Perjanjian Kerjasama (Joint Venture) Penanaman Modal Asing dalam Usaha Perhotelan

The formation of investment activities in a country varies greatly according to the open nature of the country and its people. Therefore, cooperation is created and established between the two parties is because of the desire to seek profit so that a group of people together create a company, either with parties from one country or across countries. This is what forms a joint venture agreement. Based on this background, this research was conducted with the aim of describing how the procedure for making a joint venture agreement in the hotel business and what the legal consequences are for the default of the joint venture agreement in the hotel business. This research was conducted using a normative legal research method. The results of this study indicated that the procedure for making a joint venture agreement in a hotel business must be in the form of a limited liability company and must have conditions in providing a hotel company and are required to apply for a principle license and a permanent business license subject to the investor coordinating body to submit reports on the investor's activities. In addition, the legal consequence of the joint venture agreement default in the hospitality business is that those who violate the agreement, the parties related to the agreement, will be subject to statutory sanctions related to the rules of the joint venture agreement as well as the regulations that they have agreed upon together.

Download Full-text

Akibat Hukum Surat Pertanggungjawaban Laporan Tahunan Yang Tidak Ditandatangani Oleh Seluruh Dewan Komisaris

Volksgeist Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi ◽

10.24090/volksgeist.v3i2.4062 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 3 (2) ◽

pp. 133-143

Author(s):

Atika Wulan Dari ◽

Busyra Azheri ◽

Yussy Adelina Mannas

Keyword(s):

Annual Report ◽

Case Reports ◽

Limited Liability ◽

General Meeting ◽

Company Law ◽

Limited Liability Company ◽

Legal Consequence ◽

A Company ◽

Legal Consequences ◽

Laws And Regulations

The purpose of this study is to analyze how the legal consequences of the annual report accountability letter were not signed by the entire Board of Commissioners of a limited liability company by looking at the case of PT. Garuda Indonesia Tbk which occurred in 2019. Where in that case there was a rejection by 2 (two) Commissioners from PT. Garuda Indonesia Tbk to sign the annual report at the General Meeting of Shareholders. The nature of this research uses normative research, namely by reviewing laws and regulations, as well as company case reports. Based on this case, the function of company organs in charge of supervising a company is not going well. The case shows that this organ does not carry out its supervisory function in accordance with Article 108 of the Limited Liability Company Law. The legal consequence in this case is the imposition of fines on the organ of the company that signs the annual report. This is a consequence of the collegiality of the responsibility of the Board of Commissioners in a limited liability company.

Download Full-text

Politics of Legal in Nominee Agreement And Its Practice In Indonesia

Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics ◽

10.14505//jarle.v11.1(47).23 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

pp. 196

Author(s):

SUPARJI SUPARJI

Keyword(s):

Human Behavior ◽

Research Method ◽

Code Of Ethics ◽

Limited Liability ◽

Secondary Data ◽

Limited Liability Company ◽

Legal Research ◽

Community Needs ◽

The Law ◽

A Company

This study aims to examine the legal politics of nominee agreement in Indonesia. The research method used is normative juridical, which conceptualizes the law as what is written in the legislation or the law as a rule or norm that is a benchmark of human behavior that is considered appropriate. This type of legal research is carried out by examining secondary data in the field of law as library data using deductive thinking methods. The results stated that there are no specific rules that override or provide other possibilities related to the issue of absolute ownership of shares by shareholders registered in the register of shareholders of a limited liability company. The unauthorized nominee of agreement in Indonesia is prohibited. The prohibition on nominee agreement is clearly stated in Law No. 25 of 2007 concerning investment. In fact, nominee agreement has grown and developed in the community, due to community needs. Establishment of nominee agreements in practice can be categorized into the formation of direct nominee agreements, namely by directly making agreements between those who affirm that ownership of shares in a company is limited to and on behalf of others. Thus, the legal profession such as notary, legal consultant and lawyer in this case must provide legal counseling, and participate in supervisory duties. As a profession, it should keep the professional code of ethics instead of making unauthorized nominee by making a nominee agreement.

