Concordance Study Between IBM Watson for Oncology and real clinical practice for Cervical cancer patients in China：a Retrospective analysis. (Preprint)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fangwen Zou ◽  
Chao-Yuan Liu ◽  
Xu-Hong Liu ◽  
Yi-Fang Tang ◽  
Jin-An Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Clinical Decision Support Systems ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Real Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND Watson for Oncology (WFO) is a artificial intelligence clinical decision-support systems with evidence-based treatment options for oncologists. WFO has been gradually used in China, but limited reports on whether WFO is suitable for Chinese patients. OBJECTIVE This study aims to investigate the concordance of treatment options between WFO and real clinical practice at the Second Xiangya Hospital Cancer Center for Cervical cancer patients retrospectively. METHODS We retrospectively enrolled 300 cases of cervical cancer patients who were hospitalized at the Second Xiangya Hospital Cancer Center from May 2017 to August 2018. WFO provide treatment options for 246 supported cases. Real clinical practice were defined as concordant if treatment options were designated “recommended” or “for consideration” by WFO. Concordance of treatment option between WFO and real clinical practice was analysed statistically. RESULTS Treatment concordance between WFO and real clinical practice occurred in 72.8% (179/246) of cervical cancer cases.Logistic regression analysis showed that rural registration residence [0.64(0.427-0.946), P=0.025], advanced age [0.08(0.03-0.28), P=0.032], poor ECOG performance status [0.29(0.083-1.058), P=0.048], stages II-IV disease ([2.08 (1.002-4.325), P=0.046], [2.09(1.001-4.381), P=0.047], [0.19(0.038-0.91), P=0.025], respectively) have remarkable impact on consistency.Pathological type, differentiation degree, lymphatic and distant metastasis were not found to affect concordance.The main reasons attributed to the 27.2% (67/246) of the discordant cases were the substitution of nedaplatin for cisplatin,reimbursement plan of bevacizumab, surgical preference,and absence of neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy and PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies recommendations. CONCLUSIONS WFO recommendations were in 72.8% of concordant with real clinical practice for cervical cancer patients in China. However, several localization and individual factors limit its wider application. So,WFO could be an essential tool but it cannot currently replace oncologists.To be rapidly and fully apply to cervical cancer patients in China, accelerate localization and improvement were needed for WFO.

Patterns of referral to palliative care in clinical practice in patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 39-39
Author(s):  
Safiya Karim ◽  
Shahid Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Logistic Regression Models ◽  
Symptomatic Disease

39 Background: Recent evidence has shown that patients with stage IV NSCLC benefit from early referral to palliative care (PC). In August 2010, a landmark randomized control trial revealed that patients with advanced NSCLC, who received early PC, had better quality of life, mood and survival (NEJM 2010; 363:733-42). Our study aimed to determine pattern of PC referral in clinical practice, in patients with stage IV NSCLC before and after the publication of the trial, and to assess factors correlated with PC referral. Methods: The study population was comprised of a cohort of patients with stage IV NSCLC, diagnosed between 2009 and 2011, and referred to the Saskatoon Cancer Center. Logistic regression models were used to assess factors correlated with PC referral. Kaplan Meier method was used to estimate survival. Cox regression analyses were used to determine factors correlated with survival. Results: 215 patients with median age of 68 yrs (range: 40-92) and M:F of 108:107 were identified. 101 (47%) patients had comorbid illness, 100 (47%) had ECOG performance status <2, 136 (63%) were married/common law and 161 (75%) had symptomatic disease. 126/251 (58%) were referred to PC. 70/118 (59%) diagnosed before Sep 2010 were referred to PC compared with 56/97 (58%) diagnosed after Sep 2010 (p=NS). The median time to PC referral from date of diagnosis was 51 days (inter-quartile range: 19-155). 33% patients were referred within 4 wks of diagnosis. Symptomatic disease (odd ratio [OR]=3.7, 95% CI =1.8-7.5), bone metastasis (OR = 3.0, 95% CI = 1.6-5.6), and brain metastasis (OR=2.2, 95% CI =1.1-4.5) were correlated with referral to PC. Median survival of whole cohort was 4 months (95% CI: 3.1-4.8). 2nd or 3rd line therapy (Hazard ratio [HR]= 0.54, 95% CI:0.34-0.87), non-smoking status (HR= 0.58, 95% CI:0.38-0.87), chemotherapy (HR 0.64, 95% CI:0.46-0.89), and lack of symptoms (HR=0.68, 95%CI:0.48-0.96) were correlated with better survival. Conclusions: Our study shows that publication of the landmark trial did not influence the pattern of referral to PC at our center. Symptomatic patients and those with metastasis to brain or bone were more often referred to PC. No survival benefit was seen in patients who were referred to PC.

