants: distributive justice, procedural justice and interactional justice. Our research model is generally supported by a survey of 238 participants in one of the biggest crowdsourcing communities in China. We find that the three types of justice influence participants’ creativity through different mechanisms. Furthermore, idea generation and idea cooperation mediate the relationship between distributive justice, procedural justice and creative performance. Our study provides both theoretical and practical implications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document