Cerebral tumor resection assisted by electromagnetic tracking frameless stereotactic system
Introduction: Electromagnetic (EM) technology used as a tracking device in neurosurgery is relatively new and less common than its optical counterpart: only a few companies manufacture such devices. The main objective is to describe the technology that is used in EM tracking (Compass Cygnus), and its advantages and disadvantages in brain tumor resection as it is incorporated in a neuro-oncology program. Methods: We used the Compass Cygnuss-PFS frameless stereotactic system which performs EM tracking (EMFSS); we analyzed the technology used in the system and describe how a procedureis carried out, signalizing its advantages and disadvantages. We then report our initial experience in tumor resections using this technology from august 2008 to january 2009 in the Neuro-oncology Program of the Hospital de Diagnóstico of El Salvador. Results: The EMFSS operates by using a Flock ofBirds Technology (FOB). Twenty patients were operated on using the EMFSS: 18 of them harbored a tumor either primary or secondary in origin. Its precision was considered adequate in 16 cases (88.8 %) when compared to non-mobile, non-deformable structures (cranial base floor, tentorium, falx, etc). Intraoperative ultrasound in two cases: it was considered inadequatedue to brain shift/deformation, in two cases (11.1%) and a re-registration process had to be carried out during surgery. Tumor location was: 5 (27.7%) in non eloquent, 8 (44.4%) near eloquent, and 5 (27.7%) in eloquent cortex. Volumetric tumor resection was 87% (40-100%). Five patients (27.7%) had complications, 4 (80%) of them transient and resolved during 30 day follow-up. One (5.5%) patient had definite neurological worsening. Thirty day mortality was 0. Preoperative Karnofsky Physiological Score (KPS) and at discharge and at one month follow up was 80 (60-90), 80 (60-90) and 80(60-100) respectively. Conclusions: EM tracking is a reliable system when its accuracy is tested against non-mobile structures and ultrasound. It is compact and the “line of sight” does not have to be taken into consideration. Its big advantages are “tailored” craniotomy design and spatial orientations in deepseated tumors, where ultrasound is not efective; its biggest limitation is its incapacity to re-register with anatomical points or landmarks and image fusion or transition.