scholarly journals A comparative study of functional outcome between platelet rich plasma injection versus steroid infiltration in plantar fasciitis

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 393
Author(s):  
Harpreet Singh ◽  
Malay P. Gandhi ◽  
Aliasgar J. Rampurwala ◽  
Tej S. Rudani
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Plantar Fasciitis ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Corticosteroid Injection ◽  
Injection Group ◽  
Plasma Injection ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Individual

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Plantar fasciitis (PF) is considered as degenerative tendinopathies. Repeated micro trauma is the major etiology of these diseases. Autologous platelet rich plasma (PRP) injections are becoming more popular in the treatment of enthesopathies like PF. The growth factors in PRP cause tissue healing. We compared the result of injecting intra-lesional autologous PRP injections versus steroid infiltration in chronic PF.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> A prospective, interventional and analytic comparative study was done and 81 patients (120 heels) were included in this study and were followed up for 6 months. We assessed the outcome of each patient using visual analog score (VAS) and foot and ankle disability index (FADI) on follow-up at 1, 3, and 6 months. <strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> In our study, female preponderance was seen. Left side was more common as compared to right side. Unilateral PF is more common than bilateral. The difference with in the individual group at baseline and at 1,3 and 6 months was statistically highly significant in terms of VAS and FADI (p=0.0001) But the difference in the between the two groups was insignificant for VAS and FADI at 1, 3 and 6 months.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> In our study, as there is no significant difference in VAS and FADI score between corticosteroid injection group and PRP injection group at 1, 3 and 6 months follow up. So, it’s reasonable to conclude that both are equally effective in PF. But as PRP injection comes out to be more time consuming and more costly, corticosteroid seems to be more efficient, cost and time wise. Hence, the latter should be a better choice.      </p>

A Feasibility Study Comparing Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection With Saline for the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis Using a Prospective, Randomized Trial Design

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Johnson-Lynn ◽  
Alan Cooney ◽  
Diarmaid Ferguson ◽  
Deborah Bunn ◽  
William Gray ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Feasibility Study ◽  
Plantar Fasciitis ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Loss To Follow Up ◽  
Plasma Injection ◽  
Level Ii ◽  
Lost To Follow Up ◽  
And Control

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been advocated for treatment of plantar fasciitis but there are few good-quality clinical trials to support its use. We conducted a feasibility study of PRP versus saline for treatment of plantar fasciitis. Patients with 6 months or more of magnetic resonance imaging–proven plantar fasciitis, who had failed conservative treatment were invited to participate in the study. Patients were block randomized to either PRP or an equivalent volume of saline. The techniques used for injection and rehabilitation were standardized for both groups. The patient and assessor were blinded. Visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and painDETECT score were recorded preoperatively and at 6 months follow-up. From 35 patients approached, 28 (19 female, mean age 50 years) were recruited, with 14 randomized to each arm. At 6 months, 8 patients (28.6%) were lost to follow-up. There was a significant change in VAS score from baseline to follow-up in both intervention (mean change 37.2, P = .008) and control (mean change 42.2, P = .003) groups. There was no correlation between preoperative painDETECT score and change in VAS. Recruitment and loss to follow-up rates were relatively high. Both treatments resulted in a similar, significant, improvement in symptoms. Levels of Evidence: Level II

scholarly journals A comparative study of effectiveness of local injection of autologous platelet rich plasma and injection corticosteroid solution in treatment of plantar fasciitis

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 335
Author(s):  
Vithal Prakash Puri ◽  
Anil Kumar Gaur
Keyword(s):  
Plantar Fasciitis ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Corticosteroid Injection ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Visual Analog Scales ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> The heel pain is the most common problem worldwide and it was associated with plantar fasciitis (PF). The condition of treatment is very complex. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and injection of corticosteroids is the treatment of PF. This study was designed to access the effect of local PRP and local corticosteroid injection in PF patients.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> Sixty patients (between 29 to 60 years of age) with chronic PF were randomized prospectively in single tertiary care center in India. The study conducted from December 2013 to December 2015. All the patients were enrolled according to inclusion criteria and divided into two groups randomized. In group A (n=30) received PRP and group B (n=30) received corticosteroids injections. Visual analog scales (VAS) were filled by all the included patients. The follow-up scheduled at one and six months after complete enrolment of patients.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Between both the groups the significantly different observed at one and six months follow-up from the baseline. At one month follow-up significantly improvement in mean VAS score were observed in group B (p&lt;0.001). At six months follow-up significantly improvement in mean VAS score were observed in group A (p&lt;0.001).</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> The present study concluded from the significance difference between both the groups proved promising form of treatment in chronic PF patients. Both the treatment was safe and effective in relieving pain improving function at different time period.</p><p> </p>

scholarly journals Comparison of ultrasound-guided platelet-rich plasma injection and conventional physical therapy for management of adhesive capsulitis: a randomized trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (12) ◽  
pp. 030006052097603
Author(s):  
Aung Chan Thu ◽  
Sang Gyu Kwak ◽  
Win Nyi Shein ◽  
La Min Htun ◽  
Thae Thae Han Htwe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Exercise Therapy ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Corticosteroid Injection ◽  
Adhesive Capsulitis ◽  
Short Wave ◽  
Plasma Injection ◽  
Oral Pain ◽  
Evaluation Time ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Conventional Physiotherapy

