scholarly journals Effects of Intravenous Lidocaine on Alfentanil Consumption During Procedural Sedation for Colonoscopy in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: a Randomized Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Twan Aalbers ◽  
Sandra A.S. van den Heuvel ◽  
Ewald M. Bronkhorst ◽  
Aura A.J. van Esch ◽  
Gert Jan Scheffer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Procedural Sedation ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Lidocaine Group ◽  
Sedation And Analgesia ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

Abstract Background: Procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) is used during colonoscopy to facilitate the procedure and relieve patient’s discomfort. The foremost risk of PSA is respiratory depression. Lidocaine could be a promising additional analgesic in IBD patients to minimise side effects of PSA.Our primary objective was to investigate whether i.v. lidocaine reduces the amount of alfentanil used during PSA in IBD patients. Additionally, we investigated whether lidocaine reduces cardiorespiratory incidents and the amount of propofol required during the procedure.Methods: A randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled study was performed at the endoscopy unit of the Radboud University Medical Centre from November 2016 to December 2018. Seventy-six patients with IBD, ASA 1 or 2, between 18 and 65 years, scheduled for colonoscopy with PSA were included. Patients received lidocaine 1.5 mg kg-1 followed by a continuous infusion of 2 mg kg-1 h-1 (intervention group, n=38) or 0.9% saline in equivalent volumes (control group, n=38) during colonoscopy.Results: There was a reduction in the use of alfentanil (327µg (95%CI=-31-505, p=0.082)), and propofol (39 mg (95%CI=-5-83, p=0.083)) in the lidocaine group compared with the control group. Ten patients (26%) in the control group and 8 patients in the lidocaine group (21%) experienced a period of hypoxia (p=0.788). In both groups, no periods of hypotension were noted.Conclusion: Our investigation has shown a reduction in the use of propofol and alfentanil in patients undergoing colonoscopy with PSA. The differences were not statistically significant. Lidocaine did not reduces the incidence of cardiorespiratory events.Trial registration:EudraCT, 2016-002210-46, registered 19 may 2016,https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2016-002210-46/resultsISRCTN, ISRCTN47787339, retrospectively registered 6 February 2019, http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN47787339

scholarly journals Comparison of lidocaine, huffing maneuver and combination of both in prevention fentanyl induced cough before induction of anesthesia: a double-blind, prospective, randomized placebo-controlled study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laleh Dehghanpisheh ◽  
Mohammadhossein Eghbal ◽  
Fatemeh Bagheri Baravati ◽  
Pooya Vatankhah
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Placebo Control ◽  
Anesthesia Induction ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Lidocaine Group ◽  
Cough Reflex ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Intravenous bolus injection of fentanyl has been frequently reported to be associated with cough reflex during patient anesthesia. However, the search for the most effective protocol continues. This study aimed to compare the effect of reducing cough reflex after injection of fentanyl in a fusion protocol by combining the injections of lidocaine and Huffing maneuver and comparing with a placebo control group, before anesthesia induction. Methods This prospective randomized controlled trial study was performed on 400 patients who were divided into four groups of combined protocol (group 1), lidocaine group (group 2), Huffing maneuver group (group 3), and the control receiving normal saline (group 4). Then patients were injected with 2. 5 μg /kg fentanyl and monitored for 2 min regarding their cough reflex, as well as the severity. Results In group one, 9 patients (9%), in group two, 45 patients (45%), 22 patients (22%) in group three, and in group four, 75 patients (75%), developed cough reflex following fentanyl injection. Also, 13 patients (13%) developed moderate and 4 (4%) developed severe coughs in the control group reported, while no reports of severe or moderate cough were among the intervention groups. There was a significant difference between the intervention group and the control group both in terms of the rate and severity of the fentanyl-induced cough. Conclusion By using a combination of lidocaine injection along and Huffing maneuver, better results can be obtained in reducing the frequency, and also the severity of cough followed by fentanyl injection. Trial registration The trial was registered with IRCT.IR (09/03/2018-No. IRCT20141009019470N74).