Treating nonagenarians with cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8542-8542
Author(s):  
E. J. Crane ◽  
M. Extermann
Keyword(s):  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Patient Population ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Preliminary Evaluation ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Patients Âgés ◽  
One Year

8542 Background: In the U.S., the number of cancer patients who are greater than age 85 is expected to quadruple in the next 50 years. Barriers exist to treating this patient population because of concerns of frailty, lack of inclusion in clinical trials, and unknown outcomes when treating this patient population. This single institution retrospective evaluation provides data regarding treatment outcomes for cancer patients ages 90 or older at the time of their treatment at this cancer center. Methods: The charts of all patients registered at the Moffitt Cancer Center who were age 90 or older at during their treatment/evaluation were eligible to be reviewed. The total number of charts eligible was 643. Included patients: 1) had a diagnosis of cancer, 2) had a clear treatment plan with at least two follow-up visits over a one month time period, 3) patients with only one evaluation would be eligible if a clear treatment plan was outlined and their death occurred within 6 months of their evaluation at this cancer center. To date, 329 charts have been reviewed which has yielded 121 patients who meet the inclusion criteria. Results: Preliminary evaluation of reveals that the most common diagnoses are breast cancer (14%), malignant melanoma (11%), head and neck cancer (9%), SCC of the skin (9%), and prostate cancer (8%). Treatment plans included surgery for 45% of the patients with 36% of the patients undergoing general anesthesia. Chemotherapy was administered to 6.8% of the patients, and hospice was recommended to 7.8%. One year after evaluation at this cancer center 54% of the patients were alive, and 42% were alive at 2 years. The average number of medications that these patients used was 5.5 and greater than 95% of the patients had an ECOG performance status of 1. Conclusions: These preliminary results indicate that the nonagenarian cancer patients are probably healthy given the low number of medications taken, indicating fewer comorbid conditions. These patients do have months to years of survival after their therapies which included surgery under general anesthesia and chemotherapy. Although the nonagenarian cancer patient population found at a referral center is likely to be healthier than that found in the community, these findings indicate that nonagenarians with few comorbidities and a good performance status can be successfully treated for their cancer. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Cancer related fatigue: A ubiquitous problem yet so under reported, under recognized and under treated

2015 ◽  
Vol 04 (01) ◽  
pp. 021-023 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akhil Kapoor ◽  
Mukesh Kumar Singhal ◽  
Puneet Kumar Bagri ◽  
Satya Naraya ◽  
Surender Beniwal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Common Side Effect ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Cancer Related Fatigue ◽  
Chronic Illness Therapy ◽  
Coefficient Of Concordance

Abstract Background: Cancer related fatigue (CRF) is a problem that is highly under reported, under recognized and thus, under treated. About 80% of patients receiving chemotherapy/radiotherapy experience CRF, making it the most common side effect of cancer treatment. Functional assessment of chronic illness therapy fatigue (FACIT-F) version-4 is a 13 item questionnaire that has been used to measure the level of fatigue of cancer patients during their daily activities over the past 7 days. Materials and Methods: 92 patients of age 18 years and above attending the oncology Out Patient Department (OPD) of a regional cancer center were recruited in this study and were given FACIT-F questionnaire. The relevant sociodemographic parameters were obtained from the medical records of the patients. The internal consistency of the 13 items was measured using the Cronbach′s alpha. Results: The Cronbach alpha coefficient for FACIT-F scale in our study was found to be 0.74. Kendall′s coefficient of concordance was estimated to be 0.080. The correlation between Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status and mean score of FACIT-F was studied, Pearson correlation coefficient was estimated to be 0.271 (P = 0.009). Conclusions: FACIT-F is a brief, simple, easy to administer and patient friendly tool to measure the fatigue in last 7 days. CRF should be given adequate attention from the beginning of the treatment to improve the quality of life of cancer patients.

