scholarly journals John Ruskin e as pedras de Veneza

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 281
Author(s):  
Claudio Silveira Amaral

John Ruskin, crítico de arte inglês do século XIX, criou uma metodologia para o projeto de arquitetura com base em uma filosofia da Natureza, cuja ética é similar à de uma política da ajuda mútua, na qual cada elemento natural é dependente de outro na busca de uma situação de equilíbrio. Segundo essa lógica, Ruskin estruturou diversos temas, influenciando, com isso, intelectuais de sua época e de outras, como o escritor Marcel Proust, os arquitetos Frank Lloyd Wright e Le Corbusier, assim como o político intelectual brasileiro Rui Barbosa, que utilizou a lógica ruskiniana para compor sua Reforma do Ensino Primário, considerada o primeiro projeto de industrialização do Brasil. Ruskin, diferentemente do que atesta a historiografia da Arquitetura Moderna, foi um moderno e não um neogótico medievalista, pois seu  trabalho se estruturou a partir de algumas das categorias da modernidade, como a lógica e a razão.PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Arquitetura. História. Metodologia.

2018 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 585-598
Author(s):  
Younès Ez-Zouaine
Keyword(s):  

La rédaction de Contre Sainte-Beuve et d’À la recherche du temps perdu de Marcel Proust a été précédée par la traduction de The Bible of Amiens (1884) et de Sesame and Lilies (1865) de John Ruskin. L’examen de ces deux traductions montre que le traducteur s’en est inspiré pour échafauder le socle esthétique de son oeuvre à venir. En effet, la traduction des essais ruskiniens fait partie intégrante du processus d’apprentissage et de maturation qui devance et prépare la rédaction définitive de À la recherche du temps perdu. Cette traduction a consisté en une activité de transfert des contenus esthétiques de l’oeuvre de l’esthète anglais à la sienne propre. Nous essaierons dans cet article de montrer que le cadre esthétique d’À la recherche du temps perdu provient directement, avec quelques modifications que nécessite toute transformation créatrice, de sa confrontation avec les livres de Ruskin.


1984 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 364-365
Author(s):  
Paul Venable Turner ◽  
Thomas L. Doremus ◽  
Le Corbusier

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lilia Mironov

Throughout the 20th century and into the 21st, the emergence of airports as gateways for their cities has turned into one of the most important architectural undertakings. Ever since the first manned flight by the Brothers Orville and Wilbur Wright on December 17th 1903, utilitarian sheds next to landing strips on cow pastures evolved into a completely new building type over the next few decades – into places of Modernism as envisioned by Le Corbusier and Frank Lloyd Wright (who themselves never built an airport), to eventually turn into icons of cultural identity, progress and prosperity. Many of these airports have become architectural branding devices of their respective cities, regions and countries, created by some of the most notable contemporary architects. This interdisciplinary cultural study deals with the historical formation and transformation of the architectural typology of airports under the aspect of spatial theories. This includes the shift from early spaces of transportation such as train stations, the synesthetic effect of travel and mobility and the effects of material innovations on the development, occupation and use of such spaces. The changing uses from mere utilitarian transportation spaces to ones centered on the spectacular culture of late capitalism, consumption and identity formation in a rapidly changing global culture are analyzed with examples both from architectural and philosophical points of view. The future of airport architecture and design very much looks like the original idea of the Crystal Palace and Parisian Arcades: to provide a stage for consumption, social theatre and art exhibition.


2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. e070
Author(s):  
Juan Sebastian Malecki ◽  
Gonzalo Fuzs

El presente artículo se propone abordar las contribuciones de Carlos Lange y Luís Rébora a la cultura arquitectónica de Córdoba a partir del análisis de sus casas particulares. Rosarinos de orígenes, ambos llegaron a Córdoba en diversos momentos de la década del cuarenta, logrando una exitosa inserción profesional en un campo disciplinar acotado y en proceso de consolidación. Uno de sus principales aportes fue la introducción de una novedosa concepción espacial, por lo menos para el contexto cordobés, en la que es posible identificar diferentes presupuestos que remiten a la arquitectura de Frank Lloyd Wright, de Le Corbusier y de Marcel Breuer. La clara referencia a la arquitectura de Wright en la casa de Lange sitúan a ambos -la casa y a Lange- como una de las primeras referencias al arquitecto norteamericano en el país, y los ubica en el marco más amplio de su recepción temprana.  


Author(s):  
Paul Haacke

This chapter rethinks Le Corbusier’s idea of New York as an “enchanted catastrophe” by focusing on related concerns about architectural elevation and capitalist “creative destruction” in critical writings about the rise of the modernist American metropolis. In particular, it considers essays by Louis Sullivan and Frank Lloyd Wright and novels by John Dos Passos as well as key French texts by Fernand Léger, Le Corbusier, Jean-Paul Sartre, Simone de Beauvoir, and Michel de Certeau, among others. In turn, it traces the post-World War II shift according to which Paris “lost its hegemony,” as Beauvoir put it, and New York appeared to replace it as the capital of the twentieth century.


Author(s):  
Leslie Sklair

Although some find it unpleasant and others find it flippant, the term ‘starchitect’ is theoretically useful for the sociology of architecture. It connects the world of the architect with the world of celebrity, and it con­nects architecture as an esoteric aesthetic practice with architecture as an industry in the public eye. Over the last few years, the term has become well established in the mass media and in trade publications, and it is also, slowly, starting to be taken seriously by scholars in and around architecture (e.g., McNeill 2009, Ponzini and Nastasi 2011; Knox 2012; Gravari-Barbas and Renard-Delautre 2015). The quest for fame, of course, is not new. Leon Battista Alberti, universal man, prodigious self-promoter of the early renaissance, and still an architectural notable, wrote an allegorical play on fame in the 1440s, recently reprinted (Alberti 1987). Neither Frank Lloyd Wright (1869–1959) nor Le Corbusier (1887–1965, Corb) shunned public­ity; both were what we would now call celebrities. Their rivalry is well documented, mostly in arguments around different conceptions of modernism—they never met. Noting that Wright called the Villa Savoye, one of Corb’s most celebrated buildings, ‘a box on stilts’, the cultural historian Nicholas Cox Weber, in his life of Corb, comments: ‘Today, it is an icon of twentieth-century design and has spawned countless imitations all over the world’ (2008: 288; see also Etlin 1994). Wright and Corb died around the time capitalist globalization was beginning to establish itself as a truly global system, and their own lives contained significant measures of socially produced iconicity. Although these terms were not used about them during their lifetimes, they can be considered proto-global and proto-iconic architects, by which I mean that the terms ‘global’ and ‘iconic’ are fruitfully employed today about them and their surviving architectural works. So, before considering the starchitects of our time, it is instructive first of all to delve briefly into the careers of these two most iconic architects of the first half of the 20th century. Wright and Corb both enjoy institutional legacies and continue to have plenty of enthusiasts.


Moreana ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 43 (Number 166- (2-3) ◽  
pp. 249-252
Author(s):  
David Baird-Smith

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document