scholarly journals Predictors of surgical outcomes after in situ ulnar nerve decompression for cubital tunnel syndrome

2018 ◽  
Vol Volume 14 ◽  
pp. 69-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lingde Kong ◽  
Jiangbo Bai ◽  
Kunlun Yu ◽  
Bing Zhang ◽  
Jichun Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulnar Nerve ◽  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Nerve Decompression ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome

scholarly journals Predicting Revision Following In Situ Ulnar Nerve Decompression for Patients With Idiopathic Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 427-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael P. Gaspar ◽  
Patrick M. Kane ◽  
Dechporn Putthiwara ◽  
Sidney M. Jacoby ◽  
A. Lee Osterman
Keyword(s):  
Ulnar Nerve ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Nerve Decompression ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome

scholarly journals Anconeus Epitrochlearis Muscle Associated With Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: A Case Series

Hand ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 477-482
Author(s):  
Nicholas Kim ◽  
Ryan Stehr ◽  
Hani S. Matloub ◽  
James R. Sanger
Keyword(s):  
Ulnar Nerve ◽  
Nerve Conduction ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Nerve Conduction Studies ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Persistent Symptoms ◽  
Compressive Neuropathy ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome

Background: Cubital tunnel syndrome is a common compressive neuropathy of the upper extremity. The anconeus epitrochlearis muscle is an unusual but occasional contributor. We review our experience with this anomalous muscle in elbows with cubital tunnel syndrome. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed charts of 13 patients noted to have an anconeus epitrochlearis muscle associated with cubital tunnel syndrome. Results: Ten patients had unilateral ulnar neuropathy supported by nerve conduction studies. Three had bilateral cubital tunnel syndrome symptoms with 1 of those having normal nerve conduction studies for both elbows. Eight elbows were treated with myotomy of the anconeus epitrochlearis muscle and submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve. The other 8 elbows were treated with myotomy of the anconeus epitrochlearis muscle and in situ decompression of the ulnar nerve only. All but 1 patient had either clinical resolution or improvement of symptoms at follow-up ranging from 2 weeks to 1 year after surgery. The 1 patient who had persistent symptoms had received myotomy and in situ decompression of the ulnar nerve only. Conclusions: An anomalous anconeus epitrochlearis occasionally results in compression of the ulnar nerve but is usually an incidental finding. Its contribution to compression neuropathy can be tested intraoperatively by passively ranging the elbow while observing the change in vector and tension of its muscle fibers over the ulnar nerve. Regardless of findings, we recommend myotomy of the muscle and in situ decompression of the ulnar nerve. Submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve may be necessary if there is subluxation.

Minimally Invasive Ulnar Nerve Decompression for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong-Jun Cho ◽  
Sung-Min Cho ◽  
Seung-Hoon Sheen ◽  
Dong-Hwa Heo ◽  
Jun-Hyung Cho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Ulnar Nerve ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Nerve Decompression ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome

The Use of Preoperative Dynamic Ultrasound to Predict Ulnar Nerve Stability Following In Situ Decompression for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Rutter ◽  
Louis C. Grandizio ◽  
W. James Malone ◽  
Joel C. Klena
Keyword(s):  
Ulnar Nerve ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Dynamic Ultrasound ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome

scholarly journals P.086 Endoscopic assisted ulnar nerve decompression: a technical note

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (S2) ◽  
pp. S35-S35
Author(s):  
MB Alotaibi ◽  
B Yarascavitch ◽  
K Reddy
Keyword(s):  
Ulnar Nerve ◽  
Early Identification ◽  
Skin Incision ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Technical Note ◽  
Surgical Approaches ◽  
Nerve Decompression ◽  
Endoscopic View ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome

Background: Cubital tunnel syndrome is the second most frequent upper extremity entrapment neuropathy. Various surgical approaches have been described in the literature for Ulnar nerve decompression, ranging from open In-situ decompression to endoscopic Ulnar nerve release. In this technical note we describe a new endoscopic approach for Ulnar nerve decompression. Methods: Four cadavers, a total of eight fresh arms were dissected using our new endoscopic technique. The technique involves a 2.5cm skin incision placed 2.5cm distal to the medial epicondyle, and perpendicular to the long nerve axis. Early identification of motor branches was achieved using this skin incision. Under endoscopic view using 30 degree rigid scope Ulnar nerves were decompressed Results: Early identification of motor branches was achieved using distally placed skin incision in all eight arms. Conclusions: The safety of identifying Ulnar nerve motor branches in the early steps of the procedure, and the avoidance of scar formation over the elbow joint are the proposed advantages of this approach. More clinical studies needed to validate this outcome.

