scholarly journals RESTORATIVE JUSTICE SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KORBAN KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA

2009 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 238
Author(s):  
Rena Yulia

AbstractThe victim of domestic violence had needed of protection concept thatdifferent with another victim of violent crime. Participation of victim haswant to give justice for all. It is, because punishment to offender brings theimpact for victim. Restorative justice is a concept in criminal justice systemwhich is participation victim with it. The present of criminal justice system isthe offender oriented. Victim has not position to considerate offenderpunishment. Only offender can get the right and the victim hopeless. In thedomestic violence, victim and offender have relationship. Because there area family. · So, probability they have some interest in economic and relation.When wife become a victim and husband as offender, his wife hasdependency economic from her husband. It means, if husband get a decisionfrom judge, his wife will be suffer. Domestic violence is different crime. So, itis necessQ/y to made some different concept. In this article, will discussedabout alternative of legal protection for victim of domestic violence incriminal justice system to protect the victim

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 168
Author(s):  
Ferdricka Nggeboe

The marriage bond that is conducted aims to form a happy prosperous household, eternal and lasting under the protection of God Almighty, with the aim, automatically the family should be fostered as well as possible, mutual love and affectionate love between husband and wife and children . Each couple wishes for a harmonious married life, but not forever the condition of the household between husband and wife good and peaceful, because sometimes there are quarrels and bickering, which often leads to the occurrence of violence in the household that eventually happened to a percerarian. The legal policy issued by the Government of the Republic of Indonesia to anticipate violence especially domestic violence is Law Number 23 Year 2004 on the Elimination of Domestic Violence (PKDRT). This law is expected to reveal the various violations in the household and the protection of the rights of victims of violence without exception, therefore the question to be answered in this study is, How to protect the law against women victims of domestic violence in the criminal justice system in the City Jambi. This research uses empirical juridical type, and as its analysis knife the researcher uses legal protection theory, that is preventive law protection and repressive law protection. The emphasis of the analysis on the fact that repressive legal protection in the criminal justice system is reflected from the case reporting process until the case is decided by the judge in court. In addition to a brief overview of the process of domestic violence in the criminal justice system, there are also some judges' decisions on cases with free decisions and verdicts stating that the case was revoked. That the repressive legal protection of victims of domestic violence through the decision of a court of a criminal verdict has shown the comparison of law, although it is still far from the legal certainty.Keywords: Legal Protection Against Women, Domestic Violence Victims, Criminal Justice System


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 104-112
Author(s):  
I Nyoman DIPA RUDIANA ◽  
I Ketut RAI SETIABUDHI

The renewal of the orientation of punishment for children in conflict with the law from a retributive justice approach to restorative justice is a good start for efforts to restore a victim-oriented situation by giving the perpetrator the opportunity to express his regret to the victim with the concept of diversion. However, not all cases of children are entitled to diversion. In accordance with Article 7 paragraph (2) of the SPPA Law, the requirement for diversion is a criminal act punishable by imprisonment of under 7 (seven) years and not a repetition of a criminal act. Meanwhile, criminal acts that are punishable by more than 7 (seven) years and repetition of criminal acts are not entitled to diversion. The concept of diversion and the terms of diversion are interpreted very narrowly so that they do not reflect dignified justice. The law cannot only regulate legal certainty. The law must provide a sense of justice with dignity and justice that humanize humans. This writing aims to determine the concept of diversion of the juvenile criminal justice system based on dignified justice. The type of research used is literature, the nature of this research is descriptive, the results of the research are the reconstruction of the concept of diversion based on dignified justice must be reconstructed by expanding the concept of diversion so that every child without exception has the right to get diversion.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
A. Sudarman Kantao ◽  
Azwad Rachmat Hambali ◽  
Muh. Rinaldy Bima

Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis dan memperoleh pemahaman terhadap penerapan nilai serta hambatan dalam penerapan keadilan restoratif pada perkara peradilan pidana anak sesuai dengan Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak dalam rangka memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi Anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum dan kendala yang dihadapi majelis hakim pengadilan Negeri watansoppeng dalam menerapkan keadilan restoratif untuk mengadili tindak pidana yang dilakukan oleh anak. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terkait proses persidangan terhadap kasus anak, hakim Pengadilan Negeri Watansoppeng senantiasa mengupayakan penerapan restoratif justice dengan memberi saran kepada korban, terdakwa dan pihak keluarga untuk mengusahakan perdamaian sebagai upaya penyelesaian kasus di luar jalur persidangan, namun upaya tersebut seringkali ditolak oleh korban dan keluarganya dan menginginkan agar pelaku dihukum seberat-beratnya. Faktor Kebudayaan dari keluarga korban inilah yang tidak mendukung penyelesaian perkara di luar peradilan atau perdamaian. This study aims to analyze and gain an understanding of the application of values ​​and obstacles in the application of restorative justice in juvenile criminal justice cases in accordance with Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System for Children in order to provide legal protection for children who are in conflict with the law and the obstacles they face. watansoppeng District Court panel of judges in implementing restorative justice to adjudicate crimes committed by children. The results showed that in relation to the trial process for juvenile cases, the judges at the Watansoppeng District Court always tried to apply restorative justice by advising victims, defendants and their families to seek peace as an effort to resolve cases outside the court, but these efforts were often rejected by the victim and his family and wants the perpetrator to be punished as severely as possible. The cultural factor of the victim's family does not support the settlement of cases outside the court or peace.


Hukum Islam ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Ludfi Ludfi ◽  
Jumati Jumiati ◽  
Febriana Hidayati

AbstractSettlement of domestic violence cases in Indonesia still uses the retributive justice approach, the settlement of these cases is solely intended to impose sanctions on perpetrators of domestic violence without considering the loss suffered by the victim. Therefore, Law Number 23 of 2004 concerning Elimination of Domestic Violence regulates the rights of victims in obtaining justice through the criminal justice system so that the aim is not only to take action against perpetrators but also protect victims of domestic violence.Further, Government Regulation Number 4 of 2006 concerning the Implementation and Cooperation of the Recovery of Victims of Domestic Violence intersects with the concept of restorative justice. This can be seen by the regulation of the recovery of victims of domestic violence involving collaboration with various parties. However, when compared, it is still considered not enough to provide protection and recover victims of domestic violence, because only one goal is set from restorative justice, the recovery of victims. This regulation still puts victims as objects by putting the victims away to participate in the criminal justice system, and not explaining the recovery process, which is the ultimate goal of restorative justice.


2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 431
Author(s):  
Ridwan Mansyur

Banyak penyelesaian perkara kekerasan dalam rumah tangga yang tidak memenuhi rasa keadilan, terutama bagi korban dan subordinat dalam rumah tangga. Dalam disertasi ini disampaikan hasil yaitu pertama, penyelesaian perkara kekerasan dalam rumah tangga pada kenyataannya diselesaikan melalui Undang-Undang No. 23 Tahun 2004 sebagai lex specialis. Penyelesaian kasus kekerasan dalam rumah tangga berdasarkan aturan tersebut, secara empiris lebih menekankan pada pemidanaannya, sehingga terlihat tujuan preventif, protektif, dan konsolidatif tidak terpenuhi. Kedua, penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa kekerasan dalam rumah tangga merupakan perkara dengan multi dimensi penyelesaian karena terdapat sisi lingkup perdata dan di sisi lain lingkup pidana. Oleh karena itu dibutuhkan suatu media di dalam sistem yang dapat mengakomodasi penyelesaian perkara tersebut, yang salah satunya adalah dengan menggunakan pendekatan restorative justice. There are many domestic violence settlements that do not satisfy the sense of justice, especially for the victims and subordinate in the household. The dissertation results: first, the settlement of domestic violence in fact settled by Act No. 23 of 2004 as lex special. The settlements of domestic violence cases based on that rule, empirically emphasis on the criminal sanction, so that the purpose of preventive, protective and consolidative was not rise. Second, the research concluded that domestic violence is a case with the multi-dimensional settlement because there is the scope of the civil and criminal sphere on the other side. Therefore, it needs a medium in the system that can accommodate the completion of the case, which one of them is restorative justice approach.