Download Full-text

Implementasi Peraturan Presiden Nomor 13 Tahun 2018 dalam Pendirian Perseroan Terbatas

Acta Comitas ◽

10.24843/ac.2019.v04.i01.p01 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 4 (1) ◽

pp. 1

Author(s):

Lidya Permata Dewi

Keyword(s):

Research Methods ◽

Money Laundering ◽

Limited Liability ◽

Limited Liability Company ◽

Legal Research ◽

Know How ◽

A Company

In order to overcome and eradicate the crime of money laundering the president has issued Presidential Regulation No. 13 of 2018 concerning The Implementation of the Principles of Recognizing Beneficial Owners of Corporations in the Context of Prevention and Eradication of Acts Crime of Money Laundering and Crime of Terrorism Funding, so the problem in this study is how is the implementation of Presidential Regulation Number 13 of 2018 in the establishment of a limited liability company and whether the beneficial owner has implemented it. This study uses empirical legal research methods, because it wants to know how the implementation of Presidential Regulation No. 13 of 2018 in the establishment of a limited liability company and whether the beneficial owner has implemented it, to find out this study uses the facta approach and the statute approach. The results of this study are officials appointed by the company to inform the data of the beneficial owner of a company in accordance with Article 18 paragraph (3) of the Presidential Regulation No. 13 of 2018, one of which is a Notary, that the implementation of Presidential Regulation No. 13 of 2018 in the establishment of limited liability companies is in the form of a Statement in which the beneficial owner states that it is true as the owner and depositor of funds within the company, but not all notaries want to implement Presidential Regulation No. 13 of 2018 because, assuming that it will make a boomerang for the notary find out who is actually the beneficial owner of the company and here the notary is still subject to and cling to the Act of Notary Position which is only pouring out what the parties want into the deed. Demi menanggulangi dan memberantas kejahatan tindak pidana pencucian uang ini presiden telah membuat peraturan Presiden No. 13 pada tahun 2018 mengenai Penerapan Prinsip Mengenali Pemilik Manfaat Dari Korporasi Dalam Rangka Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang dan Tindak Pidana Pendanaan Terorisme, sehingga permasalahan dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimanakah implementasi Peraturan Presiden Nomor 13 Tahun 2018 dalam pendirian perseroan terbatas dan apakah pemilik manfaat sudah ada yang menerapkannya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum empiris, dikarenakan ingin mengetahui bagaimanakah implementasi Peraturan Presiden Nomor 13 Tahun 2018 dalam pendirian perseroan terbatas dan apakah pemilik manfaat sudah ada yang menerapkannya, untuk mengetahuinya penelitian ini menggunakan suatu metode dengan pendekatan fakta atau istilah asingnya the facts approach dan dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan atau istilah asingnya the statute approach. Hasil penelitian ini adalah pejabat yang ditunjuk oleh perusahaan untuk menginformasikan data pemilik manfaat dari suatu perusahaan sesuai pada Pasal 18 ayat (3) Peraturan Presiden Nomor 13 Tahun 2018 yang salah satunya adalah Notaris, bahwa implementasi Peraturan Presiden Nomor 13 Tahun 2018 dalam pendirian perseroan terbatas adalah dalam bentuk Surat Pernyataan yang di dalamnya adalah pemilik manfaat menyatakan bahwa memang benar selaku pemilik dan penyetor dana di dalam perusahaan, namun tidak semua notaris mau menerapkan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 13 Tahun 2018 tersebut karena, beranggapan bahwa akan menjadikan bumerang tersendiri bagi Notaris yang mengetahui siapa sebenarnya pemilik manfaat dari perusahaan tersebut dan disini notaris masih tunduk dan berpegang teguh dengan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris yaitu hanya menuangkan apa yang menjadi keinginan para pihak ke dalam akta.

Download Full-text

Kepastian Hukum Jumlah Modal Dasar Pendirian Perseroan Terbatas Setelah Berlakunya PP Perubahan Modal Dasar Perseroan Terbatas

Acta Comitas ◽

10.24843/ac.2020.v05.i02.p11 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 5 (2) ◽

pp. 340

Author(s):

Ida Bagus Putra Pratama ◽

I Made Dedy Priyanto

Keyword(s):

Research Method ◽

Government Regulation ◽

Limited Liability ◽

Company Law ◽

Limited Liability Company ◽

Legal Certainty ◽

Legal Research ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

Basic Capital ◽

Before And After

Research on legal certainty the amount of basic capital establishment of limited liability company based on the norms of conflict between article 32 paragraph (1) of the limted liability company law concerning "the limited liability company capital of at least Rp 50,000,000.00" with article 1 paragraph (3) of government regulations The limited liability of the company's capital of limited liability concerning "the founding capital of the company is determined by agreement”. 2 problem are formulated: (1) What is the form for deposit of stock capital on the provisions of article 33 of the limited liability company law, (2) How is the legal certainty of the number of basic capital of the limited liability After the validity of government regulation change of the limited liability company. This purpose research is finding form of the deposit of stock capital and the basic capital of the limited liability company before and after enforcement of government regulation of limited liability of the company. The legal research method used normative legal research method with statute approach and conceptual approach. Capital deposits of shares can be made in the form of money and other forms of immovable tangible objects such as land and intangible objects in the form of bill of Rights; and arrangements regarding the underlying capital applicable in the establishment of the limited liability company is Article 1 paragraph (3) of government regulation of the limited liability of the company.

