Mengkonstruksi Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) yang Berlandaskan Hukum Islam dalam Kerangka Hukum Nasional

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-68
Author(s):  
Nita Triana
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Law System ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Adat Law

ADR is an alternative dispute resolution, that consider peaceful and agreement.  Such a dispute has been a long time known by Indonesia society. Musyawarah and mufakat principles that exist in Adat Law and Islah principle that exist in Islamic Law constitute Living Law in Indonesia. Principle of Law as forgiving, peaceful and agreement that exists in Islah can construct ADR in frame National Law system.

scholarly journals JUSTICE IN MANY ROOMS IN SHARIA BANKING DISPUTE RESOLUTION TO ACHIEVE JUSTICE

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
Nita Triana
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Second Step ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Long Time ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Religious Courts

This paper examines the dispute resolution of Sharia Banking. The method is a non-doctrinal legal research using qualitative research  and Socio Legal approach. Sharia banking cannot be separated from the problems between the banking and the Customer. This problem is calledproblematic financing. The resolution  of problematic financing of sharia banks in litigation is now the absolute authority of the Religious Courts. The downside of litigation settlement usually takes a long time, the need for proof, the cost is quite expensive and the result is winningor lost. Therefore, the settlement of sharia banking is very rarely resolved through litigation. Alternative Dispute Resolution is a choice of dispute settlement chosen by Sharia Banking. The first stage isto carry out negotiation between all parties, namely Banking (lender) and The Customer (Debtor) in the form of warning and guidance. If it does not succeed, there will bedebt restructuration. The second step is mediation, in the form of consultation with third party as a mediator.  The mediation determines the rescue process of debt by Banks when a debtor is still unable to return his debt, executed by the bank. According to Marc Galanter these various dispute resolutionsis called justice in many rooms. In Islamic Law it is known as Sulh (peace). However, to a large extent this non-litigation settlement is more satisfactory to both parties in resolving the dispute because it senses fairness and a win-win solution.

scholarly journals JUSTICE IN MANY ROOMS IN SHARIA BANKING DISPUTE RESOLUTION TO ACHIEVE JUSTICE

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
Nita Triana
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Second Step ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Long Time ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Religious Courts

This paper examines the dispute resolution of Sharia Banking. The method is a non-doctrinal legal research using qualitative research  and Socio Legal approach. Sharia banking cannot be separated from the problems between the banking and the Customer. This problem is calledproblematic financing. The resolution  of problematic financing of sharia banks in litigation is now the absolute authority of the Religious Courts. The downside of litigation settlement usually takes a long time, the need for proof, the cost is quite expensive and the result is winningor lost. Therefore, the settlement of sharia banking is very rarely resolved through litigation. Alternative Dispute Resolution is a choice of dispute settlement chosen by Sharia Banking. The first stage isto carry out negotiation between all parties, namely Banking (lender) and The Customer (Debtor) in the form of warning and guidance. If it does not succeed, there will bedebt restructuration. The second step is mediation, in the form of consultation with third party as a mediator.  The mediation determines the rescue process of debt by Banks when a debtor is still unable to return his debt, executed by the bank. According to Marc Galanter these various dispute resolutionsis called justice in many rooms. In Islamic Law it is known as Sulh (peace). However, to a large extent this non-litigation settlement is more satisfactory to both parties in resolving the dispute because it senses fairness and a win-win solution.

scholarly journals ISLAH MENURUT HUKUM ISLAM RELEVANSINYA DENGAN PENEGAKAN HUKUM PIDANA DI TINGKAT PENYIDIKAN

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Waluyadi ,
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Empirical Research ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Criminal Matters ◽  
Case Based

