欧盟与东盟货物与资本自由流动法律比较及启示 (Legal Comparison in the Free Movement of Goods Between the EU and ASEAN)

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junlei Peng
2021 ◽  
pp. 300-321
Author(s):  
Margot Horspool ◽  
Matthew Humphreys ◽  
Michael Wells-Greco

This chapter introduces the law on the free movement of goods in the EU. It discusses the following: the customs union; the free movement of goods provisions in the TFEU; customs duties and common customs tariffs; charges having equivalent effect to a customs duty, and charges falling within the scope of internal taxation.


2020 ◽  
pp. 294-322
Author(s):  
Sylvia de Mars

This chapter explores the free movement of goods, which lies at the very heart of the internal market. The idea of the free movement of goods was the starting point that the EEC Treaty aimed for, and remains one of the greatest achievements of the EU to date. However, as with everything in EU law, there are a lot of legal rules underpinning a fairly straightforward concept. The Treaty contains two separate sets of provisions that address matters of taxation when it comes to trade in products. The first relates to border taxation, while the second relates to internal taxation. With regard to non-taxation issues, the primary issue is quantitative restrictions: situations where a Member State either blocks a specific volume of products from entering its market, or outlaws/bans a product altogether. The chapter then considers the exceptions to free movement of goods, and assesses how Brexit may impact on the free movement of goods between the UK and the EU.


2021 ◽  
pp. 322-362
Author(s):  
Margot Horspool ◽  
Matthew Humphreys ◽  
Michael Wells-Greco

This chapter discusses the non-pecuniary obstacles to the law on the free movement of goods in the EU. It discusses the following: prohibition of quantitative restrictions and measures having equivalent effect; grounds of derogation under Article 36 TFEU; indistinctly applicable measures and mandatory requirements, Cassis de Dijon and developing the list of mandatory requirements; principles of mutual recognition and equivalence; Case C-267 and 268/91 Keck and Mithouard (1993) and certain selling arrangements; presentation requirements; the conditions in Keck and the difficulties in finding a consistent rule; the blurred distinction between Article 36 TFEU and ‘mandatory requirements’; Article 35 TFEU; and Directive 98/34 on the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations.


Author(s):  
Sacha Garben

The effectiveness of the many rights and obligations under EU law rests on a legal framework consisting of direct application of Treaty rules, harmonized European rules, national rules, and mutual recognition, and the task of implementing and ensuring compliance with these rules lies, in practice, with a large number of public authorities in the twenty-eight MS. In order to carry out this task, MS’ authorities need to cooperate closely, meaning that administrative cooperation is not only desirable but is required by the very nature of the EU. In the context of the free movement of goods, many circulation regimes are accompanied by their own specific mechanism of administrative cooperation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 7-35
Author(s):  
Luca De Lucia

This article deals with mutual recognition in relation to the free movement of goods and aims to demonstrate that, as a result of harmonisation policies, this principle is not unitary in its design. Focusing in particular on the role of national authorities (or that of other bodies that carry out this same function), it examines three models through which mutual recognition operates. These models are: a) mutual recognition under the Treaty (the European legislator has laid down three different regulations over the years to facilitate the functioning of this mechanism); b) transnational administrative authorisations; c) conformity assessments and certifications of conformity issued by notified bodies. This article first highlights how these models protect the free circulation of goods to varying extents and how they are aimed at coordinating different forms of pluralism: regulatory, administrative and that of the market. Two legislative developments regarding this subject are then briefly discussed. Finally, after having mentioned some consequences of the harmonisation legislation on the principle of mutual recognition, some observations are made about possible research developments in this matter.


Author(s):  
Paul Torremans

This chapter discusses the international and European aspects of trade marks. Trade mark law is based on the Paris Convention and the TRIPS Agreement, with the Madrid system offering an international registration system. Inside the EU, one can also register a single trade mark for the whole of the Community by means of the Community Trade Mark Regulation. Trade mark law also has a substantial interaction with the Treaty provisions on the free movement of goods, but minimal conflict with competition law.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document