Objective We evaluated the effect of ultrasound (US)-guided injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) into the shoulder joint in patients with adhesive capsulitis (AC) and compared its effect with that of conventional physiotherapy (CPT). Methods Sixty-four subjects with AC were included and randomly allocated into two groups, as follows: PRP (n=32; intra-articular [IA] PRP [4 mL] was injected); and CPT (n=32; short wave diathermy and exercise therapy were performed at three sessions/week for 6 weeks). Treatment outcomes evaluated therapeutic effectiveness before and at 1, 3, and 6 weeks after PRP injection and CPT initiation. Results Subjects in both groups showed a significant decrease in the visual analogue scale score for pain and shoulder and hand scores, and they a significant increase in shoulder passive range of motion at all evaluation time points. There was no significant difference in the measured outcomes between the two groups. However, there was less acetaminophen consumption after IA PRP injection compared with that after CPT. Conclusions IA PRP injection is a useful option for treating patients with AC, particularly those who have low therapeutic compliance for exercise therapy or have contraindications for corticosteroid injection or oral pain reduction medication.

Platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of coccydynia: a case report and review of regenerative medicine for coccydynia

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 1151-1154
Author(s):  
Walter I Sussman ◽  
Mairin A Jerome ◽  
Lisa Foster
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Corticosteroid Injection ◽  
Post Injection ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Plasma Injection ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Sacral Hiatus ◽  
Practice Patient ◽  
Point Tenderness

Aim: To describe the successful treatment of coccydynia using ultrasound-guided injection of platelet-rich plasma. Setting: Outpatient orthopedic practice. Patient: 17-year-old female with BMI of 42.6. Case description: The patient presented with 6 months of nontraumatic coccygeal pain exacerbated by sitting. Physical exam was significant for point-tenderness over the sacral hiatus and coccyx. A corticosteroid injection around the sacrococcygeal ligament was administered with immediate resolution of her pain following the injection with the anesthetic. The patient reported significant pain relief for 1 week. The superficial sacrococcygeal ligament was then treated with a platelet-rich plasma injection under US guidance. Results: The patient reported a 70% improvement in pain and sitting tolerance at 6 weeks. By 6 months post injection, her pain was 100% resolved, and she remained pain free at the 12-month follow-up. Conclusion: Platelet-rich plasma may be considered as a treatment option in patients with refractory coccydynia.

Positive Effect of Platelet-Rich Plasma on Pain in Plantar Fasciitis: A Double-Blind Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (13) ◽  
pp. 3238-3246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joost C. Peerbooms ◽  
Paul Lodder ◽  
Brenda L. den Oudsten ◽  
Kamiel Doorgeest ◽  
Hans M. Schuller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Plantar Fasciitis ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Corticosteroid Injection ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Pain Scores

Background: When nonoperative treatment for chronic plantar fasciitis fails, often a corticosteroid injection is given. Corticosteroid injection gives temporary pain reduction but no healing. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has proven to be a safe therapeutic option in the treatment of tendon, muscle, bone, and cartilage injuries. Purpose: To determine the effectiveness of PRP as compared with corticosteroid injections for chronic plantar fasciitis. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: Patients with chronic plantar fasciitis were allocated to have steroid injection or PRP. The primary outcome measure was the Foot Function Index (FFI) Pain score. Secondary outcome measures were function, as scored by the FFI Activity, FFI Disability, and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society, and quality of life, as scored with the short version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF). All outcomes were measured at baseline and at 4, 12, and 26 weeks and 1 year after the procedure. Results: Of the 115 patients, 63 were allocated to the PRP group, of which 46 (73%) completed the study, and 52 were allocated to the control group (corticosteroid injection), of which 36 (69%) completed the study. In the control group, FFI Pain scores decreased quickly and then remained stable during follow-up. In the PRP group, FFI Pain reduction was more modest but reached a lower point after 12 months than the control group. After adjusting for baseline differences, the PRP group showed significantly lower pain scores at the 1-year follow-up than the control group (mean difference, 14.4; 95% CI, 3.2-25.6). The number of patients with at least 25% improvement (FFI Pain score) between baseline and 12-month follow-up differed significantly between the groups. Of the 46 patients in the PRP group, 39 (84.4%) improved at least 25%, while only 20 (55.6%) of the 36 in the control group showed such an improvement ( P = .003). The PRP group showed significantly lower FFI Disability scores than the control group (mean difference, 12.0; 95% CI, 2.3-21.6). Conclusion: Treatment of patients with chronic plantar fasciitis with PRP seems to reduce pain and increase function more as compared with the effect of corticosteroid injection. Registration: NCT00758641 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

scholarly journals Platelet rich plasma versus corticosteroid injection for plantar fasciitis: A comparative study