<p align="center"><strong><em>Abstract</em></strong></p><p><em>The purpose of this reseach is to describe the reality of peace at investigation levels,  then compared to islah according to Islamic law as the reason of criminal removing, to find / to know the relevance. Based on the relevance, it possible become material for the legislators to formulate islah as a model of law enforcement at the level of investigation. This research is the normative research supported by empirical research. The data used was primary and secondary data. Data was collected by means of study documentation and interviews. Data were analyzed quatitatively dan and presented quatitatively. The research showed that the completion of criminal case based on the agreement between perpetrator and victim, along the case have not reached the judge. If the agreement is violated, they agreed to use the formal law. Criminal case which are resolved with peace/islah personalized and value of the loss is relatively small. Islam placing islah as an alternative the completion of criminal matters, along the case have not reached the judge. In the literature and practice, settling disputes with peace  known as Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), which is based on Restorative Justice Theory. Al Qur’an has set peace/islah as a model the completion of criminal matters, long before these theories arises.  Peace/ islah in the completion of a criminal case at the level of investigation relevant to satisfy the principle of fast, simple, and inexpensive.</em></p><p><strong><em>Keyword : </em></strong><em>Islah, Islamic Law, Relevance and Investigation</em></p><p align="center"><strong>Abstrak</strong></p><p>Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mendeskripsikan realitas perdamaian pada tingkat penyidikan, selanjutnya akan dibandingkan dengan islah menurut hukum Islam sebagai alasan penghapus pidana, untuk diketahui/ ditemukan relevansinya. Berdasarkan relevansi tersebut, dimungkinkan menjadi bahan bagi pembentuk undang-undang  untuk menformulasikan islah sebagai model penegakan hukum pidana pada  tingkat penyidikan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian normatif  yang didukung dengan penelitian  empiris. Data yang digunakan mencakup data primer dan data sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan data  dilakukan dengan cara studi dokumentasi dan wawancara. Data dianalisis secara kualitatif dan disajikan secara deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan penyelesaian perkara pidana dengan perdamaian pada tingkat penyidikan mendasarkan kesepakatan pelaku dan korban. Apabila kesepakatan itu dilanggar, mereka sepakat untuk menggunakan hukum formal. Perkara pidana yang diselesaikan dengan perdamaian/ islah, bersifat personal dan nilai kerugiannya relatif kecil. Islam menempatkan perdamaian/islah sebagai alternatif penyelesaian perkara pidana, sepanjang perkara tersebut belum sampai ke tangan hakim. Dalam literatur dan praktik,  penyelesaian perkara dengan perdamaian disebut <em>Alternative Disput Resolution </em>(ADR) yang mendasarkan pada teori <em>Restorative Justice. Al-Qur’an </em>telah menetapkan Perdamaian/ Islam sebagai model penyelesaian perkara pidana, jauh sebelum teori-teori itu muncul<em>. Perdamaian/ Islah  </em>dalam penyelesaian perkara pidana ditingkat penyidikan, relevan untuk pemenuhan asas cepat, sederhana dan biaya ringan.</p><p><strong>Kata Kunci: </strong>Islah, Hukum Islam, Relevansi dan Penyidikan</p>

scholarly journals Penyelesaian Sengketa antara Bank Sharî‘ah dengan Nasabah Bermasalah melalui Badan Arbitrase Sharî‘ah Nasional (BASYARNAS) menurut UU No. 30 tahun 1999

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 193
Author(s):  
Sulistyowati Sulistyowati
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
Arbitration Board ◽  
Strong Emphasis ◽  
The Cost

<p>This study deals with dispute settlement between <em>Bank Syari’ah</em> and its customers through the National Shari’ah Arbitration Board (BASYARNAS). It focuses to elaborate the procedures of dispute settlement between <em>Bank Syari’ah</em> and its customers of financing from the perspective of Islamic law according to Bill No. 30/1999 above law No. 30 year 1999. Based on procedures as mentioned in the bill with regard to arbitration and alternative dispute resolution, Basyarnas, in proofing and resolving cases, has fulfilled the procedures and satisfied the conflicting parties with justice, so there is no need to appeal and reconsideration. This means that Basyarnas has conducted dispute resolution according to the existing procedures. The dispute settlement has also been in accordance with the Qur’ân and other Islamic legal rules which consist of the principles of power and mandate applied by the arbitrator in deciding and resolving the dispute. The board—as an independent institution—has setttled the disputes on the basis of justice for all parties, rejected the act of bribery since the cost is measurable. In addition, Basyarnas also gives strong emphasis on the principle of equality, friendship, consistence and response-bility in resolving disputes.</p>

scholarly journals Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa sebagai Solusi Mewujudkan Asas Pemeriksaan Perkara “Sederhana, Waktu Singkat dan Biaya Murah”

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Syafrida Syafrida
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Good Faith ◽  
District Court ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Short Time

