Legal Protection for Creditors Against Validity of Trade Binding Act with Loan Without Dependent Rights (Analysis of Verdict Number: 34/Pdt/2017/PT. YYK and Number : 214/Pdt.G/2014/PN.Jkt Sel)

Authentica ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-185
Author(s):  
Nina Trisnowati
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Bond Number ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
District Court ◽  
Power Of Attorney ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Outstanding Debt ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Binding Agreement

Credit, which was previously considered taboo, is now a necessity in society. Everyone is looking for convenience for credit without knowing the risks and impacts that will occur in the future. The most important element of credit (debt) is the trust of the creditor towards the borrower as the debtor. Sale and Purchase Agreement (hereinafter referred to as PJB) is an agreement between a seller to sell his property to a buyer made with a notarial deed. Cases that occurred in Yogyakarta High Court Decision Number 34 / Pdt /2017/PT.YYK and District Court Decision Number 214 / Pdt, G / 2014 / PN. Jkt.Sel is a case of debt receivable with collateral for a certificate of land rights and the parties poured their agreement into the Sale and Purchase Binding Act (PPJB) and the Selling Power of Attorney, considering that after the two decisions, there was an outstanding debt problem, while the debtor was still have not been able to repay their debts to creditors, with guarantees of certificates of land rights without mortgage. The purpose of this study was to analyze the judges' consideration of the decision Number 34 / Pdt /2017/PT.YYK with Decision Number 214 / Pdt.G / 2014 / PN. Jkt Cell regarding sale and purchase agreement. analyze the legal protection for creditors against the validity of the deed of sale and purchase agreement with a loan without mortgage. analyze repayment by defaulting debtors relating to debts and loans without mortgages. The method used in this study is a normative juridical method, analyzed Normatively Qualitatively, The results of the study show that in Decision Number 34 / Pdt /2017/PT.YYK which states are null and void and do not have the power to bind an authentic deed regarding the "Purchase Bond" Number 01/2015 and authentic deed in the form of "Sales Authority" Number 02/2015 , because based on the Supreme Court Jurisprudence of the Republic of Indonesia number 275K / PDT / 2004. Whereas as a comparison for Decision Number 214 / Pdt.G / 2014 / PN. Jkt Cell, which originally had a legal relationship, that is, debt and receivables which stated that the Plaintiff was proven to have committed a default on the Defendant, stated the Purchase Binding Agreement No. 45 dated July 11, 2008 and all of its derivatives are valid and correct deeds; declare the Deed of Credit Recognition No. 46 dated July 11, 2008 and all of its derivatives are valid and correct deeds; certifies Fiduciary Deed (movable property) No. 47 dated July 11, 2008 and all of its derivatives are valid and correct deeds. Keywords: Legal Protection, Debt-Receivables, Binding Agreement of Purchase, Abuse of Circumstances.

scholarly journals Penomoran dan Penanggalan Akta Notaris Berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan (Analisis Putusan PN Denpasar Nomor 530/Pdt. G/2016/PN. Dps.)

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-102
Author(s):  
Istadevi Utami Rahardika ◽  
I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha ◽  
Putu Ayu Sriasih Wesna
Keyword(s):  
Civil Code ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
District Court ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Power Of Attorney ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Binding Agreement

The Denpasar District Court (PN) in its decision Number 530 / Pdt.G / 2016 / PN.Dps stated that it has punished the Notary to immediately give the number and date to the Sale and Purchase Binding Agreement Deed and the Power of Attorney. This is interesting and important to examine in this research in relation to the basis of authority and the method of assigning the number and date of the deed signed by the parties before the notary after the Denpasar District Court decision. This normative legal research aims to examine the contents of a positive legal level, concerning the Numbering and Dating of Notary Deeds, using primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials, while the analysis method uses grammatical and systematic interpretation. The results showed that the basic authority of the Denpasar District Court to decide disputes regarding the numbering and dating of notary deeds, namely Article 130 HIR / 154 Rbg, Article 1851 of the Civil Code, Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 48 of 2009, Perma RI Number 1 of 2016, and the principle of ius curia novit. In connection with the numbering and dating of the Notary deed, it can be done based on the provisions of the UUJNP and refers to the Denpasar District Court decision.

