Patent Foramen Ovale, the Role of Antiplatelet Therapy Alone or Anticoagulant Therapy Alone Versus Device Closure for Cryptogenic Stroke: A Review of the Literature and Current Recommendations

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-150
Author(s):  
Harsha S. Nagarajarao ◽  
Chandra P. Ojha ◽  
Archana Kedar ◽  
Debabrata Mukherjee
Keyword(s):  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Narrow Channel ◽  
Paradoxical Embolism ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Current Guidelines

: Cryptogenic stroke and its relation to the Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO) is a long-debated topic. Recent clinical trials have unequivocally established the relationship between cryptogenic strokes and paradoxical embolism across the PFO. This slit-like communication exists in everyone before birth, but most often closes shortly after birth. PFO may persist as a narrow channel of communication between the right and left atria in approximately 25-27% of adults. : In this review, we examine the clinical relevance of the PFO with analysis of the latest trials evaluating catheter-based closure of PFO’s for cryptogenic stroke. We also review the current evidence examining the use of antiplatelet medications versus anticoagulants for stroke prevention in those patients with PFO who do not qualify for closure per current guidelines.

scholarly journals Patent Foramen Ovale and Cryptogenic Stroke: Challenges in Diagnosis and Management

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dhanang Ali Yafi ◽  
Azmi Azmi
Keyword(s):  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Adult Population ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Paradoxical Embolism ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Arterial Circulation ◽  
Systemic Embolization ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Pfo Closure

A patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a common disorder that affects between 20-34% of the adult population. This condition is a benign finding for most people. However, In some the PFO can open widely and enabling paradoxical embolism to transit from venous to arterial circulation, which is associated with stroke and systemic embolization. There are still unclear to date regarding the effectiveness of pharmacological anticoagulant therapy, defined as antithrombin or antiplatelet therapy, which has proven to be more beneficial for patients with PFO and cryptogenic stroke. In addition, surgical and transcutaneous PFO closure has been proposed for secondary prevention of stroke in patients with cryptogenic stroke with PFO. Both catheter-based and surgical modes of closure have been shown to reduce the incidence of subsequent embolism substantially. This review will discuss the evidence regarding the relationship between PFO and cryptogenic stroke and decision making for management strategies.

Patent foramen ovale

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 225-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vafa Alakbarzade ◽  
Tracey Keteepe-Arachi ◽  
Nazia Karsan ◽  
Robin Ray ◽  
Anthony C Pereira
Keyword(s):  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Paradoxical Embolism ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Atrial Septal Aneurysm ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Peripheral Ischaemia ◽  
New Evidence ◽  
Pfo Closure

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is the most common anatomical cause of an interatrial shunt. It is usually asymptomatic but may cause paradoxical embolism, manifesting as stroke, myocardial infarction or visceral/peripheral ischaemia. PFO is a risk factor for stroke and may be associated with migraine with aura. New evidence suggests PFO closure reduces the risk of recurrent ischaemic stroke in a highly selected population of stroke survivors: those aged 60 years or younger with a cryptogenic stroke syndrome, a large right-to-left shunt, an atrial septal aneurysm and no evidence of atrial fibrillation. They benefit from percutaneous PFO closure in addition to antiplatelet therapy, rather than antiplatelet therapy alone. Current evidence does not support PFO closure in the treatment of migraine.

scholarly journals Patent foramen ovale and embolic cryptogenic stroke

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 4-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. A. Kulesh ◽  
V. V. Shestakov
Keyword(s):  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Diagnostic Techniques ◽  
Paradoxical Embolism ◽  
Cardiac Anomaly ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Actual Problem ◽  
Cerebral Circulation Disorders

The paper considers the actual problem of cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale (PFO). It highlights the issues of pathogenesis and role of paradoxical embolism in the development of cerebral circulation disorders. The features of clinical manifestations and neuroimaging pattern of stroke in the presence of PFO are described. Ultrasound diagnostic techniques used to verify a cardiac anomaly are characterized. Approaches to establishing a cause-and-effect relationship between the presence of PFO and the development of stroke are presented. The current possibilities of secondary prevention in this category of patients, in particular the results of studies of percutaneous PFO occlusion, are discussed.

Stroke Prophylaxis by Percutaneous Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale and Left Atrial Appendage

2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 67
Author(s):  
Antonio L Bartorelli ◽  
Claudio Tondo ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Left Atrial ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Stroke Risk ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Atrial Appendage ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Percutaneous Procedures ◽  
Cerebrovascular Events

Innovative percutaneous procedures for stroke prevention have emerged in the last two decades. Transcatheter closure of the patent foramen ovale (PFO) is performed in patients who suffered a cryptogenic stroke or a transient ischaemic attach (TIA) in order to prevent recurrence of thromboembolic events. Percutaneous occlusion of the left atrial appendage (LAA) has been introduced to reduce stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The role of PFO and LAA in the occurrence of cerebrovascular events and the interventional device-based therapies to occlude the PFO and LAA are discussed.

scholarly journals The Role of Patent Foramen Ovale Closure in the Secondary Prevention of Cryptogenic Stroke: a Meta-Analysis Report

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sónia P. Pinto Pereira ◽  
Alzira Nunes ◽  
Cristina Santos ◽  
Scott E. Kasner ◽  
José P. L. Nunes
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Prevention ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Foramen Ovale

Patent Foramen Ovale Device Closure in a 27 Years Old Young Lady with Cryptogenic Ischaemic Stroke - First Case Report from Bangladesh

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 227-234
Author(s):  
AQM Reza ◽  
Aparajita Karim ◽  
Mahmood Hasan Khan ◽  
Kazi Atiqur Rahman ◽  
Md Aliuzzaman Joarder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischaemic Stroke ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Incidental Finding ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Paradoxical Embolism ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Coagulation Therapy ◽  
First Case ◽  
Treatment Paradigm ◽  
Meta Analyses