AbstractBackground to the problem "Alternative Dispute Resolution" (APS) is a dispute resolution agency or dissent which is resolved through an agreement procedure by the parties carried out outside the court by means of consultation, negotiation, mediation, conciliation or expert judgment. The settlement is based on good faith by ignoring litigation settlement through the District Court which takes a long time and is expensive, bound to formal procedures that must be implemented. This certainly contradicts the principle of civil procedural law "examination is as simple as possible, short time and low cost." The method used to write this article is Library Research using secondary data in the form of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials relating to Alternative Dispute Resolution (APS). The research is normative juridical. The conclusion is that dispute resolution through alternative dispute resolution carried out in a manner that is carried out outside the court is based on good faith to reach an agreement, mutually beneficial is to realize the principle of hearing a simple "short time and low cost." While the superiority of resolution through Alternative Dispute Resolution (APS) is an examination based on the agreement of the parties, good faith, mutual benefit between the two parties, no one loses and wins, prevents hostility between the parties and closed examination.Keywords: Alternative Dispute Resolution, Examination "simple, short time and low cost"  AbstrakLatar belakang masalah Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa (APS) adalah lembaga penyelesaian sengketa atau beda pendapat yang diselesaikan melalui prosedur kesepakatan oleh para pihak dilakukan di luar pengadilan dengan cara konsultasi, negosiasi, mediasi, konsiliasi atau penilaian ahli. Penyelesaian didasarkan itikad baik dengan mengenyampingkan penyelesaian secara litigasi melalui Pengadilan Negeri yang memakan waktu yang lama dan biaya yang mahal, terikat pada prosedur yang formal yang harus dilaksanakan. Hal ini tentu bertentangan asas hukum acara perdata “pemeriksaan sesederhana mungkin, waktu singkat dan biaya murah.” Metode yang digunakan untuk menulis artikel ini adalah Penelitian Kepustakaan dengan menggunakan data sekunder berupa bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder dan bahan hukum tertier yang berkaitan dengan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa (APS). Penelitian bersifat yuridis normatif. Kesimpulannya bahwa penyelesaian sengketa melalui alternatif penyelesaian sengketa yang dilakukan dengan cara yang dilakukan di luar pengadilan didasarkan pada itikad baik untuk mencapai kesepakatan, saling menguntungkan adalah untuk mewujudkan asas pemeriksaan perkara “sederhana waktu singkat dan biaya murah.” Sedang keunggulan penyelesaian melalui Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa (APS) adalah pemeriksaan didasarkan kesepakatan para pihak, itikad baik, saling menguntungkan kedua belah pihak, tidak ada pihak yang kalah dan menang, mencegah permusuhan diantara para pihak dan pemeriksaan tertutup.Kata Kunci: Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa, Pemeriksaan “sederhana, waktu singkat dan biaya murah”

scholarly journals عروض مختصرة

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (75) ◽  
pp. 232-223
Author(s):  
حنان لطفي زين الدين
Keyword(s):  
Political Economy ◽  
Middle East ◽  
Southeast Asia ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Political Islam ◽  
Muslim Community ◽  
Islam And Politics ◽  
Oxford University