Jurnal Hukum ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 165
Author(s):  
Aryani Witasari ◽  
Muhammad Sholikul Arif

The research objective is to identify and analyze the implementation of Diversion in order to realize Restorative Justice in the Juvenile Criminal Justice System in an effort to provide legal protection for child criminal offenders. The approach method used in this research is normative juridical or library law research or doctrinal law research, namely legal research by examining library materials and secondary materials, the results of the study found that the obligation to seek diversion with the Restorative Justice approach at every stage in the criminal justice process Children must be carried out in the Criminal Justice System, Diversion as a step towards transferring the settlement of children's cases from the criminal justice process to non-criminal justice processes by prioritizing the Restorative Justice approach which can be carried out by way of deliberation or mediation which emphasizes efforts to restore back to its original state in a friendly manner.


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-40
Author(s):  
Sartika Intaning Pradhani

The Child Criminal Justice System in practice, the child as a victim of sexual violence does not always feel its justice being reversed because the diversion process involving the community, the police, the social department, and the parties concerned does not always have a victim's perspective. The absence of a victim's perspective in resolving the issue of sexual violence through diversities makes restorative justice incapable of restoring and fulfilling justice for child victims of sexual violence compared to the criminal justice system in general because diversity is unable to bridge the gap between the challenges faced by victims and the help available to victims. Legal protection of child victims of crime, especially crimes against morality, with child offenders under the Criminal Justice System which must prioritize the approach of Restorative Justice by guaranteeing the rights of child victims to the efforts of medical rehabilitation and social rehabilitation both inside and outside the institution; assurance of safety, whether physical, mental, or social; and ease in obtaining information about case development through diversion. Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak pada praktiknya, anak sebagai korban kekerasan seksual tidak selalu merasakan keadilannya dikemalikan karena proses diversi yang melibatkan masyarakat, polisi, departemen sosial, dan para pihak terkait tidak selalu memiliki perspektif korban. Ketiadaan perspektif korban dalam penyelesaian permasalahan kekerasan seksual melalui diversi membuat keadilan restoratif tidak mampu mengembalikan dan memenuhi keadilan bagi anak korban kekerasan seksual dibandingkan dengan sistem peradilan pidana secara umum karena diversi tidak mampu untuk menjembatani jurang antara tantangan yang dihadapi oleh para korban dan pertolongan yang tersedia untuk para korban. Perlindungan hukum terhadap anak korban kejahatan, khususnya kejahatan terhadap kesusilaan, dengan pelaku anak menurut Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak yang wajib mengutamakan pendekatan Keadilan Restoratif dengan memberikan jaminan hak anak korban terhadap upaya rehabilitasi medis dan rehabilitasi sosial, baik di dalam lembaga maupun di luar lembaga; jaminan keselamatan, baik fisik, mental, maupun sosial; dan kemudahan dalam mendapatkan informasi mengenai perkembangan perkara melalui diversi. DOI: 10.15408/jch.v5i1.6575