The Foot ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 235-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kowshik Jain ◽  
Philip N. Murphy ◽  
Timothy M. Clough
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Plantar Fasciitis ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Corticosteroid Injection

scholarly journals Comparative Study of Platelet-rich Plasma and Corticosteroid Injection in the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 84-89
Author(s):  
Gyaneshwar Tank ◽  
Ravikant Rohila ◽  
Rohit Gupta, ◽  
Amit Gupta,
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Plantar Fasciitis ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Corticosteroid Injection ◽  
Tendon Healing ◽  
Plantar Fascia ◽  
Asia Pacific ◽  
Initial Visit ◽  
Group I ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

ABSTRACT Introduction Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is promoted now­adays as an ideal autologous biological blood-derived product. It enhances wound healing, bone healing, tendon healing and is currently being widely used. Aims and objectives A prospective cohort study was done to assess the efficacy of autologous PRP injection and to compare it with corticosteroid injection in treatment of plantar fasciitis (PF). Materials and methods Eighty patients were included in the study and divided into two groups. Group I (30 patients) received PRP injection and group II (50 patients) were given steroid injection. Patients were clinically assessed at different intervals. Functional outcome was evaluated on the basis of visual analog scale (VAS) and foot and ankle ability measure (FAAM) scores. Planter fascia thickness was assessed pre- and postinjection by ultrasound. Results Platelet-rich plasma and corticosteroid injection groups at the initial visit had VAS score of 8.44 and 8.38 respectively which was reduced to 1.46 and 3.02 at the end of 6 months. The PRP and corticosteroid injection groups at the initial visit had FAAM score of 29.9 and 31.6 respectively which increased to 83.4 and 69.1 at the end of 6 months. After injection, the PRP group had significant reduction (35.90%) in the thickness of plantar fascia as compared to corticosteroid group (28.67%). Conclusion Treatment of PF with PRP extract reduces pain and significantly increases function, exceeding the effect of steroid on long-term follow-up. How to cite this article Tank G, Gupta R, Gupta A, Rohila R. Comparative Study of Platelet-rich Plasma and Corticosteroid Injection in the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis. J Foot Ankle Surg (Asia-Pacific) 2017;4(2):84-89.

scholarly journals A comparative study between local injection of autologous platelet rich plasma and injection of corticosteroid in functional improvement of plantar fasciitis

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 653 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vithal Prakash Puri ◽  
Anil Kumar Gaur
Keyword(s):  
Plantar Fasciitis ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Functional Improvement ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Group B ◽  
Autologous Platelet

Background: Plantar fasciitis is a common cause of heel pain in adults. Although it is usually a self-limiting condition, the pain may become prolonged and severe enough to cause significant distress and disruption to the patient’s daily activities and work. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of autologous platelet rich plasma (PRP) and steroid injections in chronic cases of plantar fasciitis (PF).Methods: A prospective, randomized study was conducted from December 2013 to December 2015 amongst 60 patients with chronic PF were randomized prospectively in single tertiary care center in India. All the patients were enrolled according to inclusion criteria and divided into 2 groups i.e. group A (n=30) received PRP and group B (n=30) received corticosteroids injections. Roles and Maudsley score (RM Score) and Foot Function Index (FFI) was evaluated for all the included patients. The follow-up scheduled at 1 and 6 months after complete enrolment of patients.Results: Between both the groups, the significant difference was observed at 1 and 6 months follow-up from the baseline. At 1-month follow-up, statistically significant improvement in mean RM scores were seen in both the groups from baseline and when RM scores were compared between two groups, group B had statistically better mean scores. At 1-month follow-up there was no statistically significant difference between the mean FFI score values between two groups. At 6-month follow-up, statistically significant improvement in mean FFI scores were seen in both the groups, however when both groups were compared to each other, improvement in mean FFI scores was statistically better in group A as compared to group B.Conclusions: The present study concluded the use of PRP in chronic cases of plantar fasciitis seems more safe and effective in long term than the traditional treatment of steroid injection at different time period.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document