scholarly journals Clinical factors and outcomes of subsegmental pulmonary embolism in cancer patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 1050-1058
Author(s):  
Melissa Yan ◽  
Ryan Kieser ◽  
Carol C. Wu ◽  
Wei Qiao ◽  
Cristhiam M. Rojas-Hernandez
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Pulmonary Arteries ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract In the cancer population, patients diagnosed with venous thromboembolism (VTE) are considered to have a threefold increased risk of mortality compared with those without VTE. With the advent of modern computed tomography (CT), the rate of diagnosis of subsegmental pulmonary embolism (SSPE) has increased, likely as a result of improved visualization of the peripheral pulmonary arteries. The clinical significance of SSPE remains unclear because of the lack of randomized controlled clinical trials. The aim of this study was to identify the incidence and risk factors of recurrent proximal PE within 12 months of diagnosis of SSPE in cancer. We performed a retrospective analysis of 206 adult cancer patients who were diagnosed with SSPE from 2014 to 2016 at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. At the time of SSPE diagnosis, the majority had metastatic cancer, 108 patients (53.2%) were undergoing chemotherapy, and 23 patients (11.2%) had a history of VTE. Most patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2. Sixty-seven percent of SSPE was discovered incidentally on restaging CT scans, with the majority being a single and isolated event (70.9%). Within 12 months of SSPE diagnosis, 18 patients (8.7%) were found to have a recurrent PE. The patients treated with anticoagulation had a lower rate of PE recurrence (8% vs 13% in those not treated with anticoagulation). Treatment with anticoagulation did not appear to have a significant impact on overall survival (P = .48) when adjusted for ECOG performance status and cancer stage.

Comprehensive assessment of drug consumption as a basis for pharmacotherapy optimization

2019 ◽  
pp. 22-31
Author(s):  
Olga Vyacheslavovna Zhukova
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Comprehensive Assessment ◽  
Drug Consumption ◽  
Treatment Standards ◽  
Disease Epidemiology ◽  
Efficacy Analysis ◽  
Epidemiological Monitoring ◽  
Guidelines Development ◽  
Real Clinical Practice

This article describes the rationale for methodology of comprehensive assessment of drug consumption in real clinical practice. The proposed methodology includes three stages: 1) epidemiological monitoring – disease epidemiology assessment; assessment of the role of factors leading to the disease; 2) pharmacoepidemiological monitoring – assessment of pharmacotherapy in real clinical practice; clinical efficacy analysis of drugs; cost-effectiveness analysis; 3) long-term clinical and economical evaluation of various treatment options. Comprehensive assessment of drug consumption should result in optimal pharmacotherapy regimens, decrease of the drug load, increasing of the therapy effectiveness and cost reduction. The scheme of comprehensive assessment of drug consumption is universal and can be used for clinical guidelines development, treatment standards, for the optimal formation of drugs lists at the federal level. Separate stages and sub-steps of an integrated assessment also can be used at the territorial and local levels, medical institution, to optimize pharmacotherapy.

Elderly breast cancer patients treated with Nab-paclitaxel: Results in real clinical practice

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Gascón Ruiz ◽  
Diego Casas Deza ◽  
Miguel Lafuente Blasco ◽  
Andrea Sesma Goñi ◽  
Mara Cruellas Lapeña ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Real Clinical Practice

scholarly journals Hyaluronic acid preparations in the treatment of osteoarthritis: is it clear to us?

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 40-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. E. Karateev ◽  
Е. Yu. Pogozheva ◽  
V. N. Amirdzhanova ◽  
Е. S. Filatova
Keyword(s):  
Hyaluronic Acid ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Social Activity ◽  
Joint Disease ◽  
Saline Injection ◽  
Comparative Efficacy ◽  
Joint Function ◽  
Therapeutic Value ◽  
Real Clinical Practice

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a progressive joint disease that causes persistent pain, limited joint function, disability, and loss of social activity. One of the most popular OA treatment options is intra-articular (I/A) hyaluronic acid (HA) injections. This procedure was introduced into clinical practice in the early 1980s and is used universally. To date, there is no consensus on the therapeutic value of HA. Many investigations confirm that HA is effective as not only a symptomatic agent, but also a structure-modifying one. Some works also show that the effect of HA is equal or only slightly superior to that of placebo (I/A saline injection). The review describes the mechanism of action and comparative efficacy of various (lowand high-molecular weight) HA preparations, as well as the safety of their use in real clinical practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document