Open vs Retractor-Endoscopic In Situ Decompression of the Ulnar Nerve in Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

Neurosurgery ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 605-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephan Dützmann ◽  
K. Daniel Martin ◽  
Stephan Sobottka ◽  
Gerhard Marquardt ◽  
Gabriele Schackert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Ulnar Nerve ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Matched Pairs ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Endoscopic In Situ Decompression

Abstract BACKGROUND: Both open ulnar nerve decompression and retractor-endoscopic ulnar nerve decompression have been shown to yield good results. However, a comparative evaluation of the techniques is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To compare the results of open and endoscopic surgery in cubital tunnel syndrome. METHODS: One hundred fourteen patients undergoing open (n = 59) or endoscopic (n = 55) decompression of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome were retrospectively compared. The long- and short-term outcomes were compared with respect to the time until return to full activity and the duration of postoperative pain. Additionally, matched pairs between the 2 groups were chosen for analysis (n = 34). RESULTS: Long-term results in the open vs endoscopic groups were as follows: excellent results, 54.2% vs 56.4%; good results, 23.8% vs 32.7%; fair results, 20.3% vs 9.1%; and poor results, 1.7% vs 1.8%, respectively. For the matched pairs, the results had similar significance levels (P = .84). The times until return to full activity in the open vs the endoscopic groups were as follows: 2 to 7 days, 18.6% vs 76.4%; 7 to 14 days, 55.9% vs 10.9%; and > 14 days, 25.4% vs 12.7% (P < .001 between nonmatched and matched pairs). The durations of postoperative pain in the open vs the endoscopic groups were as follows: 1 to 3 days, 45.8% vs 67.3%; 3 to 10 days, 42.5% vs 25.4%; and > 10 days, 11.7% vs 7.3% (P =.04 for nonmatched and P = .05 for matched pairs). CONCLUSION: There are no significant differences in long-term outcomes after open and retractor-endoscopic in situ decompression of the ulnar nerve in cubital tunnel syndrome. The short-term results are significantly better in endoscopic surgery.

scholarly journals Relationship between Smoking and Outcomes after Cubital Tunnel Release

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (01) ◽  
pp. 012-015
Author(s):  
Nicholas Crosby ◽  
Naveed Nosrati ◽  
Greg Merrell ◽  
Hill Hasting
Keyword(s):  
Ulnar Nerve ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Nerve Decompression ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Simple Decompression ◽  
Postoperative Improvement

Abstract Purpose Several studies have drawn a connection between cigarette smoking and cubital tunnel syndrome. One comparison article demonstrated worse outcomes in smokers treated with transmuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve. However, very little is known about the effect that smoking might have on patients who undergo ulnar nerve decompression at the elbow. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of smoking preoperatively on outcomes in patients treated with ulnar nerve decompression. Materials and Methods This study used a survey developed from the comparison article with additional questions based on outcome measures from supportive literature. Postoperative improvement was probed, including sensation, strength, and pain scores. A thorough smoking history was obtained. The study spanned a 10-year period. Results A total of 1,366 surveys were mailed to former patients, and 247 surveys with adequate information were returned. No significant difference was seen in demographics or comorbidities. Patients who smoked preoperatively were found to more likely relate symptoms of pain. Postoperatively, nonsmoking patients generally reported more favorable improvement, though these findings were not statistically significant. Conclusion This study finds no statistically significant effect of smoking on outcomes after ulnar nerve decompression. Finally, among smokers, there were no differences in outcomes between simple decompression and transposition.

Long-term Reoperation Rate for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Subcutaneous Transposition Versus In Situ Decompression

Hand ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 155894471987315
Author(s):  
Douglas T. Hutchinson ◽  
Ryan Sullivan ◽  
Micah K. Sinclair
Keyword(s):  
Ulnar Nerve ◽  
Reoperation Rate ◽  
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Cubital Tunnel ◽  
Multicenter Cohort Study ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Subcutaneous Transposition

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term revision rate of in situ ulnar nerve decompression with anterior subcutaneous transposition surgery for idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter, cohort study compared patients who underwent ulnar nerve surgery with a minimum 5 years of follow-up. The primary outcome studied was the need for revision cubital tunnel surgery. In total, there were 132 cases corresponding to 119 patients. The cohorts were matched for age and comorbidity. Results: The long-term reoperation rate for in situ decompression was 25% compared with 12% for anterior subcutaneous transposition. Seventy-eight percent of revisions of in situ decompression were performed within the first 3 years. Younger age and female sex were identified as independent predictors of need for revision. Conclusions: In the long-term follow-up, in situ decompression is seen to have a statistically significant higher reoperation rate compared with subcutaneous transposition.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document