Controlled Study of the Use of Local Steroid Injection in the Treatment of Trigger Finger and Thumb

1992 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. LAMBERT ◽  
R. J. MORTON ◽  
J. P. SLOAN
Keyword(s):  
Local Anaesthetic ◽  
Steroid Injection ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Trigger Finger ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Methylprednisolone Acetate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Local Steroid Injection ◽  
Control Injection

A controlled double-blind prospective study of injection of methylprednisolone acetate plus local anaesthetic against a control injection of a local anaesthetic in the treatment of trigger finger and thumb has shown a 60% success rate for the steroid injection against 16% for the control group (p < 0.05). This is the first controlled trial of local steroid therapy in this condition.

scholarly journals Azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine in hospitalised patients with confirmed COVID-19–a randomised double-blinded placebo-controlled trial

2021 ◽  
pp. 2100752
Author(s):  
Pradeesh Sivapalan ◽  
Charlotte Suppli Ulrik ◽  
Therese Sophie Lapperre ◽  
Rasmus Dahlin Bojesen ◽  
Josefin Eklöf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Safety Outcome ◽  
Hospitalised Patients ◽  
Double Blinded ◽  
Combined Intervention

BackgroundCombining the antibiotic azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine induces airway immunomodulatory effects, with the latter also having in vitro antiviral properties. This may improve outcomes in patients hospitalised for COVID-19.MethodsPlacebo-controlled double-blind randomised multicentre trial. Patients ≥18 years, admitted to hospital for≤48 h (not intensive care) with a positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test, were recruited. The intervention was 500 mg daily azithromycin for 3 days followed by 250 mg daily azithromycin for 12 days combined with 200 mg twice daily hydroxychloroquine for all 15 days. The control group received placebo/placebo. The primary outcome was days alive and discharged from hospital within 14 days (DAOH14).ResultsAfter randomisation of 117 patients, at the first planned interim analysis, the data and safety monitoring board recommended stopping enrolment due to futility, based on pre-specified criteria. Consequently, the trial was terminated on February 1, 2021. A total of 61 patients received the combined intervention and 56 patients received placebo. In the intervention group, patients had a median of 9.0 DAOH14 (IQR, 3–11) versus. 9.0 DAOH14 (IQR, 7–10) in the placebo group (p=0.90). The primary safety outcome, death from all causes on day 30, occurred for 1 patient in the intervention group versus. 2 patients receiving placebo (p=0.52), and readmittance or death within 30 days occurred for 9 patients in the intervention group versus. 6 patients receiving placebo (p=0.57).ConclusionsThe combination of azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine did not improve survival or length of hospitalisation in patients with COVID-19.

scholarly journals EVALUATION OF EFFECTIVENESS OF AROGYA KASHAYAM-20 IN COVID-19 CASES - A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Umesh Shukla ◽  
Nitin Ujjaliya
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Large Population ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Group A ◽  
Negative Conversion

Introduction: The characteristic clinical features of Covid-19 disease range between asymptomatic to mild-moderate symptoms. Studies suggest that a large population (80%) presents its asymptomatic or milder form. Remaining 20 percent, owing to severity of the diseases, need hospital-based care. Many treatment protocols and strategies have been promoted and recommended by authorities including WHO, but nothing has actually been finalized till date. The present study was planned to evaluate the effectiveness of an Ayurvedic formulation viz. Arogya Kashayam-20 in the hospitalized cases of Covid-19.Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of Arogya Kashayam-20 in the cases of COVID-19 particularly the negative conversion of RTPCR in 10 days duration.Material and Methods: This was a randomized controlled trial conducted at COVID-19 Care Center, Pt. Khushilal Sharma Government Ayurveda College &amp; Institute, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh with a sample size of 112 participants, aged between 16 to 60 years of either sex. Participants were divided in two groups viz. group A and B. Both the groups received Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), vitamin C and Zinc as per the prevailing ICMR guidelines and group 'A' received additionally Arogya Kashayam-20 for 10 days. Outcome measure of the study was to see the negative conversion RT-PCR test after intervention period of 10 days. CTRI Registration: CTRI/2020/06/026221. Results: Among the 60 cases registered in study group (group A), 51 cases (85.00%) were reported with negative RTPCR on 10th day. Out of 52 cases registered in control group (group B); 39 cases (75.00%) were tested negative RTPCR on 10th day. In both the groups all the cases were discharged asymptomatically on 10th day as per the prevailing ICMR guidelines. No ADR/AE observed during the intervention period.Conclusion: The study observes that the add on intervention group has a better outcome in terms of RT-PCR negative reports after 10 days comparing to the control group.

