Outlawing the Spoils: A History of the Civil Service Reform Movement, 1865-1883

1962 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 714
Author(s):  
Herbert J. Bass ◽  
Ari Hoogenboom
Keyword(s):  
Civil Service ◽  
Reform Movement ◽  
Civil Service Reform ◽  
History Of

Outlawing the Spoils: A History of the Civil Service Reform Movement, 1865-1883

1962 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 281
Author(s):  
Geoffrey T. Blodgett ◽  
Ari Hoogenboom
Keyword(s):  
Civil Service ◽  
Reform Movement ◽  
Civil Service Reform ◽  
History Of

Another Chapter in Michigan Civil Service Reform

1941 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-82
Author(s):  
Edward H. Litchfield
Keyword(s):  
Civil Service ◽  
Service System ◽  
Constitutional Amendment ◽  
Public Employment ◽  
Civil Service Reform ◽  
State Constitution ◽  
Democratic Administration ◽  
Complete Reversal ◽  
History Of ◽  
Merit System

The civil service scene in Michigan has changed so rapidly in the last few years that it has been difficult for persons in other areas to keep abreast of developments. Thus, while in 1936 Michigan knew little of merit in public employment, 1937 found her in the vanguard of the reform movement. In that year, the recommendations of a study commission were embodied in a comprehensive civil service system by a Democratic administration. The year 1939 brought an almost complete reversal of policy with the passage of a Republican “ripper” act. Today another development is in the process of maturing. A civil service amendment to the state constitution was adopted in the November election of 1940.It is not the purpose of this article to review the details of the history of Michigan's civil service movement, for this has been done elsewhere. Suffice it to say that Michigan's experience with spoils politics was neither better nor worse than that of other jurisdictions; the recommendations of the Civil Service Study Commission, of which Dr. James K. Pollock was chairman, are now well known; the excellence of the state's merit system under William Brownrigg has also been generally recognised.However, three developments remain to be discussed: first, the contents of the “ripper” legislation; second, the effects of that legislation upon the present personnel situation; third, the proposed constitutional amendment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document