مبادئ الحوار الهادف بين الأديان والمذاهب والفرق، علي أبو سعيدة، بيروت: مؤسسة البلاغ، 2012م. التواصل والحوار؛ أخلاقيات النقاش في الفكر الفلسفي المعاصر، الناصر عبد اللاوي، بيروت: دار الفارابي، 2013م، 190 صفحة. الوحدة في الاختلاف؛ حوار الأديان في الشرق الأوسط. تأليف: محمد أبو نمر، أمل خوري، إيملي ويلتي، ترجمة وتحقيق: عبد علي السعيدي، عمّان: الأهلية للنشر والتوزيع، 2013م، 415 صفحة. الفرق والمذاهب والجماعات الإسلامية، الحسيني الحسيني معدي، القاهرة: دار كنوز للنشر والتوزيع، 2013م، 448 صفحة. محتكمات الخلاف الفقهي من خلال القواعد والمقاصد الشرعية، محمد هندو، بيروت: دار البشائر الإسلامية، 2012م، 672 صفحة. الحماية القانونية للمعتقدات وممارسة الشعائر الدينية وعدم التمييز فى إطار الاتفاقيات الدولية والقانون الوضعي والشريعة الإسلامية: دراسة مقارنة، خالد مصطفى فهمى، الإسكندرية: دار الفكر الجامعي، 2012م، 350 صفحة. الحرية الفكرية والدينية: رؤية إسلامية جديدة، يحيى رضا جاد، القاهرة: الدار المصرية اللبنانية، 2013م، 272 صفحة. الحرية والمواطنة والإسلام السياسي؛ التحولات السياسية الكبرى وقضايا النهوض الحضاري، لؤي صافي، بيروت: الشبكة العربية للأبحاث والنشر، 2013م، 176 صفحة. الأحزاب السياسية بين الحرية والتقييد: دراسة مقارنة، محمد إبراهيم خيري الوكيل، المنصورة: دار الفكر والقانون، 2013م، 500 صفحة. الحقوق والحريات السياسية في الشريعة الإسلامية. رحيل غرايبة، بيروت: الشبكة العربية للأبحاث والنشر، 2012م، 460 صفحة. Non-Western Reflection on Politics. Petr Drulák (Editor), Sárka Moravcová (Editor), Peter Lang International Academic Publishers (October 16, 2013), 259 pages. A Communication Perspective on Interfaith Dialogue: Living Within the Abrahamic Traditions. Daniel S, Jr. Brown (Editor), Lexington Books; 1st edition (January 30, 2013), 238 pages. The Oxford Handbook of Islam and Politics (Oxford Handbooks). John L. Esposito and Emad El-Din Shahin (Editors). Oxford University Press, USA (November 8, 2013), 708 pages. Modern Perspectives on Islamic Law. Ann Black, Hossein Esmaeili and Nadirsyah Hosen, Edward Elgar Pub (August 30, 2013), 320 pages. An Introduction to the Modern Middle East: History, Religion, Political Economy, Politics. David S. Sorenson, West view Press; Second Edition, Second Edition (December 24, 2013), 560 pages. Religion and Regimes: Support, Separation, and Opposition. Mehran Tamadonfar & Ted G. Jelen, Lexington Books (November 30, 2013), 288 pages. Political Islam in the Age of Democratization (Middle East Today). Kamran Bokhari & Farid Senzai, Palgrave Macmillan (December 18, 2013). 272 pages. Islam in Modern Thailand: Faith, Philanthropy and Politics (Routledge Contemporary Southeast Asia Series). Rajeswary Ampalavanar Brown, Routledge (September 16, 2013). 296 pages. Islam, Sharia and Alternative Dispute Resolution: Mechanisms for Legal Redress in the Muslim Community. Mohamed Keshavjee, I. B. Tauris (July 24, 2013), 240 pages. للحصول على كامل المقالة مجانا يرجى النّقر على ملف ال PDF  في اعلى يمين الصفحة.

scholarly journals Penal Mediation as Alternative Dispute Resolution: A Criminal Law Reform in Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 369-380
Author(s):  
Anggita Anggraeni
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Law Reform ◽  
Alternative Form ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Descriptive Data ◽  
Long Time ◽  
First Time

In the minor crime, the solving of cases process through formal process in the court is the prosess that is taking much cost and long time it aint suitable with detriments of the crime impact, these all are contrary with the principal fast, simple and unexpensive judicature. Writing this thesis aims to know the legal certainty of implementing Penal Mediation as an Alternative Dispute Resolution and prospects of applying Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System. The approach used in this research is a qualitative research approach that produces descriptive data in the form of people's written or oral words and observable behavior. The type of research that will be used in this research is doctrinal research. Penal mediation is an alternative form of resolving disputes outside the court (commonly known as ADR or "Alternative Dispute Resolution" and some call it "Apropriate Dispute Resolution"). Penal mediation for the first time is known in positive legal terminology in Indonesia since the issuance of KAPOLRI No. Pol: B / 3022 / XII / 2009 / SDEOPS dated December 14, 2009 concerning Handling Cases through Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), even though they are partial. In essence, the principles of mediation of the penalties referred to in this KAPOLRI letter emphasize that the settlement of criminal cases using ADR, must be agreed by the parties that litigate, but if there is no new agreement resolved in accordance with applicable legal procedures in a professional and proportional manner.