scholarly journals A parental educational intervention to facilitate informed consent for pediatric procedural sedation in the emergency department: a parallel group randomized controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yen-Ko Lin ◽  
Yung-Sung Yeh ◽  
Chao-Wen Chen ◽  
Wei-Che Lee ◽  
Chia-Ju Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Informed Consent ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Informed Consent Process ◽  
Consent Process ◽  
Procedural Sedation ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Video Assisted

Abstract Background Obtaining valid parental informed consent for pediatric procedures in the emergency department (ED) is challenging. This study compared a video-assisted informed consent intervention with conventional consent discussion to inform parents about pediatric procedural sedation in the ED. Methods A video-assisted informed consent intervention was developed to explain the process, benefits, risks, and alternatives of pediatric procedural sedation. A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted with a convenience sample of parents of children recommended for procedural sedation for facial laceration in the ED. Intervention group participants watched the video. Control group participants received information from physicians during conventional discussion. Participants completed pre- and post-education knowledge tests and rated their satisfaction with the informed consent process. The primary outcome was efficacy of the video intervention compared with conventional discussion. Secondary outcomes were parental satisfaction and consent refusal. A covariate-controlled multivariable regression model was used to analyze between-group differences in knowledge and satisfaction. Results There were 32 participants in the intervention group and 30 in the control group. Mean knowledge scores were higher in the intervention group (91.67 ± [standard deviation] 12.70) than in the control group (73.33 ± 19.86). The intervention group showed significantly greater knowledge score differences (coefficient: 18.931, 95% confidence interval: 11.146–26.716). Intervention group participants showed greater satisfaction than control group participants. Conclusions Video-assisted informed consent was superior to conventional discussion for informing parents during an ED informed consent process. Video-assisted informed consent may improve parents’ understanding of pediatric procedural sedation and satisfaction with the informed consent process in the ED. Institutions should develop structured methods and strategies to better inform parents, facilitate treatment decisions, and improve parent satisfaction in the ED. Trial registration: The ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier is NCT01850329. Registered 9 May, 2013 - Retrospectively registered, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT01850329

scholarly journals 2838. Safety and Immunogenicity of a gp120-CD4 Chimeric Subunit Vaccine: A Phase 1a Randomized Controlled Trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S65-S66
Author(s):  
Joel V Chua ◽  
Charles Davis ◽  
Amy Nelson ◽  
Ka Wing J Lam ◽  
Lydiah Mutumbi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Subunit Vaccine ◽  
Vaccine Development ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Chimeric Protein ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Single Chain ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Humoral Responses ◽  
Hiv 1