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeha Dwanty El Rachma

AbstractChildren are the most valuable treasure, for the family, society and nation. The constitution expressly states in Article 28B paragraph 2 which states that every child has the right to justice and legal protection in their development which is free from violence and discrimination. The explanation of this article is a basic human right that must be fulfilled. At this stage of searching for identity it is influenced by their mentality, so that children sometimes still do not understand whether the action is good or not. Sometimes children are easily affected by situations and conditions around them, especially if the environment is very bad for them. If the child is comfortable, there will be a concern if the child violates the law. Children who are already criminal offenders need a criminal justice system strategy that is to try to minimize intervention in the juvenile criminal justice system. Diversion is a policy carried out to prevent (diversion) the perpetrator from the formal criminal justice system, but there are conditions for diversion, which is not a criminal repetition. The research method used in this study is the normative juridical method. The results obtained are the results of the diversion show that the diversion has not fully had a positive effect on children who are criminal suspects, it is proven that by the recurrence of criminal acts by the suspect.Keywords: child; diversionAbstrakAnak merupakan harta yang paling berharga, bagi keluarga, masyarakat dan bangsa. Konstitusi secara tegas dalam Pasal 28B ayat (2) yang menyatakan  Setiap anak berhak mendapatkan keadilan serta perlindungan hukum dalam tumbuh kembangnya yang bebas dari kekerasan dan diskriminasi. Penjelasan dari pasal tersebut merupakan hak asasi anak yang wajib dipenuhi. pada tahapan pencarian jati diri ini dipengaruhi oleh mentalitasnya, sehingga anak terkadang masih belum paham apakah tindakan tersebut baik atau tidak. Terkadang anak mudah terpengaruh oleh situasi dan kondisi di sekitarnya, apalagi jika lingkungan tersebut sangat buruk bagi mereka. Apabila anak sudah nyaman maka akan dikhawatirkan bila anak tersebut melanggar hukumAnak yang terlanjur menjadi pelaku pidana diperlukan strategi sistem peradilan pidana yaitu mengupayakan seminimal mungkin intervensi sistem peradilan pidana anak.Diversi merupakan kebijakan yang dilakukan untuk menghindarkan (Pengalihan) pelaku dari sistem peradilan pidana formal,Tapi terdapat syarat untuk dilakukannya diversi yaitu bukan merupakan pengulangan Pidana. Metode Penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian yang didapat adalah menunjukkan bahwa diversi belum sepenuhnya memberikan pengaruh positif bagi anak yang menjadi tersangka pidana, hal itu dibuktikan bahwa dengan berulangnya tindak pidana oleh tersangka.


2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Rusli Arafat

<table width="605" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" width="406"><p><em>Investigation of criminal case through the criminal justice system must to base on the appropriate processes and procedure that can be accounted. One of the important procedures to investigation is the right to get legal protection.  Legal protection is one of the fundamental rights that every human being possesses, one form of legal protection is right to obtain legal aid in every steps of investigation process. The legal aid has an important meaning for someone who dealing with legal issues. This research is discussed about application of legal aid in the process of police investigation. This research also specializes in the approach using the rule of national law (legislation) to be able to know the application of legal aid with the principle of accusatoir. The result of this research is Legal aid can reduce the number of violence in the process of investigation of suspects by the police (investigation) in order to protect the human rights of the suspect, the role of legal aid is needed, the number of investigation of suspects not accompanied by advocate it cause torture of the suspect, because the investigator considers the suspect to be an object of inspection instead of placing the suspect as the subject of the investigation.</em></p><p><strong><em>Keywords: </em></strong><em><em>The criminal justice system, Investigation, legal aid, accusatoir principle</em></em></p></td></tr></tbody></table>


Author(s):  
Guntarto Widodo

This study describes The principles system of legal protection against Children as criminal perpetrator in Law of the Republic of Indonesia Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning Juvenile Criminal Justice System refer to the Convention on The Rights of The Child  and it has covered most of the principles of child protection perpetrator as well. The research method used in this study is a normative legal research because it includes the scope of legal dogmatic learning or researching legal rules. The study also found  First, The provision of punishment against the child has been in accordance with that stipulated in Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Children Protection which states that imprisonment can be applied to the child when there is not last effort any longer, and shall be executed separately from the adult prison;,Second,  The Child protection efforts shall be implemented by imposing sentencing restorative (restorative justice) and diversion in the event that completing the requirement of Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning Juvenile Criminal Justice System. Keywords: Sentencing System, Criminal Justice System, Child Protection


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document