scholarly journals URGENCY OF ARBITRATION CLAUSE IN DETERMINING THE RESOLUTION OF SHARIA ECONOMIC DISPUTES

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nita Triana
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Qualitative Method ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Arbitration Clause ◽  
The Future ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Alternative Choice ◽  
The Right ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Future Business

This study explains the importance of the arbitration clause in determining the resolution of sharia economic disputes. The settlement of economic disputes in the Court is less in the interest of the economic actors, because of the long time, the limited resources and the results of the win-loss cause damage to future business relations. Resolution of arbitration disputes is an alternative choice. The research method used is a qualitative method, a type of doctrinal research with a normative juridical approach. Dispute resolution arbitrarily has many advantages over litigation (Court), the nature of which prioritizes negotiations, can avoid hostility so that business relationships will still be intertwined properly. To ensure that in the future will use the arbitration event, if there is a dispute in a commercial agreement between the two parties it is important to make an arbitration clause separate from the commercial agreement (principal agreement). The arbitration clause is binding on both parties. The power of the arbitration clause will give legal consequences to prevent one of the parties who have agreed on an arbitration agreement to seek a dispute resolution in the Court. These legal consequences are usually implemented in the form of the right to file exceptions to absolute authority over a lawsuit or case filed with the Court whose parties have been bound by an arbitration agreement. Arbitration agreements (arbitration clauses) are very important to be carried out to smooth the movement of the sharia economy in the future, especially when the sharia economic movement is international. Arbitration in Islamic law has long been known as a form of dispute resolution known as tahkim. Tahkim is to appoint someone as a referee or peacemaker, by two or more people who are in dispute in order to settle the case which they have peacefully divided. The selected referee or peacemaker is a person who is approved by both parties because they are considered able to resolve the dispute between them. This person who acts as a referee, peacemaker or arbitrator in Islamic law is called hakam

scholarly journals Inheritance Laws in Indonesia

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 99
Author(s):  
Irawaty Irawaty ◽  
Diyantari Diyantari
Keyword(s):  
Legal System ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Inheritance Law ◽  
Law System ◽  
The People ◽  
System 2 ◽  
Religious Nation ◽  
Civil Law System ◽  
Adat Law

Indonesia implements civil law system. There are three sub legal systems which are implemented until today. They are: positive/national law system, Islamic law system, and Adat law system. The majority of Indonesians are Islamic believers. The people claim that they are a religious nation. However, the implementation of the inheritance law in accordance with the Islamic law and the Adat law is sometimes different. One of the ethnic groups which has different regulation in heritance is Minangkabau. Minangkabau inheritance adat law has been a controversy. It is because while they claim that all Minangkabau people are Islam, they implement an inheritance law that is said as violating the Islamic inheritance law. In Islam, inheritance is passed down to children, both daughter(s) and son(s)  with the composition son(s) inherits two parts compared to daugther(s). Many people  mislead that the Minangkabau inheritance law passes down the inheritance to daughter(s) only. This paper discusses: 1) how are inheritance matter regulated in each of the aforementioned sub legal system? 2) how is inheritance matter regulated in Minangkabau ethnic group?    

scholarly journals Jurisdictional perspectives on alternative dispute resolution and access to justice: introduction

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-107
Author(s):  
Lola Akin Ojelabi ◽  
Mary Anne Noone
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Critical Discussion ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
Special Issue ◽  
Law System ◽  
The Family ◽  
Equitable Outcomes ◽  
The Relationship

In many parts of the world, the adoption of alternative dispute-resolution (ADR) processes was premised on creating better access to justice for citizens, particularly those with lesser means (Woolf, 1996; Access to Justice Advisory Committee, 1994). ADR's foundational link with access to justice is in relation to not only justice as a process for the resolution of disputes, but also justice in relation to equality of access and equitable outcomes. This Special Issue focuses on the relationship between ADR and access to justice in various contexts and jurisdictions, including Australia, China, England and Wales, Scotland and Singapore, and within the family-law system in Australia. The papers engage in a critical discussion of ADR's contribution to access to justice in the resolution of disputes and, in particular, the extent to which ADR has contributed to improved access to justice. In doing this, the papers highlight the role of access-to-justice discourse in the development and growth of ADR; where available, review evaluations of access to justice in relation to ADR initiatives; and, finally, reflect on the future of ADR and access to justice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document