Abstract Background A primary challenge for HIV vaccine development is to raise antiviral antibodies capable of recognizing highly variable viral antigens. The full-length single chain (FLSC) gp120-CD4 chimeric protein was designed to present a highly conserved CD4-induced HIV-1 envelope structure that evokes cross-reactive humoral responses (Figure 1). IHV01 is an FLSC subunit vaccine formulated in alum adjuvant. The safety and immunogenicity of IHV01 was evaluated in this first-in-human phase 1a trial. Methods This randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study involved three dose-escalating cohorts (75 µg, 150 µg, and 300 µg doses). Eligible participants were HIV-1 uninfected healthy volunteers aged 18 to 45 years. Participants in each cohort were block randomized in groups of four in a 3:1 ratio to receive either vaccine or placebo. Intramuscular injections were given on weeks 0, 4, 8, and 24. Participants were followed for an additional 24 weeks after the last immunization. Crossreactive antibody binding titers against diverse HIV envelopes and antigens and specific CD4i epitopes on gp120 were assessed. Results Sixty-five volunteers were enrolled—49 vaccine and 16 placebo. Majority (81%) of vaccinations with IHV01 produced no localized or systemic reactions; no different from the control group. The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was not significantly different between groups. Majority (89%) of vaccine-related AEs were mild in severity. The most common vaccine-related AEs were injection site pain (31%), pruritus (10%), and headache (10%). There were no vaccine-related serious AE, discontinuation due to AE, or intercurrent HIV infection. By the final vaccination, all subjects in all cohorts had developed antibodies against IHV01; all placebo recipients were negative. The antibodies induced by IHV01 reacted with envelope antigens from diverse HIV-1 strains (Figure 2). Conclusion IHV01 vaccine was safe, well tolerated, and immunogenic in all doses tested. The vaccine raised broadly reactive humoral responses against multiple gp120 domains, transition state structures, and CD4i epitopes. Disclosures All Authors: No reported Disclosures.

scholarly journals Efficacy of an Objective Structured Clinical Examination Training Approach for Training Pharmacy Students in Diabetes Mellitus Counseling: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Pharmacy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 229
Author(s):  
Imaneh Farahani ◽  
Samieh Farahani ◽  
Maira A. Deters ◽  
Holger Schwender ◽  
Stephanie Laeer
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Communication Skills ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Objective Assessment ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Pharmacy Students ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Training Approach

Pharmacists’ tasks are multifaceted and include, for example, vital counseling and communication skills. Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) could be used to train pharmacy students in these skills. Our study sought to determine the efficacy of our OSCE training approach for training pharmacy students’ counseling and communication skills on diabetes mellitus compared to a control group. This randomized controlled study was conducted with pharmacy students using a pre-post-design. The intervention group completed diabetes OSCE training, while the control group solved diabetes patient cases using subjective, objective, assessment, and plan notes. Before and after the respective training, both groups completed OSCEs evaluating counseling and communication skills. Before each OSCE encounter, the participants completed a self-assessment questionnaire and, upon completion of the seminar, filled out a satisfaction survey. The OSCE-trained group demonstrated a significantly greater increase in counseling and communication skills and self-confidence than the control group. Both groups were generally satisfied with the seminar. These results demonstrate that our OSCE training approach allows for the effective training of pharmacy students’ diabetes counseling and communication skills and suggests the inclusion of such a skill-based approach more widely in pharmacy students’ education.

scholarly journals Effect of Oral Ingestion of Low-Molecular Collagen Peptides Derived from Skate (Raja Kenojei) Skin on Body Fat in Overweight Adults: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Marine Drugs ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young Tak ◽  
Yun Kim ◽  
Jeong Lee ◽  
Yu-Hyun Yi ◽  
Young Cho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Fat ◽  
Animal Studies ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Collagen Peptides ◽  
Collagen Peptide ◽  
Skin Collagen ◽  
Overweight Adults

Recent animal studies found the potential of a collagen peptide derived from skate skin to have anti-obesity effects through the suppression of fat accumulation and regulation of lipid metabolism. However, no studies have yet been performed in humans. Here, this very first human randomized, placebo-controlled, and double-blinded study was designed to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of skate skin collagen peptides (SCP) for the reduction of body fat in overweight adults. Ninety healthy volunteers (17 men) aged 41.2 ± 10.4 years with a mean body mass index of 25.6 ± 1.9 kg/m2 were assigned to the intervention group (IG), which received 2000 mg of SCP per day or to the control group (CG) given the placebo for 12 weeks and 81 (90%) participants completed the study. Changes in body fat were evaluated using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry as a primary efficacy endpoint. After 12 weeks of the trial, the percentage of body fat and body fat mass (kg) in IG were found to be significantly better than those of subjects in CG (−1.2% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.024 and −1.2 kg vs. 0.3 kg, p = 0.025). Application of SCP was well tolerated and no notable adverse effect was reported from both groups. These results suggest the beneficial potential of SCP in the reduction of body fat in overweight adults.