A patent foramen ovale (PFO) is highly prevalent in patients with strokes of unknown cause or cryptogenic strokes (CSs). It has been remained an unsolved question as to whether a PFO should be closed or not to prevent recurrent strokes in patients diagnosed with cryptogenic stroke (CS). A paradoxical embolism through a PFO is pointed as a leading cause of CS, especially in younger patients with low risk factors for stroke. It also remains an unsolved matter on type of anti-coagulation therapy, which would be better for patients with CS and a PFO. In addition, surgical and transcutaneous closure of a PFO has been proposed for the secondary prevention of stroke in patients with CS with PFO. Several randomized controlled trials have been conducted in recent years to test whether a PFO closure gives a significant benefit in the management of CS. Many investigators believed that a PFO was an incidental finding in patients with CS. However, meta-analyses and more recent specific trials have eliminated several confounding factors and possible biases and have also emphasized the use of a shunt closure over medical therapy in patients with CS. Therefore, these latest studies can possibly change the treatment paradigm in the near future. We are reporting a case of cryptogenic ischaemic stroke in middle cerebral artery territory due to paradoxical embolism through a PFO which was successfully closed with a device solely by a Bangladeshi Consultant & his team first time in Bangladesh. Cardiovasc. j. 2021; 13(2): 227-234

Abstract WP264: Frequency of Hypercoagulability in Patients With Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source and Patent Foramen Ovale

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Liu ◽  
Srikant Rangaraju ◽  
Alexander Duncan ◽  
Samir Belagaje ◽  
Trina Belair ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Paradoxical Embolism ◽  
Embolic Stroke ◽  
Composite Outcome ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Primary Mechanism ◽  
Detailed Evaluation ◽  
D Dimer

Introduction: Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is more commonly found in patients with cryptogenic stroke and paradoxical embolism is commonly assumed to be the primary mechanism. Our objective was to determine the frequency of hypercoagulability in cryptogenic stroke patients and PFO. Methods: Consecutive patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) seen at the Emory Clinic from January 1, 2017 to June 30, 2019 who underwent echocardiogram with bubble study and markers of coagulation and hemostatic activation (MOCHA) testing (serum d-dimer, prothrombin fragment 1.2, thrombin-antithrombin complex, fibrin monomer) were included; abnormal MOCHA was defined as ≥ 2 elevated markers. Venous thromboembolism, malignancy, other defined hypercoagulable state, and the composite outcome were assessed at routine follow-up and compared across groups based on PFO status. Results: Of 172 patients (mean age 63 ± 16 years, 60% female), 40 (23%) had a PFO. Compared to the PFO- group, the PFO+ group was younger (p=<0.001), less likely to have hypertension (p<0.001) and diabetes (p=0.011), and had a higher ROPE score (p=0.007) (Table 1). There was no difference in the frequency of abnormal MOCHA between groups and the composite outcome was less frequent in PFO+ versus PFO- patients (p=0.017). In the subgroup of patients <60 years old, there was no difference in the frequency of abnormal MOCHA and the composite outcome. Conclusion: Hypercoagulability as measured by MOCHA was not associated with the presence of PFO in ESUS patients. Based on our results, ESUS patients should undergo a detailed evaluation for alternative causes of stroke other than paradoxical embolism.

Abstract TMP13: Baseline DWMRI Characteristics In Patients With Cryptogenic Stroke And Patent Foramen Ovale: Results From The Closure I Trial

Stroke ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Jung ◽  
Benny Kim ◽  
Joseph Massaro ◽  
Anthony J Furlan
Keyword(s):  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Recurrent Stroke ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Paradoxical Embolism ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Multivariate Proportional Hazard

Background: Cryptogenic stroke may have several etiologies including paradoxical embolism through a patent foramen ovale (PFO). A cardiac source of embolism may be suggested by multiple infarcts, sometimes hemorrhagic, in different vascular distributions or a cortical wedge shaped infarct. We report the baseline diffusion weighted MRI (DWMRI) characteristics in patients with cryptogenic stroke and a patent foramen ovale (PFO) from the CLOSURE I trial. Methods: CLOSURE I compared device closure versus medical therapy for secondary prevention in patients with cryptogenic TIA or stroke and a PFO. Of 909 patients randomized, 562 patients demonstrated acute infarcts on baseline DWMRI and are included in this analysis. Multivariate proportional hazard Cox regression compared imaging subgroups with remaining randomized patients Results: Single infarcts were found in 62% of patients. Of these, 61% were anterior circulation, 30% posterior, and 8.5% were of uncertain territory. Of the anterior circulation infarcts, 40% were cortical, 36% subcortical, and 24% affected both the cortical and subcortical regions. Of the posterior circulation infarcts, 45% were thalamic or cerebellar. Of 562 patients, 18.5% had a single subcortical lesion <1.5cm in diameter and met the radiological definition of an acute lacunar infarct. Multiple infarcts were found in 38%. Infarcts in a single vascular territory were found in 23%, often in the anterior circulation (66%). Infarcts in multiple vascular territories were found in 15%. Hemorrhagic infarction was present in 9%. Adjusting for patient characteristics, no significant difference in 2 year rate of TIA, stroke or death was found compared to remaining randomized patients. Discussion: The specificity of infarct patterns for embolism in patients with cryptogenic stroke and a PFO is uncertain. We found no significant relationship between lacunar or subcortical infarction and the risk of recurrent TIA or stroke. Baseline infarct patterns on DWMRI in patients with cryptogenic stroke and PFO may not be useful in predicting recurrent stroke risk or determining best prevention therapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document