Download Full-text

Kewenangan Notaris terhadap Pembuatan Covernote

Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum ◽

10.22225/jkh.2.1.2535.421-425 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 1 (2) ◽

pp. 421-425

Author(s):

I Made Ari Nurjaya ◽

I Nyoman Sumardhika ◽

Ida Ayu Putu Widiati

Keyword(s):

Research Method ◽

Land Ownership ◽

Criminal Code ◽

Legal Research ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

Legal Consequence ◽

Legal Consequences ◽

Legal Product ◽

Laws And Regulations

One of the legal products made by notary as a part of their authorities is a deed, both authentic deeds and underhand-made deeds. In addition to these deeds, a notary also has the authority to issue a certificate which is commonly referred to as a covernote. A certificate or covernote is a statement or note in the form of information confirming that a land ownership deed is in the process of a certificate making that is due to a process of roya, transfer of name of land ownership and splitting of one certificate into two. This study examines two issues related to notary authority, namely the basis for the notary’s authority in issuing a covernote and the legal consequences of making the covernote. This study uses a normative legal research method and a conceptual approach as well as a statutory approach. The results showed that the covernote issued by a notary was actually an ordinary certificate, not a legal product of a notary. Covernote only contains an explanation of the deed that is in the process of certification which has not been completed and will be completed within a period determined by the notary itself, so the covernote is not legally binding. The notary is authorized to make a covernote, but it is not regulated in the laws and regulations so that, if it is concluded, the covernote is not a legal product of a notary. The legal consequences for the notary if they fail to carry out the covernote, they can be held liable to solve them immediately. The legal consequence of not fulfilling the contents of the covernote is a violation of Article 1366 of the Criminal Code because notaries are considered negligent in carrying out their duties and authorities.

Download Full-text

Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemegang Saham Minoritas Pada Perseroan Terbatas Yang Melakukan Merger

Jurnal Analogi Hukum ◽

10.22225/ah.2.1.1618.59-62 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 2 (1) ◽

pp. 59-62

Author(s):

I Kadek Sridana ◽

I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽

I Putu Gede Seputra

Keyword(s):

Research Method ◽

Government Regulation ◽

Legal Protection ◽

Limited Liability ◽

Limited Liability Company ◽

Minority Shareholders ◽

Legal Position ◽

The Law ◽

A Company

Abstract-Mergers can be said as a strategy or one way to increase a company, therefore there is a need for legal protection for minority shareholders if they do not agree with the merger but the merger is still implemented, and the shareholders are forced to accept the merger. The formulation of the problem in this case is (1) what is the position of the minority shareholders for the limited liability company that merges? (2) What is the legal protection of minority shareholders in a limited liability company that merges? This research method uses a normative research method by approaching the problem in the form of a draft law that relates to the problem under study. The sources of legal material to be used are sourced from research, the literature in the form of primary legal material and secondary legal material. The result of this study are the legal position of the minority shareholders of the company (PT) that carried out the merger has been regulated in Law number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies and in Government Regulation Number 27 of 1998 concerning merger, consolidation and takeover of the interests of minority shareholders. In general, the law of limited liability companies is a guideline in the framework of protecting minority shareholders. Protection of minority shares is one of the important things, especially when the company conducts legal actions such as mergers, both preventive legal protection and repressive legal protection. Keywords: Legal protection, shareholders, mergers Abstrak- Merger dapat dikatakan sebagai strategi atau salah satu cara untuk meningkatkan suatu perusahaan oleh karena itu perlu adanya perlindungan hukum terhadap pemegang saham minoritas apabila mereka tidak setuju dengan merger namun merger tetap dilaksanakan, dan pemegang saham tersebut dipaksakan untuk menerima merger tersebut. Adapun rumusan masalah dalam hal ini (1) Bagaimanakah kedudukan pemegang saham minoritas bagi perseroan terbatas yang melakukan merger? (2) Bagaimanakah perlindungan hukum terhadap pemegang saham minoritas pada perseroan terbatas yang melakukan merger? Metode penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan melakukan pendekatan masalah berupa pedekatan perundang-undangan yang berkaitan dengan masalah yang dikaji. Adapun sumber bahan hukum yang akan digunakan yakni bersumber dari penelitian, kepustakaan berupa bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Adapun hasil dari penelitian ini adalah kedudukan hukum pemegang saham minoritas terhadap perusahaan (PT) yang melakukan merger, sudah diatur dalam Undang-undang nomor 40 tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan terbatas serta dalam Peraturan pemerintah Nomor 27 Tahun 1998 tentang penggabungan, peleburan, dan pengambilalihan tentang kepentingan pemegang saham minoritas. Secara umum hukum perseroan terbatas menjadi pedoman dalam rangka perlindungan pemegang saham minoritas. Perlindungan terhadap saham minoritas merupakan salah satu hal yang penting terutama saat persroan melakukan perbuatan hukum seperti merger baik perlindungan hukum secara preventif maupun perlindungan hukum secara represif. Kata kunci: Perlindungan hukum, Pemegang saham, Merger