scholarly journals Protocol for a randomised, open-label, parallel group, multicentre controlled study to evaluate the clinical performance and safety of Stay Safe Link compared with Stay Safe in patients with end-stage kidney disease on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. e024589
Author(s):  
Wen Yao Mak ◽  
Loke Meng Ong ◽  
Bak Leong Goh ◽  
Sunita Bavanandan ◽  
Lily Mushahar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
End Stage

IntroductionPeritonitis is a major complication of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), the risk of which is significantly influenced by the type of PD transfer system. Although the Y-disconnect and double-bag system is more efficient in preventing peritonitis compared with the spike system, little information is available to differentiate risks between different brands of the Y-disconnect double-bag system. A randomised controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a newly introduced system is needed to provide the necessary clinical evidence to guide policy decision-making.Methods and analysisThe study is an open-label randomised controlled trial. A total of 434 patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing CAPD will be enrolled and randomised to either the intervention group, Stay Safe Link, or the control group, Stay Safe. All study subjects will be followed up and monitored for 1 year. The primary safety outcome is the rate of peritonitis while the primary efficacy outcomes are the delivered dialysis dose and ultrafiltration volume.Ethics and disseminationThe study was approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee, National Institute of Health Malaysia. A written informed consent will be obtained from all participating subjects prior to any trial-related procedure and the study conduct will adhere strictly to Good Clinical Practice. The findings will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal.Trial registration numberNCT03177031; Pre-results.

Dexamethasone (DM) for cancer-related fatigue: A double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9002-9002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sriram Yennurajalingam ◽  
Susan Frisbee-Hume ◽  
Marvin Omar Delgado-Guay ◽  
Janet Bull ◽  
Alexandria T. Phan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Cancer Related Fatigue ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale

9002 Background: Cancer-related-fatigue (CRF) is the most common and distressing symptoms in patients with advanced cancer. Currently, there is no standard treatment for CRF. Although corticosteroids have been used in the treatment of CRF, there are no well-powered placebo-controlled trials that used a validated CRF outcome measure. The primary objective of this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study is to compare the effect of DM versus placebo on CRF. Methods: Advanced cancer patients with fatigue ≥ 4/10 on the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) and at least 2 other CRF-related symptoms (pain, nausea, appetite, depression, anxiety or sleep disturbance ≥ 4/10), normal cognition, no infections and hemoglobin ≥ 9 g/L were eligible for enrollment. Patients were randomized to either receive dexamethasone 4 mg orally twice a day for 15 days (primary end point) or matching placebo. The primary outcome was the day 15 change in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness-Fatigue (FACIT-F) subscale scores. Differences in the group means (normal distribution) were analyzed using the two-sample t-test. Results: In 83 evaluable patients (43 DM and 40 placebo), median age was 60 years, 61% were white, and 53% were female. There was no difference in the demographics and fatigue (FACIT-F subscale) between DM and placebo groups except for sex (p=0.02). The mean (SD) FACIT-F subscores at baseline and at day 15 for DM were 18 (11) and 27 (11) (p<0.001) and for placebo were 21 (9) and 24 (12) (p=0.06), respectively. Mean improvement in FACIT-F subscale was significantly higher in the DM group compared to placebo (9.6 (11) vs. 3.1 (9.7), p=0.005). We found a significant difference in ESAS physical distress (p=0.02), but no differences in ESAS overall symptom distress (p=0.11) and ESAS psychological distress (P=0.88) between DM and placebo. There were insignificantly higher numbers of grade ≥3 toxicities in patients who received DM than in patients who received placebo (20/42 vs. 18/47, p=0.37). Conclusions: Dexamethasone was more effective than placebo in reducing CRF in patients with advanced cancer. Long-term safety studies are needed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document