Spin Glasses: General Features

Author(s):  
Daniel L. Stein ◽  
Charles M. Newman

This chapter finally deals with the concept of spin glasses. The intention is not to provide anything approaching a thorough history of the subject. The field today is broad, with threads and subthreads extending in a multitude of different directions. Rather, the chapter focuses on a relatively narrow part of the overall subject. It discusses some of the history of their discovery, their basic properties and experimental phenomenology, and some of the mysteries surrounding them. It introduces some of the basic theoretical constructs that underlie much of the discussion in later chapters. Topics covered include dilute magnetic alloys and the Kondo effect, nonequilibrium and dynamical behavior, mechanisms underlying spin glass behavior, the Edwards–Anderson Hamiltonian, frustration, dimensionality and phase transitions, broken symmetry and the Edwards–Anderson Order Parameter, and energy landscapes and metastability.

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Hudl ◽  
Roland Mathieu ◽  
Per Nordblad

1982 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 5987-5995 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Gash ◽  
R. Roshko ◽  
O. G. Symko

Paleobiology ◽  
1980 ◽  
Vol 6 (02) ◽  
pp. 146-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
William A. Oliver

The Mesozoic-Cenozoic coral Order Scleractinia has been suggested to have originated or evolved (1) by direct descent from the Paleozoic Order Rugosa or (2) by the development of a skeleton in members of one of the anemone groups that probably have existed throughout Phanerozoic time. In spite of much work on the subject, advocates of the direct descent hypothesis have failed to find convincing evidence of this relationship. Critical points are:(1) Rugosan septal insertion is serial; Scleractinian insertion is cyclic; no intermediate stages have been demonstrated. Apparent intermediates are Scleractinia having bilateral cyclic insertion or teratological Rugosa.(2) There is convincing evidence that the skeletons of many Rugosa were calcitic and none are known to be or to have been aragonitic. In contrast, the skeletons of all living Scleractinia are aragonitic and there is evidence that fossil Scleractinia were aragonitic also. The mineralogic difference is almost certainly due to intrinsic biologic factors.(3) No early Triassic corals of either group are known. This fact is not compelling (by itself) but is important in connection with points 1 and 2, because, given direct descent, both changes took place during this only stage in the history of the two groups in which there are no known corals.


2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 13-26
Author(s):  
Brandon W. Hawk

Literature written in England between about 500 and 1100 CE attests to a wide range of traditions, although it is clear that Christian sources were the most influential. Biblical apocrypha feature prominently across this corpus of literature, as early English authors clearly relied on a range of extra-biblical texts and traditions related to works under the umbrella of what have been called “Old Testament Pseudepigrapha” and “New Testament/Christian Apocrypha." While scholars of pseudepigrapha and apocrypha have long trained their eyes upon literature from the first few centuries of early Judaism and early Christianity, the medieval period has much to offer. This article presents a survey of significant developments and key threads in the history of scholarship on apocrypha in early medieval England. My purpose is not to offer a comprehensive bibliography, but to highlight major studies that have focused on the transmission of specific apocrypha, contributed to knowledge about medieval uses of apocrypha, and shaped the field from the nineteenth century up to the present. Bringing together major publications on the subject presents a striking picture of the state of the field as well as future directions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document