Download Full-text

Hak Waris Bagi Ahli Waris yang Tidak Dapat Ditentukan Keberadaannya Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata

Jurnal Preferensi Hukum ◽

10.22225/jph.1.2.2370.11-15 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 1 (2) ◽

pp. 11-15

Author(s):

Anak Agung Krisna Kumala Dewi ◽

I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽

Diah Gayatri Sudibya

Keyword(s):

Research Method ◽

Civil Code ◽

Legal Research ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

Missing Persons ◽

Legal Consequence ◽

Legal Consequences

The heirs whose whereabouts cannot be determined are the heirs who have lost the news, so it is not known whether he is alive or dead. These are usually called missing persons. However, in fact, a lot of heirs ignore the inheritance rights of an heir whose existence cannot be determined. Based on this background, this research was conducted with the aim of elaborating the arrangement of inheritance rights for heirs whose existence cannot be determined and the legal consequences for heirs whose existence is known after the inheritance is divided. This study used a normative legal research method with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results of this study showed that the existence of inheritance rights for heirs that cannot be determined is regulated in Article 463 of the Civil Code. The inheritance rights of heirs whose existence cannot be determined remain attached to it in accordance with the provisions of Article 467 of the Civil Code. However, as long as the whereabouts of the heir are not known, the position will be replaced by the successor heirs. Furthermore, as a legal consequence after an heir is known to exist, the replacement heir is obliged to return all the inherited assets received under the provisions of Article 482 paragraph (1) of the Civil Code.

Download Full-text

The responsibility of a limited liability company with authorized fictitious capital: Evidence from the emerging market

Corporate Law and Governance Review ◽

10.22495/clgrv3i1p4 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 3 (1) ◽

pp. 43-52

Author(s):

Yalid Yalid ◽

Ryan Aditama ◽

Sindi Sindi ◽

Husni Tamrin ◽

Iswandi Iswandi

Keyword(s):

Emerging Market ◽

Limited Liability ◽

Empirical Approach ◽

Limited Liability Company ◽

Legal Research ◽

Legal Entity ◽

Fictitious Capital ◽

Legal Consequences ◽

Capital Payment ◽

Authorized Capital

The phenomenon of law related to the capital subscribed and fully paid up company is limited liability companies in Indonesia, many of which are not real. The aim of this research is to answer the question: "What is the legality and legal consequences of an establishment with a fictitious authorized capital?". The research was conducted via the study of literature with this type of normative legal research supported by an empirical approach. The results of the research contribute to knowledge that the responsibility of a limited liability company with a capital payment basis is fictitious when the establishment does not essentially meet the validity of the establishment of the limited liability company itself, whether based on terms “materially” or “formally”. The terms formilnya (“formally”) depositing of the authorized capital must be issued and paid-up in full. Although the capital is fictitious or not real, if it has been approved by a legal entity, then it remains as a legitimate legal entity, but the substance of it is a limited liability company. Depositing the authorized capital which is not real contradicts the nature of the limited liability company as a legal entity

Download Full-text

PERLUASAN PENGATURAN PENGURUSAN PERSEROAN TERBATAS DALAM PEMBAHARUAN HUKUM PERSEROAN TERBATAS

Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum ◽

10.24843/ks.2020.v08.i10.p01 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 8 (10) ◽

pp. 1495

Author(s):