scholarly journals AKIBAT HUKUM PEMBATALAN AKTA JUAL BELI (AJB) ATAS TANAH OLEH PEJABAT PEMBUAT AKTA TANAH (PPAT) DALAM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 888/K/PDT/2016

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 253
Author(s):  
Livia Clarista ◽  
Endang Pandamdari
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
District Court ◽  
High Court ◽  
Original State ◽  
Legal Standing ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Laws And Regulations

Buying and selling is a process of transferring rights of land carried out by making a sale and purchase deed by a land deed official. Therefore, the procedure must be in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations to produce a valid deed and can be used to transfer the land rights. In this case, there was a mismatch in the procedure for making land sale and purchase deeds carried out by land deed official. This caused a legal defect in the deed which was then supported by a statement from the District Court Verdict Number 381/Pdt.G/2014/PN/Bdg. and the Bandung High Court with Decision Verdict 451/PDT/2015/ PT BDG., where both of them grant the plaintiff's claim, namely land deed official itself. However, the Supreme Court Judges considered that land deed official did not have a legal standing in filing a claim because it was deemed not to have legal interests in the sale and purchase deed. The Supreme Court Judges in Verdict Number 888 / PDT / 2016 canceled the previous court decision. This resulted in the deed returning to its original state. However, the deed can then only be canceled by the parties in it, but the cancellation also can only be done if both parties agree. While the legal consequences of the land deed official issuing the sale and purchase deed are the acceptance of sanctions in the form of temporary and permanent dismissals.

scholarly journals Implementation of Parate Executie Object of Liability

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Redi Res
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
District Court ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Ratio Decidendi

Parate executive is the primary purpose of establishing Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights to provide solid legal protection for creditors holding mortgage objects. The easy and inexpensive execution process should make the parate executive the leading choice for creditors in auctioning mortgage objects if the debtor defaults. However, in reality, the parate execution could not be carried out properly because of the Supreme Court Decision No. 3210 K/Pdt/1984, in which one of the ratio decidendi in it that the public auction conducted by the Bandung KPKNL is invalid, and this is also supported by book II of the Supreme Court's guidelines which requires fiat execution from the District Court. This paper will explain how the two conflicting legal bases will impact the implementation of parate executives in the field. Keywords: Parate Executie;  Mortgage; Land.

scholarly journals First Travel Fraud Case and the Legal Protection for the Victims

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 267-280
Author(s):  
Hafizh Siraji
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
The State ◽  
District Court ◽  
Material Loss ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Case Number

Fraud committed by PT. First Travel has at least harmed prospective Hajj and Umrah pilgrims as many as 35,000 people, of which the material loss in this case is 500 billion. This is also suspected by the lack of strict regulations made by the state through Law No. 13 of 2008 concerning the implementation of Hajj and Umrah. However, until now the protection for the loss of first travel victims has not been completed, the decision of the Depok District Court with case number 83/Pid.B/2018/PN.Dpk which led to an appeal with case number 3096/K/PID.SUS/2018 decided on January 31, 2019. All assets seized were in accordance with the Decree of the Minister of Justice of the Republic of Indonesia Number M.04.PR.07.03 of 1985 concerning the organization and working procedures of RUTAN and RUPBASAN. This paper is indented to analyze the protection for the victims on the fraud case on PT First Travel Fraud case.

scholarly journals EFFECTIVENESS IN IMPLEMENTING SUPREME COURT REGULATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA NUMBER 2 YEAR 2015 ON PROCEDURES SETTLEMENT OF SIMPLE LAWSUIT IN SETTLING THE CIVIL CASES

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 2
Author(s):  
Wiryatmo Lukito Totok ◽  
Anik Iftitah
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
District Court ◽  
Code System ◽  
Medium Term ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
Civil Cases ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Effectiveness Index

President Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 Year 2015 on the National Medium Term Development Plan 2015-2019 mandates to carry out Reformation of the Civil Code system which is easy and fast, in an effort to improve the competitiveness of national economy. Related to this, the Supreme Court answered the vacancy of a simple lawsuit by issuing Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia (PERMA) Number 2 Year 2015 on procedures for settlement of simple suit in settling civil cases. The empirical juridical research in the Court of Kediri showed that the implementation of Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 Year 2015 made the lawsuit procedure simpler and very effective and in accordance with the principle of simple, fast and light cost. Effectiveness Index of Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 year 2015 at Kediri District Court Class I B was in the "good" category, influenced by substance rule of the law, legal culture, structure of the law, and community knowledge. Keywords: Effectiveness, Simple Lawsuit Received: 07 January, 2017; Accepter: 15 March, 2017

scholarly journals Case Review of Surabaya District Court Decision No. 672/Pdt.G/2016/PN.Sby about Unlawful Sale and Purchase Agreement of Land and Building

NORMA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Ramzi Maulana Arghie
Keyword(s):  
Bargaining Power ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
District Court ◽  
Case Review ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Law

The research, entitled Case Study of Surabaya District Court Decision No. 672/Pdt.G/2016/PN.Sby about Unlawful Sale and Purchase Agreement of Land and Building aims to find out whether or not Dirk Tatipata is said to have defaulted on the Sale and Purchase Agreement (PPJB) of land, which he did with Ronald Sanjaya, how the legal protection for Dirk Tatipata as the party who was harmed by the decision of the Surabaya District Court, This is normative legal research, Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that legally, it is clear that Dirk Tatipata does not have high bargaining power and is a seller of land and buildings on Jl. Sleep No. 103 that has been done in front and signed by Notary Anita Lucia Kendarto, S.H., M.Kn. with several letters/deeds. Thus, legal resistance is still being carried out by carrying out a lawsuit in the land and building dispute case at the Surabaya District Court, and ending his defeat coupled with a penalty of trial fees and payment for his unlawful actions harmed Ronald Sanjaya as the legal owner of the land and buildingsKeywords: Agreement, Sale, and Purchase of Land and Buildings, Against the Law

scholarly journals IMPLEMENTASI PERATURAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG PROSEDUR MEDIASI DI PENGADILAN (Study Putusan Pengadilan Agama Rantauprapat No. No.487/Pdt.G/2020/PA-RAP Jo Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Medan No.73/Pdt.G/2020/PTA-MDN)

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-81
Author(s):  
Muhammad Yusuf Siregar
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Aspects ◽  
Judicial System ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
High Court ◽  
Is Research ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Position ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Research Show

This study aims to analyze the legal aspects of the implementation of the Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 on Mediation Procedures in Courts (Study of Rantauprapat Religious Court Decision No. 487 / Pdt.G / 2020 / PA-RAP Jo Medan High Court Decision No. 73 / Pdt.G / 2020 / PTA-MDN. This research is Normative Empirical, which is research by looking at conditions in the field by linking the source of laws and regulations in force in the Republic of Indonesia. The benefits that will be received from the results of this study are to find out and analyzing the legal position of the Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Courts and To find out and analyze the Implementation of the Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Courts in the Rantauprapat Religious Court Decision No.487 / Pdt .G / 2020 / PA-RAP Jo Medan High Court Decision No.73 / Pdt.G / 2020 / PTA-MDN. The results of the research show that the provisions of the Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2008 and / or Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Courts in article 02 paragraph 04 states that "Judges in consideration of the decision of a case must state that the case concerned has strived for peace through Mediation by stating the name of the Mediator for the case concerned. The position of Mediation as stated in the Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2016 is one of the steps that must be taken in carrying out the Judicial system which is based on the decision of the Medan High Court Panel of Judges declaring that to completely reject the Plaintiff's Lawsuit with the Consideration that the case has been taken through the Mediation route although not maximally and His legal consideration is that the position of the witnesses presented by the Plaintiff is a witness who did not see the Plaintiff and Defendant fighting, but only told the story of the Plaintiff. Keywords: Implementation, Procedure, Mediation

scholarly journals DISKURSUS SOSIOLOGI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 46/PUU-VIII/2010