Pande Putu Indahyani Lestari ◽

I Gede Agus Kurniawan

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Method ◽

Limited Liability ◽

Company Law ◽

Legal Research ◽

Legal Entity ◽

Study Results ◽

The Board Of Directors ◽

A Company

Tujuan studi ini untuk mengkaji perluasan pengaturan pengurusan perseroan terbatas dalam pembaharuan hukum Perseroan Terbatas. Dalam UUPT menyebutkan bahwa Direksi berwenang dan bertanggung jawab penuh untuk menjalankan pengurusan Perseroan. Studi ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif, yakni suatu penelitian menggunakan berdasarkan dengan pendekatan bahan hukum, baik hukum primer dan hukum sekunder. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa Direksi sebagai organ perseroan bertanggung jawab atas kepentingan Perseroan, apabila dalam suatu Perseroan tidak memiliki Direksi maka Perseroan tidak akan bisa berjalan atau beroperasional dengan baik selayaknya sebuah badan hukum. Kemudian dalam hal ini ketika masa jabatan Direksi sudah habis mengakibatkan terjadinya kekosongan kepengurusan Direksi, di dalam UUPT tidak ada yang mengatur manakala suatu Perseroan sudah tidak memiliki Direksi. The purpose of this study is to examine the expansion of management arrangements for limited liability companies in the legal renewal of Limited Liability Companies. The UUPT states that the Directors are authorized and fully responsible for carrying out the management of the Company. This study uses a normative legal research method, which is a research using based on the approach of legal materials, both primary and secondary law. The study results show that the Board of Directors as a corporate organ is responsible for the interests of the Company, if in a Company does not have a Board of Directors, the Company will not be able to operate or operate properly as a legal entity. Then in this case when the term of office of the Board of Directors has expired resulting in a vacancy in the management of the Board of Directors, in the Company Law no one regulates when a Company does not have a Board of Directors.

Download Full-text

ANALISIS YURIDIS PENGAMBILALIHAN SAHAM PT PRIMA TOP BOGA OLEH PT NIPPON INDOSARI CORPINDO, TBK DARI PERPEKTIF UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 5 TAHUN 1999 (Studi Kasus Putusan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Nomor: 07/KPPU-M/2018)

Yuriska : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum ◽

10.24903/yrs.v11i2.521 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 11 (2) ◽

pp. 178

Author(s):

Suradiyanto Suradiyanto ◽

Dinny Wirawan Pratiwie

Keyword(s):

Data Analysis ◽

Limited Liability ◽

Secondary Data ◽

Third Parties ◽

Limited Liability Company ◽

Analysis Method ◽

Legal Research ◽

Library Research ◽

The Status ◽

Legal Consequences

The purpose of this study is to review and analyze the legal consequences of acquisitions made on limited liability companies; and based on theconsiderations used by KPPU to determine that PT Nippon Indosari Corpindo, Tbk. Has violated Law Number 5 of 1999 .This research is normative legal research. Secondary data collection in library research is done by studying documents. The data analysis method used in this study is descriptive and analyzed qualitatively.The results of this study are: (1) Acquisition or Acquisition of Limited Liability Companies can also provide legal consequences affecting the Limited Liability Company. The legal consequences referred to in the Limited Liability Company are the legal consequences both institutionally, namely shareholders, employees, and third parties, as well as the legal consequences of certain parties, especially to third parties or creditors from the acquired limited liability company. In practice that has happened so far, the status of creditors' receivables in a limited liability company that has been acquired is the responsibility of the new Shareholders ; and (2) In the reading of the decision it was also explained that the reported party had acquired / taken over shares of PT Prima Top Boga on January 24, 2018, amounting to 32,051 shares (issuance of new shares) taken over by adding capital worth Rp31,499,722,800 , 00 (thirty one billion four hundred ninety nine million seven hundred twenty thousand eight hundred rupiahs) by Pt Nippon Indosari Corpindo, Tbk. After a long process, through the Merger Directorate, it was conveyed that based on the calculation of calendar days, notices of the takeover of shares of the PT Prima Top Boga company should be notified to the Commission no later than March 23, 2018. However, the reported report took place on March 29, 2018. In accordance with PP No. 57 of 2010 that the reported party is obliged to notify the Commission of the acquisition of shares no later than 30 (thirty) working calendar days from the date the juridically effective Business Entity, Business Entity Consolidation or Takeover of Company Shares are effective.

Download Full-text