2021 ◽  
pp. 236-246
Author(s):  
Dwi Sakti Muhamad Huda ◽  
Dodi Alaska Ahmad Syaiful ◽  
Desi Wahyuni
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Reason ◽  
Kinship System ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right ◽  
Sociological Discourse ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Broad Scale

The Constitutional Court Decision Number 46 / PUU-VIII / 2010 annulled the provisions of Article 43 paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law because it contradicts the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and does not have binding legal force. The legal reason behind the rechtfinding is to emphasize that children born outside of marriage have the right to legal protection. This research was conducted with the aim of knowing the impact of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 46 / PUU-VIII / 2010 on one of the judges' judicial duties. This study uses a socio-legal approach with data collection techniques for study documents of literature materials. Based on the results of the analysis of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 46 / PUU-VIII / 2010, it does not contradict and intersect with the sociological discourse in accordance with the argumentum a contrario method. Then have coherence between the parental or bilateral kinship system with the Constitutional Court Decision No. 46 / PUU-VIII / 2010 in its application in Indonesia. This condition demands the intellectuality of Judges who are required to think on a broad scale and consider other disciplines in their legal findings.

scholarly journals PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN BERENCANA YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH ANAK (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Nomor 16/Pid.Sus-Anak/2016/PN.Cbn)

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 114-136
Author(s):  
Djesi Ariani
Keyword(s):  
Legal System ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
District Court ◽  
Human Being ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
High Regard ◽  
The Law

AbstractChildren are a mandate from God Almighty which is inherent in their dignity as a whole human being. Every child has dignity and value that is worthy of high regard and every child born must have his/her rights without the child's request. The problems in this thesis are: the responsibility of children as perpetrators in criminal acts of premeditated murder in the Indonesian legal system, legal protection against children as perpetrators of criminal offenses planned in District Court Decision Number 16 / Pid.Sus-Anak / 2016 / PN.Cbn , the legal considerations of the judges against children as perpetrators of premeditated murder in District Court Decision Number 16 / Pid.Sus-Anak / 2016 / PN.Cbn.Legal Protection of Children in Criminal Acts Based on Law Number 11 Year 2012, from the results of the study, it is stated that children who are dealing with the law, including children as victims or children as perpetrators of crime, it is appropriate for children who are in conflict with the law to get legal protection both as the perpetrators or as the victims.Keywords: Criminal Liability, Planned Murder, Children

scholarly journals Legal Protection for Village Communities Against Land Rights in the Construction of a National Strategy Project Through a Complete Systematic Land Registration System (Study of Pasuruan District Land Registration)

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 48
Author(s):  
Ratna Biraeng Kumalasari
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Registration System ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Community Needs ◽  
Village Communities ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

In this study using normative legal research. Policies related to land are required to guarantee legal certainty and certainty of land ownership rights by every person (individual) or by legal entities. So the community needs to register land in order to obtain a certificate of land rights which serves as a strong means of proof of ownership of land rights by someone. Meanwhile, Article 19 paragraph (1) of the Basic Agrarian Law states that to ensure legal certainty by the Government, land registration is held throughout the territory of the Republic of Indonesia. This is done so that land owners can obtain legal certainty for the land they have owned, and it’s intended that rights holders obtain valid evidence in the form of certificates as a strong means of proof as holders of rights to the land they own. Starting from the description above, the researcher can provide several aspects of the study, including: First, the Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) target is so large that it’s not an easy job for the Pasuruan Regency land office, which has 29 State Civil Servants, assisted by 63 non-government employees, due to the limited number of existing staff, the implementation of the Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) land office in Pasuruan Regency involves; 1. The private sector as a third party helping 20,200 fields for measurement and mapping activities, 2. Community participation in assissting Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) in village locations for 10,100 respectively, and 29,700 fields carried out and carried out by the Pasuruan Regency Land Office ASN.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document